[Bug fortran/80766] [7/8 Regression] [OOP] ICE with type-bound procedure returning an array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80766 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/80766] [7/8 Regression] [OOP] ICE with type-bound procedure returning an array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80766 --- Comment #12 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: janus Date: Mon Jun 5 09:31:32 2017 New Revision: 248873 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248873=gcc=rev Log: 2017-06-05 Janus Weil Backport from trunk

[Bug fortran/80766] [7/8 Regression] [OOP] ICE with type-bound procedure returning an array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80766 --- Comment #11 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: janus Date: Mon May 22 17:08:24 2017 New Revision: 248341 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248341=gcc=rev Log: 2017-05-22 Janus Weil PR fortran/80766

[Bug fortran/80766] [7/8 Regression] [OOP] ICE with type-bound procedure returning an array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80766 --- Comment #10 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #9) > (In reply to janus from comment #8) > > This shows one ICE in the testsuite: > > > > FAIL: gfortran.dg/typebound_proc_32.f90 -O (internal compiler

[Bug fortran/80766] [7/8 Regression] [OOP] ICE with type-bound procedure returning an array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80766 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug fortran/80766] [7/8 Regression] [OOP] ICE with type-bound procedure returning an array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80766 --- Comment #8 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to janus from comment #5) > This rather simple patch fixes the ICE on trunk: > > Index: gcc/fortran/resolve.c > === > ---

[Bug fortran/80766] [7/8 Regression] [OOP] ICE with type-bound procedure returning an array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80766 --- Comment #7 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to janus from comment #6) > I just verified that reverting the class.c parts of r241450 fixes the ICE as > well. It does not show any failures on the select_type_* test cases either. >

[Bug fortran/80766] [7/8 Regression] [OOP] ICE with type-bound procedure returning an array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80766 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/80766] [7/8 Regression] [OOP] ICE with type-bound procedure returning an array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80766 --- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to janus from comment #4) > I actually think that r241450 might be more relevant here than r241403 (in > particular since it messes with gfc_find_derived_vtab). I just verified that

[Bug fortran/80766] [7/8 Regression] [OOP] ICE with type-bound procedure returning an array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80766 --- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- I have investigated a bit on the origin of the problem, and it seems that it is related to the vtype symbols not being resolved properly (and the TBP component having the type BT_UNKNOWN although

[Bug fortran/80766] [7/8 Regression] [OOP] ICE with type-bound procedure returning an array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80766 --- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #3) > Revision r241395+patch (2016-10-21) is OK, r241433+patch (2016-10-21) gives > the ICE. AFAICT the only possible revision is the range is

[Bug fortran/80766] [7/8 Regression] [OOP] ICE with type-bound procedure returning an array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80766 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > > Confirmed, likely r241403 (pr69566). > > Not so sure here. Looks rather unrelated to me. Why do you think this one > is the culprit? Revision r241395+patch (2016-10-21) is OK, r241433+patch