--- Comment #6 from sayle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-25 22:27 ---
Subject: Bug 23673
Author: sayle
Date: Sat Feb 25 22:27:54 2006
New Revision: 111442
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=111442
Log:
PR middle-end/23673
* fold-const.c (fold_binary)
--- Comment #7 from roger at eyesopen dot com 2006-02-25 23:36 ---
Fixed on mainline.
--
roger at eyesopen dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-04 04:28 ---
I am no longer going to work on this, it is too much hasle to get this fixed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-02 18:12 ---
ok, I have a fix without rewritting some of fold_binary. I just needed to
added a check for BIT_XOR_EXPR comming back, like invert_expr does.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23673
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-02 03:17 ---
Hmm, this is getting harder (unless I just want to do (a^CST) == CST and (a^b)
== 0. I am still deciding if I want to fix fold_binary from stoping from
returning a new tree if it does nothing except for switch the
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-30 16:44 ---
I am going to fix this one.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-17
02:12 ---
Confirmed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
