https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80518
--- Comment #8 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #7)
> The guideline might be changing:
> https://github.com/isocpp/CppCoreGuidelines/pull/1448
> If that pull request is merged we might want to change
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80518
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
The guideline might be changing:
https://github.com/isocpp/CppCoreGuidelines/pull/1448
If that pull request is merged we might want to change -Wsuggest-override too,
without needing a separate option.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80518
--- Comment #6 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Arnaud Desitter from comment #2)
> Interesting. Shame that there is no rationale.
>
> I suppose that "-Wsuggest-override=2" could warn about "override" missing
> for destructor.
I'd just like
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80518
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
https://github.com/isocpp/CppCoreGuidelines/issues/721
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80518
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||redi at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80518
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80518
--- Comment #2 from Arnaud Desitter ---
Interesting. Shame that there is no rationale.
I suppose that "-Wsuggest-override=2" could warn about "override" missing for
destructor.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80518
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
--- Comment #1 from
