Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: roland.illig at gmx dot de
Target Milestone: ---
gcc/c-family/c-attribs.c says:
> "refernced symbol declared here"
That should be "referenced" instead.
A test to trigger this diagnostic is:
~~~c
/* { dg-do compile }
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: roland.illig at gmx dot de
Target Milestone: ---
rx.c says:
> "invalid control register for mvtc : %d - using 'psw'"
This should rather be:
> "invalid control register %d for mvtc; using %"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99303
--- Comment #2 from Roland Illig ---
same file, other typo:
> "clauses on the same construct %L"
The "at %L" is missing.
: c
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: roland.illig at gmx dot de
Target Milestone: ---
gcse.c says:
> warning (OPT_Wdisabled_optimization,
> "%s: %d basic blocks and %d registers; "
> "increase %<--pa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99304
--- Comment #4 from Roland Illig ---
Thank you for fixing the typos.
Could you perhaps add the test cases to the test suite, to have the two
diagnostics covered? Now that the typo is fixed, both should trivially pass.
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: roland.illig at gmx dot de
Target Milestone: ---
> Maximum number of accesse stored in each modref reference.
Should be 'accesses'.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95177
--- Comment #15 from Roland Illig ---
(In reply to Steve Kargl from comment #9)
> I'm still trying to understand how an
> option names -Werror=char-subscripts could trigger an
> error. There are no subscripts.
There _are_ subscripts, just look
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103457
--- Comment #2 from Roland Illig ---
Cool, thank you for taking this optimization.
Just to give you a bit of background: I discovered this while converting some
of the enum types in BSD Make to proper bitfields, which theoretically should
be
: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: roland.illig at gmx dot de
Target Milestone: ---
~~~c
#include
typedef struct GNodeFlagsS {
bool remake:1;
bool childMade:1;
bool force:1;
bool doneWait:1;
bool
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102998
--- Comment #1 from Roland Illig ---
> for the following redeclarations
That's wrong. There is only 1 redeclaration in the code that follows.
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: roland.illig at gmx dot de
Target Milestone: ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Warning-Options.html says:
> For example, the warning triggers for the following redeclarations because
> the first one allows an array
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95177
--- Comment #17 from Roland Illig ---
(In reply to Francois-Xavier Coudert from comment #16)
> I feel like the "array subscript has type char" error is really a red
> herring in this case.
I agree, especially for C programmers who are not aware
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93748
--- Comment #3 from Roland Illig ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> Since all 4 are internal compiler error, they will not be used for
> translation and the rules for diagnostic does not need to apply here.
Are you sure about the
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: roland.illig at gmx dot de
Target Milestone: ---
mn10300.c says:
> break;;
nvptx.c says:
> tree r = NULL_TREE;;
jit-playback.c says:
> tree x = as_tree ();;
These extra semicolons (and all the others in the whole tre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104552
--- Comment #13 from Roland Illig ---
>From aarch64.cc:
> invalid feature modifier %s
The %s must be %qs, like in the related messages.
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: roland.illig at gmx dot de
Target Milestone: ---
arm-builtins.cc says:
if (fcode == ARM_BUILTIN_WSRLHI)
error ("the count should be no less than 0; please check the
intr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104552
--- Comment #19 from Roland Illig ---
>From nvptx.cc:
> PTX version (-mptx) needs to be at least %s to support selected -misa (sm_%s)
Missing %<...%> around -mptx and -misa.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104552
--- Comment #10 from Roland Illig ---
>From aarch64-sve-builtins.cc:
> error_at (location, "passing single vector %qT to argument %d"
> " of %qE, which expects a tuple of %d vectors",
> actual, argno + 1, fndecl,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104552
--- Comment #14 from Roland Illig ---
>From aarch64.cc:
> "invalid name (%qs) in % pragma or attribute"
What is the point of having parentheses around %qs? That seems redundant to me.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104552
--- Comment #16 from Roland Illig ---
>From arm-builtins.cc:
> "the range of count should be in 0 to 32;
> please check the intrinsic %<_mm_rori_pi16%> in code"
Please double-check whether the "0 to 32" is a typo and should rather be "0 to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104794
--- Comment #2 from Roland Illig ---
While here, please add the missing space in the middle of the string:
error ("incompatible options %'-mstack-protector-guard=global%' and"
"%'-mstack-protector-guard-offset=%qs%'",
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104794
--- Comment #3 from Roland Illig ---
While here:
> error ("incompatible options %'-mstack-protector-guard=global%' and"
>"%'-mstack-protector-guard-offset=%qs%'",
The idiomatic way to write quotes is %<...%>, not %'...%'.
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: roland.illig at gmx dot de
Target Milestone: ---
Target: msp430
>From msp430.cc:
> error ("%<__delay_cycles()%> only takes constant arg
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99297
Roland Illig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|11.0|12.0
--- Comment #1 from Roland Illig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104552
--- Comment #9 from Roland Illig ---
>From config/host-darwin.cc:
> error ("PCH memory not available %m");
Looks like a missing ":" before "%m".
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104794
--- Comment #1 from Roland Illig ---
>From arm-builtins.cc:
> "the range of count should be in 0 to 32;
> please check the intrinsic %<_mm_rori_pi16%> in code"
While here, please double-check whether the "0 to 32" is a typo and should
rather
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104794
--- Comment #4 from Roland Illig ---
And another thing:
> %'-mstack-protector-guard-offset=%qs%'
This produces nested quotes. The %qs should rather be a simple %s. Maybe you
can write a unit test to see how the end result looks. I didn't find
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: roland.illig at gmx dot de
Target Milestone: ---
>From i386.c:
> %<-m96bit-long-double%> is not compatible with this target
> %<-mpreferred-stack-boundary%> is not supp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40883
--- Comment #11 from Roland Illig ---
Is there a general plan of fixing these "trivial" nits? Half of my reports from
2019 are still open after 3 years.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104794
--- Comment #5 from Roland Illig ---
Same for %'-mstack-protector-guard=tls%' in the same file.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104552
--- Comment #18 from Roland Illig ---
>From nds32.cc:
> this built-in function not support on the v3m toolchain
"support" should be "supported".
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104552
--- Comment #20 from Roland Illig ---
>From pru.cc:
> register name %<%s%>
Please use the canonical %qs instead of the unnecessarily verbose %<%s%>.
Everywhere.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90148
--- Comment #7 from Roland Illig ---
Still reproducible in GCC 12. Any chance of these trivial things getting fixed
in the next year?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104552
--- Comment #12 from Roland Illig ---
>From aarch64-sve-builtins.cc:
> "capture by copy of SVE type %qT"
This message should use the same grammar as the related ones, the word "cannot"
is a useful indicator of the general error condition.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104552
--- Comment #17 from Roland Illig ---
>From bfin.cc:
> cannott
Should be "cannot".
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: roland.illig at gmx dot de
Target Milestone: ---
>From i386.c:
const char *url
= CHANGES_ROOT_URL "gcc-12/changes.html#zero_width_bitfields";
inform (i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104552
--- Comment #21 from Roland Illig ---
>From rs6000-c.cc:
> passing argument %d of %qE discards const qualifier from pointer target type
The word "const" must be in % quotes.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104552
--- Comment #11 from Roland Illig ---
>From aarch64-sve-builtins.cc:
> passing %qT to argument %d of %qE, which expects a scalar integer
"scalar integer" sounds redundant, this may be a copy-and-paste mistake from
the message directly above,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104552
--- Comment #15 from Roland Illig ---
>From aarch64.cc:
> arch extension %<%s%>
Use the idiomatic %qs instead.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104552
--- Comment #22 from Roland Illig ---
>From v850-c.cc:
> %<#pragma%> GHS end found without previous startXXX
> %<#pragma%> GHS endXXX does not match previous startXXX
> junk at end of %<#pragma%> ghs section
> malformed %<#pragma%> ghs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104552
--- Comment #23 from Roland Illig ---
>From c-parser.cc and cp/parser.cc:
> %<#pragma omp target%> with modifier other than % or %on
> % clause
Missing space between "%" and "on".
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: roland.illig at gmx dot de
CC: egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
>From cp/module.cc:
> error_at (loc, "compiled module is %
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: roland.illig at gmx dot de
CC: egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Target: nvptx
>From nvptx.cc:
> PTX version (-mptx) needs to be at least %s to support selected
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: roland.illig at gmx dot de
CC: egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
>From cp/module.cc:
inform (loc, "compiler is %sversio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104552
Roland Illig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40883
Bug 40883 depends on bug 104552, which changed state.
Bug 104552 Summary: Mistakes in strings to be translated in GCC 12
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104552
What|Removed |Added
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: roland.illig at gmx dot de
CC: egallager at gcc dot gnu.org, msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Target: v850
>From v850-c.cc:
> %<#pragma%> GHS e
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: roland.illig at gmx dot de
CC: egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
>From cp/module.cc:
> returning to the gate for a mechanical issue
This diagnostic is a fatal
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: roland.illig at gmx dot de
CC: egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Target: rs6000
>From rs6000-c.cc:
> passing argument %d of %qE discards const qualifie
++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: roland.illig at gmx dot de
Target Milestone: ---
cp/parser.cc says:
> use of % in parameter declaration only available with %<-std=c++20%>
> or %<-fconcepts%>
What about %<-std=gnu++20%>?
ty: normal
Priority: P3
Component: d
Assignee: ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org
Reporter: roland.illig at gmx dot de
Target Milestone: ---
d/decl.cc says:
> warning (OPT_Wtemplates, "%s %qs instantiated",
> ti->kind (), ti->toPrettyChars (fal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104552
--- Comment #35 from Roland Illig ---
(In reply to rsand...@gcc.gnu.org from comment #33)
> (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #28)
> > (In reply to Roland Illig from comment #11)
> > > From aarch64-sve-builtins.cc:
> > > > passing %qT to
iority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: roland.illig at gmx dot de
Target Milestone: ---
cp/constraint.cc says:
> if (TYPE_P (parm))
> verbatim ("MAP %qD TO %qT", TEMPLATE_TYPE_DECL (parm), arg);
> else
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: roland.illig at gmx dot de
Target Milestone: ---
>From cp/module.cc:
> not Encapsulated Lazy Records of Named Declarations
Is this message trying to be funny? As the German translator, I got the
abbrev
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: roland.illig at gmx dot de
Target Milestone: ---
>From cp/module.cc:
> inform (DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION (new_decl),
> "... this enumerator %
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104552
--- Comment #25 from Roland Illig ---
>From cp/module.cc:
inform (loc, "compiler is %sversion %s%s%s",
IS_EXPERIMENTAL (my_ver) ? "experimental " : "",
my_string,
reject_p ? "" :
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104808
--- Comment #2 from Roland Illig ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> these are in debug_* functions so they don't need to be translated as they
> are not user visible at all.
> That is they are only used while debugging GCC.
If
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104552
--- Comment #24 from Roland Illig ---
>From cp/module.cc:
> error_at (loc, "compiled module is %sversion %s",
> IS_EXPERIMENTAL (their_ver) ? "experimental " : "",
> their_string);
The word "experimental" must be
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104552
--- Comment #26 from Roland Illig ---
>From cp/module.cc:
> returning to the gate for a mechanical issue
This diagnostic is a fatal error. Fatal errors must be actionable. This
diagnostic isn't actionable, instead it increases confusion for
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: roland.illig at gmx dot de
Target Milestone: ---
fortran/openmp.cc says:
> selector '%s' not allowed for context selector set '%s' at %C
One year ago, the message contained the idiomatic %qs.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104888
--- Comment #5 from Roland Illig ---
Related, in trans-openmp.cc:
> "specified at %L "
The space at the end is too much.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104888
--- Comment #4 from Roland Illig ---
While here:
> requiries
typo: should be requires
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104888
--- Comment #2 from Roland Illig ---
While here:
> "'omp_allocator_handle_kind' kind at %L"
Should this be uppercase instead?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104888
--- Comment #1 from Roland Illig ---
While here:
> expected : at %C
The quotes around the %<:%> are missing.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104888
--- Comment #3 from Roland Illig ---
While here:
> DEPEND clause of depobj
Should DEPOBJ be uppercase?
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: roland.illig at gmx dot de
Target Milestone: ---
cp/mapper-client.cc says:
---snip---
...
errmsg = "opening";
...
errmsg = "reading";
...
if (errmsg)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104552
--- Comment #37 from Roland Illig ---
I'm splitting this bug report into multiple bug reports, to clean up the mess
that the 36 comments created. It was a bad idea from the beginning. :)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104794
--- Comment #11 from Roland Illig ---
Thank you, looks good now.
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: roland.illig at gmx dot de
CC: egallager at gcc dot gnu.org, sje at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Target: aarch64
>From aarch64.cc:
> invalid feature modifier %s
The %s
mponent: c
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: roland.illig at gmx dot de
CC: egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
in bfin.cc and range-op.cc
This typo doesn't appear in any tests so it should be trivial to fix.
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: roland.illig at gmx dot de
CC: egallager at gcc dot gnu.org, rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Target: aarch64
>From aarch64-sve-builtins.cc:
> er
normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: roland.illig at gmx dot de
CC: egallager at gcc dot gnu.org, msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
As of 2022-03-12, the GCC tree contains 44 instances of the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104552
--- Comment #38 from Roland Illig ---
(In reply to Roland Illig from comment #7)
> From params.opt:
> > --param=ranger-debug=[none|trace|gori|cache|tracegori|all]
> > Specifies the output mode for debugging ranger.
>
> Why " " instead of the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104552
--- Comment #7 from Roland Illig ---
>From params.opt:
> When propagating IPA-CP effect estimates, multiply frequencies of recursive
> edges that that bring back an unchanged value by this factor.
"that that"
>From params.opt:
> Maximum
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104552
--- Comment #3 from Roland Illig ---
(In reply to Iain Buclaw from comment #2)
> (In reply to Roland Illig from comment #0)
> > > -fdump-cxx-spec=Write all declarations as C++ code to
> > > .
> >
> > The '' should be '' as well.
> >
: translation
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: roland.illig at gmx dot de
Target Milestone: ---
> -fdump-cxx-spec=Write all declarations as C++ code to .
The '' should be '' as well.
> When a symbol is resolved, check alias this scope before going to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104552
--- Comment #4 from Roland Illig ---
>From common.opt:
> an invalid linenum macros
"an" + "macros" doesn't match
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99291
--- Comment #6 from Roland Illig ---
Still reproducible in GCC 12.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104552
--- Comment #8 from Roland Illig ---
>From tree-ssa-uninit.c:
> accessing argument %u of a function declared with attribute %<%s%>
The %<%s%> should be the conventional %qs.
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: roland.illig at gmx dot de
Target Milestone: ---
~~~c
#include
typedef struct Buffer {
char *buf;
size_t len;
size_t cap;
} Buffer;
Buffer Buffer_Init_Return(void);
void
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109105
--- Comment #3 from Roland Illig ---
Nothing has changed yet.
There is no built-in validation in the translated messages that each '%%L' from
the msgid matches a '%%L' from the msgstr.
I suggest to replace the label 'bad_op' with a function
Component: c
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: roland.illig at gmx dot de
Target Milestone: ---
Target: alpha
$ cat <<'EOF' > tree.c
typedef struct tnode_t {
struct tnode_t *tn_left, *tn_right;
int v_quad;
} tnode_t;
int cons
: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: roland.illig at gmx dot de
Target Milestone: ---
~~~c
int sum_const(_Bool a, _Bool b)
{
return (a ? 1 : 0 ) + (b ? 1
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: roland.illig at gmx dot de
Target Milestone: ---
The function resolve_operator constructs a format string and then passes it to
gfc_error. This approach is wrong, and if a translator
: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: roland.illig at gmx dot de
Target Milestone: ---
Target: riscv
riscv.opt says:
> Enable the CSR checking for the ISA-dependent CRS and the read-only CSR.
Is the CRS a typo and should be CSR?
As the German translator, I'm not famil
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: roland.illig at gmx dot de
Target Milestone: ---
m2expr.c says:
> error_at (
> location,
> "internal error: not expecting operand1 to be a constant set");
This should rather be a call to internal_error_at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109100
--- Comment #1 from Roland Illig ---
While here: In that same message, there is a single space between sentences 1
and 2, but 2 spaces between sentences 2 and 3.
While here: can not is usually spelled cannot.
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: roland.illig at gmx dot de
Target Milestone: ---
scanner.cc says:
> Ignoring '!$omx' vendor-extension sentinel at %C
The single quotes should be replaced with %< and %>,
see
<https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gccin
Assignee: gaius at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: roland.illig at gmx dot de
Target Milestone: ---
m2builtins.cc says:
> %s:%d:assertion of condition `%s' failed
The backtick and single quote should be replaced with %< and %>, see
<https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gccin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109032
--- Comment #1 from Roland Illig ---
While here:
> turns on runtime checking to check whether a CASE statement requires an ELSE
> clause when on was not specified
Did you mean "when one was not"?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109032
--- Comment #4 from Roland Illig ---
While here:
> (*
>BuildDivM2 - build and return ((op2 < 0) : (op1 divtrunc op2) ? (op1
> divfloor op2))
> when -fiso, -fpim4 or -fpositive-mod-floor-div is present else
>
ponent: c
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: roland.illig at gmx dot de
Target Milestone: ---
> "result of %<%wu^%wu%> is %wu;"
> " did you mean %<1 << %wu%> (%wu)?",
Since '^' is a binary operator, it is usually
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109032
--- Comment #2 from Roland Illig ---
While here:
> turns on runtime checking to check whether a floating point number is about
> to exceed range
What exactly does "is about to" mean, and why didn't you just write "exceeds
the range"?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109032
--- Comment #5 from Roland Illig ---
While here:
> dependancies
Typo; should be dependencies.
Component: rtl-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: roland.illig at gmx dot de
Target Milestone: ---
> error ("returns_twice call is %s in basic block %d",
This message must not be user-visible, except in a call to internal_error.
In gene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109033
--- Comment #1 from Roland Illig ---
> "%@ %s (fndecl %qD, depth %i)",
Why am I supposed to translate this string? It just doesn't make sense to
translate this into German, or any other natural language.
Component: modula2
Assignee: gaius at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: roland.illig at gmx dot de
Target Milestone: ---
> compiler checks to force definition module procedure parameter names with
> their implementation module counterpart
This message is not understandable, espe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109032
--- Comment #3 from Roland Illig ---
While here:
> specify the library order, currently legal entries include: log, min, pim,
> iso or their directory name equivalent m2log, m2min, m2pim, m2iso.
In what legislation are these entries "legal"?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109034
--- Comment #1 from Roland Illig ---
While here:
> "you can silence this warning by using a hexadecimal constant"
> " (%wx rather than %wd)",
%x requires an unsigned argument, %wd requires a signed argument, so %wd should
probably be %wu
Component: translation
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: roland.illig at gmx dot de
Target Milestone: ---
> %qs is loaded but symbol %qs is not found: %s
That string is marked as 'format-c' but should be 'format-gcc-internal'.
> to generate dependenci
401 - 500 of 531 matches
Mail list logo
