https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81900
--- Comment #11 from Aldy Hernandez ---
Author: aldyh
Date: Wed Sep 13 17:14:07 2017
New Revision: 252505
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252505=gcc=rev
Log:
2017-08-21 Richard Biener
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81900
Yui NARUSE changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||naruse at airemix dot jp
--- Comment #10
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81900
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Aug 21 13:18:35 2017
New Revision: 251226
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251226=gcc=rev
Log:
2017-08-21 Richard Biener
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81900
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81900
--- Comment #7 from pipcet at gmail dot com ---
I can confirm that fixes things here, thank you!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81900
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
Ah ...
@@ -2396,9 +2446,6 @@ compute_antic (void)
if (e->flags & EDGE_ABNORMAL)
{
bitmap_set_bit (has_abnormal_preds, block->index);
-
- /* We also anticipate
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81900
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
So while there is one simple issue with the iteration, fix:
@@ -2119,14 +2170,13 @@ static sbitmap has_abnormal_preds;
static bool
compute_antic_aux (basic_block block, bool block_has_abnormal_pred_edge)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81900
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81900
--- Comment #3 from pipcet at gmail dot com ---
I've investigated some more, and Mikael's bisection appears to confirm my
investigation:
The problem appears to be this chunk:
@@ -2418,7 +2423,9 @@ compute_antic (void)