.
--
Summary: Optimizer crash
Product: gcc
Version: 4.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: dcb314 at hotmail dot com
GCC
--- Comment #1 from dcb314 at hotmail dot com 2006-08-26 11:00 ---
Created an attachment (id=12143)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12143action=view)
C++ source code
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28856
ReportedBy: dcb314 at hotmail dot com
GCC host triplet: i686-suse-linux
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28936
--- Comment #1 from dcb314 at hotmail dot com 2006-09-02 14:40 ---
Created an attachment (id=12178)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12178action=view)
C source code
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28936
: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: dcb314 at hotmail dot com
GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28941
--- Comment #1 from dcb314 at hotmail dot com 2006-09-03 10:34 ---
Created an attachment (id=12180)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12180action=view)
C++ source code
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28941
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: dcb314 at hotmail dot com
GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29009
--- Comment #1 from dcb314 at hotmail dot com 2006-09-10 21:56 ---
Created an attachment (id=12217)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12217action=view)
C source code
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29009
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: dcb314 at hotmail dot com
GCC host triplet: x86_64-suse-linux-gnu
http
--- Comment #1 from dcb314 at hotmail dot com 2006-10-25 14:29 ---
Created an attachment (id=12489)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12489action=view)
C++ source code
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29590
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: dcb314 at hotmail dot com
GCC host triplet: x86_64-suse-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29857
--- Comment #1 from dcb314 at hotmail dot com 2006-11-15 22:13 ---
Created an attachment (id=12628)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12628action=view)
C source code
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29857
at hotmail dot com
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20475
ReportedBy: dcb314 at hotmail dot com
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC host triplet: linux-pc-i686
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20764
--- Additional Comments From dcb314 at hotmail dot com 2005-06-20 08:10
---
I fiddled with the supplied patch, and got this
--- expr.c.sav 2005-06-18 14:45:34.0 +0100
+++ expr.c 2005-06-19 11:19:02.0 +0100
@@ -5537,6 +5537,20 @@
tree low_bound = (domain
: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: dcb314 at hotmail dot com
GCC host triplet: x86_64-suse-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26140
--- Comment #1 from dcb314 at hotmail dot com 2006-02-06 23:02 ---
Created an attachment (id=10793)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10793action=view)
C++ source code
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26140
dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: dcb314 at hotmail dot com
GCC host triplet: x86_64-suse-linux
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26245
--- Comment #19 from dcb314 at hotmail dot com 2006-02-18 12:09 ---
(In reply to comment #17)
Created an attachment (id=10869)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10869action=view) [edit]
patch
I'm currently testing this patch.
I tried out the suggested patch on gcc
--- Comment #27 from dcb314 at hotmail dot com 2006-02-18 14:33 ---
(In reply to comment #21)
hmm, thanks. it should have looked like this:
I tried your second patch, and the compile of the compiler got as far
as the following
/home/dcb/gnu/42-20060211/working/./prev-gcc/xgcc
-B/home
at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: dcb314 at hotmail dot com
GCC host triplet: x86+64-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26425
--- Comment #1 from dcb314 at hotmail dot com 2006-02-22 17:06 ---
Created an attachment (id=10892)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10892action=view)
C source code
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26425
--- Comment #37 from dcb314 at hotmail dot com 2006-02-24 17:38 ---
(In reply to comment #33)
Created an attachment (id=10902)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10902action=view) [edit]
updated patch.
better patch. I'm going to post that one when regtesting
: 4.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: dcb314 at hotmail dot com
GCC host triplet: x86_64-suse-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id
--- Comment #1 from dcb314 at hotmail dot com 2006-02-26 22:32 ---
Created an attachment (id=10916)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10916action=view)
C++ source code
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26476
ReportedBy: dcb314 at hotmail dot com
GCC host triplet: x86_64-suse-linux
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26490
--- Comment #1 from dcb314 at hotmail dot com 2006-02-27 23:10 ---
Created an attachment (id=10928)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10928action=view)
C source code
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26490
--- Comment #4 from dcb314 at hotmail dot com 2006-02-28 14:12 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
won't fix.
I kind of gathered that after a year or so of inactivity.
Would you be willing to give us some more detail on
why no fix ?
For instance, is this fixed in some later version of gcc
--- Comment #4 from dcb314 at hotmail dot com 2006-03-15 10:42 ---
(In reply to comment #0)
The one liner
void f( int fred, char * fred);
is IMHO illegal code because fred is the name of two parameters.
I just checked gcc 4.2 and it is broken there as well.
Even adding flags
: gcc
Version: 4.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: dcb314 at hotmail dot com
GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla
--- Comment #1 from dcb314 at hotmail dot com 2006-04-23 19:12 ---
Created an attachment (id=11319)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11319action=view)
C source code
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27273
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: dcb314 at hotmail dot com
GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27381
--- Comment #1 from dcb314 at hotmail dot com 2006-05-02 11:19 ---
Created an attachment (id=11357)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11357action=view)
C source code
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27381
: tree check fail for legal code
Product: gcc
Version: 4.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: dcb314 at hotmail dot com
GCC host
: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: dcb314 at hotmail dot com
GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27472
--- Comment #2 from dcb314 at hotmail dot com 2006-05-07 21:44 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
-fsee has now been turned off by default so this is not a regression.
By now do you mean before or after the 20060506 snapshot ?
The code used to compile on the previous snapshot,
it doesn't
at hotmail dot com
GCC host triplet: i686-suse-linux
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27735
--- Comment #1 from dcb314 at hotmail dot com 2006-05-22 22:11 ---
Created an attachment (id=11496)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11496action=view)
C source code
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27735
--- Comment #2 from dcb314 at hotmail dot com 2006-05-22 22:15 ---
(In reply to comment #0)
I just tried to compile Suse Linux package qemacs-0.3.1-214 with the
GNU C compiler version 4.2 snapshot 20060520.
The compiler snapshot said
xml.c: In function 'xml_colorize_line':
xml.c:159
--- Comment #7 from dcb314 at hotmail dot com 2006-05-29 22:34 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
Based on 8.3.5/8 and the example from 8.3.6/9 which reads
int f(int a, int b = a);
I think this bug is invalid and function declarations with duplicate parameter
names are not invalid
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: dcb314 at hotmail dot com
GCC host triplet: x86_64-suse
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28162
--- Comment #1 from dcb314 at hotmail dot com 2006-06-25 09:28 ---
Created an attachment (id=11744)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11744action=view)
C source code
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28162
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: dcb314 at hotmail dot com
GCC host triplet: x86_64-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25547
of the same.
--
Summary: 4 * set but never used
Product: gcc
Version: 4.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: dcb314 at hotmail
dot org
ReportedBy: dcb314 at hotmail dot com
GCC host triplet: x86_x64-linux
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25734
--- Comment #2 from dcb314 at hotmail dot com 2006-01-11 11:31 ---
Created an attachment (id=10619)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10619action=view)
C source code which causes crash with -Os
I've stripped out about 3,000 lines of source code to
get the attachment
at hotmail dot com
GCC host triplet: x86_64-linux
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25771
--- Comment #1 from dcb314 at hotmail dot com 2006-01-12 18:22 ---
Created an attachment (id=10631)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10631action=view)
C++ source code
You need to use flag -O2 on an x86_64 linux box
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: dcb314 at hotmail dot com
GCC host triplet: x86_64-suse-linux
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25808
--- Comment #2 from dcb314 at hotmail dot com 2006-01-16 22:28 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Both of these are questionable, I don't see why there should be a different
diagnostic.
Because the two different diagnostics make it easier to grep for.
For example, Intel C++ compiler finds
Product: gcc
Version: 4.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: dcb314 at hotmail dot com
GCC host triplet: x86_64-suse-linux
http
--- Comment #1 from dcb314 at hotmail dot com 2006-01-19 18:44 ---
Created an attachment (id=10675)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10675action=view)
C source code for ice
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25860
Version: 4.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: dcb314 at hotmail dot com
GCC host triplet: x86_64-suse-linux
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla
--- Comment #1 from dcb314 at hotmail dot com 2006-01-19 18:48 ---
Created an attachment (id=10676)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10676action=view)
C++ source code
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25861
--- Comment #4 from dcb314 at hotmail dot com 2006-01-19 19:17 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
This has been faling since at least 20051219.
I rather suspect there would be a useful job for someone
to take each weekly snapshot of gcc 4.2 and make
sure it compiles some recentish
: ice in vect_recog_dot_prod_pattern
Product: gcc
Version: 4.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: dcb314 at hotmail dot com
GCC host
--- Comment #1 from dcb314 at hotmail dot com 2006-01-22 14:05 ---
Created an attachment (id=10703)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10703action=view)
c source code
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25911
--- Comment #1 from dcb314 at hotmail dot com 2006-01-29 23:29 ---
Created an attachment (id=10756)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10756action=view)
C++ source code
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26022
: 4.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: dcb314 at hotmail dot com
GCC host triplet: x86_64-suse-linux
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id
: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: dcb314 at hotmail dot com
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: dcb314 at hotmail dot com
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19710
++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: dcb314 at hotmail dot com
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC host triplet: linux-i686-pc-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19868
--- Additional Comments From dcb314 at hotmail dot com 2005-02-14 10:05
---
This bug is still broken in the snapshot for 3.4
dated 20050211
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18371
Version: 3.4.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: bootstrap
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: dcb314 at hotmail dot com
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC host
--- Additional Comments From dcb314 at hotmail dot com 2004-11-08 17:41
---
Must be a different variable/line which you quoted that is giving the problem.
You might be correct, but valgrind always reports accurate line numbers.
The bug still seems to be file parser.c, line 11646
: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: dcb314 at hotmail dot com
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18623
variable set but never used
Product: gcc
Version: 3.4.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P2
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: dcb314 at hotmail dot com
: P2
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: dcb314 at hotmail dot com
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18675
-
20051015
Product: gcc
Version: 4.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: dcb314 at hotmail dot com
GCC host triplet: x86_64-linux-gnu
--- Comment #1 from dcb314 at hotmail dot com 2005-10-19 13:34 ---
Created an attachment (id=10024)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10024action=view)
source code
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24443
: 4.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: dcb314 at hotmail dot com
GCC host triplet: x86_64_linux_suse
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29895
--- Comment #1 from dcb314 at hotmail dot com 2006-11-19 13:37 ---
Created an attachment (id=12644)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12644action=view)
C source code
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29895
--- Comment #2 from dcb314 at hotmail dot com 2006-12-13 13:25 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Does this work now on the mainline?
The only access to mainline I have is
by the weekly snapshots.
I expect to try out 4.3-20061216.
Thus, answer expected Monday 18 Dec 2006.
--
http
--- Comment #3 from dcb314 at hotmail dot com 2006-12-17 09:05 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
I expect to try out 4.3-20061216.
I tried it out and it is still broken.
Is that three snapshots in a row
that fail on x86_64 ?
--
dcb314 at hotmail dot com changed:
What
--- Comment #4 from dcb314 at hotmail dot com 2006-12-18 09:28 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
I tried it out and it is still broken.
I have more detail.
I finally managed to get a working compiler
by removing all of the following flags from the
configure line
--disable-multilib
: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: dcb314 at hotmail dot com
GCC host triplet: x86_64-suse-linux-pc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30244
--- Comment #1 from dcb314 at hotmail dot com 2006-12-18 09:31 ---
Created an attachment (id=12822)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12822action=view)
C source code
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30244
at hotmail dot com
GCC host triplet: x86_64-pc-linux
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30245
--- Comment #3 from dcb314 at hotmail dot com 2006-12-18 09:53 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
then it can only be postive
Plausible, but I don't think so.
The executed code displays a negative number after about
64 iterations, then displays about thirty zeros.
There is one set bit
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: dcb314 at hotmail dot com
GCC host triplet: x86_64-suse-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30253
--- Comment #1 from dcb314 at hotmail dot com 2006-12-18 17:10 ---
Created an attachment (id=12826)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12826action=view)
gzipped C++ source code
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30253
--- Comment #7 from dcb314 at hotmail dot com 2006-12-19 12:34 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
In that case, you might want to read the C++ standard text to
appreciate the facts.
There is a strange sort of echo in this bug report ;-
I accept the point that the code is undefined
--- Comment #9 from dcb314 at hotmail dot com 2006-12-19 16:37 ---
(In reply to comment #8)
And they expect a lot from our optimizers.
Surely not at the -O2 level ?
I thought folks serious about optimisation used -O3
and / or a bunch of other flags like -fsomething ?
The problem
--- Comment #11 from dcb314 at hotmail dot com 2006-12-19 22:03 ---
(In reply to comment #10)
Again use -fwrapv and forget about it.
Sigh. This implies using -fwrapv everywhere.
Still relatively expensive - I still don't know where the compiler
is doing the new behaviour
--- Comment #5 from dcb314 at hotmail dot com 2006-12-21 19:55 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
This was introduced between 4.3.0 20061202 and 4.3.0 20061220
Strange - is there a possible typo on the last date ?
I found snapshot 4.3-20061216 going wrong, so if the
last date is correct
: 4.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: dcb314 at hotmail dot com
GCC host triplet: x86_64-suse-linux
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30333
: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: dcb314 at hotmail dot com
GCC host triplet: x86_64-suse-linux
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30338
--- Comment #1 from dcb314 at hotmail dot com 2006-12-31 11:40 ---
Created an attachment (id=12849)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12849action=view)
C source code
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30338
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: dcb314 at hotmail dot com
GCC host triplet: x86_64-suse-linux
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30339
--- Comment #1 from dcb314 at hotmail dot com 2006-12-31 11:42 ---
Created an attachment (id=12850)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12850action=view)
gzipped C source code
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30339
: 4.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: dcb314 at hotmail dot com
GCC host triplet: x86_64-suse-linux
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30383
--- Comment #1 from dcb314 at hotmail dot com 2007-01-05 15:31 ---
Created an attachment (id=12860)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12860action=view)
C source code
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30383
code with -Os
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: dcb314 at hotmail dot com
GCC host triplet: x86_64-suse
--- Comment #1 from dcb314 at hotmail dot com 2007-01-06 13:26 ---
Created an attachment (id=12864)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12864action=view)
C source code
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30392
Version: 4.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: dcb314 at hotmail dot com
GCC host triplet: x86_64-suse-linux
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla
--- Comment #1 from dcb314 at hotmail dot com 2007-01-06 16:01 ---
Created an attachment (id=12865)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12865action=view)
gzipped C++ source code
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30393
--- Comment #3 from dcb314 at hotmail dot com 2007-01-07 12:08 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
I think this was fixed by:
2007-01-02 Joseph Myers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can you check to make sure?
Seems fixed to me.
--
dcb314 at hotmail dot com changed:
What|Removed
Version: 4.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: dcb314 at hotmail dot com
GCC host triplet: x86_64_suse_linux
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi
--- Comment #1 from dcb314 at hotmail dot com 2007-01-13 21:22 ---
Created an attachment (id=12901)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12901action=view)
C++ source code
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30458
--- Comment #3 from dcb314 at hotmail dot com 2007-01-13 21:38 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Can you try after:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2007-01/msg00460.html
I can't process this until the next snapshot, due 20070119.
Is that soon enough ?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla
1 - 100 of 2874 matches
Mail list logo
