http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55465
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55465
Bug 55465 depends on bug 48858, which changed state.
Bug 48858 Summary: Incorrect error for same binding label on two generic
interface specifics
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48858
What|Removed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55465
--- Comment #14 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: burnus
Date: Mon May 20 20:08:05 2013
New Revision: 199120
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=199120root=gccview=rev
Log:
2013-05-20 Tobias Burnus bur...@net-b.de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55465
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55465
--- Comment #13 from Juno Krahn juno.krahn at nih dot gov 2012-11-30 17:21:08
UTC ---
This issue was once discussed by members of the Fortran standards committee. I
don't recall if that was on usenet or somewhere in the committee meeting
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55465
--- Comment #12 from Fran Martinez Fadrique fmartinez at gmv dot com
2012-11-27 09:49:20 UTC ---
After readign the standard carefully again (I have the formal version for f2k3,
not the draft for f2k8) I cannot really see how the need for
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55465
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||janus at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55465
--- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-26 17:08:20 UTC ---
Note: The same behavior occurs with all gfortran versions I tried (4.3, 4.6,
4.7 and trunk).
The check which rejects it is in gfc_verify_binding_labels
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55465
--- Comment #5 from Fran Martinez Fadrique fmartinez at gmv dot com
2012-11-26 17:36:04 UTC ---
I have also tried with ekopath and g95 and both take it without a diagnostic.
I have been checking section 15.4 of the ISO standard and I have
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55465
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55465
Juno Krahn juno.krahn at nih dot gov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||juno.krahn
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55465
--- Comment #8 from Juno Krahn juno.krahn at nih dot gov 2012-11-26 19:55:11
UTC ---
Also, I should have mentioned that multiple interface specs used to work in Gnu
Fortran, and it still works in current Intel, Sun and Open64 Fortran
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55465
Harald Anlauf anlauf at gmx dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gmx
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55465
--- Comment #10 from Harald Anlauf anlauf at gmx dot de 2012-11-26 20:24:56
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
Well, then somebody should also complain to NAG.
The code in comment #6 fails to compile.
And to IBM.
% xlf -qversion
IBM
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55465
--- Comment #11 from Harald Anlauf anlauf at gmx dot de 2012-11-26 20:57:53
UTC ---
I'm also having difficulties to see how the interface definition
could be standard compatible. The F2k8 draft says:
15.5.1 Deļ¬nition and reference of
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55465
--- Comment #1 from Fran Martinez Fadrique fmartinez at gmv dot com
2012-11-25 18:19:56 UTC ---
Created attachment 28773
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28773
Supporting file to compile the main source for the report
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55465
--- Comment #2 from Fran Martinez Fadrique fmartinez at gmv dot com
2012-11-25 18:21:36 UTC ---
Created attachment 28774
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28774
The main file where the problem is encountered
17 matches
Mail list logo
