[Bug c++/111274] ice in fixup_blocks_walker with -O1 and -fopenmp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111274 --- Comment #11 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- OK, I've been digging around in the code. do_poplevel() only fills in BIND_EXPR_BLOCK if stmts_are_full_exprs_p() is true. I haven't figured out the control flow that affects the latter

[Bug target/93006] Better code with a-- == 0 rather than --a == -1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93006 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug tree-optimization/109638] unsigned > 1 ? 0 : n is not optimized to n == 1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109638 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|---

[Bug libfortran/111022] ES0.0E0 format gave ES0.dE0 output with d too high.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111022 --- Comment #21 from Jerry DeLisle --- (In reply to john.harper from comment #20) > With the first test case all the EN outputs were 666. but the Fortran 2018 > standard 13.7.2.3.4 paragraph 2 requires that EN0.0 produce 666.E+0 but > Table

[Bug analyzer/111289] New: Unwarranted -Wanalyzer-va-arg-type-mismatch warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111289 Bug ID: 111289 Summary: Unwarranted -Wanalyzer-va-arg-type-mismatch warning Product: gcc Version: 13.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug libfortran/111022] ES0.0E0 format gave ES0.dE0 output with d too high.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111022 --- Comment #20 from john.harper at vuw dot ac.nz --- With the first test case all the EN outputs were 666. but the Fortran 2018 standard 13.7.2.3.4 paragraph 2 requires that EN0.0 produce 666.E+0 but Table 13.2 first ENw.d line appears to

[Bug other/111288] formatting mistake in HTML documentation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111288 --- Comment #4 from Bruno Haible --- My proposed patch is a correction to commit 2b4e0415ad664cdb3ce87d1f7eee5ca26911a05b by Jakub Jelinek. > patches should be posted to gcc-patches@ after reading > https://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html I do

[Bug other/111288] formatting mistake in HTML documentation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111288 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- patches should be posted to gcc-patches@ after reading https://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html

[Bug other/111288] formatting mistake in HTML documentation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111288 --- Comment #2 from Bruno Haible --- Created attachment 55841 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55841=edit Rendering after applying the fix

[Bug libstdc++/111238] libstdc++ tests should use -Wl,-gc-sections in more configurations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111238 --- Comment #2 from Christophe Lyon --- Oops sorry I pushed an unwanted patch, which I reverted with https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=084a7cf9fb2d9cb98dfbe7d91602c840ec50b002

[Bug other/111288] formatting mistake in HTML documentation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111288 --- Comment #1 from Bruno Haible --- Created attachment 55840 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55840=edit Rendering before applying the fix

[Bug other/111288] New: formatting mistake in HTML documentation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111288 Bug ID: 111288 Summary: formatting mistake in HTML documentation Product: gcc Version: 13.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug libstdc++/111238] libstdc++ tests should use -Wl,-gc-sections in more configurations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111238 --- Comment #1 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Christophe Lyon : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:56d0592db19b69e3cc217fabe5c2f8be3a75a8cf commit r14-3660-g56d0592db19b69e3cc217fabe5c2f8be3a75a8cf Author: Christophe Lyon

[Bug other/111287] doc: "strict ISO mode" definition is not up-to-date

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111287 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug other/111287] New: doc: "strict ISO mode" definition is not up-to-date

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111287 Bug ID: 111287 Summary: doc: "strict ISO mode" definition is not up-to-date Product: gcc Version: 13.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/111286] [12/13/14 Regression] ICE on functional cast empty brace-init-list to const array reference

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111286 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/111286] New: ICE on functional cast to const array reference

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111286 Bug ID: 111286 Summary: ICE on functional cast to const array reference Product: gcc Version: 13.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug testsuite/111071] [14 Regression] gcc.target/aarch64/sve/acle/aarch64-sve-acle-asm.exp has new failures since commit e7a36e4715c7

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111071 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a338c5f6114f3b9f2ed067bc7738b405091a76ce commit r14-3658-ga338c5f6114f3b9f2ed067bc7738b405091a76ce Author: Thiago Jung

[Bug libfortran/111022] ES0.0E0 format gave ES0.dE0 output with d too high.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111022 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/110009] Another missing ABS detection

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110009 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||98907 --- Comment #8 from Andrew

[Bug tree-optimization/110009] Another missing ABS detection

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110009 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski --- Created attachment 55838 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55838=edit dg-testcase

[Bug tree-optimization/111285] New: vector ABSU is lowered incorrectly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111285 Bug ID: 111285 Summary: vector ABSU is lowered incorrectly Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug libfortran/111022] ES0.0E0 format gave ES0.dE0 output with d too high.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111022 --- Comment #18 from Jerry DeLisle --- With Johns test case from Comment #15 and the patch in Comment #17 I get the following: $ ./a.out real kinds 4 8 10 16 With (A,1X,EN0.0 ) 666. With (A,1X,EN0.0 ) 666. With (A,1X,EN0.0 ) 666. With

[Bug libstdc++/26142] global debug namespace clashes everywhere

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26142 --- Comment #11 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:affbb7b4322a01cecddaa4dfb70faee925a2348b commit r14-3654-gaffbb7b4322a01cecddaa4dfb70faee925a2348b Author: Jonathan Wakely

[Bug target/111279] ICE: Segmentation fault with m68k,SJLJ and -malign-int

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111279 --- Comment #3 from Thorsten Otto --- Created attachment 55837 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55837=edit Avoid segmentation fault when calling assign_temp with a NULL type pointer Attached is a potential patch to fix

[Bug c/109393] Very trivial address calculation does not fold

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109393 --- Comment #8 from philipp.tomsich at vrull dot eu --- On Mon, 4 Sept 2023 at 13:38, manolis.tsamis at vrull dot eu < gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > My current match.pd pattern to do that is below; any feedback or > improvements > are

[Bug other/100059] [OpenMP] wrong code with 'declare target link' and a scalar variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100059 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added Component|middle-end |other Resolution|---

[Bug c/109393] Very trivial address calculation does not fold

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109393 --- Comment #7 from Manolis Tsamis --- After some attempts to improve on this, my current solution is: 1) Do not change pointer_int_sum in c-common (otherwise codegen regressions are observed) 2) Introduce a pattern that folds (unsigned

[Bug libstdc++/111258] std::string cannot to be moved in constant evaluated expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111258 --- Comment #3 from Jiang An --- I've reduced the example and filed Bug 111284.

[Bug c++/111284] New: Some passing-by-value parameters are miscompiled since GCC 9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111284 Bug ID: 111284 Summary: Some passing-by-value parameters are miscompiled since GCC 9 Product: gcc Version: 13.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug ipa/111283] [14 Regression] gnat profilebootstrap broken on trunk 20230902 on 32bit targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111283 --- Comment #6 from Matthias Klose --- last known successful profiled bootstrap with trunk 20230811

[Bug ipa/111283] [14 Regression] gnat profilebootstrap broken on trunk 20230902 on 32bit targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111283 --- Comment #5 from Matthias Klose --- a normal bootstrap (at least on i686-linux-gnu) succeeds

[Bug c++/111272] [13/14 Regression] Truncated error messages with -std=c++23 and -std=c++26

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111272 Jiang An changed: What|Removed |Added CC||de34 at live dot cn --- Comment #3 from

[Bug middle-end/100059] [OpenMP] wrong code with 'declare target link' and a scalar variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100059 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/98907] Failure to optimize abs pattern

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98907 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/110009] Another missing ABS detection

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110009 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski --- Vector testcases too: ``` #define vector __attribute__((vector_size(4*sizeof(int vector int signed_f1(vector int v) { vector int b_5; vector int _7; vector int _9; b_5 = v>>(sizeof(int)*8 -

[Bug tree-optimization/110009] Another missing ABS detection

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110009 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski --- With the nop_convert added and using bitwise_equal_p : (simplify (mult:c @0 (nop_convert? (bit_ior:c (rshift @1 INTEGER_CST@2) integer_onep))) (if (!TYPE_UNSIGNED (TREE_TYPE (@1)) && wi::to_wide

[Bug tree-optimization/110009] Another missing ABS detection

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110009 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug tree-optimization/110010] (a>>N) != (b>>N) is not optimized to (a^b) >= (1<

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110010 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ipa/111283] [14 Regression] gnat profilebootstrap broken on trunk 20230902 on 32bit targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111283 --- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab --- Doesn't fail here, but it uses release checking: https://build.opensuse.org/package/live_build_log/devel:gcc:next/gcc14/openSUSE_Tumbleweed/i586

[Bug tree-optimization/111148] Missing boolean optimizations due to comparisons

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Note f was done in r14-3528 .

[Bug c++/111274] ice in fixup_blocks_walker with -O1 and -fopenmp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111274 David Binderman changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug tree-optimization/111282] `a & (b ^ ~a)` (or `a & ~(a ^ b)`) not optimized to `a & b` in gimple

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111282 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Note `|` case already handled by r8-4395: /* a | ~(a ^ b) --> a | ~b */ (simplify (bit_ior:c @0 (bit_not:s (bit_xor:c @0 @1))) (bit_ior @0 (bit_not @1)))

[Bug tree-optimization/110919] [14 Regression] Dead Code Elimination Regression at -O3 since r14-1691-gbc5a2c2e793

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110919 --- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #7) > Generalized for -O1 case: > // (a & (b & ~a)) -> 0 > // (a & (b | ~a)) -> a & b > // (a & (b ^ ~a)) -> a & b > // (a & (b cmp !a)) -> a & (b cmp 0) > (for op

[Bug target/110066] [13 Regression] [RISC-V] Segment fault if compiled with -static -pg

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110066 --- Comment #26 from rvalue --- (In reply to CVS Commits from comment #22) > The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski : > > https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bbc1a102735c72e3c5a4dede8ab382813d12b058 > > commit

[Bug ipa/111283] [14 Regression] gnat profilebootstrap broken on trunk 20230902 on 32bit targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111283 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[14 Regression] gnat|[14 Regression] gnat

[Bug ipa/111283] [14 Regression] gnat bootstrap broken on trunk 20230902 on 32bit targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111283 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- It works on x86_64. I wonder if those targets being ILP32 make it fail for some heurstics differences ...

[Bug ipa/111283] [14 Regression] gnat bootstrap broken on trunk 20230902 on 32bit targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111283 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|ada |ipa CC|

[Bug ada/111283] gnat bootstrap broken on trunk 20230902 on 32bit targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111283 --- Comment #1 from Matthias Klose --- Configured with: -v --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++,m2 --with-gcc-major-version-only --program-prefix= --enable-shared

[Bug ada/111283] New: gnat bootstrap broken on trunk 20230902 on 32bit targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111283 Bug ID: 111283 Summary: gnat bootstrap broken on trunk 20230902 on 32bit targets Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/110919] [14 Regression] Dead Code Elimination Regression at -O3 since r14-1691-gbc5a2c2e793

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110919 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski --- Generalized for -O1 case: // (a & (b & ~a)) -> 0 // (a & (b | ~a)) -> a & b // (a & (b ^ ~a)) -> a & b // (a & (b cmp !a)) -> a & (b cmp 0) (for op (tcc_comparison bit_and bit_xor bit_and) (simplify

[Bug tree-optimization/111282] `a & (b ^ ~a)` (or `a & ~(a ^ b)`) not optimized to `a & b` in gimple

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111282 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Note we will need to detect both `a & (b ^ ~a)` and `a & ~(a ^ b)` since a might be comparison too.

[Bug tree-optimization/111282] `a & (b ^ ~a)` (or `a & ~(a ^ b)`) not optimized to `a & b` in gimple

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111282 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/111282] New: `a & (b ^ ~a)` (or `a & ~(a ^ b)`) not optimized to `a & b` in gimple

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111282 Bug ID: 111282 Summary: `a & (b ^ ~a)` (or `a & ~(a ^ b)`) not optimized to `a & b` in gimple Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: