https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97092
Alex Coplan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97092
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Andrea Corallo
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:41a2a54476cba88376c4b30ca8b94b4a088a66ce
commit r10-9153-g41a2a54476cba88376c4b30ca8b94b4a088a66ce
Author: Andrea
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97092
--- Comment #10 from Andrea Corallo ---
"acoplan at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs" writes:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97092
>
> --- Comment #9 from Alex Coplan ---
> Thanks for fixing this Andrea! FWIW I can reproduce the
"acoplan at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs" writes:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97092
>
> --- Comment #9 from Alex Coplan ---
> Thanks for fixing this Andrea! FWIW I can reproduce the ICE with the same
> testcase and options on the head of the GCC 10 branch (contrary to my
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97092
--- Comment #9 from Alex Coplan ---
Thanks for fixing this Andrea! FWIW I can reproduce the ICE with the same
testcase and options on the head of the GCC 10 branch (contrary to my first
message).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97092
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Andrea Corallo :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:499651e43854ea65303eb55324263c25256c9735
commit r11-5926-g499651e43854ea65303eb55324263c25256c9735
Author: Andrea Corallo
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97092
--- Comment #7 from Andrea Corallo ---
"rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs"
writes:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97092
>
> --- Comment #6 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
> ---
> (In reply to Andrea Corallo from
"rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs"
writes:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97092
>
> --- Comment #6 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
> ---
> (In reply to Andrea Corallo from comment #5)
>> "rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs"
>> writes:
>>
>> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97092
--- Comment #6 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
(In reply to Andrea Corallo from comment #5)
> "rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs"
> writes:
>
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97092
> >
> > --- Comment #4 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97092
--- Comment #5 from Andrea Corallo ---
"rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs"
writes:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97092
>
> --- Comment #4 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
> ---
> (In reply to Andrea Corallo from
"rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs"
writes:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97092
>
> --- Comment #4 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
> ---
> (In reply to Andrea Corallo from comment #3)
>> Created attachment 49710 [details]
>> PR97092.patch
>>
>> What is going on is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97092
--- Comment #4 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
(In reply to Andrea Corallo from comment #3)
> Created attachment 49710 [details]
> PR97092.patch
>
> What is going on is that in 'update_costs_from_allocno' we try to
> identify the smallest
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97092
--- Comment #3 from Andrea Corallo ---
What is going on is that in 'update_costs_from_allocno' we try to
identify the smallest mode using narrower_subreg_mode to then update the
costs.
The two modes involved here are E_DImode and E_VNx2QImode,
What is going on is that in 'update_costs_from_allocno' we try to
identify the smallest mode using narrower_subreg_mode to then update the
costs.
The two modes involved here are E_DImode and E_VNx2QImode, cause these
are not ordered we ICE in 'paradoxical_subreg_p'.
Now I don't know if the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97092
--- Comment #2 from Andrea Corallo ---
"akrl at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs" writes:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97092
>
> --- Comment #1 from akrl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
> Hi all,
>
> I can't reproduce this on current
"akrl at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs" writes:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97092
>
> --- Comment #1 from akrl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
> Hi all,
>
> I can't reproduce this on current master (76a1719f0ff), I guess has been
> fixed in the meanwhile?
As not said I swapped two
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97092
--- Comment #1 from akrl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Hi all,
I can't reproduce this on current master (76a1719f0ff), I guess has been
fixed in the meanwhile?
Andrea
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97092
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.3
18 matches
Mail list logo
