https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110842
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110842
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
--- Comment #5 from Martin Jambor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110842
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||openmp
--- Comment #4 from Tobias
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110842
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
> Why a regression?
It worked before (if only by accident), hence I put "Regression" there.
> libgomp has no support for loop iterators larger than 64-bit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110842
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Why a regression?
libgomp has no support for loop iterators larger than 64-bit unsigned, and I
believe in OpenMP it is implementation defined which iterator type is used.
C/C++ OpenMP loops with __int128 or
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110842
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
Keywords|
