--- Comment #4 from bangerth at dealii dot org 2006-03-08 05:09 ---
I agree with Richard and Andrew. I don't see why we should issue different
diagnostics for essentially the same case.
W.
--
bangerth at dealii dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-17 11:51 ---
I agree with Pinskia here - also the detection of a constant RHS is difficult
and
will cause followup PRs that we do not catch all cases.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25808
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-16 15:27 ---
Both of these are questionable, I don't see why there should be a different
diagnostic.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25808
--- Comment #2 from dcb314 at hotmail dot com 2006-01-16 22:28 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Both of these are questionable, I don't see why there should be a different
diagnostic.
Because the two different diagnostics make it easier to grep for.
For example, Intel C++ compiler finds
