http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43460
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44071
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mirq
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49742
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49742
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49742
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49452
--- Comment #17 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-07-18 16:35:22 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #16)
(In reply to comment #15)
The machine-dependent reorg pass does something unexpected:
(insn 30 18 14 3 (set (reg
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49452
--- Comment #16 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-07-18 16:31:12 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #15)
The machine-dependent reorg pass does something unexpected:
(insn 30 18 14 3 (set (reg/f:SI 11 fp)
(plus:SI
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49473
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49799
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49404
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48789
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46883
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46883
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46881
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46693
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |ramana
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46693
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46693
--- Comment #10 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-12-13 14:11:13 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
Works for me on x86_64-darwin.
Fails for me on x86_64 -linux with trunk as of today.
Ramana
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46693
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46934
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45701
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46693
--- Comment #13 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-12-14 12:07:54 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #12)
Maybe dup of PR46909?
I can verify that the fix for PR46909 fixes the issue on trunk.
I'm looking into 4.5 branch right
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46693
--- Comment #14 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-12-14 12:13:00 UTC ---
It doesn't seem to fail for me with the RC for GCC 4.5.2
with -march=armv5te -mthumb
-march=armv5te
-march=armv7-a
-march=armv7
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45701
--- Comment #5 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-24
11:04:08 UTC ---
Ok I'll test this. (In reply to comment #4)
Created attachment 22835 [details]
gcc46-pr45701.patch
Remembering pointers to tail call insns is both
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47145
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46715
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47246
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45701
--- Comment #9 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-19
10:39:28 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
On IRC you've mentioned some TLS test issues, were they caused by this patch
or
unrelated?
Sorry about the delay
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44392
--- Comment #14 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-01-25 07:18:09 UTC ---
Author: ramana
Date: Tue Jan 25 07:18:05 2011
New Revision: 169221
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=169221
Log:
2011-01-21 Ramana
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44392
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45447
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47508
Summary: [4.6 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure with -ftracer
for pr42918.c
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47527
Summary: [4.6 regression] -flto -flto-partition=none broken for
arm-linux-gnueabi
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47454
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42835
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40457
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47166
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47373
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47562
Summary: Meta bug to keep track of Neon enhancements.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: meta-bug
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45039
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45847
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45847
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45622
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43725
--- Comment #4 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-05
07:16:35 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
(In reply to comment #1)
So the compiler is correct not to be using vld1 for this code. The memory
format of int32x4_t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45886
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45932
Summary: execute/pr37573.c fails after Neon misaligned patch.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45932
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jules
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46003
Summary: cond5.C fails for ARM EABI tests.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45980
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45932
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46312
Summary: gcc.dg/vec-scal-opt2.c fails for ARM targets.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46312
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46312
--- Comment #9 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-12
10:51:58 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
So this gets fixed by moving the testcase to a different directory for x86_32
?
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-scal-opt.c scan
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46510
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|*-*-darwin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46510
--- Comment #11 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-11-18 15:29:24 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
Also occurs for arm-eabi with the tls tests in the testsuite.
FAIL: gcc.dg/tls/opt-14.c (internal compiler error
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46667
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46667
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.6 Regression]|[4.6
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46667
--- Comment #7 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-02
17:52:38 UTC ---
Here's the backtrace I see for arm-eabi.
#0 error (gmsgid=0xf323c8 %+D causes a section type conflict) at
../../combined/gcc/diagnostic.c:747
#1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46667
--- Comment #8 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-02
17:54:22 UTC ---
Created attachment 22605
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22605
Testcase for ARM
Backtrace shown in previous comment from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46003
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46715
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46693
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46631
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46329
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46483
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46508
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45885
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45937
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45252
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46715
--- Comment #3 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-03
10:49:30 UTC ---
I don't see a problem with trunk FWIW. using arm-eabi on a x86_64 linux host.
Don't have access to i386-apple-darwin8.11.1 host
Ramana
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39501
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45885
--- Comment #4 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-03
13:21:48 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
$ ./xgcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=./xgcc
Target: arm-unknown-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../configure --target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51985
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51980
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48941
--- Comment #9 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-27
16:20:07 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
Any chance of seeing the work on this restart ?
I found this bug while looking for something that would help (I raised bug
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50313
--- Comment #6 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-30
14:35:10 UTC ---
Author: ramana
Date: Mon Jan 30 14:35:05 2012
New Revision: 183727
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=183727
Log:
Fix PR target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50313
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52060
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52258
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52187
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51835
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46092
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51785
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51785
--- Comment #14 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-02-28 16:09:52 UTC ---
I can confirm that a build for arm-linux-gnueabi completes and do some
cross-testing on qemu if that's deemed to be enough.
Any other ideas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52412
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52396
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51980
--- Comment #4 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-30
07:58:49 UTC ---
Your testcase is broken - it doesn't honour reinterpret_casts properly . This
is a better testcase.
#include arm_neon.h
uint32x4_t sqrlen4D_16u8
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51980
--- Comment #5 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-30
08:17:21 UTC ---
Experimenting with :
Applying the patch of PR48941 and the patch for lower-subreg here
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-03/msg01886.html
I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52800
Bug #: 52800
Summary: eglibc build broken with internal compiler error in
cfgloop .
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52800
--- Comment #1 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-30
23:34:41 UTC ---
Richi - probably yours -
svn+ssh://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk@185913 broken
svn+ssh://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk@185910 good
regards,
Ramana
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63173
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59799
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61114
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61997
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61915
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[AArch64] High amounts of |[AArch64
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61749
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59448
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61714
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63173
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63293
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61915
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
501 - 600 of 1212 matches
Mail list logo