https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78147
Dan Raviv changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dan.raviv at gmail dot com
--- Comment #8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78147
--- Comment #7 from Paul Smith ---
I don't really think this change is related to -Wunused-private-field: at least
I don't see any relationship.
My personal preference would be to not even bother to create an option for
this; I think that GCC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78147
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Tillmann Karras from comment #5)
> This warning is useful, but as was pointed out in comment #2, it currently
> triggers three times for each parameter.
That's a separate issue, now reported
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78147
Tillmann Karras changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tilkax at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78147
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78147
--- Comment #3 from Paul Smith ---
Unfortunately not because I never had time to do more than the patch attached
here: in particular I didn't hook it up to any command-line arguments, nor did
I add regression tests for it. I didn't think it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78147
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2017-03-17 00:00:00 |2018-11-14
--- Comment #2 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78147
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
