[Bug target/44141] Redundant loads and stores generated for AMD bdver1 target

2012-05-09 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44141 Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|ra |

[Bug target/44141] Redundant loads and stores generated for AMD bdver1 target

2012-05-09 Thread uros at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44141 --- Comment #20 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-09 18:06:52 UTC --- Author: uros Date: Wed May 9 18:06:47 2012 New Revision: 187347 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=187347 Log: PR target/44141 * config/i386/i386.c

[Bug target/44141] Redundant loads and stores generated for AMD bdver1 target

2012-05-09 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44141 Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug target/44141] Redundant loads and stores generated for AMD bdver1 target

2012-05-08 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44141 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Component|rtl-optimization|target ---

[Bug target/44141] Redundant loads and stores generated for AMD bdver1 target

2012-05-08 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44141 --- Comment #18 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2012-05-08 10:32:33 UTC --- (In reply to comment #17) Which makes this a target bug then. Uros? Following the explanation in comment #16, I'd say so. Please note that we already

[Bug target/44141] Redundant loads and stores generated for AMD bdver1 target

2012-03-27 Thread venkataramanan.kumar at amd dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44141 --- Comment #8 from Venkataramanan venkataramanan.kumar at amd dot com 2012-03-27 10:46:53 UTC --- Created attachment 27013 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27013 Simplied test case form ac.f90

[Bug target/44141] Redundant loads and stores generated for AMD bdver1 target

2012-03-27 Thread venkataramanan.kumar at amd dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44141 --- Comment #9 from Venkataramanan venkataramanan.kumar at amd dot com 2012-03-27 10:51:06 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) Created attachment 27013 [details] Simplied test case form ac.f90 GCC revision : 184502 Command to reproduce: gfortran

[Bug target/44141] Redundant loads and stores generated for AMD bdver1 target

2012-03-22 Thread venkataramanan.kumar at amd dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44141 --- Comment #4 from Venkataramanan venkataramanan.kumar at amd dot com 2012-03-22 13:17:34 UTC --- I dont have permission to confirm this bug. Here is my analysis for the cause. #(insn:TI 4886 4885 4888 132 (set (reg:V2DF 25 xmm4 [8797]) #

[Bug target/44141] Redundant loads and stores generated for AMD bdver1 target

2012-03-22 Thread venkataramanan.kumar at amd dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44141 --- Comment #5 from Venkataramanan venkataramanan.kumar at amd dot com 2012-03-22 13:23:39 UTC --- Created attachment 26955 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26955 Simple patch to print vmovups at assembly generation stage

[Bug target/44141] Redundant loads and stores generated for AMD bdver1 target

2012-03-22 Thread venkataramanan.kumar at amd dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44141 --- Comment #6 from Venkataramanan venkataramanan.kumar at amd dot com 2012-03-22 13:26:16 UTC --- This patch tries to change vmovupd to vmovups during assembly printing stage when tuning flag for bdver1 is set. I am yet to test this one.

[Bug target/44141] Redundant loads and stores generated for AMD bdver1 target

2012-03-22 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44141 Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug target/44141] Redundant loads and stores generated for AMD bdver1 target

2012-02-22 Thread xiaoyuanbo at yeah dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44141 xiaoyuanbo xiaoyuanbo at yeah dot net changed: What|Removed |Added CC||xiaoyuanbo at yeah

[Bug target/44141] Redundant loads and stores generated for AMD bdver1 target

2010-05-14 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-05-14 15:31 --- *** Bug 44142 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44141

[Bug target/44141] Redundant loads and stores generated for AMD bdver1 target

2010-05-14 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-14 16:35 --- I suppose the optimization can be re-implemented as a peephole2 or as optimization in the assembler instead? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44141