https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80210
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--- Comment #22 from Peter
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80210
--- Comment #21 from Peter Bergner ---
Author: bergner
Date: Fri Dec 15 03:41:16 2017
New Revision: 255671
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255671=gcc=rev
Log:
gcc/
Backport from mainline
2017-10-02 Peter Bergner
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80210
--- Comment #20 from Peter Bergner ---
Author: bergner
Date: Thu Dec 14 17:43:32 2017
New Revision: 255655
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255655=gcc=rev
Log:
gcc/
Backport from mainline
2017-10-02 Peter Bergner
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80210
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80210
--- Comment #18 from Peter Bergner ---
Author: bergner
Date: Mon Oct 2 16:56:58 2017
New Revision: 253358
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253358=gcc=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR target/80210
* config/rs6000/rs6000.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80210
--- Comment #17 from Peter Bergner ---
(In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #16)
> I have a patch that I am testing that fixes both new problems.
Patch for these two problems submitted here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80210
--- Comment #16 from Peter Bergner ---
While investigating the new failure in Comment 15, I modified the test case
slightly to move the #pragma to the beginning of the test case. I found I get
another similar looking ICE, but which isn't the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80210
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80210
--- Comment #14 from Aldy Hernandez ---
Author: aldyh
Date: Wed Sep 13 17:10:05 2017
New Revision: 252485
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252485=gcc=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR target/80210
* config/rs6000/rs6000.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80210
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--- Comment #13 from Peter
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80210
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80210
--- Comment #11 from Peter Bergner ---
Author: bergner
Date: Tue Aug 22 20:13:11 2017
New Revision: 251293
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251293=gcc=rev
Log:
gcc/
Backport from mainline
2017-08-17 Peter Bergner
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80210
--- Comment #10 from Peter Bergner ---
Author: bergner
Date: Tue Aug 22 20:10:58 2017
New Revision: 251292
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251292=gcc=rev
Log:
gcc/
Backport from mainline
2017-08-17 Peter Bergner
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80210
--- Comment #9 from Peter Bergner ---
Author: bergner
Date: Tue Aug 22 20:08:51 2017
New Revision: 251291
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251291=gcc=rev
Log:
gcc/
Backport from mainline
2017-08-17 Peter Bergner
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80210
--- Comment #8 from Peter Bergner ---
Fixed on trunk. I'm testing backports to the open release branches and will
commit them after the trunk patch has aged a bit (next week?).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80210
--- Comment #7 from Peter Bergner ---
Author: bergner
Date: Fri Aug 18 23:41:41 2017
New Revision: 251190
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251190=gcc=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR target/80210
* config/rs6000/rs6000.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80210
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80210
--- Comment #5 from Michael Meissner ---
On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 07:26:57PM +, bergner at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80210
>
> --- Comment #4 from Peter Bergner ---
> So it seems
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80210
--- Comment #4 from Peter Bergner ---
So it seems rs6000_pragma_target_parse() ends up calling
rs6000_option_override_internal(), which is modifying the options via global
variables. All other arches pass in the option variables to their
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80210
--- Comment #3 from Peter Bergner ---
A more direct test case:
bergner@bns:~/gcc/BUGS/PR80210> cat sqrt.i
double
foo (double a)
{
return __builtin_sqrt (a);
}
#pragma GCC target "no-powerpc-gpopt"
bergner@bns:~/gcc/BUGS/PR80210>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80210
--- Comment #2 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Confirmed. The define_expand condition is *not* checked?! Possibly by
the pow->sqrt code (yeah I'm guessing here).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80210
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
22 matches
Mail list logo
