http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56852
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||error
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56867
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-07
20:15:06 UTC ---
Can you attach the test case?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56261
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56867
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56872
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56872
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-08
16:39:10 UTC ---
Front-end optimization generates for
print *,SUM([(s**(REAL(k-1)/REAL(m-1)),k=1,m)])
the code:
D.1918 = s;
D.1919 = __builtin_powf (D.1918
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56872
--- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-08
20:10:54 UTC ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Mon Apr 8 19:36:43 2013
New Revision: 197610
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=197610root=gccview=rev
Log:
2013-04-08
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56872
--- Comment #8 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-08
20:11:12 UTC ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Mon Apr 8 20:01:33 2013
New Revision: 197612
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=197612root=gccview=rev
Log:
2013-04-08
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56872
--- Comment #9 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-08
20:12:37 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
Fixed on trunk and 4.8.
Thanks a lot for the bug report, and sorry for the breakage.
Thanks for the patch, Thomas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56849
--- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-08
20:13:47 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Sun Apr 7 08:41:17 2013
New Revision: 197550
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=197550root=gccview=rev
Log:
2013-04-07
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56849
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56887
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37132
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37132
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-09
23:08:35 UTC ---
For gdb-support, see http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15353
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37132
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-10
13:08:22 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Draft patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-04/msg00560.html
The draft patch fails for dummy arguments
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56907
Bug #: 56907
Summary: C_LOC shall not call internal-PACK when an array
argument is used
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56919
Bug #: 56919
Summary: [4.6/4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] Wrong result for
SYSTEM_CLOCK on Cygwin
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56919
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56919
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-11
20:14:13 UTC ---
First, I think we made a thinko with the random_seed example at
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gfortran/RANDOM_005fSEED.html
it uses (as does Angelo's
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56919
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-11
21:18:43 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
In summary:
- Cygwin is probably okay - it just starts from 0 with the first call to
system_clock(monotonic,...) which
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56845
--- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-12
07:42:30 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Fri Apr 12 07:41:50 2013
New Revision: 197844
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=197844root=gccview=rev
Log:
2013-04-12
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56845
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56929
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56845
--- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-12
09:23:20 UTC ---
FIXED an issue created by the previous patch, cf.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2013-04/msg00116.html
* * *
Author: burnus
Date: Fri Apr 12 08
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56929
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-12
17:56:39 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Fri Apr 12 17:55:48 2013
New Revision: 197930
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=197930root=gccview=rev
Log:
2013-04-12
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56929
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56937
Bug #: 56937
Summary: Unnecessarily temporary with array-vector assignments
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56937
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56945
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53478
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56919
--- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-15
12:57:51 UTC ---
Author: jb
Date: Mon Apr 15 12:43:15 2013
New Revision: 197968
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=197968root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR 56919 Improve
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56816
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56969
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56968
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56968
--- Comment #8 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-16
08:54:19 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
Ok, I have verified that this also regtests cleanly and fixes the test case
(as
expected). Will commit the following patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56969
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-16
11:13:34 UTC ---
Draft patch:
--- a/gcc/fortran/intrinsic.c
+++ b/gcc/fortran/intrinsic.c
@@ -4238,3 +4238,4 @@ got_specific:
expr-value.function.isym = specific
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56981
Bug #: 56981
Summary: Slow I/O: Unformatted 5x slower, large sys component;
formatted slow as well
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56969
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-16
14:18:12 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Tue Apr 16 14:17:15 2013
New Revision: 198000
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=198000root=gccview=rev
Log:
2013-04-16
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56969
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56981
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56386
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39505
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39505
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WONTFIX |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56981
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-17
09:39:58 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
There is a seek inside next_record_w_unf. That function is used for DIRECT
I/O.
Looks conceptually wrong to me
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40958
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40958
--- Comment #10 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-17
13:50:58 UTC ---
Author: jb
Date: Wed Apr 17 10:19:40 2013
New Revision: 198023
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=198023root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR 40958 Compress
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56981
--- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-17
14:50:16 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
The reason why gfortran is slow here is that for non-regular files we use
unbuffered I/O. If you write to a regular file
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56994
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56994
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56907
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56907
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57022
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57023
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57033
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57035
Bug #: 57035
Summary: TS29113's C535b: Wrongly accept DIMENSION(..) to
TRANSFER
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57042
Bug #: 57042
Summary: ICE/Segfault with -fdump-parse-tree
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57048
Bug #: 57048
Summary: [4.9 Regression] Handling of C_PTR and C_FUNPTR leads
to reject valid
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57048
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55117
--- Comment #22 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-25
12:42:45 UTC ---
Created attachment 29938
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29938
FE patch for namelist read with type extension (+ test case
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57071
Bug #: 57071
Summary: Optimize (-1)**k to 1 - 2 * mod(K, 2)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57073
Bug #: 57073
Summary: __builtin_powif (-1.0, k) should be optimized to 1.0
- 2.0 * (K%2)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57071
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57071
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-26
07:07:22 UTC ---
As James Van Buskirk pointed out, the algorithm will fail if k 0. Thus, he
suggests, which gives the expected result:
1 - ISHFT(IAND(K,1),1)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57073
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57071
--- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-26
07:26:31 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
1 - ISHFT(IAND(K,1),1)
For the real version Jakub suspects that (k 1) ? -1.0 : 1.0 is faster than
the mod/convert
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57079
Bug #: 57079
Summary: [Fortran-dev] version/type/attribute fields not set
with CLASS components
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: fortran-dev
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57079
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57093
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57093
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-28
21:19:26 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Sun Apr 28 19:54:44 2013
New Revision: 198379
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=198379root=gccview=rev
Log:
2013-04-28
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57073
--- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-29
08:40:59 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
patch that fails
The Fortran patch of the attachments looks fine, except for:
+ one = gfc_copy_expr (op1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39290
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56981
--- Comment #8 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-29
09:34:58 UTC ---
Author: jb
Date: Mon Apr 29 08:42:00 2013
New Revision: 198390
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=198390root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR 56981 Improve
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56981
--- Comment #9 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-29
09:36:04 UTC ---
Follow-up idea regarding the flushing of when the buffer is full to avoid
unnecessary seeks: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2013-04/msg00258.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39290
--- Comment #9 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-29
12:40:50 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
There are a quite a few problems it seems:
1. we rely on s1-attr.function _and_ s2-attr.function being set, which is
obviously
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57114
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57114
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56937
--- Comment #9 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-30
12:35:49 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
Currently, we do not support assigning values to variables
and then later using the values for dependency analysis
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57126
Bug #: 57126
Summary: Wrongly rejects a generic call because it doesn't
match the intrinsic while another specific matches
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57126
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57126
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-30
16:51:05 UTC ---
Fortran 2008, 16.5.1.4 Host association has:
If an entity that is accessed by use association has the same nongeneric name
as a host entity, the host
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57094
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-30
21:44:37 UTC ---
I thought the following would work. While it does so for the test cases, it
causes new failures. In principle, not elem_len but dim[0].sm is the correct
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57129
Bug #: 57129
Summary: ICE (segfault) in check_extended_derived_type
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56800
--- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-30
21:57:28 UTC ---
For the test case in comment 0:
__builtin_memset (y._data.base_addr, 0, 4);
y._data.rank = 1;
y._data.type = -1;
y
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57142
Bug #: 57142
Summary: SIZE/SHAPE overflow despite kind=8
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57142
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57073
--- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-05-02
21:08:36 UTC ---
The problem is the following in gimplify.c:
In gimplify_cond_expr, one has:
/* If this COND_EXPR has a value, copy the values into a temporary
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57073
--- Comment #8 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-05-02
22:00:53 UTC ---
For completeness, gimplify_ctxp-into_ssa is 0 for the -O0 optimization and it
gets set to 1 in gimple_regimplify_operands. Thus, it is not surprising
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57141
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57073
--- Comment #9 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-05-03
09:58:20 UTC ---
After some discussion with Jakub and Richard - and after doing some code reads,
I think it is best do handle this in tree-ssa-math-opts.c (search
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57160
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57141
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-05-05
14:04:42 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Sun May 5 14:01:38 2013
New Revision: 198609
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=198609root=gccview=rev
Log:
2013-05-05
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57141
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57174
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57174
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56800
--- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-05-07
10:00:20 UTC ---
FIXED by the following commit (on the Fortran-dev branch).
Thanks for the report!
Author: burnus
Date: Tue May 7 09:37:19 2013
New Revision
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56800
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57094
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57142
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-05-07
17:26:40 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Tue May 7 16:36:48 2013
New Revision: 198687
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=198687root=gccview=rev
Log:
2013-05-07
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57142
--- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-05-07
17:28:51 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Tue May 7 17:28:12 2013
New Revision: 198690
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=198690root=gccview=rev
Log:
2013-05-07
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57142
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
801 - 900 of 5621 matches
Mail list logo
