[Bug fortran/67740] Wrong association status of allocatable character pointer in derived types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67740 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clange001 at gmail dot com

[Bug fortran/106317] deferred-length character array pointer in derived type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106317 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE

[Bug fortran/86100] Spurious error with -fcheck=bounds and allocatable class(*) array components

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86100 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot

[Bug fortran/115070] [13/14/15 Regression] ICE using IEEE_ARITHMETIC in a derived type method with class, intent(out)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115070 --- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Replacing the scalar argument 'obs' by something with rank > 0 avoids the ICE, but then assumed-rank is not accepted with intent(out). Another bug...

[Bug fortran/115070] [13/14/15 Regression] ICE using IEEE_ARITHMETIC in a derived type method with class, intent(out)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115070 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||12.3.1 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug fortran/115072] Memory leak with unlimited polymorphic function result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115072 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Memory link with unlimited |Memory leak with unlimited

[Bug fortran/115039] Statement function with inquiry refs rejected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115039 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot

[Bug fortran/115039] Statement function with inquiry refs rejected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115039 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Keywords

[Bug fortran/115039] New: Statement function with inquiry refs rejected

: fortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- As reported in: https://fortran-lang.discourse.group/t/real-and-imaginary-parts-of-complex-number/1113/18 an inquiry reference (%re, %im) is incorrectly reported

[Bug fortran/86100] Spurious error with -fcheck=bounds and allocatable class(*) array components

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86100 --- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- The code fragment in comment#2 was added in r7-3760-g92c5266bbd5378.

[Bug fortran/86100] Spurious error with -fcheck=bounds and allocatable class(*) array components

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86100 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/114922] fsyntax-only need the modules

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114922 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status

[Bug fortran/114874] [14/15 Regression] ICE with select type, type is (character(*)), and substring

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114874 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/114874] [14/15 Regression] ICE with select type, type is (character(*)), and substring

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114874 --- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- The dump-fortran-original shows the following difference between 13 and 14: @@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ code: ASSIGN p:c 'abc' - BLOCK + SELECT TYPE symtree: '__tmp_CHARACTER_0_1'|| symbol

[Bug fortran/114859] [14/15 Regression] Seeing new segmentation fault in same_type_as since r14-9752

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114859 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code --- Comment #17

[Bug fortran/114827] Valgrind reports errors with class(*) assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114827 --- Comment #11 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Submitted: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2024-April/060464.html

[Bug fortran/114827] Valgrind reports errors with class(*) assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114827 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #58048|0 |1 is obsolete

[Bug fortran/114874] [14/15 Regression] ICE with select type, type is (character(*)), and substring

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114874 --- Comment #1 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to anlauf from comment #0) > The following code fails for me with latest 14-branch/15-release candidate: Oops, I meant: 14-release candidate/15-mainline after branching...

[Bug fortran/114874] [14/15 Regression] ICE with select type, type is (character(*)), and substring

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114874 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||10.5.0, 11.4.1, 12.3.1

[Bug fortran/114874] New: [14/15 Regression] ICE with select type, type is (character(*)), and substring

: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- The following code fails for me with latest 14-branch/15-release candidate: program p implicit none class

[Bug fortran/114827] Valgrind reports errors with class(*) assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114827 --- Comment #8 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 58056 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58056=edit Patch part 2. This part fixes the array case. Needs further testing.

[Bug fortran/114827] Valgrind reports errors with class(*) assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114827 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/102620] [12 Regression] ICE in gfc_get_array_span, at fortran/trans-array.c:865 since r12-1233-gd514626ee2566c68

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102620 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status

[Bug fortran/102620] [12 Regression] ICE in gfc_get_array_span, at fortran/trans-array.c:865 since r12-1233-gd514626ee2566c68

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102620 --- Comment #12 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #11) > It would be splendid if you would backport the patch. In the last week or > so, I have built up quite a list of backports to do, which I will

[Bug fortran/102620] [12 Regression] ICE in gfc_get_array_span, at fortran/trans-array.c:865 since r12-1233-gd514626ee2566c68

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102620 --- Comment #10 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #9) > (In reply to anlauf from comment #8) > > I get the same behavior at r13-8559 as 14-mainline. There seems to be > > another co

[Bug fortran/114815] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault - on creating type with len parameter and dependent on it character array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114815 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug fortran/114827] Valgrind reports errors with class(*) assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114827 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug fortran/103496] [F2018][TS29113] C_SIZEOF – rejects now valid args with 'must be an interoperable data entity'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103496 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status

[Bug fortran/102597] ICE in gfc_get_extern_function_decl, at fortran/trans-decl.c:2243 since r8-3365-gb89a63b916340ef2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102597 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||10.5.0, 11.4.1, 12.3.1

[Bug fortran/54389] [F2003/F2008 difference] PURE functions and pointer dummy arguments / DECL_PURE_P issue

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54389 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #7 from

[Bug fortran/114781] Error in ALLOCATE with MOLD=

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114781 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-04-19

[Bug fortran/103471] [11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE in gfc_typenode_for_spec, at fortran/trans-types.c:1114

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103471 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/114739] [14 Regression] ice in gfc_find_derived_types, at fortran/symbol.cc:2458

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114739 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/114739] [14 Regression] ice in gfc_find_derived_types, at fortran/symbol.cc:2458

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114739 --- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Reduced testcase: program main implicit complex(z) z2%re = 1. z2%im = 2. end

[Bug fortran/113793] malloc abort on character allocate with source argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113793 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |14.0 Resolution

[Bug fortran/114467] f951: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114467 --- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to thomas from comment #3) > (In reply to anlauf from comment #1) > > Can you attached a self-contained reproducer? > > > > The traceback looks familiar. Ar

[Bug fortran/114739] [14 Regression] ice in gfc_find_derived_types, at fortran/symbol.cc:2458

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114739 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code

[Bug fortran/95682] [11/12 Regression] Default assignment fails with allocatable array of deferred-length strings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95682 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||13.2.1, 14.0

[Bug fortran/113793] malloc abort on character allocate with source argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113793 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot

[Bug fortran/113793] malloc abort on character allocate with source argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113793 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||accepts-invalid

[Bug fortran/113793] malloc abort on character allocate with source argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113793 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #57931|0 |1 is obsolete

[Bug fortran/103496] [F2018][TS29113] C_SIZEOF – rejects now valid args with 'must be an interoperable data entity'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103496 --- Comment #5 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 57937 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57937=edit c_sizeof_8.f90 Here's a testcase derived from comment#0. Feel free to adapt it to your meet your ne

[Bug fortran/113793] malloc abort on character allocate with source argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113793 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #57354|0 |1 is obsolete

[Bug fortran/106500] ICE on function as an argument to c_sizeof()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106500 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone

[Bug fortran/103496] [F2018][TS29113] C_SIZEOF – rejects now valid args with 'must be an interoperable data entity'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103496 --- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- The code in comment#0 compiles at r14-9893-gded646c91d2c0f and gives the indicated results.

[Bug fortran/114626] Very long time for compilation the attached program, depends on value of a parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114626 --- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Another option is to not declare max_sum as parameter but as variable. With integer :: max_sum = 2 * max_ij ** 3 the code compiles almost instantly, but it has noticeable

[Bug fortran/106500] ICE on function as an argument to c_sizeof()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106500 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot

[Bug fortran/106500] ICE on function as an argument to c_sizeof()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106500 --- Comment #5 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to anlauf from comment #4) > What is unclear to me: when is an expression interoperable? > Or rather when is it *not*? > > (Note that the standard text has not essenti

[Bug fortran/106317] deferred-length character array pointer in derived type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106317 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||10.5.0, 11.4.1, 12.3.0

[Bug fortran/114626] Very long time for compilation the attached program, depends on value of a parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114626 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug fortran/114474] [11/12/13/14 Regression] DATA statement with derived type, pointer component rejected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114474 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug fortran/89925] [11 Regression] Wrong array bounds from ALLOCATE with SOURCE or MOLD

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89925 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status

[Bug libfortran/114618] Format produces incorrect output when contains 1x, ok when uses " "

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114618 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Component|fortran |libfortran See

[Bug fortran/106500] ICE on function as an argument to c_sizeof()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106500 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code

[Bug fortran/89925] [11 Regression] Wrong array bounds from ALLOCATE with SOURCE or MOLD

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89925 --- Comment #16 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- BTW: r12-5767 backports cleanly to 11-branch and regtests cleanly. I could push it if there are no objections, so that we can finally close this one.

[Bug fortran/89925] [11/12/13/14 Regression] Wrong array bounds from ALLOCATE with SOURCE or MOLD

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89925 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/89925] [11/12/13/14 Regression] Wrong array bounds from ALLOCATE with SOURCE or MOLD

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89925 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||12.3.0, 13.2.1, 14.0

[Bug fortran/104585] incorrect error for dummy arguments with both VALUE and DIMENSION attributes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104585 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/49278] ICE (segfault) when combining DATA with default initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49278 --- Comment #31 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- I've just checked the various comments. What's left: - comment#2 : the testcase still fails. See also comment#7 about the invalid partial initialization - lack of diagnostics of overlapping

[Bug fortran/113363] ICE on ASSOCIATE and unlimited polymorphic function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113363 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |REOPENED --- Comment #6

[Bug fortran/113412] ATAN(Y,X) does not check arguments and generates wrong error message.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113412 --- Comment #6 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to kargls from comment #5) > The pointers to expr->symtree is NULL. This new patch catches your example. It does, but behaves weird for some other cases. Try: program main c

[Bug fortran/87477] [meta-bug] [F03] issues concerning the ASSOCIATE statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87477 Bug 87477 depends on bug 113363, which changed state. Bug 113363 Summary: ICE on ASSOCIATE and unlimited polymorphic function https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113363 What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/113363] ICE on ASSOCIATE and unlimited polymorphic function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113363 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone

[Bug fortran/102620] [12 Regression] ICE in gfc_get_array_span, at fortran/trans-array.c:865 since r12-1233-gd514626ee2566c68

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102620 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[12/13 Regression] ICE in |[12 Regression] ICE

[Bug fortran/113412] ATAN(Y,X) does not check arguments and generates wrong error message.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113412 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/103368] [11/12/13 Regression] ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:15668 since r12-4464-g017665f63047ce47

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103368 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||14.0 Summary|[11

[Bug fortran/113956] [13/14 Regression] ice in gfc_trans_pointer_assignment, at fortran/trans-expr.cc:10524

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113956 --- Comment #5 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to anlauf from comment #4) > (In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #3) > > I can see why the assert is there but it is manifestly wrong for both the > > assume

[Bug fortran/99852] Missing error "Arithmetic overflow" for some cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99852 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status

[Bug fortran/99852] Missing error "Arithmetic overflow" for some cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99852 --- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- *** Bug 104848 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug fortran/104848] ICE in simplify_intrinsic_op, at fortran/expr.cc:1305

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104848 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE

[Bug fortran/92178] Segmentation fault after passing allocatable array as intent(out) and its element as value into the same subroutine

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92178 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org |mikael at gcc dot

[Bug fortran/106987] [11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE in simplify_intrinsic_op, at fortran/expr.cc:1305

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106987 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Target Milestone

[Bug fortran/103707] Stray "Array operands are incommensurate"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103707 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING --- Comment #10

[Bug fortran/113799] gfc_replace_expr: double free detected ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113799 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone

[Bug fortran/106987] [11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE in simplify_intrinsic_op, at fortran/expr.cc:1305

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106987 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #6

[Bug fortran/50410] ICE in record_reference, pointer variable in data statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50410 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[11/12/13/14 Regression]|ICE in record_reference

[Bug fortran/113956] [13/14 Regression] ice in gfc_trans_pointer_assignment, at fortran/trans-expr.cc:10524

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113956 --- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #3) > I can see why the assert is there but it is manifestly wrong for both the > assumed length target and a constant length. That's why I wanted t

[Bug fortran/113956] [13/14 Regression] ice in gfc_trans_pointer_assignment, at fortran/trans-expr.cc:10524

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113956 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |13.3 CC

[Bug fortran/114474] [11/12/13/14 Regression] DATA statement with derived type, pointer component rejected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114474 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-03-27

[Bug fortran/114474] [11/12/13/14 Regression] DATA statement with derived type, pointer component rejected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114474 --- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 57817 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57817=edit Draft patch This adds a fixup of the expression type of the actual argument of the DT constructor wh

[Bug fortran/114475] [14 Regression] Regression with iso_c_binding and submodules

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114475 --- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Jürgen Reuter from comment #1) > I suspect this commit here, > https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit; > h=44c0398e65347def316700911a51ca8b4ec0a411 > but not tot

[Bug fortran/114475] [14 Regression] Regression with iso_c_binding and submodules

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114475 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status

[Bug fortran/114474] [11/12/13/14 Regression] DATA statement with derived type, pointer component rejected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114474 --- Comment #1 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Might have been caused by the fix for pr67804 (r10-10418).

[Bug fortran/114467] f951: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114467 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed

[Bug fortran/114474] [11/12/13/14 Regression] DATA statement with derived type, pointer component rejected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114474 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid Known

[Bug fortran/114474] New: [11/12/13/14 Regression] DATA statement with derived type, pointer component rejected

Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- While working on pr50410, I noticed that the following code works with gfortran <= 9.5.0, but fails with 10.

[Bug fortran/101135] Load of null pointer when passing absent assumed-shape array argument for an optional dummy argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101135 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone

[Bug fortran/114438] Missed constraint F2023:c7108

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114438 --- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- The same text existed in F2018, so it is not new: F2018:C7103 and Note 1. Either every compiler developer team misunderstood that clause, or we need an interp, based on the example, to be able

[Bug fortran/114438] Missed constraint F2023:c7108

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114438 --- Comment #1 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Can you be a little more explicit? If I extend the program as follows: type(params) :: p p = params( 0.1, 2.0 ) write(*,*) p p = params( 0.1, 2 ) write(*,*) p I get

[Bug fortran/104848] ICE in simplify_intrinsic_op, at fortran/expr.cc:1305

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104848 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug fortran/104848] ICE in simplify_intrinsic_op, at fortran/expr.cc:1305

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104848 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||14.0 --- Comment #6 from

[Bug fortran/49565] character(kind=4) is emitted as DW_ATE_unsigned, not DW_ATE_unsigned_char

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49565 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|WAITING Resolution

[Bug fortran/24546] [meta-bug] gfortran debugging problems

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24546 Bug 24546 depends on bug 49565, which changed state. Bug 49565 Summary: character(kind=4) is emitted as DW_ATE_unsigned, not DW_ATE_unsigned_char https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49565 What|Removed

[Bug fortran/77517] ICE in conv_intrinsic_move_alloc, at fortran/trans-intrinsic.c:9517

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77517 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug fortran/94377] [PDT] ICE when deallocating a parameterized derived type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94377 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW Last reconfirmed|2020

[Bug fortran/24546] [meta-bug] gfortran debugging problems

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24546 Bug 24546 depends on bug 49565, which changed state. Bug 49565 Summary: character(kind=4) is emitted as DW_ATE_unsigned, not DW_ATE_unsigned_char https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49565 What|Removed

[Bug fortran/49565] character(kind=4) is emitted as DW_ATE_unsigned, not DW_ATE_unsigned_char

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49565 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug fortran/103715] [11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE in gfc_find_gsymbol, at fortran/symbol.c:4301 since r9-3803-ga5fbc2f36a291cbe

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103715 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug fortran/114001] is_contiguous considers unlimited polymorphic dummy always as contiguous

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114001 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone

[Bug fortran/80012] FIXME in diagnostic "%s procedure at %L is already declared as %s procedure" from symbol.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80012 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >