http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58954
Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57893
--- Comment #2 from Paul Thomas pault at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: pault
Date: Fri Nov 1 06:56:41 2013
New Revision: 204286
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204286root=gccview=rev
Log:
2013-11-01 Paul Thomas pa...@gcc.gnu.org
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58948
Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58957
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58955
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58925
octoploid at yandex dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58384
Igor Zamyatin izamyatin at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||izamyatin at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58956
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52015
Matan matanshukry at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matanshukry at gmail
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58384
--- Comment #4 from Yuri Rumyantsev ysrumyan at gmail dot com ---
I checked that the fix for PR58831 does not cure the issue, but we cab close
this bug since 253.perlbmk is passed now with pre-reload scheduler.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58958
Bug ID: 58958
Summary: [4.9 Regression] Wrong aliasing info for variable
index
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58959
Bug ID: 58959
Summary: Add warning when format specifiers refers to wrong
signess
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58959
--- Comment #1 from Markus Mayer lotharlutz at gmx dot de ---
Created attachment 31131
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31131action=edit
preprocessed test file
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58959
--- Comment #2 from Markus Mayer lotharlutz at gmx dot de ---
Created attachment 31132
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31132action=edit
output of 'gcc -v -save-temps -Wall -Wextra test.c'
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58952
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
That's a bug in uclibc, it should be a function (not a macro) in C++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58952
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Oh sorry, I didn't read your report properly - so we're missing the #undef that
would fix it
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52015
--- Comment #25 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
See comment 15 - it's only fixed if you use mingw-w64, and is not possible to
fix for mingw
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58952
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58952
--- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Fri Nov 1 11:10:55 2013
New Revision: 204291
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204291root=gccview=rev
Log:
2013-11-01 Paolo Carlini
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58952
--- Comment #5 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Fri Nov 1 11:16:56 2013
New Revision: 204292
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204292root=gccview=rev
Log:
2013-11-01 Paolo Carlini
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58952
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58954
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58954
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58960
Bug ID: 58960
Summary: [4.9 regression] ICE in bmp_iter_set_init
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58961
Bug ID: 58961
Summary: missing variable may be used uninitialized in this
function
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58961
afenkart at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||afenkart at gmail dot com
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57636
gcc at mag32 dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gcc at mag32 dot net
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57636
--- Comment #4 from gcc at mag32 dot net ---
Created attachment 31134
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31134action=edit
-save-temps file
This is the -save-temps file generated when I run the offending command.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58904
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58962
Bug ID: 58962
Summary: Pretty printers use obsolete Python syntax
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58947
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58962
--- Comment #1 from Bruce Merry bmerry at gmail dot com ---
I've now realised that this is actually just the tip of the iceberg - I suspect
that libstdc++'s pretty printers aren't Python 3 ready, while Ubuntu is
shipping a gdb linked to libython
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58961
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Well this is most likely a dup of another bug.
test.c:22:8: warning: ‘a’ is used uninitialized in this function
[-Wuninitialized]
maybe used is closer to what it should be.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58834
--- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: glisse
Date: Fri Nov 1 15:23:24 2013
New Revision: 204296
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204296root=gccview=rev
Log:
2013-11-01 Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58834
Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55252
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||michael at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58953
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58948
--- Comment #2 from sshannin at gmail dot com ---
Ahh, good call. I forgot that it would parse like that.
I wonder if there's any way to declare it such that the namespaces/types are
unambiguous that will parse correctly in both the c++11 and
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58948
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58845
Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ice-on-valid-code, |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58115
--- Comment #7 from Bernd Edlinger bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de ---
Created attachment 31136
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31136action=edit
reduced test case
apparently this is not yet fixed...
reduced test case attached.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58862
--- Comment #9 from Paulo J. Matos pa...@matos-sorge.com ---
I didn't manage to reproduce the bug yet. With the git sha before my commit
4bc0f16, I get the following on a profiledbootstrap on x64:
insn-opinit.c: In function 'void
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58862
--- Comment #10 from Teresa Johnson tejohnson at google dot com ---
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 10:01 AM, pa...@matos-sorge.com
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58862
--- Comment #9 from Paulo J. Matos
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58862
--- Comment #11 from Teresa Johnson tejohnson at google dot com ---
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 10:14 AM, Teresa Johnson tejohn...@google.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 10:01 AM, pa...@matos-sorge.com
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58862
--- Comment #12 from Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com ---
Untar the file from the link [1] to a temp dir, go to the gcc directory in the
temp dir and type:
path-to-gcc-build-dir/gcc/lto1 @ccBysEru.args
Reading object files: build/genmddeps.o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58948
--- Comment #4 from Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com ---
(In reply to sshannin from comment #2)
I wonder if there's any way to declare it such that the namespaces/types are
unambiguous that will parse correctly in both the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58963
Bug ID: 58963
Summary: Does C++ need flag_complex_method = 2?
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58964
Bug ID: 58964
Summary: [4.9 Regression] Bogus message: error:
-mpreferred-stack-boundary=0 is not between 2 and 12
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58845
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenther
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58845
--- Comment #4 from Volker Reichelt reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Btw, clang 3.2 accepts the first code snippet and rejects the second one.
I.e. it accepts and || for vectors and returns a vector of the same size.
IMHO GCC should also go for
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58115
--- Comment #8 from Bernd Edlinger bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de ---
Created attachment 31137
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31137action=edit
untested patch
targetm.set_current_function modifies
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58965
Bug ID: 58965
Summary: [4.8/4.9 Regression] [c++11] ICE with member
initializer in static union
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58965
Volker Reichelt reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58965
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58966
Bug ID: 58966
Summary: [4.9 Regression] [c++11] ICE with wrong usage of
constexpr
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58967
Bug ID: 58967
Summary: Powerpc -mlra cannot compile quadrature_lib.cc in
Spec2006 with -O3 -ffast-math -funroll-loops -m32
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58968
Bug ID: 58968
Summary: Powerpc -mlra cannot compile ormas1.f in gamess Spec
2006 with -m32 -mcpu=power7 -O3 -mlra -w -ffast-math
-funroll-loops
Product: gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58969
Bug ID: 58969
Summary: bogus error: the value of 'kName' is not usable in a
constant expression
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55252
--- Comment #12 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org ---
PR52962 is another case where it would make more sense to give the error on the
macro expansion location rather than on the macro definition.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43736
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44781
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48326
--- Comment #6 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot
com ---
On Fri, 1 Nov 2013, michael at talamasca dot ocis.net wrote:
Do I have to file a separate bug report in order to fix the problem that
current GCC releases
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40635
--- Comment #3 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org ---
This somehow got worse. Now we only warn with -O1 or -Os but not with -O2 or
-O3.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58708
--- Comment #9 from emsr at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: emsr
Date: Fri Nov 1 23:00:48 2013
New Revision: 204305
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204305root=gccview=rev
Log:
gcc/cp:
2013-11-01 Edward Smith-Rowland 3dw...@verizon.net
64 matches
Mail list logo
