https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42355
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2021-12-09 00:00:00 |2024-2-20
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42355
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2010-01-04 19:39:44 |2021-12-9
Known to fail|
--- Comment #13 from peter_foelsche at agilent dot com 2010-01-08 21:37
---
boost::mpl::sort seems to be known to be a memory hog.
Also on other platforms.
I replaced this with other code.
--
peter_foelsche at agilent dot com changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #9 from peter_foelsche at agilent dot com 2010-01-04 18:12
---
Created an attachment (id=19464)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19464action=view)
tmp.ii
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42355
--- Comment #11 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-04 19:45
---
A random backtrace from where we take endless time and memory:
#0 0x007b8a46 in pp_c_type_qualifier_list (pp=0x18b6280,
t=0x756b8dc8)
at
--- Comment #12 from peter_foelsche at agilent dot com 2010-01-04 20:00
---
(In reply to comment #10)
Please also provide output of g++ -v. If you manage to compile this
successfully then the output of -ftime-report will also be interesting.
Confirmed with -g (-g0 is very fast and
--- Comment #7 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-12-26 14:04
---
Please provide a self-contained .ii, see:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/#report
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42355
--- Comment #8 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-12-26 14:06
---
Also, please do your best to minimize it, see:
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/A_guide_to_testcase_reduction
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42355
--- Comment #6 from peter_foelsche at agilent dot com 2009-12-15 20:58
---
Created an attachment (id=19313)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19313action=view)
tmp.cpp
g++ -c tmp.cpp -I ~/boost_1_40_0 -g
-g is important
--
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-13 15:04 ---
Please update to 4.4.2 at least. Without a testcase we can't do anything
here.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from peter_foelsche at agilent dot com 2009-12-12 01:34
---
Created an attachment (id=19280)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19280action=view)
console output of the compiler
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42355
--- Comment #2 from peter_foelsche at agilent dot com 2009-12-12 01:36
---
maybe on Monday I can create an instance like described of the offending
classes
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42355
--- Comment #3 from peter_foelsche at agilent dot com 2009-12-12 01:37
---
the compiler takes more than 10GB of RAM.
There is 40GB of RAM available.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42355
--- Comment #4 from peter_foelsche at agilent dot com 2009-12-12 01:40
---
the same happens with boost 1_40
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42355
14 matches
Mail list logo
