http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55272
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55272
--- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-12
11:03:46 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Mon Nov 12 11:03:42 2012
New Revision: 193429
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193429
Log:
2012-11-12
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55272
--- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-12
11:09:50 UTC ---
FIXED on the 4.8 trunk (which was only affected).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55272
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55282
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55297
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55291
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55395
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55225
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-21
13:46:41 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Wed Nov 21 13:46:34 2012
New Revision: 193695
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193695
Log:
2012-11-21
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55225
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55427
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55444
Bug #: 55444
Summary: Rejects valid code with USE ISO_C_BINDING in BLOCK
DATA
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55462
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-25
19:59:11 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Sun Nov 25 19:59:07 2012
New Revision: 193796
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193796
Log:
2012-11-25
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55462
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55469
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55469
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-26
10:23:54 UTC ---
Didn't help. The following should work. The crucial part is free_line. At a
glance free_saved(dtp) (here and in comment 2) seems also to be sensible
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55465
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55475
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55476
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54572
--- Comment #10 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-27
09:32:55 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
Created attachment 28779 [details]
Patch to use libbacktrace
I have to apply the following patch on your patch in order
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54572
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55476
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-27
19:21:09 UTC ---
Too simple patch. It won't work in the following case:
module m
integer, pointer :: p
contains
subroutine test
integer, target :: t
p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55476
--- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-27
19:23:34 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
Too simple patch. It won't work in the following case:
… and it shouldn't: That's actually a case where the warning is correct!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37336
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55476
--- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-27
22:20:49 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Tue Nov 27 22:20:44 2012
New Revision: 193872
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193872
Log:
2012-11-27
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55476
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55501
--- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-28
10:48:58 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
type(MPI_Datatype) :: MPI_INTEGER = merge(MPI_Datatype(4), MPI_Datatype(8),
.false.)
The problem is related to having
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55501
--- Comment #8 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-28
10:54:56 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
+tsource-expr_type != EXPR_STRUCTURE)
That's not okay: If you have
integer, allocatable :: a(:), b(:)
one has
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55501
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55501
--- Comment #12 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-28
14:54:33 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
integer :: i(-1:1) = 0
print *, lbound(merge(i,i,.true.))
Without the patch, this prints:
1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52161
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52161
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-28
21:42:21 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Wed Nov 28 21:42:17 2012
New Revision: 193908
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193908
Log:
2012-11-28
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52161
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52161
--- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-29
08:43:57 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Thu Nov 29 08:43:48 2012
New Revision: 193924
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193924
Log:
2012-11-28
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55469
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55539
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37336
--- Comment #15 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-03
08:54:26 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Mon Dec 3 08:54:18 2012
New Revision: 194075
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194075
Log:
2012-11-03
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55475
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-03
08:56:22 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Mon Dec 3 08:56:11 2012
New Revision: 194076
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194076
Log:
2012-12-03
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55475
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46897
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55574
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37336
--- Comment #17 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-03
21:13:50 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Mon Dec 3 21:13:42 2012
New Revision: 194104
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194104
Log:
2012-12-03
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55593
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55591
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55601
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55534
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55603
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55603
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-05
10:14:03 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
The problem seems to be that we fail to do auto-deallocation of the function
result (after the assignment). One should check
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55534
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-06
00:04:34 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
I addition to the patch in comment #2 tried:
That piece I also had, but I forgot to include it in the diff. (I have too
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55618
Bug #: 55618
Summary: [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Failures with
ISO_Varying_String test suite
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55618
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-07
21:13:57 UTC ---
Created attachment 28898
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28898
Test case (still depends on the iso_varying_string module
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55636
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-10
08:12:39 UTC ---
See thread starting at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2012-10/msg6.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55601
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-10
08:41:36 UTC ---
Hmm, seemingly, the check ignores --disable-libquadmath-support by only testing
for C's __float support, cf. libgfortran/acinclude.m4's
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55633
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55618
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55638
Bug #: 55638
Summary: Wrongly accepts INTENT + VALUE - and wrongly requires
it for PURE
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55618
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55362
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55539
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-12
11:16:33 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Strangely enough I needed to add some epsilon to 0.5 so that
the second test passes, because the exact value 0.5 appears
to get
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55664
Bug #: 55664
Summary: Missing diagnostic dependent using declaration
resolved to type without 'typename'
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55638
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55638
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-15
23:25:41 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Sat Dec 15 23:25:36 2012
New Revision: 194525
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194525
Log:
2012-12-16
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55638
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55197
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-16
14:36:58 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Sun Dec 16 14:36:54 2012
New Revision: 194537
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194537
Log:
2012-12-16
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55197
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54818
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55732
Bug #: 55732
Summary: -fno-automatic: Doesn'
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55733
Bug #: 55733
Summary: -fno-automatic: Fails for scalar allocatables
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55733
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-18
15:20:40 UTC ---
*** Bug 55732 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55732
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55733
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-18
15:24:16 UTC ---
The following test case also fails; I think the problem is the string
components which isn't marked as TREE_STATIC:
! { dg-do run }
! { dg-options
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55735
Bug #: 55735
Summary: ICE with deferred-length strings in COMMON
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55733
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55735
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55729
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55735
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-18
20:04:12 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
(In reply to comment #1)
Postscript: The example in comment 0 mixes a scalar and an array pointers.
While the ICE occurs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54818
--- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-19
09:03:46 UTC ---
My patch is wrong. It might lead to passing an integer(8) instead of integer(4)
as hidden argument when calling a procedure. The proper way it to use
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55733
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-19
09:21:20 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Wed Dec 19 09:21:17 2012
New Revision: 194604
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194604
Log:
2012-12-19
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55636
--- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-19
09:21:21 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Wed Dec 19 09:21:17 2012
New Revision: 194604
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194604
Log:
2012-12-19
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55733
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55636
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54884
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55733
--- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-19
23:05:54 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Wed Dec 19 23:05:49 2012
New Revision: 194621
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194621
Log:
2012-12-19
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54818
--- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-20
08:13:29 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Thu Dec 20 08:13:21 2012
New Revision: 194628
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194628
Log:
2012-12-20
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55745
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54818
--- Comment #8 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-20
10:48:15 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Thu Dec 20 10:48:11 2012
New Revision: 194632
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194632
Log:
2012-12-20
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54818
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55758
Bug #: 55758
Summary: LOGICAL and BIND(C): Reject kind=2/4/8/16 with
-std=f2008, improve warning, switch to nonBOOLEAN_TYPE
for those
Classification: Unclassified
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55756
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55762
Bug #: 55762
Summary: Diagnostic: Passing a procedure to LEN should tell
that one has passed a procedure
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55763
Bug #: 55763
Summary: Issues with some simpler CLASS(*) programs
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55763
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55765
Bug #: 55765
Summary: Remaining issues with unlimited polymorphic (CLASS(*))
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55765
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55763
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55763
--- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-21
22:59:27 UTC ---
To the last test case of comment 0:
gives an ICE (segfault) at
vector_comp = field
0x62d477 gfc_trans_pointer_assignment(gfc_expr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55763
--- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-22
17:27:06 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Sat Dec 22 17:27:03 2012
New Revision: 194696
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194696
Log:
2012-12-21
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55789
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54884
--- Comment #10 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-23
18:43:36 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Sun Dec 23 18:43:32 2012
New Revision: 194706
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194706
Log:
2012-12-23
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54884
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
1 - 100 of 5621 matches
Mail list logo
