--- Comment #9 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-03 09:49
---
(In reply to comment #8)
The bug seems to have disappeared from current mainline and is not present
on gomp branch either. Should it be closed?
It is fixed on both mainline and 4.1 (probably by one of Paul T's
--- Comment #8 from martin at mpa-garching dot mpg dot de 2005-11-11 07:46
---
The bug seems to have disappeared from current mainline and is not present
on gomp branch either. Should it be closed?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19669
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-27
17:13 ---
*** Bug 21986 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From martin at mpa-garching dot mpg dot de
2005-01-28 11:14 ---
Created an attachment (id=8089)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8089action=view)
compressed testcase
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19669
--
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Known to fail||4.0.0
--- Additional Comments From coudert at clipper dot ens dot fr 2005-01-28
11:49 ---
As always with modules, reducing is indeed painful. There are already many bugs
reported with modules and gfortran (some of them even very basic), and this
could probably be one of those. Unless you have
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||coudert at clipper dot ens
||dot fr
--- Additional Comments From martin at mpa-garching dot mpg dot de
2005-01-28 14:41 ---
OK, I managed to reduce the testcase (phew!). Here it is:
module ModelData
implicit none
Type ClTransferData
integer :: NumSources
end Type ClTransferData
Type(ClTransferData) :: CTransScal
end
--- Additional Comments From martin at mpa-garching dot mpg dot de
2005-01-28 14:43 ---
(From update of attachment 8089)
a reduced testcase can be found in the comments
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From coudert at clipper dot ens dot fr 2005-01-28
14:59 ---
I think this is a duplicate of PR16861 (probably the most annoying bug on
scientific codes these days, since they do use modules a lot).
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19669
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-28
15:02 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
I think this is a duplicate of PR16861 (probably the most annoying bug on
scientific codes these days, since they do use modules a lot).
This is not a duplicate of PR16861.
Here
11 matches
Mail list logo
