[Bug c++/105104] [coroutines] ICE during GIMPLE pass: coro-early-expand-ifns

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105104 --- Comment #1 from John Eivind Helset --- Indices of `bb` and `case_bb` in `convert_single_case_switch` are: (gdb) p bb->index $18 = 154 (gdb) p case_bb->index $19 = 157 If that helps.

[Bug c++/105104] New: [coroutines] ICE during GIMPLE pass: coro-early-expand-ifns

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105104 Bug ID: 105104 Summary: [coroutines] ICE during GIMPLE pass: coro-early-expand-ifns Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug rtl-optimization/105091] RTL dse1 remove stack mem storing incorrectly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105091 Ian Lance Taylor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ian at airs dot com --- Comment #8

[Bug c++/105077] The std::bad_array_new_length is not thrown for some new array scenarios.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105077 --- Comment #5 from marshal --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #4) > (In reply to marshal from comment #3) > > But why "new int[negative];" throws std::bad_array_new_length as following > > case? > > Because that case requires

[Bug debug/105041] '-fcompare-debug' failure w/ -mcpu=power6 -O2 -fharden-compares -frename-registers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105041 --- Comment #3 from Peter Bergner --- The first real change I see does occur in the rnreg dump file.

[Bug debug/105041] '-fcompare-debug' failure w/ -mcpu=power6 -O2 -fharden-compares -frename-registers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105041 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-03-29 CC|

[Bug testsuite/105085] Excess errors from new test case gcc.dg/analyzer/untracked-1.c in r12-7809-g5f6197d7c197f9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105085 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Assignee|unassigned at

[Bug analyzer/104954] Analyzer takes a very long time on Linux kernel drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/calcs/dce_calcs.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104954 --- Comment #10 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c788a0eae0a7144e6f148162512fa2e93a45a035 commit r12-7905-gc788a0eae0a7144e6f148162512fa2e93a45a035 Author: David Malcolm Date:

[Bug testsuite/105085] Excess errors from new test case gcc.dg/analyzer/untracked-1.c in r12-7809-g5f6197d7c197f9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105085 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c788a0eae0a7144e6f148162512fa2e93a45a035 commit r12-7905-gc788a0eae0a7144e6f148162512fa2e93a45a035 Author: David Malcolm Date:

[Bug fortran/104210] [11/12 Regression] ICE in gfc_zero_size_array, at fortran/arith.cc:1685 since r11-1814-gcc9a9229285a26ac

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104210 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/104210] [11/12 Regression] ICE in gfc_zero_size_array, at fortran/arith.cc:1685 since r11-1814-gcc9a9229285a26ac

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104210 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/104571] ICE in resolve_elemental_actual, at fortran/resolve.cc:2383

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104571 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED

[Bug analyzer/105103] New: RFE: detect bogus use of varargs in analyzer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105103 Bug ID: 105103 Summary: RFE: detect bogus use of varargs in analyzer Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug fortran/104571] ICE in resolve_elemental_actual, at fortran/resolve.cc:2383

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104571 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:69db6e7f4e1d07bf8f33e93a29139cc16c1e0a2f commit r12-7904-g69db6e7f4e1d07bf8f33e93a29139cc16c1e0a2f Author: Harald Anlauf Date:

[Bug fortran/104571] ICE in resolve_elemental_actual, at fortran/resolve.cc:2383

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104571 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot

[Bug analyzer/105102] New: RFE: analyzer handling for asprintf and vasprintf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105102 Bug ID: 105102 Summary: RFE: analyzer handling for asprintf and vasprintf Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug libquadmath/105101] New: incorrect rounding for sqrtq

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105101 Bug ID: 105101 Summary: incorrect rounding for sqrtq Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libquadmath

[Bug testsuite/105085] Excess errors from new test case gcc.dg/analyzer/untracked-1.c in r12-7809-g5f6197d7c197f9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105085 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/100474] ICE: in diagnose_trait_expr, at cp/constraint.cc:3706

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100474 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/103769] [11 Regression] checking ICE in hashtab_chk_error with alias template and pack expansion after r11-7931

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103769 --- Comment #12 from Alexander Lelyakin --- Great! Just to recall: At the URL https://lelyakin.de/hashtab/ You can always find results of everyday testing how can last version of GCC compile standard c++ headers. And sorry, it cannot

[Bug fortran/50549] should detect different type parameters in structure constructors (r178939)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50549 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/68495] Error when expanding nontype variadic argument in trailing return type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68495 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org See

[Bug fortran/50549] should detect different type parameters in structure constructors (r178939)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50549 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0712f356374c2cf26015cccfa3141537e42cbb12 commit r12-7900-g0712f356374c2cf26015cccfa3141537e42cbb12 Author: Harald Anlauf Date:

[Bug c/105100] New: Strange warning when modifying structures "writing 1 byte into a region of size 0" when compile with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105100 Bug ID: 105100 Summary: Strange warning when modifying structures "writing 1 byte into a region of size 0" when compile with -O3 Product: gcc Version: 11.2.1 Status:

[Bug middle-end/103597] [12 Regression] False -Wimplicit-fallthrough= involving macro since r12-5638-ga3e75c1491cd2d50

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103597 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug middle-end/103597] [12 Regression] False -Wimplicit-fallthrough= involving macro since r12-5638-ga3e75c1491cd2d50

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103597 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d886a5248e66ab911391af18bf955beb87ee8461 commit r12-7899-gd886a5248e66ab911391af18bf955beb87ee8461 Author: Marek Polacek Date:

[Bug c/100789] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE with __transaction_relaxed and left shit signed overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100789 --- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek --- The problem is that we're creating a C_MAYBE_CONST_EXPR inside of a TRANSATION_EXPR, but c_fully_fold doesn't walk into TRANSATION_EXPRs, so the C_MAYBE_CONST_EXPR leaks into the gimplifier.

[Bug c++/91911] Strange interaction between CTAD and decltype

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91911 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||accounts at prantare dot xyz ---

[Bug c++/101914] internal compiler error: in tsubst, at cp/pt.c:15553

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101914 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/71637] -Wmisleading-indentation only triggered when using integrated cpp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71637 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED CC|

[Bug c++/71637] -Wmisleading-indentation only triggered when using integrated cpp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71637 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:89976d082488b3a7dc7520b980f854ce83043d38 commit r12-7898-g89976d082488b3a7dc7520b980f854ce83043d38 Author: Patrick Palka Date:

[Bug c++/105099] New: In lookup for namespace name qualifiers only namespaces should be considered

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105099 Bug ID: 105099 Summary: In lookup for namespace name qualifiers only namespaces should be considered Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug c++/105067] [12 Regression] ICE: in operator[], at vec.h:889 since r12-7631-g9413bb55185b9e88

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105067 --- Comment #6 from Patrick Palka --- (In reply to 康桓瑋 from comment #5) > It still seems to be ICE. > https://godbolt.org/z/YjazY4ajv I only see ordinary errors, no ICEs: :3:9: error: concept 'C' has multiple template parameter lists 3 |

[Bug debug/105089] CTF for a defined extern variable is ambiguous

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105089 --- Comment #5 from Indu Bhagat --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4) > (In reply to Indu Bhagat from comment #2) > > Regarding this above-mentioned case of two variables (one inside the > > function), CTF emits debug information for

[Bug middle-end/105071] [9 Regression] Incorrect code with -Os and complex

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105071 --- Comment #3 from Martin Jambor --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #2) > Fixed on master with r10-3311-gff6686d2e5f797d6, if I add -fno-ipa-sra for > the revision, it's still correct. But it also works if you add -fno-inline ! ;-)

[Bug other/92396] -ftime-trace support

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92396 Barry Revzin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||barry.revzin at gmail dot com ---

[Bug target/102024] [12 Regression] zero width bitfields and ABIs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102024 --- Comment #21 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Earnshaw : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b243ad1afb7f06ef4ab7649600d900b09b9c6b52 commit r12-7896-gb243ad1afb7f06ef4ab7649600d900b09b9c6b52 Author: Richard Earnshaw

[Bug target/102024] [12 Regression] zero width bitfields and ABIs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102024 --- Comment #20 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Earnshaw : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3032df28f2a1cc6514571558b76d9b80373b19c6 commit r12-7895-g3032df28f2a1cc6514571558b76d9b80373b19c6 Author: Richard Earnshaw

[Bug c++/105067] [12 Regression] ICE: in operator[], at vec.h:889 since r12-7631-g9413bb55185b9e88

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105067 --- Comment #5 from 康桓瑋 --- It still seems to be ICE. https://godbolt.org/z/YjazY4ajv

[Bug debug/105089] CTF for a defined extern variable is ambiguous

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105089 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Indu Bhagat from comment #2) > Regarding this above-mentioned case of two variables (one inside the > function), CTF emits debug information for file-scope and global-scope > variables only. So

[Bug target/96882] Wrong assembly code generated with arm-none-eabi-gcc -flto -mfloat-abi=hard options

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96882 --- Comment #10 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Earnshaw : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1dca4ca1bf2f1b05537a1052e373d8b0ff11e53c commit r12-7894-g1dca4ca1bf2f1b05537a1052e373d8b0ff11e53c Author: Richard Earnshaw

[Bug debug/105089] CTF for a defined extern variable is ambiguous

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105089 --- Comment #3 from Indu Bhagat --- Re: the more "specific" one?, I think if the compiler picks the type from the defining declaration of the variable, that will be useful (and correct I think) CTF debug information. So, for the following-

[Bug debug/105089] CTF for a defined extern variable is ambiguous

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105089 --- Comment #2 from Indu Bhagat --- Regarding this above-mentioned case of two variables (one inside the function), CTF emits debug information for file-scope and global-scope variables only. So in this example, the declaration of a inside the

[Bug c++/104419] [[no_unique_address]] interaction with is_standard_layout

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104419 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- >From what I can see, the reason why tuple2 is not std-layout is https://eel.is/c++draft/class.prop#3.6 checked in: /* ...has all non-static data members and bit-fields in the class

[Bug c++/85282] CWG 727 (full specialization in non-namespace scope)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85282 --- Comment #17 from Patrick Palka --- This won't be implemented in time for GCC 12, sadly. FWIW a class-scope explicit specialization should in most cases be equivalent to an appropriately constrained partial specialization. So as a

[Bug c++/105092] ICE with local with NULL DECL_CONTEXT on templatized OpenMP iterator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105092 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 52714 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52714=edit gcc12-pr105092.patch Untested fix.

[Bug c++/105098] ICE: endless recursion during auto deduction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105098 --- Comment #5 from Azat --- >Seems to be fixed on trunk by r12-3906-g51018dd1395c72. Indeed, thanks! Will it be backported to gcc-11?

[Bug c++/102479] segfault when deducing class template arguments for tuple with libc++-14

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102479 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||a3at.mail at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug c++/105098] ICE: endless recursion during auto deduction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105098 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/105098] ICE: endless recursion during auto deduction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105098 --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek --- Seems to be fixed on trunk by r12-3906-g51018dd1395c72.

[Bug c++/105092] ICE with local with NULL DECL_CONTEXT on templatized OpenMP iterator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105092 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/104419] [[no_unique_address]] interaction with is_standard_layout

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104419 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-03-29 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/104386] no_unique_address causes invalid member alignment of pod struct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104386 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/105098] ICE: endless recursion during auto deduction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105098 --- Comment #2 from Azat --- Created attachment 52713 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52713=edit original file generated with -save-temps And here is the original pre-processed temporary file.

[Bug c++/105098] ICE: endless recursion during auto deduction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105098 --- Comment #1 from Azat --- Created attachment 52712 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52712=edit reduced Here is reduced file, that had been created with the following test for creduce: #!/usr/bin/env bash #

[Bug c++/105098] New: ICE: endless recursion during auto deduction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105098 Bug ID: 105098 Summary: ICE: endless recursion during auto deduction Product: gcc Version: 11.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/101030] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE with -Wconversion and a?:b extension in template argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101030 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug testsuite/105095] gcc.dg/vect/complex/fast-math-complex-* tests are not executed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105095 Tamar Christina changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/102466] -O3 -fsanitize=undefined causes warnings (writing 2 bytes into a region of size 0)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102466 --- Comment #4 from Mathieu Malaterre --- I can reproduce it using -Wall -fsanitize=undefined -O2 * https://github.com/malaterre/PublicRep/tree/master/gcc/libjxl

[Bug tree-optimization/102466] -O3 -fsanitize=undefined causes warnings (writing 2 bytes into a region of size 0)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102466 Mathieu Malaterre changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mathieu.malaterre at gmail dot com

[Bug target/104857] [nvptx] Add macro specifying ptx isa version

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104857 Tom de Vries changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/104857] [nvptx] Add macro specifying ptx isa version

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104857 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Tom de Vries : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a2eacdbd4c4a698b3b6f27ef5e1f8dd3d836b2e5 commit r12-7893-ga2eacdbd4c4a698b3b6f27ef5e1f8dd3d836b2e5 Author: Tom de Vries Date:

[Bug sanitizer/105093] ICE in expand_expr_addr_expr_1, at expr.c:7607 since r6-3529-gf11a7b6d57f6fcba

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105093 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug analyzer/105092] ICE with local with NULL DECL_CONTEXT on templatized OpenMP iterator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105092 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at redhat dot com,

[Bug c/105097] hashtab_chk_error when using g3 option to compile some C program

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105097 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-03-29 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug tree-optimization/105086] [12 Regression] Dead Code Elimination Regression at -Os (trunk vs. 11.2.0) 25

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105086 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Macleod --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5) > Even wrapping multiple times as long as it wraps finite number of times > should be possible to handle, no? > for (unsigned int i = ~0U; i != 2; i -= 7) >

[Bug tree-optimization/105086] [12 Regression] Dead Code Elimination Regression at -Os (trunk vs. 11.2.0) 25

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105086 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Even wrapping multiple times as long as it wraps finite number of times should be possible to handle, no? for (unsigned int i = ~0U; i != 2; i -= 7) ...; wraps 5 times and has 3681400539 iterations.

[Bug tree-optimization/105086] [12 Regression] Dead Code Elimination Regression at -Os (trunk vs. 11.2.0) 25

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105086 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Macleod --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3) > (In reply to Andrew Macleod from comment #2) > > > I have an alternate question. it looks like when we utilize scev to pick up > > ranges we just give up

[Bug tree-optimization/69873] Vectorizer fails to emit runtime profitability check if no peeling/versioning is done

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69873 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- It's difficult to find a testcase that we'd vectorize with a runtime profitability check but whithout any versioning or peeling because we should always be able to statically decide profitability there -

[Bug c/105097] New: hashtab_chk_error when using g3 option to compile some C program

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105097 Bug ID: 105097 Summary: hashtab_chk_error when using g3 option to compile some C program Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/65206] vectorized version of loop is removed, dependence analysis fails for *[i] vs a[j]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65206 --- Comment #14 from Richard Biener --- *** Bug 69732 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug tree-optimization/69732] Vectorization runtime alias check due to failed dependence analysis

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69732 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug middle-end/105032] Compiling inline ASM x86 causing GCC stuck in an endless loop with 100% CPU usage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105032 --- Comment #9 from Vladimir Makarov --- Cycling is the worst what can happen to compiler (even crash is better). This is the highest priority PR right now for me. I can not say why the cycle does not finish. It should as it works only for

[Bug rtl-optimization/105091] RTL dse1 remove stack mem storing incorrectly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105091 --- Comment #7 from Jiu Fu Guo --- tried to remove 'fmt' from the narrowed code, but it is still in code :)

[Bug debug/105088] Small DWARF 5 spec violation in line table when passing an absolute path

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105088 --- Comment #11 from Mark Wielaard --- I believe the intention of the DWARF5 spec as that dir entry zero would be equal to the comp_dir attribute of the CU and file entry zero would be equal to the name attribute of the CU. Also, although the

[Bug target/104714] [nvptx] Means to specify any sm_xx

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104714 Tom de Vries changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.0 Resolution|---

[Bug target/104714] [nvptx] Means to specify any sm_xx

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104714 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Tom de Vries : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:de0ef04419e90eacf0d1ddb265552a1b08c18d4b commit r12-7891-gde0ef04419e90eacf0d1ddb265552a1b08c18d4b Author: Tom de Vries Date:

[Bug rtl-optimization/105091] RTL dse1 remove stack mem storing incorrectly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105091 --- Comment #6 from Jiu Fu Guo --- ---bits_test.go package big import ( "fmt" "testing" ) type Bits []int func TestMulBits(t *testing.T) { for _, test := range []struct { x, y, want Bits }{

[Bug rtl-optimization/105091] RTL dse1 remove stack mem storing incorrectly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105091 --- Comment #5 from Jiu Fu Guo --- Created attachment 52709 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52709=edit 280r.dse1

[Bug rtl-optimization/105091] RTL dse1 remove stack mem storing incorrectly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105091 --- Comment #4 from Jiu Fu Guo --- Created attachment 52708 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52708=edit 279r.cse2

[Bug driver/105096] --target-help not an alias for --help=target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105096 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-03-29 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug testsuite/105095] gcc.dg/vect/complex/fast-math-complex-* tests are not executed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105095 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #2 from Eric Botcazou

[Bug tree-optimization/105094] [10/11/12 Regression] UBSAN in clear_bit_region(unsigned char*, unsigned int, unsigned int) (gimple-ssa-store-merging.cc:1834)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105094 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.4 Summary|UBSAN in

[Bug tree-optimization/105094] UBSAN in clear_bit_region(unsigned char*, unsigned int, unsigned int) (gimple-ssa-store-merging.cc:1834)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105094 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-03-29 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug target/104271] [12 Regression] 538.imagick_r run-time at -Ofast -march=native regressed by 26% on Intel Cascade Lake server CPU

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104271 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW CC|

[Bug sanitizer/105093] ICE in expand_expr_addr_expr_1, at expr.c:7607 since r6-3529-gf11a7b6d57f6fcba

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105093 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- --- t.ii.025t.waccess1 2022-03-29 12:27:14.769503716 +0200 +++ t.ii.026t.ubsan 2022-03-29 12:27:14.769503716 +0200 ... volatile struct X test21 () { volatile struct X & x.0_1; volatile struct

[Bug testsuite/105095] gcc.dg/vect/complex/fast-math-complex-* tests are not executed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105095 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug middle-end/100059] [OpenMP] wrong code with 'declare target link' and a scalar variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100059 --- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus --- Another example for this is https://github.com/clang-ykt/omptests 's t-same-name-definitions which has the same issue + is fixed by the pull request for nvptx-tools.

[Bug driver/105096] New: --target-help not an alias for --help=target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105096 Bug ID: 105096 Summary: --target-help not an alias for --help=target Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: trivial Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug tree-optimization/105090] BFI instructions are not generated on arm-none-eabi-g++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105090 Richard Earnshaw changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-03-29 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug tree-optimization/105090] BFI instructions are not generated on arm-none-eabi-g++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105090 --- Comment #1 from Richard Earnshaw --- This was fallout from some changes made internally in the compiler in around the gcc-10 timeframe, but it really just exposed a more general problem with the failure to detect opportunities to use

[Bug target/101908] [12 regression] cray regression with -O2 -ftree-slp-vectorize compared to -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101908 --- Comment #47 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Tue, 29 Mar 2022, crazylht at gmail dot com wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101908 > > --- Comment #46 from Hongtao.liu --- > Another issue is splitting vector load

[Bug debug/105088] Small DWARF 5 spec violation in line table when passing an absolute path

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105088 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug debug/105088] Small DWARF 5 spec violation in line table when passing an absolute path

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105088 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug debug/105088] Small DWARF 5 spec violation in line table when passing an absolute path

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105088 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- See the "Note that if a .debug_line_str section is present, both the compilation unit debugging information entry and the line number header can share a single copy of the current directory name string."

[Bug debug/105088] Small DWARF 5 spec violation in line table when passing an absolute path

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105088 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- That looks incorrect to me, the intent was that it is actually the same string, that is also why there is DW_FORM_line_strp so that it can actually use the same string rather than its copy.

[Bug analyzer/105092] ICE in get_region_for_local, at analyzer/region.cc:874

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105092 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug debug/105088] Small DWARF 5 spec violation in line table when passing an absolute path

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105088 --- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou --- This comes from binutils: https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2021-November/118442.html and I don't think that there is any violation, the file_name is simply represented by a pair (DW_LNCT_path,

[Bug debug/105088] Small DWARF 5 spec violation in line table when passing an absolute path

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105088 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug debug/105088] Small DWARF 5 spec violation in line table when passing an absolute path

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105088 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Can't reproduce with current 11 branch either. Perhaps r12-1777-ga21dc9d1529b8a8071e36b22b6e8492fc2ce7d5a which has been backported to 11 in r11-8650-gf19b20de1b24d6b53479c6815316a5201b22775d as well?

  1   2   >