http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55445
--- Comment #5 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-23 07:25:49
UTC ---
*** Bug 57040 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57040
Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56895
André Wöbbeking Woebbeking at web dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57026
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57041
Bug #: 57041
Summary: ICE in lookup_field_1, at cp/search.c:376 (with
dot-prefixed structure initialisation)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57041
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57041
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57003
Kirill Smirnov kirill.k.smirnov at math dot spbu.ru changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57003
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56988
Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.7.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57041
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-23
10:06:37 UTC ---
lookup_field_1 instead of IDENTIFIER_NODE gets the error_mark_node, and the
following assert chokes on it:
gcc_assert (identifier_p (name));
It
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57042
Bug #: 57042
Summary: ICE/Segfault with -fdump-parse-tree
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57043
Bug #: 57043
Summary: converting overloaded complex function pow in C++11 is
ambiguous
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57044
Bug #: 57044
Summary: The following code won't compile with -std=c++0x
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57045
Bug #: 57045
Summary: Build failure in libgo/runtime/proc.c: error:
‘({anonymous})’ may be used uninitialized in this
function
Classification: Unclassified
Product:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57045
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57036
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57044
--- Comment #1 from Piergiorgio Beruto pberuto at yahoo dot com 2013-04-23
10:36:46 UTC ---
Work Around is the following (add an intermediate const variable):
templatetypename T_
inline explicit myclass(T_ *s)
{
const uint32_t sz =
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57044
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57046
Bug #: 57046
Summary: wrong code generated by gcc 4.8.0 on i686
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57044
--- Comment #3 from Piergiorgio Beruto pberuto at yahoo dot com 2013-04-23
10:48:19 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Please read http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs
Is this really what you're compiling?
nemaspace and ... should not be there and
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57044
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-23
10:54:49 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Ok sorry I'm new to GCC bugzilla, If you need real code I'll provide it.
That's why you should read http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57036
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-23
11:06:50 UTC ---
Reduced testcase:
extern void g (void);
extern __inline __attribute__ ((__always_inline__,__leaf__))
f ()
{
g ();
}
struct __jmp_buf_tag *b;
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57043
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57045
--- Comment #2 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2013-04-23 11:20:09
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Reported on the ml as well, caused by extra abnormal edges into getcontext.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57036
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57046
--- Comment #1 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2013-04-23
11:31:06 UTC ---
Created attachment 29918
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29918
Single-file test case.
I can reproduce the wrong-code on
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57036
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-23
11:32:08 UTC ---
Either don't inline into functions receiving non-local gotos or remove
the ECF_LEAF handling from the call-may-do-longjmp predicate.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57034
--- Comment #4 from Christopher Hite christopher.hite at jpmorgan dot com
2013-04-23 11:35:25 UTC ---
64-bit.
Thanks for pointing out I was converting to float and back. Both of the
following work:
int32_t z3=(qFuture = double(MAX)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57036
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-23
11:56:47 UTC ---
One idea was to mark calls with whether they may induce abnormal control flow
and when inlining, do not make abnormal edges off any calls in the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57034
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-23
11:59:35 UTC ---
Guess you should read something about floating point.
0x7fff of course can't be represented exactly in IEEE 754 single precision
format, so when you
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57046
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57046
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57046
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-23
12:26:35 UTC ---
We have after the get_value call:
(insn 73 30 32 6 (set (reg:SI 76 [ D.1441 ])
(reg:SI 0 ax)) pr57046.c:42 85 {*movsi_internal}
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57047
Bug #: 57047
Summary: [C++11] stl_pair.h:137:64: internal compiler error:
Segmentation fault in constexpr constructor
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57047
--- Comment #1 from Matt Clarkson mattyclarkson at gmail dot com 2013-04-23
12:53:18 UTC ---
Created attachment 29919
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29919
The preprocessed output before the ICE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57048
Bug #: 57048
Summary: [4.9 Regression] Handling of C_PTR and C_FUNPTR leads
to reject valid
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57048
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56909
nightstrike nightstrike at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57047
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57047
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57047
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-23
13:26:46 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
The error happens on line 15 of task.cpp, so you could at least remove
everything after that, and anything else not
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57047
--- Comment #5 from Matt Clarkson mattyclarkson at gmail dot com 2013-04-23
13:42:50 UTC ---
Jonathan, apologies for putting it under libstdc++ and also for putting it as a
blocker. I didn't do that because I thought it was blocking my
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57047
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-23
13:47:52 UTC ---
We have lots of ICEs, they can't all block a release :)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57047
--- Comment #7 from Matt Clarkson mattyclarkson at gmail dot com 2013-04-23
13:53:04 UTC ---
Created attachment 29920
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29920
A simplified reproducible test case
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57047
--- Comment #8 from Matt Clarkson mattyclarkson at gmail dot com 2013-04-23
14:07:44 UTC ---
Created attachment 29921
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29921
A very short reproducible test case (85 loc)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57047
--- Comment #9 from Matt Clarkson mattyclarkson at gmail dot com 2013-04-23
14:17:10 UTC ---
This is a problem with both 4.7.2 and 4.8.0. Checked on
http://coliru.stacked-crooked.com/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55308
--- Comment #11 from Anton Shterenlikht mexas at bristol dot ac.uk 2013-04-23
14:20:11 UTC ---
The same error on the same sparc64/FreeBSD -current system
building 4.9:
gmake[5]: Leaving directory
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56909
--- Comment #18 from Arthur Zhang mail2arthur at gmail dot com 2013-04-23
14:31:12 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #17)
What is the driving factor that is causing you to want to make the gcc build
so
complicated?
I am building
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57036
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57047
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57046
Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57049
Bug #: 57049
Summary: std::swap does self move assignment, which is illegal
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57049
--- Comment #1 from Tudor Bosman tudorb at fb dot com 2013-04-23 15:54:18 UTC
---
Actually, I'll take this back. I don't believe this is a bug.
17.6.4.9 constraints arguments passed to STL functions. So if there is a
library function
--disable-plugin --disable-tls --enable-checking=yes
--disable-libssp --disable-libgomp --disable-libmudflap --with-cpu=cortex-a15
--with-fpu=neon-vfpv4 --with-float=softfp
Thread model: single
gcc version 4.9.0 20130423 (experimental) (GCC)
Thanks,
Greta
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57003
--- Comment #9 from Kirill Smirnov kirill.k.smirnov at math dot spbu.ru
2013-04-23 15:56:59 UTC ---
... whatever memcpy implementation you are calling and see whether it
correctly returns the first argument it has been passed to it in all
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57003
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-23
16:00:52 UTC ---
But __builtin_memcpy isn't necessarily the inline memcpy code, it can very well
be a library call too.
Anyway, this bugreport doesn't have a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56739
--- Comment #1 from Anton Shterenlikht mexas at bristol dot ac.uk 2013-04-23
16:11:33 UTC ---
building gcc-4.9-20130414 gives different error:
libtool: compile: /usr/ports/lang/gcc49/work/build/./gcc/xgcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57051
Bug #: 57051
Summary: Optimization regression in 4.8.0 from 4.7.2
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57044
--- Comment #5 from Piergiorgio Beruto pberuto at yahoo dot com 2013-04-23
17:04:01 UTC ---
Created attachment 29923
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29923
preprocessed source
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57044
--- Comment #6 from Piergiorgio Beruto pberuto at yahoo dot com 2013-04-23
17:06:46 UTC ---
Ok, my fault for missing the instructions.
However, I hope to have included everything you need now.
SYSTEM:
Linux sabayon 3.5.0-sabayon #1 SMP Tue Sep
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57044
--- Comment #7 from Piergiorgio Beruto pberuto at yahoo dot com 2013-04-23
17:08:17 UTC ---
Sorry for posting an archive, but the size of the .ii file was too big for
being submitted to bugzilla.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57034
--- Comment #6 from Christopher Hite christopher.hite at jpmorgan dot com
2013-04-23 17:26:26 UTC ---
Good, I was a big worried I couldn't convert ints to floats unless the int was
safely mappable. It rounds which is what I'd expect.
I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57044
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57034
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-23
17:42:25 UTC ---
GCC bugzilla is a bug reporting mechanism, not a C++ discussion forum, so
better follow-up elsewhere. That said, yes, if qFuture isn't negative and is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57016
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56605
Bill Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57003
--- Comment #11 from Kirill Smirnov kirill.k.smirnov at math dot spbu.ru
2013-04-23 21:33:10 UTC ---
I'm sorry I cannot reproduce invalid behaviour within a refined test case.
Instead I can provide commented asm dump from wine.
This
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57016
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56196
--- Comment #1 from simon at pushface dot org 2013-04-23 21:57:57 UTC ---
The bug appears to be fixed in the released GCC 4.8.0.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57003
--- Comment #12 from Kirill Smirnov kirill.k.smirnov at math dot spbu.ru
2013-04-23 22:01:18 UTC ---
I' sorry, forgot to mention compiler flags: -O2 -g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56915
--- Comment #3 from Shixiong shixiong at kugelworks dot com 2013-04-23
23:09:17 UTC ---
Created attachment 29924
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29924
Patch for PR56915
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56915
--- Comment #4 from Shixiong shixiong at kugelworks dot com 2013-04-23
23:09:58 UTC ---
Please see the attached Patch for this ICE.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57052
Bug #: 57052
Summary: missed optimization with rotate and mask
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57017
--- Comment #4 from Alan Aversa aaversa at optics dot arizona.edu 2013-04-24
05:58:29 UTC ---
Created attachment 29925
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29925
the REAL preprocessed source file
sorry, I uploaded the
75 matches
Mail list logo
