http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51059
--- Comment #1 from Nathan Sidwell nathan at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-10
07:38:26 UTC ---
There's something strange about the semantics of weak inline on darwin (or a
bug in the darwin linker?).
Here's the bits of the testcase:
extern int
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51059
--- Comment #6 from Nathan Sidwell nathan at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-11
20:11:31 UTC ---
great, who wants to commit the fix?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51113
Nathan Sidwell nathan at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nathan at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51113
Nathan Sidwell nathan at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51113
--- Comment #9 from Nathan Sidwell nathan at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-20
09:09:39 UTC ---
Author: nathan
Date: Sun Nov 20 09:09:34 2011
New Revision: 181524
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=181524
Log:
PR gcov-profile/51113
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51297
--- Comment #1 from Nathan Sidwell nathan at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-24
18:30:40 UTC ---
The line numbers in the backtrace don't seem to correspond to current sources.
for instance line 866 is the definition of find_source, not the location
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51297
--- Comment #4 from Nathan Sidwell nathan at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-24
19:08:24 UTC ---
the names being entered into the array are unique, so there is a total ordering
-- I think that's a red herring. I think the problem is the string read from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51297
--- Comment #11 from Nathan Sidwell nathan at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-26
21:44:26 UTC ---
Author: nathan
Date: Sat Nov 26 21:44:24 2011
New Revision: 181745
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=181745
Log:
PR gcov-profile
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51297
Nathan Sidwell nathan at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51113
--- Comment #10 from Nathan Sidwell nathan at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-01
19:58:55 UTC ---
Author: nathan
Date: Thu Dec 1 19:58:51 2011
New Revision: 181892
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=181892
Log:
PR gcov-profile
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51113
--- Comment #12 from Nathan Sidwell nathan at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-06
07:25:47 UTC ---
Thanks for confirming. I 'fixed' it by reverting part of the new feature set I
was implementing (hence the new xfail and removed testcases). What's
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51449
Nathan Sidwell nathan at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51361
Nathan Sidwell nathan at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nathan at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51449
--- Comment #4 from Nathan Sidwell nathan at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-10
08:32:38 UTC ---
Author: nathan
Date: Sat Dec 10 08:32:34 2011
New Revision: 182184
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182184
Log:
PR gcov-profile/51449
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51449
Nathan Sidwell nathan at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65954
--- Comment #1 from Nathan Sidwell nathan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: nathan
Date: Wed May 20 01:54:09 2015
New Revision: 223430
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=223430root=gccview=rev
Log:
cp/
PR c++/65954
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52595
--- Comment #10 from Nathan Sidwell nathan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: nathan
Date: Fri Jun 5 13:35:30 2015
New Revision: 224152
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224152root=gccview=rev
Log:
cp/
PR c++/52595
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58616
Bug 58616 depends on bug 52595, which changed state.
Bug 52595 Summary: [DR 325] commas and non-static data member initializers
don't mix
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52595
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52595
Nathan Sidwell nathan at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66421
Nathan Sidwell nathan at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nathan at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66443
Nathan Sidwell nathan at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58583
Nathan Sidwell nathan at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58616
Bug 58616 depends on bug 58583, which changed state.
Bug 58583 Summary: [c++11] ICE with invalid non-static data member
initialization in template
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58583
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58583
--- Comment #4 from Nathan Sidwell nathan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: nathan
Date: Tue Jun 16 01:59:55 2015
New Revision: 224502
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224502root=gccview=rev
Log:
cp/
PR c++/58583
* cp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66270
--- Comment #2 from Nathan Sidwell nathan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: nathan
Date: Wed May 27 20:36:14 2015
New Revision: 223773
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=223773root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c++/66270
* tree.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66270
Nathan Sidwell nathan at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52595
Nathan Sidwell nathan at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|SUSPENDED |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58583
Nathan Sidwell nathan at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66243
Nathan Sidwell nathan at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66243
--- Comment #2 from Nathan Sidwell nathan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: nathan
Date: Sun May 24 23:17:58 2015
New Revision: 223636
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=223636root=gccview=rev
Log:
cp/
PR c++/66243
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66270
Nathan Sidwell nathan at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65936
--- Comment #3 from Nathan Sidwell nathan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: nathan
Date: Sat May 23 22:28:54 2015
New Revision: 223613
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=223613root=gccview=rev
Log:
cp/
PR c++/65936
* pt.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65936
Nathan Sidwell nathan at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60943
Nathan Sidwell nathan at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60943
--- Comment #2 from Nathan Sidwell nathan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: nathan
Date: Thu May 21 20:50:45 2015
New Revision: 223502
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=223502root=gccview=rev
Log:
cp/
PR c++/60943
* decl2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66243
Nathan Sidwell nathan at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65954
Nathan Sidwell nathan at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67027
Nathan Sidwell nathan at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67027
Nathan Sidwell nathan at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
at gcc dot gnu.org |nathan at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from Nathan Sidwell ---
I think my firstprivate patch resolves this one.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67861
--- Comment #6 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Fri Oct 9 14:13:39 2015
New Revision: 228657
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228657=gcc=rev
Log:
* config/nvptx/nvptx.c (nvptx_init_axis_predicate): Fix output
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67861
--- Comment #4 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Tue Oct 6 16:47:00 2015
New Revision: 228536
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228536=gcc=rev
Log:
PR 67861
* gimple-fold.c (gimple_fold_builtin): Add break after
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67861
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58583
--- Comment #9 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Tue Jan 5 14:40:11 2016
New Revision: 232075
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232075=gcc=rev
Log:
gcc/cp/
PR c++/58583
* pt.c (build_non_dependent_expr):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58583
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58616
Bug 58616 depends on bug 58583, which changed state.
Bug 58583 Summary: [c++11] ICE with invalid non-static data member
initialization in template
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58583
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68977
--- Comment #3 from Nathan Sidwell ---
As the code is ill-formed, and IIUC the error only happens if we;ve seen an
error, I suggest
push_gimplify_context (!seen_error ());
No point making the compiler work harder than necesary in the usual
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69033
--- Comment #1 from Nathan Sidwell ---
patch r231928 reverted. Analysis at
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-12/msg02100.html
||2016-06-06
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |nathan at gcc dot
gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Testing patch. Aaron's isn't quite right.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71400
--- Comment #2 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Mon Jun 6 15:24:24 2016
New Revision: 237135
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237135=gcc=rev
Log:
PR libgcc/71400
* libgcov-driver-system.c (__gcov_error_file):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71400
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71166
--- Comment #6 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Adding an at_eof check into try_const fixes the testcase. (also) Adding an
at_eof <= 1 assert into cxx_eval_outermost_constant_expr causes 261 new fails.
Although many are obviously init & ctor related,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69916
--- Comment #4 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Wed Feb 24 13:38:20 2016
New Revision: 233663
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233663=gcc=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR other/69916
* omp-low.c (struct oacc_loop): Add
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69916
--- Comment #3 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Fixed on gomp4 r233663. Porting to trunk ...
at gcc dot gnu.org |nathan at gcc dot
gnu.org
||nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |nathan at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70501
--- Comment #4 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Tue Apr 12 16:24:11 2016
New Revision: 234904
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234904=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/70501
cp/
* constexpr.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70501
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70594
--- Comment #11 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Patrick's original patch did 2 things AFAICT
1) make constexpr_call_table GC deletable
2) add the fundef_copies_table etc.
The failure we're observing is of constexpr_call_table losing information,
which
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70594
--- Comment #12 from Nathan Sidwell ---
(In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #9)
> The decls belonging to a copy of a function must have new UIDs though
> because their uids are used to track their mutable values (within the
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70594
--- Comment #14 from Nathan Sidwell ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #13)
> If you remove the deletableness, then I'd say it is really important to
> empty the whole freelist at least at the end of parsing, so that when GIMPLE
>
at gcc dot gnu.org |nathan at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70594
--- Comment #27 from Nathan Sidwell ---
(In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #26)
> With this patch gengtype seems to assign gt_ggc_mx(tree&) to cp/constexpr.o,
> breaking cc1 link. I'm not going to try to fix that now, though someone
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70512
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70512
--- Comment #6 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Tue Apr 5 23:47:21 2016
New Revision: 234768
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234768=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/70512
* class.c (fixup_may_alias): New.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70501
--- Comment #3 from Nathan Sidwell ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-04/msg00191.html
but read the thread for why that's not the best patch. Continuing ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70594
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70594
--- Comment #19 from Nathan Sidwell ---
(In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #17)
> I still don't understand why/how this is causing problems, if
> -fcompare-debug only cares about the order of decls. The copied decls
> shouldn't appear
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70393
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70393
--- Comment #6 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Indeed, manually editing the assembly to such an initializer results in a
working program.
The CONSTRUCTOR created for ab's DECL_INITIAL has the correct things in it,
but in declaration order. I.e. it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70348
--- Comment #5 from Nathan Sidwell ---
the intended current implementation is to treat 'sum' as firstprivate.
however, putting in an explicit firstprivate causes another different ICE (in
lower_oacc_reductions) -- regardless of whether 'sum'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69916
--- Comment #5 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Mon Mar 7 13:22:07 2016
New Revision: 234026
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234026=gcc=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR middle-end/69916
* omp-low.c (struct oacc_loop):
||nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |nathan at gcc dot
gnu.org
||nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |nathan at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70393
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70393
--- Comment #7 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Thu Mar 31 15:30:33 2016
New Revision: 234636
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234636=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/70393
* varasm.c (output_constructor_regular_field): Flush
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70393
--- Comment #11 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Applied to gcc-5 branch r234653.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70393
--- Comment #10 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Thu Mar 31 20:51:20 2016
New Revision: 234653
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234653=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/70393
* varasm.c (output_constructor_regular_field):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68475
--- Comment #3 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Fri Apr 1 12:10:17 2016
New Revision: 234667
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234667=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/68475
* decl.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68475
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70393
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
||nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |nathan at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Marek, I suspected something like what you say happening, I think we then need
to go through all the 'struct S' types created
||nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |nathan at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Nathan Sidwell ---
One can turn it into the syntactically correct:
template
struct integral_constant {
};
struct X : integral_constant < b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55635
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55635
--- Comment #5 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Wed Apr 20 19:59:56 2016
New Revision: 235297
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=235297=gcc=rev
Log:
cp/
PR c++/55635
* init.c (build_vec_delete_1): Protect
++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 38345
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38345=edit
testcase
Invoked as:
nathan@morden:28>./cc1plus -fpreprocessed cexpr-error.ii
we get:
constex
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71166
--- Comment #4 from Nathan Sidwell ---
build_vec_init_elt (tree.c) says:
/* Subroutine of build_vec_init_expr: Build up a single element
intialization as a proxy for the full array initialization to get things
marked as used and any
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71166
--- Comment #3 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Created attachment 38514
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38514=edit
slightly more reduced test case
We're invoking constexpr evaluation machinery after parsing is complete --
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70685
--- Comment #7 from Nathan Sidwell ---
I'm such a doofus :(
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70616
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
at gcc dot gnu.org |nathan at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70594
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nathan at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70616
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71748
--- Comment #7 from Nathan Sidwell ---
*** Bug 70616 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 38881
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38881=edit
testcase
Iain Sandoe & I have discovered an anomaly with the placement of bi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68724
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68724
--- Comment #4 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Fri Aug 5 12:21:46 2016
New Revision: 239167
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239167=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/68724
* pt.c (unify): TRAIT_EXPR is an expr.
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68724
--- Comment #6 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Fri Aug 5 19:58:36 2016
New Revision: 239177
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239177=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/68724
* pt.c (unify): TRAIT_EXPR is an expr.
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68724
--- Comment #7 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Fri Aug 5 20:04:27 2016
New Revision: 239178
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239178=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/68724
* pt.c (unify): TRAIT_EXPR is an expr.
PR
++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
namespaces are magically conjured up if you use a qualified name:
namespace X::Y::Z
{
}
X::Y must already be a namespace, but we don't complain.
Also, we do the strong using dance
1 - 100 of 1168 matches
Mail list logo
