[Bug middle-end/55381] [4.8 Regression]: build fails on cris-elf building libgfortran with host-gcc-4.4, ICE compiling matmul_i1.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55381 --- Comment #7 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org 2012-11-20 13:01:31 UTC --- Also broken on ia64 with gcc 4.3.2. /usr/local/gcc/test/Build/./gcc/xgcc -B/usr/local/gcc/test/Build/./gcc/ -B/usr/ia64-suse-linux/bin/ -B/usr/ia64-suse-linux

[Bug target/55565] New: [4.8 regression] FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/ppc-mov-1.c scan-assembler-not fmr [0-9]+,[0-9]+

: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: sch...@linux-m68k.org Target: powerpc64-*-* Between r190317 and r191083 the test gcc.target/powerpc

[Bug fortran/55567] New: [4.8 regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/typebound_operator_18.f90 -O (test for excess errors)

Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: sch...@linux-m68k.org spawn /daten/gcc/gcc-20121201/Build/gcc/testsuite/gfortran6

[Bug fortran/55567] [4.8 regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/typebound_operator_18.f90 -O (test for excess errors)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55567 Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0

[Bug fortran/55568] New: [4.8 regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/allocate_error_4.f90 -O (test for excess errors)

Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: sch...@linux-m68k.org spawn /daten/gcc/gcc-20121201/Build/gcc/testsuite/gfortran1/../../gfortran

[Bug fortran/55568] [4.8 regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/allocate_error_4.f90 -O (test for excess errors)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55568 Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0

[Bug target/53359] [4.8 regression] undefined reference to `__gnu_cxx::__numeric_traits_integerint::__min'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53359 --- Comment #6 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org 2012-12-07 00:01:40 UTC --- Created attachment 28889 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28889 Preprocessed testcase

[Bug rtl-optimization/52573] [4.6/4.7/4.8 regression] regrename creates overlapping register allocations for output operands

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52573 --- Comment #8 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org 2012-12-07 16:45:49 UTC --- The failure disappeared somewhere between r190830 and r191055.

[Bug rtl-optimization/52573] [4.6/4.7/4.8 regression] regrename creates overlapping register allocations for output operands

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52573 --- Comment #10 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org 2012-12-08 19:31:46 UTC --- http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2012-12/msg00595.html is based on r191055.

[Bug testsuite/55429] new UNRESOLVED: 20_util/enable_shared_from_this/cons/constexpr.cc scan-assembler on darwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55429 Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug go/55201] [4.8 regression] libgo.so: undefined reference to `__atomic_compare_exchange_8'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55201 Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/55745] New: [4.8 regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr26246_2.f90 -O scan-tree-dump-times original static int 0

: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: sch...@linux-m68k.org Since r194604: $ grep 'static int' pr26246_2.f90.003t.original static integer

[Bug fortran/55745] [4.8 regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr26246_2.f90 -O scan-tree-dump-times original static int 0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55745 --- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org 2012-12-20 09:04:27 UTC --- The bug fix is older than the bug report ;-) No, it isn't. I was able to file it 18 minutes before your commit. :-)

[Bug fortran/55756] New: [4.8 regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/same_type_as_1.f03 -O (test for excess errors)

Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: sch...@linux-m68k.org spawn /daten/aranym/gcc/gcc-20121220/Build/gcc/testsuite/gfortran/../../gfortran -B/daten/aranym

[Bug bootstrap/55784] [4.8 regression] declaration of C function 'const char* strsignal(int)' conflicts with /usr/include/string.h:112: error: previous declaration

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55784 --- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org 2012-12-22 08:57:46 UTC --- Take a look at gcc/config.log.

[Bug c++/55787] Comparisons of double values don't work correctly

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55787 --- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org 2012-12-22 18:28:49 UTC --- Most likely a dup of bug 323.

[Bug libquadmath/55821] Release tarballs (unconditionally) install libquadmath.info when libquadmath is not supported

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55821 --- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org 2012-12-28 10:58:39 UTC --- That override is only needed so that libquadmath.info is built in the build directory instead of the source directory. If you want to suppress installing

[Bug c/55830] inline and __attribute__((always_inline)) treated differently for unused-function warning

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55830 --- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org 2012-12-30 22:12:28 UTC --- static alone already makes a function eligible for inlining.

[Bug c++/55885] Modulo operator crashes for int and long variables if they have minimal value

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55885 Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/55852] [4.6/4.7/4.8 regression] internal compiler error: in gfc_build_intrinsic_call, at fortran/expr.c:4647

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55852 --- Comment #10 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org 2013-01-08 16:55:58 UTC --- The test case fails because the match is too strict. $ grep iszs intrinsic_size_3.f90.003t.original integer(kind=2) iszs; iszs = (integer

[Bug tree-optimization/55927] New: FAIL: g++.dg/ipa/devirt-10.C -std=gnu++11 scan-ipa-dump-times inline Discovered a virtual call to a known target 1

Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: sch...@linux-m68k.org Target: ia64-*-* Created

[Bug web/55933] New: Missing attachment download link

Priority: P3 Component: web AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: sch...@linux-m68k.org There should be a download link for every attachment directly in the comment. The best option would be to disable the useless patch viewer.

[Bug c/52381] asm goto output operands diagnostics

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52381 --- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org 2013-01-10 14:12:54 UTC --- Like __atomic_compare_exchange_n?

[Bug tree-optimization/55927] FAIL: g++.dg/ipa/devirt-10.C -std=gnu++11 scan-ipa-dump-times inline Discovered a virtual call to a known target 1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55927 --- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org 2013-01-10 14:44:20 UTC --- Yes, it does.

[Bug middle-end/55943] New: ICE in gen_reg_rtx

Component: middle-end AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: sch...@linux-m68k.org Target: ia64-*-* Created attachment 29150 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29150 Testcase $ gcc-20130111/Build/gcc/xgcc -B gcc-20130111/Build/gcc/ -S gcc/gcc/testsuite

[Bug sanitizer/55975] New: FAIL: c-c++-common/asan/global-overflow-1.c -O0 output pattern test

: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: sanitizer AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: sch...@linux-m68k.org CC: do...@gcc.gnu.org, dvyu...@gcc.gnu.org, ja...@gcc.gnu.org, k...@gcc.gnu.org

[Bug sanitizer/55975] FAIL: c-c++-common/asan/global-overflow-1.c -O0 output pattern test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55975 --- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org 2013-01-15 19:59:47 UTC --- Breakpoint 1, __asan::AsanThread::Init ( this=this@entry=0x3fffb751d8f8 __asan::asan_thread_registry+33554432) at ../../../../../libsanitizer/asan

[Bug middle-end/56000] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: libffi.call/cls_uchar_va.c -O0 -W -Wall output pattern test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56000 --- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org 2013-01-16 08:08:33 UTC --- Does this help? http://sourceware.org/ml/libffi-discuss/2012/msg00279.html

[Bug rtl-optimization/56005] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr45352.c (internal compiler error)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56005 Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target|x86_64-*-* i686-*-* |x86_64

[Bug bootstrap/56001] [4.7 Regression] relocation truncated to fit: R_PPC_REL24 breaks bootstrap on powerpc64-linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56001 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org 2013-01-16 19:04:34 UTC --- Is your toolchain using BSS PLT?

[Bug sanitizer/55975] asan does not work with 46 bit address space on PowerPC64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55975 --- Comment #9 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org 2013-01-16 19:12:01 UTC --- -FAIL: c-c++-common/asan/global-overflow-1.c -O0 output pattern test, is ==9876== AddressSanitizer CHECK failed: ../../../../../gcc/libsanitizer/asan

[Bug rtl-optimization/52573] [4.6/4.7/4.8 regression] regrename creates overlapping register allocations for output operands

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52573 --- Comment #12 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org 2013-01-16 20:39:40 UTC --- I had locally added the patch in http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-07/msg00421.html and totally forgot about that, so comment#8 is completely bogus.

[Bug go/56017] New: libgo testsuite does not support cross testing

Priority: P3 Component: go AssignedTo: i...@airs.com ReportedBy: sch...@linux-m68k.org ../../../libgo/testsuite/gotest: line 470: ./a.out: cannot execute binary file FAIL: bufio make[4]: *** [bufio/check] Error 1

[Bug sanitizer/55975] asan does not work with 46 bit address space on PowerPC64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55975 --- Comment #11 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org 2013-01-17 23:23:47 UTC --- There are two off-by-one: diff --git a/libsanitizer/asan/asan_poisoning.cc b/libsanitizer/asan/asan_poisoning.cc index a00baff..bbbaf0a 100644

[Bug sanitizer/55975] asan does not work with 46 bit address space on PowerPC64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55975 --- Comment #12 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org 2013-01-17 23:52:39 UTC --- Created attachment 29199 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29199 make check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS='--target_board=unix/-m64 asan.exp' diff

[Bug sanitizer/55975] asan does not work with 46 bit address space on PowerPC64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55975 --- Comment #18 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org 2013-01-18 13:21:02 UTC --- (In reply to comment #15) In LLVM trunk: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=172807view=rev That only happens when running under gdb which appears

[Bug sanitizer/55975] asan does not work with 46 bit address space on PowerPC64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55975 --- Comment #19 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org 2013-01-18 13:25:42 UTC --- MEM_TO_SHODOW does not work when (SHADOW_OFFSET SHADOW_SHIFT) is less than kHighMemEnd. $ ASAN_OPTIONS=verbosity=1 ./clone-test-1.exe ==16778

[Bug c/56046] the buffer overflow can escape from the stack protection in 64-bit linux system

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56046 --- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org 2013-01-19 16:16:08 UTC --- The stack protection code cannot guarantee to detect every error.

[Bug c/56153] False warning about signed and unsigned type in conditional expression

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56153 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org 2013-01-30 16:16:15 UTC --- foo-num is unsigned, -1 is signed.

[Bug middle-end/56188] New: [4.8 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-pta-10.c scan-ipa-dump pta ESCAPED = { (ESCAPED )?(NONLOCAL )?}

Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: sch...@linux-m68k.org Target: powerpc-*-* Only fails with -m32

[Bug middle-end/56188] [4.8 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-pta-10.c scan-ipa-dump pta ESCAPED = { (ESCAPED )?(NONLOCAL )?}

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56188 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org 2013-02-03 11:52:12 UTC --- Created attachment 29341 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29341 ipa-pta-10.c.053i.pta

[Bug c++/56220] g++ failed to initialize a __thread local bool variable.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56220 Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/58709] [c++11] Bogus? int vs. scoped enum printf warning when -fabi-version = 6

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58709 --- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org --- The warning is target independent and only depends on the type. You get the same warning for int vs long even if they are the same size.

[Bug testsuite/58851] New: FAIL: gfortran.dg/unlimited_polymorphic_13.f90 -O0 execution test

Priority: P3 Component: testsuite Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org Blocks: 58793 Target: i386-*-*, m68k-*-* The storage size of real(kind=10) is target-dependent. On i386 and m68k it is 96, not 128.

[Bug testsuite/58851] FAIL: gfortran.dg/unlimited_polymorphic_13.f90 -O0 execution test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58851 --- Comment #6 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org --- unlimited_polymorphic_13.f90:43.15: type is (complex(c2)) 1 unlimited_polymorphic_13.f90:45.15: type is (complex(c3)) 2 Error: CASE label

[Bug other/58925] --enable-version-specific-runtime-libs breaks libcilk install

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58925 Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dimhen at gmail dot

[Bug bootstrap/58935] cannot install `libcilkrts.la' to a directory not ending in /usr/local/gcc_current/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58935 Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug rtl-optimization/58960] New: [4.9 regression] ICE in bmp_iter_set_init

-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org gcc/xg++ -Bgcc/ ../gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/opt/pr48272.C -nostdinc++ -I ia64-suse-linux/libstdc++-v3/include/ia64-suse-linux -Iia64-suse-linux/libstdc++-v3/include -I../libstdc++-v3/libsupc++ -I

[Bug testsuite/58851] FAIL: gfortran.dg/unlimited_polymorphic_13.f90 -O0 execution test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58851 --- Comment #8 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org --- Still broken. (gdb) ptype r3 type = real(kind=8) (gdb) ptype r4 type = real(kind=10)

[Bug testsuite/58851] FAIL: gfortran.dg/unlimited_polymorphic_13.f90 -O0 execution test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58851 --- Comment #11 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org --- It aborts.

[Bug testsuite/58851] FAIL: gfortran.dg/unlimited_polymorphic_13.f90 -O0 execution test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58851 --- Comment #13 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org --- case (10) sz = storage_size(r3)*2

[Bug rtl-optimization/59019] New: [4.9 regression] ICE in advance_target_bb, at sched-rgn.c:3561

-code Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: rtl-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org CC: law at gcc dot gnu.org Target: ia64-*-* Broken by r204414. $ gcc/xgcc -B gcc/ ../gcc

[Bug target/59035] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/c99-contract-1.c -O2 -flto -fno-use-linker-plugin -flto-partition=none execution test

Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org Target: ia64-*-* Only fails with -flto. $ gcc/xgcc -Bgcc/ ../gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg

[Bug c/59039] Undocumented __builtin_longjmp/__builtin_setjmp

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59039 --- Comment #11 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org --- In the latter testcase foo doesn't call a function so there is never a need to save anything.

[Bug c/59039] Undocumented __builtin_longjmp/__builtin_setjmp

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59039 --- Comment #21 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org --- It's only an error if they use the same jmpbuf.

[Bug rtl-optimization/59064] New: [4.9 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-ivdep-1.c (test for bogus messages, line )

Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: rtl-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org Target: ia64-*-* $ gcc/xgcc -Bgcc/ ../gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-ivdep-1.c -fno-diagnostics-show-caret -fdiagnostics

[Bug tree-optimization/58121] [4.9 regression] FAIL: cc1224a

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58121 Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/59109] New: [4.9 regression] ICE in mark_reachable_handlers, at tree-eh.c:3826

Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org CC: law at gcc dot gnu.org Target: ia64-*-* Broken by r204708. $ ../../xgcc -B../../ -c -O2 -g

[Bug target/58421] [4.9 regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20051216-1.c -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer (internal compiler error)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58421 --- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org --- Somewhere between 20131030 and 20131101.

[Bug libfortran/59227] New: [4.9 regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/erf_3.F90 -O0 execution test

Priority: P3 Component: libfortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org Blocks: 49024 Target: ia64-*-* $ gcc/gfortran -Bgcc/ -Bia64-suse-linux/./libgfortran/ ../gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/erf_3.F90 -fno

[Bug libfortran/49024] REAL*16 ERFC_SCALED inaccuracy

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49024 Bug 49024 depends on bug 59227, which changed state. Bug 59227 Summary: [4.9 regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/erf_3.F90 -O0 execution test http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59227 What|Removed |Added

[Bug libfortran/59227] [4.9 regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/erf_3.F90 -O0 execution test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59227 Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Last

[Bug libfortran/59227] [4.9 regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/erf_3.F90 -O0 execution test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59227 --- Comment #5 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org --- 4.68542210148937626195884133993966578E-0002 -1.87533922948603221391158058278771595E+0920

[Bug libfortran/59227] [4.9 regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/erf_3.F90 -O0 execution test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59227 --- Comment #7 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org --- -0.00347222 3.6169e-05 -6.27934e-07 1.52623e-08 -4.76946e-10 1.82167e-11 -8.22281e-13 4.28272e-14 -2.52799e-15 1.66777e-16 -1.21608e-17 9.71178e-19 -8.43037e-20 7.90347e-21 -7.95835e-22

[Bug libfortran/59227] [4.9 regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/erf_3.F90 -O0 execution test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59227 --- Comment #9 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org --- Looks like inv2x2 is wrong in _gfortran_erfc_scaled_r16: (gdb) i reg r42 r43 r420x0 0 r430x40072000 4613691527636451328

[Bug libfortran/59227] [4.9 regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/erf_3.F90 -O0 execution test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59227 --- Comment #10 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org --- 5.15453772226367323012693682499968245E-0002 4.72452324840876699523132987063922456E-0002 -1.87533922948603221391158058278771595E+0920 -5.09942677661379357690770320803840300E

[Bug libfortran/59227] [4.9 regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/erf_3.F90 -O0 execution test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59227 Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code

[Bug libfortran/59227] [4.9 regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/erf_3.F90 -O0 execution test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59227 Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|wrong-code | --- Comment #14

[Bug libfortran/59227] [4.9 regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/erf_3.F90 -O0 execution test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59227 --- Comment #16 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org --- Perhaps a suitable workaround would be to force linking the right __divtf3 into libgfortran.

[Bug libfortran/59227] [4.9 regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/erf_3.F90 -O0 execution test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59227 --- Comment #17 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org --- ia64 was using TFmode for 80 bit long double before r72916, so the __divtf3 name sticked for compatibility.

[Bug libfortran/59227] [4.9 regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/erf_3.F90 -O0 execution test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59227 --- Comment #20 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org --- It's not really a glibc bug, but a compatilibity wart.

[Bug libfortran/59227] [4.9 regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/erf_3.F90 -O0 execution test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59227 --- Comment #21 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org --- I'm not sure how to force linking in libgfortran Add libgcc/divtf3_s.o to the link line.

[Bug target/59230] New: __divtf3@@GCC_4.4.0 missing from libgcc_s.so.1

: target Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org Blocks: 59227 Target: ia64-*-* libgcc_s.so.1 does not provide the symbol __divtf3@@GCC_4.4.0, only the __divtf3@GCC_3.0 compatibility alias. This is causing the __divtf3

[Bug libfortran/59227] [4.9 regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/erf_3.F90 -O0 execution test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59227 --- Comment #22 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org --- Actually it appears to be a libgcc bug.

[Bug middle-end/59261] New: [4.9 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-26.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects (internal compiler error)

Keywords: ice-on-valid-code Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org Target: ia64-*-* $ gcc/xgcc -B gcc/ ../gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-26.c

[Bug c/59259] [x32] Incorrect packing and/or alignment when using a 64 bit type as array of zero length in a structure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59259 Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug driver/59321] -fuse-ld does not have effect on -print-prog-name

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59321 --- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org --- The driver doesn't actually call ld, but collect2, and passes -fuse-ld down to it.

[Bug c/59367] Syntax error with #pragma message before else

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59367 --- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org --- All preprocessing directives are deleted at the end of phase 4.

[Bug bootstrap/59536] [4.9 regression] internal compiler error: in cselib_record_set, at cselib.c:2376 breaks m68k-linux bootstrap

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59536 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org --- Between r205951 and r205984.

[Bug bootstrap/59536] [4.9 regression] internal compiler error: in cselib_record_set, at cselib.c:2376 breaks m68k-linux bootstrap

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59536 --- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org --- Created attachment 31468 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31468action=edit Preprocessed source

[Bug bootstrap/59536] [4.9 regression] internal compiler error: in cselib_record_set, at cselib.c:2376 breaks m68k-linux bootstrap

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59536 Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target|m68k-linux |m68k

[Bug bootstrap/59536] [4.9 regression] internal compiler error: in cselib_record_set, at cselib.c:2376 breaks m68k-linux bootstrap

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59536 Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug c++/59554] Errors with const and volatile in templates.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59554 Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug bootstrap/59536] [4.9 regression] internal compiler error: in cselib_record_set, at cselib.c:2376 breaks m68k-linux bootstrap

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59536 --- Comment #12 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org --- -fno-auto-inc-dec avoids the crash. Dup of #52306?

[Bug middle-end/52306] ICE in cselib_record_set, at cselib.c:2158

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52306 --- Comment #23 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org --- *** Bug 59536 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug bootstrap/59536] [4.9 regression] internal compiler error: in cselib_record_set, at cselib.c:2376 breaks m68k-linux bootstrap

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59536 Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/52306] [4.8/4.9 regression] ICE in cselib_record_set, at cselib.c:2158

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52306 --- Comment #26 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org --- What does that mean, it's too late?

[Bug target/59573] aarch64: commit 07ca5686e64 broken glibc-2.17

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59573 Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/59596] Unable to get the rpm file GCC 4.2 version for Linux X86_64 bit

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59596 Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/59598] very simple code using file open for read

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59598 Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug rtl-optimization/52714] [4.7/4.8/4.9 regression] ICE in fixup_reorder_chain, at cfglayout.c:880

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52714 --- Comment #11 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org --- try_combine is called with i1 = (insn 14 13 16 2 (set (reg/v/f:SI 34 [ stack ]) (reg/f:SI 15 %sp)) pr52714.c:9 38 {*movsi_m68k2} (nil)) i2 = (insn 16 14 17 2 (set (cc0

[Bug rtl-optimization/59649] New: [4.9 regression] conftest.c miscompiled

Priority: P3 Component: rtl-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org CC: nickc at gcc dot gnu.org Blocks: 59613 Target: ia64-*-* From ia64-suse-linux/libgomp/config.log: configure:16188

[Bug rtl-optimization/59649] [4.9 regression] conftest.c miscompiled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59649 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org --- gen_int_mode(-1, BImode) returning (const_int 1) looks wrong.

[Bug c/59668] extraneous error messages at -O1, -O2 and -O3 for valid code with string library functions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59668 --- Comment #7 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org --- 7.1.3 Reserved identifiers

[Bug c/59674] On m68k and vax variables stack variables with MAX_STACK_ALIGNMENT make ssp fail

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59674 --- Comment #7 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org --- If you have fundamental types with stricter alignment requirements than provided by STACK_BOUNDARY your ABI has a problem, and this SSP failure is just one symptom.

[Bug c++/54180] a bug using strcat function - it depends on variable declare order, but it should not.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54180 Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug target/54226] Executables compiled with -pie do not work on NetBSD/sparc or sparc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54226 Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last

[Bug go/54233] New: FAIL: runtime/pprof

Component: go AssignedTo: i...@airs.com ReportedBy: sch...@linux-m68k.org Target: powerpc64-*-* --- FAIL: pprof_test.TestCPUProfile (1.90 seconds) pprof_test.go:83: did not find ChecksumIEEE in the profile FAIL FAIL: runtime/pprof ../../../../libgo/testsuite/gotest: line

[Bug target/54142] [4.8 regression] ppc64 build failure - Unrecognized opcode: `sldi' (and `srdi`)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54142 Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug c++/54288] Wrong sign compiled at run-time

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54288 Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >