http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44141
Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ra |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44141
--- Comment #20 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-09 18:06:52 UTC ---
Author: uros
Date: Wed May 9 18:06:47 2012
New Revision: 187347
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=187347
Log:
PR target/44141
* config/i386/i386.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44141
Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44141
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|rtl-optimization|target
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44141
--- Comment #18 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2012-05-08 10:32:33
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #17)
Which makes this a target bug then. Uros?
Following the explanation in comment #16, I'd say so.
Please note that we already
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44141
--- Comment #8 from Venkataramanan venkataramanan.kumar at amd dot com
2012-03-27 10:46:53 UTC ---
Created attachment 27013
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27013
Simplied test case form ac.f90
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44141
--- Comment #9 from Venkataramanan venkataramanan.kumar at amd dot com
2012-03-27 10:51:06 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
Created attachment 27013 [details]
Simplied test case form ac.f90
GCC revision : 184502
Command to reproduce: gfortran
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44141
--- Comment #4 from Venkataramanan venkataramanan.kumar at amd dot com
2012-03-22 13:17:34 UTC ---
I dont have permission to confirm this bug.
Here is my analysis for the cause.
#(insn:TI 4886 4885 4888 132 (set (reg:V2DF 25 xmm4 [8797])
#
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44141
--- Comment #5 from Venkataramanan venkataramanan.kumar at amd dot com
2012-03-22 13:23:39 UTC ---
Created attachment 26955
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26955
Simple patch to print vmovups at assembly generation stage
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44141
--- Comment #6 from Venkataramanan venkataramanan.kumar at amd dot com
2012-03-22 13:26:16 UTC ---
This patch tries to change vmovupd to vmovups during assembly printing stage
when tuning flag for bdver1 is set.
I am yet to test this one.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44141
Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44141
xiaoyuanbo xiaoyuanbo at yeah dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xiaoyuanbo at yeah
--- Comment #1 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-05-14 15:31 ---
*** Bug 44142 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44141
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-14 16:35 ---
I suppose the optimization can be re-implemented as a peephole2 or as
optimization
in the assembler instead?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44141
14 matches
Mail list logo