[Bug testsuite/71021] [libatomic testsuite] Test program compilation fail (missing -pthread flag)

2016-06-30 Thread romain.geissler at amadeus dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71021 Romain Geissler changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |INVALID

[Bug testsuite/71021] [libatomic testsuite] Test program compilation fail (missing -pthread flag)

2016-06-30 Thread romain.geissler at amadeus dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71021 Romain Geissler changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug testsuite/71021] [libatomic testsuite] Test program compilation fail (missing -pthread flag)

2016-05-12 Thread nsz at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71021 --- Comment #4 from nsz at gcc dot gnu.org --- this might be a different issue, but then i'm not sure how you made the gcc build to use the alternate glibc path. can you attach the libatomic/testsuite/Makefile (with the CC etc variables set)? i

[Bug testsuite/71021] [libatomic testsuite] Test program compilation fail (missing -pthread flag)

2016-05-11 Thread romain.geissler at amadeus dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71021 --- Comment #3 from Romain Geissler --- Please note that this is the only target lib that fails for me. Others (like libgomp) are fine.

[Bug testsuite/71021] [libatomic testsuite] Test program compilation fail (missing -pthread flag)

2016-05-11 Thread romain.geissler at amadeus dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71021 --- Comment #2 from Romain Geissler --- The very same thing happens with gcc 6.1.1.

[Bug testsuite/71021] [libatomic testsuite] Test program compilation fail (missing -pthread flag)

2016-05-09 Thread nsz at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71021 nsz at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nsz at gcc dot gnu.org ---