[Bug ipa/81133] [8 Regression] PGO/LTO bootstrap: ICE: in inline_small_functions, at ipa-inline.c:1891

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81133 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug c++/55203] No unused warning for variables of non-trivial types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55203 --- Comment #16 from Jonathan Wakely --- I missed this update, sorry. (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #15) > Jonathan, what's the next step? It sounds as though you don't think > decorating nearly every libstdc++ class makes sense. I'd

[Bug tree-optimization/81249] [8 Regression] ICE: error: incompatible types in PHI argument 0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81249 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/55203] No unused warning for variables of non-trivial types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55203 --- Comment #17 from Marc Glisse --- I wonder if attributes unused / warn_unused should be automatically inherited by classes when a member or base has it (with various rules, maybe unused has priority over warn_unused). For a tuple of locks or

[Bug sanitizer/81262] New: [8 Regression] verify_flow_info failed for asmgoto test-case with -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81262 Bug ID: 81262 Summary: [8 Regression] verify_flow_info failed for asmgoto test-case with -fsanitize=undefined Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/81258] [7/8 Regression] ICE on C++1z code with invalid decomposition declaration: in cp_finish_decl, at cp/decl.c:6760

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81258 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/81020] [6/7/8 Regression] wrong code with -O -fno-tree-bit-ccp -fno-tree-coalesce-vars -fno-tree-vrp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81020 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/81257] [8 Regression] ICE on invalid C++ template code: in make_typename_type, at cp/decl.c:3709

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81257 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/81253] Flags -march and -mtune are ignored

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81253 Philipp changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/81248] No ipa-sra optimization for small struct / class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81248 --- Comment #7 from wilhelm.me...@hs-kl.de --- Looks like also no optimization is done for non-template function g(const uint8_t&).

[Bug c++/81260] New: Error "taking address of temporary" is missing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81260 Bug ID: 81260 Summary: Error "taking address of temporary" is missing Product: gcc Version: 5.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug sanitizer/81021] stack-use-after-scope false positive error with exceptions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81021 --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Fri Jun 30 08:51:00 2017 New Revision: 249833 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249833=gcc=rev Log: Call BUILT_IN_ASAN_HANDLE_NO_RETURN before BUILT_IN_UNWIND_RESUME (PR

[Bug c++/54769] [Core/1111] dependent class method template not found if structure template with the same name is visible

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54769 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #7

[Bug c++/81250] C++ warnings about unused stl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81250 --- Comment #6 from Marc Glisse --- See PR 55203.

[Bug sanitizer/81262] [8 Regression] verify_flow_info failed for asmgoto test-case with -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81262 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Version|7.0 |8.0 Target Milestone|---

[Bug ipa/81261] [8 Regression] ICE with -fno-guess-branch-probability

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81261 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Version|7.0 |8.0 Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/55203] No unused warning for variables of non-trivial types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55203 Jon Grant changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jg at jguk dot org --- Comment #18 from Jon

[Bug tree-optimization/81249] [8 Regression] ICE: error: incompatible types in PHI argument 0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81249 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri Jun 30 08:08:33 2017 New Revision: 249831 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249831=gcc=rev Log: 2017-06-30 Richard Biener PR

[Bug ipa/81261] New: [8 Regression] ICE with -fno-guess-branch-probability

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81261 Bug ID: 81261 Summary: [8 Regression] ICE with -fno-guess-branch-probability Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code Severity: normal

[Bug ipa/81261] [8 Regression] ICE with -fno-guess-branch-probability

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81261 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug sanitizer/81021] stack-use-after-scope false positive error with exceptions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81021 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||8.0 Known to fail|

[Bug rtl-optimization/81020] [6/7/8 Regression] wrong code with -O -fno-tree-bit-ccp -fno-tree-coalesce-vars -fno-tree-vrp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81020 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/81258] [7/8 Regression] ICE on C++1z code with invalid decomposition declaration: in cp_finish_decl, at cp/decl.c:6760

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81258 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug sanitizer/81262] [8 Regression] verify_flow_info failed for asmgoto test-case with -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81262 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ipa/80597] [8 Regression] internal compiler error: in compute_inline_parameters, at ipa-inline-analysis.c:3126

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80597 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug sanitizer/81262] [8 Regression] verify_flow_info failed for asmgoto test-case with -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81262 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 41654 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41654=edit gcc8-pr81262.patch Untested fix.

[Bug c++/81229] [8 Regression] ICE in c_tree_chain_next on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81229 --- Comment #6 from Nathan Sidwell --- Author: nathan Date: Fri Jun 30 11:40:08 2017 New Revision: 249835 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249835=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/81229 * name-lookup.c (do_pushdecl): Reset IDENTIFIER_TYPE

[Bug sanitizer/81262] [8 Regression] verify_flow_info failed for asmgoto test-case with -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81262 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek --- Bet asm goto isn't handled correctly in fix_up_fall_thru_edges or in add_labels_and_missing_jumps. Looking at the former, I'm puzzled how it works at all, seems e.g. the cond_jump variable can hold edge for

[Bug c++/55203] No unused warning for variables of non-trivial types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55203 --- Comment #19 from Jonathan Wakely --- cppcheck isn't a compiler, it just does simple pattern matching and maybe uses whitelists/blacklists of types. I don't think anything it does is really relevant to GCC.

[Bug c++/81229] [8 Regression] ICE in c_tree_chain_next on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81229 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/80510] Optimize Power7/power8 Altivec load/stores

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80510 --- Comment #10 from Michael Meissner --- Author: meissner Date: Fri Jun 30 12:09:12 2017 New Revision: 249836 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249836=gcc=rev Log: [gcc] 2017-06-30 Michael Meissner

[Bug ipa/81214] GCC target_clone support does not work for global functions with no references

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81214 --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Fri Jun 30 13:51:19 2017 New Revision: 249840 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249840=gcc=rev Log: Fix removal of ifunc (PR ipa/81214). 2017-06-30 Martin Liska

[Bug ipa/81214] GCC target_clone support does not work for global functions with no references

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81214 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||8.0 Known to fail|

[Bug fortran/81265] New: allocatable coarrays in submodule subroutines wrongly identified as unallocated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81265 Bug ID: 81265 Summary: allocatable coarrays in submodule subroutines wrongly identified as unallocated Product: gcc Version: 7.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/81265] allocatable coarrays in submodule subroutines wrongly identified as unallocated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81265 --- Comment #1 from Anton Shterenlikht --- On Cray seems to run fine too. Sorry for crooked rushed English. The code itself is very simple, so should be clear what's going on. But I think if I put all code in a single file, then I cannot

[Bug target/81266] New: FAIL: 30_threads/thread/native_handle/typesizes.cc execution test on darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81266 Bug ID: 81266 Summary: FAIL: 30_threads/thread/native_handle/typesizes.cc execution test on darwin Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug target/81266] FAIL: 30_threads/thread/native_handle/typesizes.cc execution test on darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81266 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- This was previously only run for GNU/Linux, Solaris and AIX, but is now enabled for all pthreads targets. I don't think this particular test will ever pass for targets where is_pointer is true.

[Bug c++/81259] New: Class template deduction cannot work on Constructor without parameters in some cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81259 Bug ID: 81259 Summary: Class template deduction cannot work on Constructor without parameters in some cases Product: gcc Version: 7.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/81192] [8 Regression] gcc ICE at -Os on x86_64-linux-gnu: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81192 --- Comment #11 from Tom de Vries --- Created attachment 41658 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41658=edit 3 - Ignore EDGE_DFS_BACK in tail-merge This is a fix for the issue noted in comment 7: EDGE_DFS_BACK is in an

[Bug middle-end/81172] Expected new warning option -Warray-bounds-pointer-arithmetic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81172 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic

[Bug debug/81267] New: Missing DW_AT_type in DW_TAG_typedef of "typedef of typedef of void"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81267 Bug ID: 81267 Summary: Missing DW_AT_type in DW_TAG_typedef of "typedef of typedef of void" Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/80014] [6/7/8 Regression] Caret missing in error message

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80014 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/81260] Error "taking address of temporary" is missing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81260 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/81265] allocatable coarrays in submodule subroutines wrongly identified as unallocated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81265 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/81162] [8 Regression] UBSAN switch triggers incorrect optimization in SLSR

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81162 --- Comment #7 from Bill Schmidt --- This case comes up when we're going to replace a NEGATE_EXPR with a PLUS_EXPR or MINUS_EXPR. This is another case of an unprofitable replacement that should be avoided anyway. So I think the following fix

[Bug target/81225] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE with -mavx512ifma -O3 -ffloat-store

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81225 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Jun 30 14:52:24 2017 New Revision: 249844 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249844=gcc=rev Log: PR target/81225 * config/i386/sse.md (vec_extract_lo_): For

[Bug target/81225] [6/7 Regression] ICE with -mavx512ifma -O3 -ffloat-store

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81225 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[6/7/8 Regression] ICE with |[6/7 Regression] ICE with

[Bug c++/80014] [6/7/8 Regression] Caret missing in error message

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80014 --- Comment #6 from David Malcolm --- Author: dmalcolm Date: Fri Jun 30 15:20:55 2017 New Revision: 249845 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249845=gcc=rev Log: Fix location of typeid() (PR c++/80014) gcc/cp/ChangeLog: PR c++/80014

[Bug tree-optimization/81192] [8 Regression] gcc ICE at -Os on x86_64-linux-gnu: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81192 --- Comment #9 from Tom de Vries --- Created attachment 41656 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41656=edit 1 - Fix sigsegv in find_same_succ_bb Essentially the same as the fix in comment 3.

[Bug tree-optimization/81192] [8 Regression] gcc ICE at -Os on x86_64-linux-gnu: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81192 Tom de Vries changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #41650|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug tree-optimization/81192] [8 Regression] gcc ICE at -Os on x86_64-linux-gnu: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81192 --- Comment #12 from Tom de Vries --- Currently bootstrapping and reg-testing patch series on x86_64.

[Bug libstdc++/81263] Work around CWG issue 1558 (guarantee SFINAE when using `void_t`)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81263 W E Brown changed: What|Removed |Added CC||webrown.cpp at gmail dot com --- Comment #1

[Bug c/81269] wrong color highlighting in -Wrestrict warnings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81269 --- Comment #1 from Martin Sebor --- Created attachment 41660 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41660=edit Even more unusual behavior seen in my enhancement. Attached is another screenshot, this one showing even more unusual

[Bug debug/81267] Missing DW_AT_type in DW_TAG_typedef of "typedef of typedef of void"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81267 --- Comment #1 from Pedro Alves --- xref: https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2017-06/msg00827.html

[Bug c/81269] New: wrong color highlighting in -Wrestrict warnings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81269 Bug ID: 81269 Summary: wrong color highlighting in -Wrestrict warnings Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug ipa/81261] [8 Regression] ICE with -fno-guess-branch-probability

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81261 --- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka --- Author: hubicka Date: Fri Jun 30 21:09:13 2017 New Revision: 249856 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249856=gcc=rev Log: PR ipa/81261 * tree-inline.c (expand_call_inline): Combine profile

[Bug libstdc++/81263] Work around CWG issue 1558 (guarantee SFINAE when using `void_t`)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81263 TC changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rs2740 at gmail dot com --- Comment #2 from TC

[Bug target/81268] [avr] Support __gcc_isr pseudo-instruction for more efficient ISR prologues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81268 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization

[Bug target/68467] libgcc, compilation for target m68k-linux breaks in linux_atomic.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68467 --- Comment #18 from Carlos Soto --- (In reply to angelo from comment #17) > Hi Carlos, > > maybe you can try one of these 2 toolchains i prepared years ago: > > http://sysam.it/toolchains.html > > Regads, > Angelo > Hi angelo, thanks for

[Bug target/81268] New: [avr] Support __gcc_isr pseudo-instruction for more efficient ISR prologues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81268 Bug ID: 81268 Summary: [avr] Support __gcc_isr pseudo-instruction for more efficient ISR prologues Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug tree-optimization/81245] [8 Regression] ICE building calculix with -Ofast

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81245 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ipa/81214] GCC target_clone support does not work for global functions with no references

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81214 --- Comment #5 from Michael Meissner --- The change commited in svn id 249840, does fix the problem on the PowerPC. Thanks.

[Bug c++/81257] [8 Regression] ICE on invalid C++ template code: in make_typename_type, at cp/decl.c:3709

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81257 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Fri Jun 30 21:08:53 2017 New Revision: 249855 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249855=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/81257 - ICE with invalid ::template. PR c++/54769 - wrong

[Bug c++/54769] [Core/1111] dependent class method template not found if structure template with the same name is visible

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54769 --- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Fri Jun 30 21:08:53 2017 New Revision: 249855 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249855=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/81257 - ICE with invalid ::template. PR c++/54769 - wrong

[Bug tree-optimization/58012] Gcc bootstrap failed with cloog-isl: undefined reference to std::istream::ignore(long)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58012 Mario Emmenlauer changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mario at emmenlauer dot de ---

[Bug c++/81270] New: [concepts] ill-formed code with a constrained variable declaration with multiple declarators with different deduced types not rejected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81270 Bug ID: 81270 Summary: [concepts] ill-formed code with a constrained variable declaration with multiple declarators with different deduced types not rejected Product: gcc

[Bug c++/54769] [Core/1111] dependent class method template not found if structure template with the same name is visible

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54769 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/54769] [Core/1111] dependent class method template not found if structure template with the same name is visible

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54769 --- Comment #9 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Fri Jun 30 22:20:22 2017 New Revision: 249857 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249857=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/54769 - wrong lookup of dependent template-name. PR

[Bug c++/81257] [8 Regression] ICE on invalid C++ template code: in make_typename_type, at cp/decl.c:3709

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81257 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Fri Jun 30 22:20:22 2017 New Revision: 249857 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249857=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/54769 - wrong lookup of dependent template-name. PR

[Bug fortran/78387] OpenMP segfault/stack size exceeded writing to internal file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78387 --- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Related to pr81195 and pr81241? Works on darwin with 8 threads.

[Bug middle-end/81172] Expected new warning option -Warray-bounds-pointer-arithmetic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81172 --- Comment #5 from Xi Ruoyao --- (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #4) > Clang diagnoses the the cases where the offset or index is a constant > expression (and under the expected option) but it doesn't diagnose others > where the

[Bug c++/81257] [8 Regression] ICE on invalid C++ template code: in make_typename_type, at cp/decl.c:3709

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81257 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/78387] OpenMP segfault/stack size exceeded writing to internal file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78387 --- Comment #10 from Jim Wilson --- newunit_stack needs to be allocated dynamically, just like the newunits array. I modified libgfortran to compute the highest value of newunit_tos, and print it when the program exits. I set

[Bug c++/45976] optional template keyword is not accepted by g++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45976 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/78387] OpenMP segfault/stack size exceeded writing to internal file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78387 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c/81264] New: fixincludes/fixincl.c fails on DEBUG build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81264 Bug ID: 81264 Summary: fixincludes/fixincl.c fails on DEBUG build Product: gcc Version: 6.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug c++/81250] C++ warnings about unused stl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81250 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/55203] No unused warning for variables of non-trivial types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55203 --- Comment #20 from Martin Sebor --- *** Bug 81250 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***