https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84366
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84366
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84366
--- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
All ordered comparisons (< <= > >=) with at least one argument NaN should
raise invalid, so it's indeed just one case of bug 58684.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84366
--- Comment #2 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Oh wait, this one is comparing 0. to NaN, not the same thing?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84366
--- Comment #1 from Segher Boessenkool ---
This is just the ieee128 variant of PR58684, right?
