[Bug c++/18143] [4.0 Regression] Duplicated thunk with a huge member in the hierarchy

2004-11-10 Thread nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-10 17:26 --- 2004-11-10 Nathan Sidwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] * tree.c (tree_check_failed): Emit general error if the list of node types is empty. PR c++/18143 * cp-tree.h

[Bug c++/18143] [4.0 Regression] Duplicated thunk with a huge member in the hierarchy

2004-11-10 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-10 17:35 --- Subject: Bug 18143 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-10 17:34:48 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog tree.c gcc/cp

[Bug c++/18143] [4.0 Regression] Duplicated thunk with a huge member in the hierarchy

2004-10-28 Thread mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-28 17:02 --- Nathan, this is a result of your change to limit the maximum size of a thunk. If we're going to keep that limit, we need to have a sorry() somewhere when making a bigger thunk. Or, we could restore the

[Bug c++/18143] [4.0 Regression] Duplicated thunk with a huge member in the hierarchy

2004-10-28 Thread nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-28 17:09 --- yes, I havebeen meaning to revert it, but wanted to measure the performance hit. I will make sure I get to it. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18143

[Bug c++/18143] [4.0 Regression] Duplicated thunk with a huge member in the hierarchy

2004-10-25 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-25 13:20 --- I get an ICE on the mainline without disabling checking: pr18143.cc:20: internal compiler error: in make_thunk, at cp/method.c:127 Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source if appropriate.