[Bug fortran/45824] Update expr.c's check_inquiry for C_SIZEOF, compiler_version/_options, etc.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45824 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus

[Bug fortran/47034] TRANSFER of C_PTR: Components of structure constructor are PRIVATE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47034 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus

[Bug fortran/50612] C_FUNLOC takes the wrong address (result variable not function address)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50612 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus

[Bug fortran/47023] C_Sizeof: Rejects valid code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47023 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus

[Bug fortran/38813] ICE with C_LOC(array)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38813 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus

[Bug fortran/40963] ICE segfault - c_loc with derived type component as argument

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40963 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus

[Bug fortran/38894] c_f_procpointer/c_f_pointer - add missing argument checking

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38894 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus

[Bug fortran/50269] Wrongly rejects element of assumed-shape array in C_LOC

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50269 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus

[Bug fortran/39288] Bind(C): C_LOC of character substrings (F2003 erratum, pending)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39288 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus

[Bug fortran/38536] ICE with C_LOC in resolve.c due to not properly going through expr-ref

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38536 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus

[Bug fortran/54263] C_F_POINTER wrongly accepts a SHAPE= for scalar pointers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54263 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus

[Bug fortran/49023] ICE on invalid code with C_ASSOCIATED

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49023 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus

[Bug fortran/52426] ICE for c_loc with array constructor

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52426 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus

[Bug fortran/55444] Rejects valid code with USE ISO_C_BINDING in BLOCK DATA

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55444 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus

[Bug fortran/55574] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] C binding access to c_ptr type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55574 --- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-25 15:54:31 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Mon Mar 25 15:40:26 2013 New Revision: 197053 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=197053root=gccview=rev Log: 2013-03-25

[Bug fortran/56079] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE with C_PTR renaming and TRANSFER

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56079 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus

[Bug fortran/55343] Renamed C_PTR entities are not treated as equivalent types.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55343 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus

[Bug fortran/56378] [4.6/4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE with C_LOC

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56378 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus

[Bug fortran/45824] Update expr.c's check_inquiry for C_SIZEOF, compiler_version/_options, etc.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45824 --- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-25 15:54:49 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Mon Mar 25 15:40:26 2013 New Revision: 197053 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=197053root=gccview=rev Log: 2013-03-25

[Bug fortran/47034] TRANSFER of C_PTR: Components of structure constructor are PRIVATE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47034 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/50612] C_FUNLOC takes the wrong address (result variable not function address)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50612 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/47023] C_Sizeof: Rejects valid code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47023 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/38813] ICE with C_LOC(array)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38813 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/40963] ICE segfault - c_loc with derived type component as argument

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40963 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/38894] c_f_procpointer/c_f_pointer - add missing argument checking

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38894 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/50269] Wrongly rejects element of assumed-shape array in C_LOC

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50269 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/39288] Bind(C): C_LOC of character substrings (F2003 erratum, pending)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39288 --- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-25 17:50:29 UTC --- FIXED on the 4.9 trunk. (Actually, most cases worked before.)

[Bug fortran/39288] Bind(C): C_LOC of character substrings (F2003 erratum, pending)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39288 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/54263] C_F_POINTER wrongly accepts a SHAPE= for scalar pointers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54263 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/49023] ICE on invalid code with C_ASSOCIATED

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49023 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/52426] ICE for c_loc with array constructor

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52426 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/55444] Rejects valid code with USE ISO_C_BINDING in BLOCK DATA

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55444 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/55343] Renamed C_PTR entities are not treated as equivalent types.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55343 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/38536] ICE with C_LOC in resolve.c due to not properly going through expr-ref

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38536 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/56650] Odd error messages with C_SIZEOF for valid code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56650 --- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-26 11:22:54 UTC --- Probably due to not simplifying c_sizeof(), cf. PR 36437. Related PR46641 and PR45824

[Bug fortran/56649] ICE gfc_conv_structure with MERGE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56649 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus

[Bug fortran/56649] ICE gfc_conv_structure with MERGE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56649 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/56743] Namelist bug with comment and no blank

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56743 --- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-26 16:57:53 UTC --- Created attachment 29734 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29734 Draft patch (only for read_integer) Draft patch - fixes the issue

[Bug middle-end/56748] Bogus uninitialized warning with nested if condition

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56748 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords

[Bug fortran/56650] Odd error messages with C_SIZEOF for valid code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56650 --- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-27 11:23:41 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Wed Mar 27 10:45:58 2013 New Revision: 197159 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=197159root=gccview=rev Log: 2013-03-27

[Bug fortran/56650] Odd error messages with C_SIZEOF for valid code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56650 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/36437] Simplify argument to [c_]sizeof

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36437 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus

[Bug fortran/36437] Simplify argument to [c_]sizeof

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36437 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug libfortran/56737] [4.6/4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] Wrong I/O result with format cache for Hollerith strings

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56737 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug libfortran/56737] [4.6/4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] Wrong I/O result with format cache for Hollerith strings

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56737 --- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-27 20:24:11 UTC --- If one sets the breakpoint in _gfortrani_next_format, one gets for the original, non cached version: (gdb) p dtp-u.p.fmt.array.array[1].source $13

[Bug fortran/56758] New: Missing bounds check for explict-size arrays (+ character scalar storage association)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56758 Bug #: 56758 Summary: Missing bounds check for explict-size arrays (+ character scalar storage association) Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0

[Bug libfortran/56737] [4.6/4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] Wrong I/O result with format cache for Hollerith strings

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56737 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/56735] [4.6/4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] Namelist Read Error with question marks

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56735 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong

[Bug fortran/56765] [OOP] compilation errors/ICE with unlimited polymorphic array

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56765 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice

[Bug middle-end/41115] Tree-vectorizer: VecCost tuning for X2: Without vectorization 30% faster

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41115 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus

[Bug fortran/56735] [4.6/4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] Namelist Read Error with question marks

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56735 --- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-29 09:34:29 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Fri Mar 29 09:32:57 2013 New Revision: 197228 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=197228root=gccview=rev Log: 2013-03-29

[Bug libfortran/56737] [4.6/4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] Wrong I/O result with format cache for Hollerith strings

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56737 --- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-29 09:38:20 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Fri Mar 29 09:37:37 2013 New Revision: 197229 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=197229root=gccview=rev Log: 2013-03-29

[Bug libfortran/56737] [4.6/4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] Wrong I/O result with format cache for Hollerith strings

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56737 --- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-29 09:40:13 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Fri Mar 29 09:39:47 2013 New Revision: 197230 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=197230root=gccview=rev Log: 2012-03-29

[Bug fortran/35203] OPTIONAL, VALUE actual argument cannot be an INTEGER 0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35203 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/35203] OPTIONAL, VALUE actual argument cannot be an INTEGER 0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35203 --- Comment #13 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-29 22:35:01 UTC --- FIXED on the 4.9 trunk. Thanks Toon for pointing out this feature. The feature is handled in the same way as IBM: The hidden present argument

[Bug fortran/41137] inefficient zeroing of an array

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41137 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus

[Bug libfortran/56786] New: [4.6/4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] Namelist read fails with designators containing embedded spaces

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56786 Bug #: 56786 Summary: [4.6/4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] Namelist read fails with designators containing embedded spaces Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version:

[Bug fortran/52512] Cannot match namelist object name

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52512 --- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-30 10:18:48 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) This bug fixed by Tilo's patch. Closing. Jerry, please read the PRs carefully before you close them. The issue

[Bug fortran/56743] Namelist bug with comment and no blank

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56743 --- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-30 10:47:30 UTC --- Created attachment 29752 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29752 Test case - please read comment in the file or comment 4 The test

[Bug libfortran/49791] [4.6/4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] Formatted namelist reads fails with: Cannot match namelist object

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49791 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus

[Bug fortran/56660] Fails to read NAMELIST with certain form array syntax

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56660 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus

[Bug fortran/56735] [4.6/4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] Namelist Read Error with question marks

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56735 --- Comment #8 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-30 15:00:11 UTC --- The issue has been fixed on the 4.9 development branch - and it is scheduled for backporting to the 4.6, 4.7 and 4.8 release branches. See http

[Bug fortran/56800] [fortran-dev Regression] move_alloc_13.f90 failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56800 --- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-01 18:01:03 UTC --- The problem is in gfc_array_init_size. There, one should first obtain the element size. And instead of gfc_conv_descriptor_stride_set one should use

[Bug fortran/56803] New: EOF with namelist read give INTERNAL error instead of END OF FILE error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56803 Bug #: 56803 Summary: EOF with namelist read give INTERNAL error instead of END OF FILE error Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0

[Bug fortran/56803] EOF with namelist read give INTERNAL error instead of END OF FILE error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56803 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug libfortran/56786] [4.6/4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] Namelist read fails with designators containing embedded spaces

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56786 --- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-01 20:26:22 UTC --- *** Bug 56803 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug libfortran/56786] [4.6/4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] Namelist read fails with designators containing embedded spaces

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56786 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus

[Bug libfortran/56786] [4.6/4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] Namelist read fails with designators containing embedded spaces

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56786 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong

[Bug fortran/56800] [fortran-dev Regression] move_alloc_13.f90 failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56800 --- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-01 21:34:55 UTC --- Created attachment 29769 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29769 Early draft patch The patch mostly implements a fix for this bug

[Bug fortran/50269] Wrongly rejects element of assumed-shape array in C_LOC

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50269 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|NEW

[Bug fortran/56808] New: Coarray: Wrongly accepts coindexed arguments to INTENT(OUT) dummies

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56808 Bug #: 56808 Summary: Coarray: Wrongly accepts coindexed arguments to INTENT(OUT) dummies Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status:

[Bug fortran/56808] Coarray: Wrongly accepts coindexed arguments to INTENT(OUT) dummies

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56808 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus

[Bug libfortran/56810] record-repeat fails kind check on complex read

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56810 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong

[Bug fortran/50269] Wrongly rejects element of assumed-shape array in C_LOC

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50269 --- Comment #8 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-02 13:28:00 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) (In reply to comment #6) Are we sure? When running the code example given in comment #1, I get a segfault. Yes

[Bug libfortran/56737] [4.6/4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] Wrong I/O result with format cache for Hollerith strings

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56737 --- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-02 15:43:19 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Tue Apr 2 15:42:31 2013 New Revision: 197359 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=197359root=gccview=rev Log: libgfortran

[Bug fortran/56814] New: [4.8/4.9 Regression] Bogus Interface mismatch in dummy procedure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56814 Bug #: 56814 Summary: [4.8/4.9 Regression] Bogus Interface mismatch in dummy procedure Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status:

[Bug fortran/56814] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Bogus Interface mismatch in dummy procedure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56814 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus

[Bug fortran/56735] [4.6/4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] Namelist Read Error with question marks

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56735 --- Comment #10 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-02 16:31:25 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Tue Apr 2 16:30:26 2013 New Revision: 197361 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=197361root=gccview=rev Log: libgfortran

[Bug fortran/56814] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Bogus Interface mismatch in dummy procedure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56814 --- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-02 17:25:18 UTC --- The check is in interface.c's check_result_characteristics: /* Check PROCEDURE POINTER attribute. */ if (r1 != s1 r1-attr.proc_pointer != r2

[Bug fortran/56823] Problem with: interface block dummy argument + procedure pointer actual argument

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56823 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/56814] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Bogus Interface mismatch in dummy procedure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56814 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC

[Bug fortran/56735] [4.6/4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] Namelist Read Error with question marks

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56735 --- Comment #11 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-03 09:53:24 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Wed Apr 3 09:52:06 2013 New Revision: 197396 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=197396root=gccview=rev Log: 2013-04-03

[Bug libfortran/56737] [4.6/4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] Wrong I/O result with format cache for Hollerith strings

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56737 --- Comment #8 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-03 14:02:36 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Wed Apr 3 14:00:20 2013 New Revision: 197412 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=197412root=gccview=rev Log: 2013-04-03

[Bug libfortran/56737] [4.6/4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] Wrong I/O result with format cache for Hollerith strings

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56737 --- Comment #9 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-03 14:07:02 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) 2013-04-03 Tobias Burnus bur...@net-b.de Backport from mainline: 2013-03-29 Tobias Burnus bur

[Bug fortran/50269] Wrongly rejects element of assumed-shape array in C_LOC

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50269 --- Comment #9 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-04 07:37:01 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Thu Apr 4 07:22:24 2013 New Revision: 197468 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=197468root=gccview=rev Log: 2013-04-04

[Bug fortran/50269] Wrongly rejects element of assumed-shape array in C_LOC

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50269 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/56735] [4.6/4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] Namelist Read Error with question marks

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56735 --- Comment #12 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-04 08:38:00 UTC --- 2013-04-04 Tobias Burnus bur...@net-b.de Backport from mainline: 2013-03-28 Tobias Burnus bur...@net-b.de PR fortran

[Bug fortran/56735] [4.6/4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] Namelist Read Error with question marks

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56735 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug libfortran/56737] [4.6/4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] Wrong I/O result with format cache for Hollerith strings

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56737 --- Comment #10 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-04 09:32:14 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Thu Apr 4 09:31:53 2013 New Revision: 197474 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=197474root=gccview=rev Log: libgfortran

[Bug libfortran/56737] [4.6/4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] Wrong I/O result with format cache for Hollerith strings

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56737 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug libfortran/56810] record-repeat fails kind check on complex read

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56810 --- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-04 11:24:58 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Thu Apr 4 11:24:15 2013 New Revision: 197479 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=197479root=gccview=rev Log: 2013-04-04

[Bug libfortran/56810] record-repeat fails kind check on complex read

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56810 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/56845] New: [OOP] _vptr not set to declared type for CLASS + SAVE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56845 Bug #: 56845 Summary: [OOP] _vptr not set to declared type for CLASS + SAVE Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug fortran/56845] [OOP] _vptr not set to declared type for CLASS + SAVE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56845 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus

[Bug fortran/54618] [OOP] wrong-code with CLASS(...), INTENT(OUT) -- and OPTIONAL or ALLOCATABLE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54618 --- Comment #20 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-05 11:35:11 UTC --- (In reply to comment #18) I am seeing intermittent issues with CLASS,ALLOCATABLE,INTENT(OUT) variables that have a CLASS,ALLOCATABLE component

[Bug fortran/56849] New: Missing compile-time shape check for RESHAPE assignments

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56849 Bug #: 56849 Summary: Missing compile-time shape check for RESHAPE assignments Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/56849] Missing compile-time shape check for RESHAPE assignments

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56849 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus

[Bug fortran/56850] New: Diagnostic of REAL*8 is odd: Accepted with -std=f95, -pedantic prints warning only with -std=gnu

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56850 Bug #: 56850 Summary: Diagnostic of REAL*8 is odd: Accepted with -std=f95, -pedantic prints warning only with -std=gnu Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc

[Bug fortran/56850] Diagnostic of REAL*8 is odd: Accepted with -std=f95, -pedantic prints warning only with -std=gnu

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56850 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus

[Bug fortran/56849] Missing compile-time shape check for RESHAPE assignments with an ORDER= attribute

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56849 --- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-05 20:38:05 UTC --- Seems as if someone missed the purpose of ORDER=, which doesn't affect the shape: print *, shape (reshape([1,2,3,4,5,6], [2,3], order=[1,2])) print

<    3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   >