[Bug testsuite/68972] g++.dg/cpp1y/vla-initlist1.C test case fails on powerpc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68972 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug testsuite/79427] New: g++.dg/tls/thread_local-order2.C fails starting with r245249

Priority: P3 Component: testsuite Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- FAIL: g++.dg/tls/thread_local-order2.C -std=c++11 execution test FAIL: g++.dg/tls/thread_local-order2.C -std=c++14 execution test

[Bug testsuite/79427] g++.dg/tls/thread_local-order2.C fails starting with r245249

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79427 --- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- I checked and on the first system where I noticed this glibc is the distro (Ubuntu 14.04) default 2.17. Other Be systems where it also failed are that or older.

[Bug tree-optimization/79293] New: [7 regression] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-sprintf.c fails starting with r244953

: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- At least I think it is 244753. There were a bunch of updates for that revision which left the compiler unable

[Bug other/79295] New: [7 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/bcd-3.c fails starting with r244942

Priority: P3 Component: other Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Causes an ICE spawn /home/seurer/gcc/build/gcc-test/gcc/xgcc -B/home/seurer/gcc/build/gcc-test/gcc/ /home/seurer/gcc/gcc-test/gcc

[Bug testsuite/79169] New: g++.dg/warn/Wduplicated-branches1.C fails on powerpc since its introduction in r244705

Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: testsuite Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- This was on a powerpc LE system but the same thing happens on BE. Fri Jan 20 10:35:29 CST 2017 Differences

[Bug testsuite/79455] New: c-c++-common/tsan/race_on_mutex.c fails on powerpcle starting with r244854 (where it was activated)

Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: testsuite Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- r244854 | jakub | 2017-01

[Bug target/79140] New: gcc.target/powerpc/ssp-1.c fails starting with its introduction in r244562

: normal Priority: P3 Component: target Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Fails on both BE and LE power8 gcc configured simply with: /home/seurer/gcc/gcc-trunk/configure --prefix=/home/seurer/gcc

[Bug tree-optimization/77445] [7 Regression] Performance drop after r239219 on coremark test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77445 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/79160] gcc.target/powerpc/vsx-elemrev-4.c fails on powerpc BE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79160 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target||powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu

[Bug target/79160] New: gcc.target/powerpc/vsx-elemrev-4.c fails on powerpc BE

Component: target Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS=powerpc.exp=vsx-elemrev-4.c Using /home/seurer/gcc/gcc-trunk/gcc/testsuite/config/default.exp as tool-and-target-specific interface

[Bug target/79158] New: gcc.target/powerpc/pr70669.c fails on powerpc BE

: target Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- This test case was added in r234995 where it failed for both BE and LE. Sometime later it was fixed for LE but still fails for BE. Run on a powerpc8 BE system. Executing

[Bug tree-optimization/78775] [7 Regression] ICE in maybe_warn_alloc_args_overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78775 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug sanitizer/65479] sanitizer stack trace missing frames past #0 on powerpc64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65479 --- Comment #20 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: seurer Date: Mon Jan 9 20:45:59 2017 New Revision: 244241 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244241=gcc=rev Log: 2017-01-09 Bill Seurer <seu...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Ba

[Bug sanitizer/65479] sanitizer stack trace missing frames past #0 on powerpc64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65479 --- Comment #21 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: seurer Date: Tue Jan 10 19:11:55 2017 New Revision: 244284 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244284=gcc=rev Log: 2017-01-10 Bill Seurer <seu...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Ba

[Bug sanitizer/65479] sanitizer stack trace missing frames past #0 on powerpc64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65479 --- Comment #19 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: seurer Date: Wed Dec 21 19:09:10 2016 New Revision: 243863 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243863=gcc=rev Log: [PATCH, v2, rs6000] pr65479 Add -fasynchronous-unwind-tables when

[Bug other/80056] New: gcc.dg/tree-prof/pr66295.c fails on powerpc

Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- This new test case doesn't compile correct on powerpc. spawn /home/seurer/gcc/build/gcc-test2/gcc/xgcc -B/home/seurer/gcc/build/gcc-test2/gcc/ /home/seurer/gcc/gcc-test2/gcc

[Bug rtl-optimization/80401] New: [7 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/dimode_off.c and gcc.target/powerpc/pr79038-1.c fail starting with r246764

Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: rtl-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- The failing tests are looking for specific assembler

[Bug rtl-optimization/80401] [7 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/dimode_off.c and gcc.target/powerpc/pr79038-1.c fail starting with r246764

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80401 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target||powerpc

[Bug target/80482] New: [7 Regression] vec_mul produces compilation error if 1 of its parms is const or volatile

Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- If one (just one) of its parameters is const, volatile, or const volatile vec_mul produces a compilation error

[Bug rtl-optimization/80401] [7 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/dimode_off.c and gcc.target/powerpc/pr79038-1.c fail starting with r246764

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80401 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug rtl-optimization/80401] [7 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/dimode_off.c and gcc.target/powerpc/pr79038-1.c fail starting with r246764

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80401 --- Comment #4 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- This was fixed somewhere in the revisions 246851 through 246857.

[Bug rtl-optimization/80401] [7 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/dimode_off.c and gcc.target/powerpc/pr79038-1.c fail starting with r246764

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80401 --- Comment #8 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- I tried to reproduce natively on power using the same revision where Mike was seeing failures but I didn't see any problems. He was doing an x86->power cross compiler though.

[Bug target/80482] [7 Regression] vec_mul produces compilation error if 1 of its parms is const or volatile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80482 --- Comment #1 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- I see the problem. The compiler is enforcing "the parameter types must match" too tightly. It should be checking the unqualified types (sans const/volatile) instead of the types directly.

[Bug tree-optimization/81637] New: [8 regression] compilation of 416.games from spec2006 fails starting with r250670

: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- /home/seurer/gcc/install/gcc-test2/bin/gfortran -c -o symorb.fppized.o -m64 -O3 -mcpu=power8 -ffast-math

[Bug testsuite/81699] New: [8 regression] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/reassoc-23.c fails starting with r250853

Priority: P3 Component: testsuite Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- I saw this on both powerpc64 LE and BE power8 systems. spawn -ignore SIGHUP /home/seurer/gcc/build/gcc-test2/gcc/xgcc -B/home

[Bug testsuite/81807] New: many *.cc asan tests fail on powerpc64

Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- After r250991 a whole bunch of the asan *.cc tests (activated in that revision) fail on powerpc64 (both LE and BE). It looks like some #defines are missing or wrong from

[Bug testsuite/81399] New test case 27_io/basic_stringstream/assign/81338.cc fails on powerpc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81399 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug libgomp/81386] [8 regression] libgomp.fortran/appendix-a/a.16.1.f90 fails starting with 249424

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81386 --- Comment #3 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 41777 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41777=edit Assembler for works

[Bug libgomp/81386] [8 regression] libgomp.fortran/appendix-a/a.16.1.f90 fails starting with 249424

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81386 --- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 41776 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41776=edit Assembler for fails

[Bug libgomp/81386] [8 regression] libgomp.fortran/appendix-a/a.16.1.f90 fails starting with 249424

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81386 --- Comment #4 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Looking at the difference in generated code. The more recent (failing) builds are generating a whole bunch of vector ops where the old (working) code did not. < failing code (r250280) >

[Bug libgomp/81386] [8 regression] libgomp.fortran/appendix-a/a.16.1.f90 fails starting with 249424

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81386 --- Comment #6 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- So here is comparing 249423 (works) with 249424 (fails): seurer@genoa:~/gcc/build/gcc-test2$ svn info $GCC_SRC . . . Revision: 249423 . . . seurer@genoa:~/gcc/build/gcc-test2$ /home/seurer/gcc

[Bug libgomp/81386] [8 regression] libgomp.fortran/appendix-a/a.16.1.f90 fails starting with 249424

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81386 --- Comment #1 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- I looked back through the tester logs and noticed that the test case doesn't always fail and there are two different failures and always with -O3 PASS: libgomp.fortran/appendix-a/a.16.1.f90 -O0

[Bug testsuite/81399] New: New test case 27_io/basic_stringstream/assign/81338.cc fails on powerpc64le

: normal Priority: P3 Component: testsuite Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- 27_io/basic_stringstream/assign/81338.cc fails on powerpc64 LE. It works fine on BE. seurer@genoa:~/gcc/build/gcc-test

[Bug testsuite/81399] New test case 27_io/basic_stringstream/assign/81338.cc fails on powerpc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81399 --- Comment #1 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- I was wrong, it fails at least some of the time on powerpc64 BE too.

[Bug libgomp/81386] New: [8 regression] libgomp.fortran/appendix-a/a.16.1.f90 fails starting with 249424

: normal Priority: P3 Component: libgomp Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org CC: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- These were run on a power8 LE machine. The compiled code works fine

[Bug target/81550] New: [8 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/loop_align.c fails starting with r250482

: normal Priority: P3 Component: target Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- spawn /home/seurer/gcc/build/gcc-test3/gcc/xgcc -B/home/seurer/gcc/build/gcc-test3/gcc/ /home/seurer/gcc/gcc-test3/gcc

[Bug target/81535] New: [8 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/pr79439.c fails starting with r250442

Priority: P3 Component: target Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- I noticed this on a powerpc64le power8 system: spawn /home/seurer/gcc/build/gcc-test/gcc/xgcc -B/home/seurer/gcc/build/gcc-test

[Bug target/81535] [8 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/pr79439.c fails starting with r250442

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81535 --- Comment #1 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- The failures also occur on powerpc64 BE. This test that was added in this revision also fails: spawn /home/seurer/gcc/build/gcc-test/gcc/xgcc -B/home/seurer/gcc/build/gcc-test/gcc/ /home/seurer

[Bug testsuite/81539] New: Bad target in new test case gcc.target/powerpc/mmx-packuswb-1.c from r250432

: normal Priority: P3 Component: testsuite Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS=powerpc.exp=gcc.target/powerpc/mmx-packuswb-1.c . . . ERROR: gcc.target/powerpc/mmx

[Bug tree-optimization/81573] [8 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81573 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/81573] [8 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81573 --- Comment #6 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- And it is run multiple times which means make check takes forever. WARNING: program timed out. FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr81573.c -O0 execution test . . . WARNING: program timed out. FAIL: gcc.dg

[Bug tree-optimization/81573] [8 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81573 --- Comment #7 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- The problem in the test case is that the code assumes "char" is signed. On power it is not. So "b" starts at 0, is decremented to 255, and ...etc... The for loop will run forever.

[Bug other/81567] New: New test case 27_io/basic_fstream/53984.cc fails on powerpc64

Priority: P3 Component: other Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- This fails on powerpc64 both BE and LE. It throws the assertion on line 29. Tested on a power8 system. make -k check RUNTESTFLAGS

[Bug target/80618] [8 regression] test case gcc.dg/pr50310-2.c fails with ICE starting with 247544

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80618 --- Comment #13 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- The fortran ones already have their own bugzilla: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80946

[Bug target/80482] [7/8 Regression] vec_mul produces compilation error if 1 of its parms is const or volatile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80482 --- Comment #6 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: seurer Date: Tue Apr 25 16:16:13 2017 New Revision: 247256 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=247256=gcc=rev Log: [PATCH, rs6000] pr80482 Relax vector builtin parameter checks PR

[Bug testsuite/80551] New: c-c++-common/tsan/race_on_mutex.c fails on powerpc

: testsuite Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- This test case fails on powerpc64 BE. It used to also fail on LE but that was fixed recently (see https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79455) The failure

[Bug testsuite/79455] c-c++-common/tsan/race_on_mutex.c fails on powerpcle starting with r244854 (where it was activated)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79455 --- Comment #5 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- I was hoping that fixing this on powerpc64 LE would also fix it on BE but the issue there is slightly different. See https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80551

[Bug target/80482] [7/8 Regression] vec_mul produces compilation error if 1 of its parms is const or volatile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80482 --- Comment #3 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Yeah, I was going to try something like that. There are some other places this probably need to be done too.

[Bug target/80482] [7/8 Regression] vec_mul produces compilation error if 1 of its parms is const or volatile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80482 --- Comment #5 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: seurer Date: Tue Apr 25 15:22:40 2017 New Revision: 247250 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=247250=gcc=rev Log: [PATCH, rs6000] pr80482 Relax vector builtin parameter checks PR

[Bug target/81648] New: [8 regression] r250759 breaks build on powerpc64

: target Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- r250758 worked fine. /home/seurer/gcc/gcc-test/gcc/config/rs6000/vsx.md: In function 'rtx_def* gen_vextract_fp_from_shorth(rtx, rtx)': /home/seurer/gcc/gcc-test/gcc/config

[Bug tree-optimization/81655] [7/8 Regression] new test case gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr81588.c fails on powerpc64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81655 --- Comment #5 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- At the time I had not seen this on trunk but indeed it does fail there too.

[Bug tree-optimization/81655] New: [7 Regression] new test case gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr81588.c fails on powerpc64

Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr81588.c scan-tree-dump-times reassoc1 "Optimizing range test [^\n\r]* and comparis

[Bug testsuite/81784] New: [8 regression] gcc.dg/compare2.c fails starting with r250984

Priority: P3 Component: testsuite Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- The recent change to the test case gcc.dg/compare2.c doesn't seem to work quite right. At least not on powerpc64 where it fails on both

[Bug go/81893] [8 regression] compilation error in libgo starting with r251127

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81893 --- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Yes, it compiles OK on LE. Note that I saw the errors on both power7 and power8 BE systems and using different versions of gcc to build.

[Bug other/81927] New: [8 regression] Many, many test case failures starting with r251220

Priority: P3 Component: other Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Here's one in detail: spawn -ignore SIGHUP /home/seurer/gcc/build/gcc-test/gcc/xgcc -B/home/seurer/gcc/build/gcc-test/gcc/ /home/seurer

[Bug other/81927] [8 regression] Many, many test case failures starting with r251220

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81927 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target||powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu

[Bug other/81931] New: [8 regression] r251260 breaks many tests on powerpc64

Component: other Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- This change to wide-int.h breaks many tests on powerpc64 both LE and BE. The symptom is the compiled code hangs. There are hundreds of test cases that time out

[Bug other/81931] [8 regression] r251260 breaks many tests on powerpc64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81931 --- Comment #1 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- I think this may also be causing bootstrap builds of gcc to hang on powerpc64.

[Bug testsuite/80611] New: [8 regression] test case gfortran.dg/coarray_lock_7.f90 fails starting with r247495

: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: testsuite Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- spawn /home/seurer/gcc/build/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite/gfortran/../../gfortran -B/home/seurer/gcc

[Bug tree-optimization/80618] [8 regression] test case gcc.dg/pr50310-2.c fails with ICE starting with 247544

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80618 --- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- And some C and FORTRAN vector test cases fail as well > FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-44.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects scan-tree-dump-times > vect "Alignment of access forced using peelin

[Bug tree-optimization/80618] [8 regression] test case gcc.dg/pr50310-2.c fails with ICE starting with 247544

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80618 --- Comment #1 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Also this test: FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/pr50310.c compilation, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions (internal compiler error) FAIL: gcc.c

[Bug tree-optimization/80618] New: [8 regression] test case gcc.dg/pr50310-2.c fails with ICE starting with 247544

: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- spawn /home/seurer/gcc/build/gcc-trunk/gcc/xgcc -B/home/seurer/gcc/build/gcc-trunk/gcc/ /home/seurer/gcc/gcc

[Bug testsuite/80694] [8 regression] test cases gcc.dg/vect/vect-44.c and vect-50.c fail starting with r247780

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80694 --- Comment #4 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- These tests have flip-flopped between working and not several times recently. I will got back through the logs and run some test to see if I can find where things started to go bad.

[Bug testsuite/80643] NA->FAIL: gcc.dg/pr79214.c gcc.dg/pr79222.c gcc.dg/pr79223.c gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtins-folding-gimple-ub.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80643 --- Comment #7 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- The Fortran tests (from 80644) that I traced to this revision still fail on powerpc64le: spawn /home/seurer/gcc/build/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite/gfortran/../../gfortran -B/home/seurer/gcc/build/gcc

[Bug testsuite/80694] New: [8 regression] test cases gcc.dg/vect/vect-44.c and vect-50.c fail starting with r247780

Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: testsuite Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- r247780 updated (well, reverted) these two test cases and now they are failing on powerpc64le. spawn /home

[Bug target/81143] New: New test case gcc.target/powerpc/pr79799-2.c fails on powerpc BE

Priority: P3 Component: target Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- This only fails on a big endian system: spawn -ignore SIGHUP /home/seurer/gcc/build/gcc-trunk/gcc/xgcc -B/home/seurer/gcc/build/gcc

[Bug target/81158] New: [8 regression] Many test case failures starting with r249424

Priority: P3 Component: target Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- The following tests are the ones that fail on powerpc64. Most fail on just LE but a few also fail on BE. FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute

[Bug testsuite/81179] New: [8 regression] gcc.dg/vect/pr65947-9.c and gcc.dg/vect/pr65947-14.c fail starting with r249553

Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: testsuite Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- r249553 dropped XFAIL from these but they still fail on powerpc64 (BE and LE). spawn /home/seurer/gcc

[Bug tree-optimization/81184] New: [8 regression] gcc.dg/pr21643.c and gcc.dg/tree-ssa/phi-opt-11.c fail starting with r249450

: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- These fail on powerpc64 both LE and BE. gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ipa-split-5.c also

[Bug target/81158] [8 regression] Many test case failures starting with r249424

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81158 --- Comment #3 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- I tried 249423 and don't see those failures but do with 249424. For example: seurer@genoa:~/gcc/build/gcc-test$ updategcc 249423 seurer@genoa:~/gcc/build/gcc-test$ make -j50 seurer@genoa:~/gcc

[Bug bootstrap/81216] [8 Regression] bootstrap failed on i386 and powerpc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81216 --- Comment #5 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- *** Bug 81220 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug other/81220] [8 regression] ICE during gcc build after r249643

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81220 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug bootstrap/81216] [8 Regression] bootstrap failed on i386 and powerpc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81216 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug other/81220] New: [8 regression] ICE during gcc build after r249643

: other Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- This was on a powerpc64 LE system. I tried this on powerpc64 BE and did not see the same issue nor when I tried on x86. r249642 works fine. It occurs when the just built

[Bug tree-optimization/80884] New: [8 regression] test case gcc.target/powerpc/20050830-1.c fails starting with r247886

: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- This test fails on power6 (BE obviously) but still works on power7 and later

[Bug tree-optimization/80791] New: [8 regression] test case gcc.dg/sms-1.c fail2 starting with r247885

Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- With this revision SMS fails when compiling this test case. With revision r247884 and earlier we get: SMS SC already

[Bug tree-optimization/80894] [8 Regression] 456.hmmer in SPEC CPU 2006 is miscompiled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80894 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/80948] New: [8 regression] test case gcc.dg/torture/pr68017.c fails with ICE starting with r248771

Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Fails on powerpc64 LE and BE for power8/7/6 make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS=dg-torture.exp=gcc.dg

[Bug tree-optimization/80925] [8 Regression] vect peeling failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80925 --- Comment #6 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- I see them still for r248738. My configure is pretty simple: --enable-languages=c,fortran,c++ --with-cpu=power8 --disable-bootstrap and it's the same on both BE and LE. I am using binutils

[Bug ipa/80882] [8 regression] test case gfortran.dg/pr48636.f90 fails starting with r248375

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80882 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug tree-optimization/80948] [8 regression] test case gcc.dg/torture/pr68017.c fails with ICE starting with r248771

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80948 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug middle-end/66313] Unsafe factorization of a*b+a*c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66313 Bug 66313 depends on bug 80948, which changed state. Bug 80948 Summary: [8 regression] test case gcc.dg/torture/pr68017.c fails with ICE starting with r248771 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80948 What|Removed

[Bug tree-optimization/80925] [8 Regression] vect peeling failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80925 --- Comment #12 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Hmmm, they don't all fail on power6/7 (costmodel-pr37194.c for instance). I attached a dump from -fdump-tree-vect-details for one that does (power6).

[Bug target/80982] New: gcc.target/powerpc/builtins-3-runnable.c fails starting with its introduction in r248846

Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- This fails only on BE Executing on host: /home/seurer/gcc/build/gcc-trunk/gcc/xgcc -B/home/seurer/gcc/build/gcc

[Bug tree-optimization/80925] [8 Regression] vect peeling failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80925 --- Comment #14 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- spawn -ignore SIGHUP /home/seurer/gcc/build/gcc-test/gcc/xgcc -B/home/seurer/gcc/build/gcc-test/gcc/ /home/seurer/gcc/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-33-big-array.c -fno-diagnostics-show

[Bug tree-optimization/80925] [8 Regression] vect peeling failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80925 --- Comment #13 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 41475 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41475=edit Dump from -fdump-tree-vect-details for test case gcc.dg/vect/vect-33-big-array.c

[Bug target/80982] gcc.target/powerpc/builtins-3-runnable.c fails starting with its introduction in r248846

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80982 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target||powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu

[Bug tree-optimization/81010] [8 regression] test case gcc.target/powerpc/pr56605.c fails starting with r248958

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81010 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target||powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu

[Bug tree-optimization/81010] New: [8 regression] test case gcc.target/powerpc/pr56605.c fails starting with r248958

: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- This only occurs on BE. spawn -ignore SIGHUP /home/seurer/gcc/build/gcc-test2/gcc/xgcc -B/home/seurer/gcc

[Bug tree-optimization/80894] [8 Regression] 456.hmmer in SPEC CPU 2006 is miscompiled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80894 --- Comment #7 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Yes, there is quite a bit of difference especially starting in the function read_asc20hmm. There are a whole bunch of if/else ifs there using strncmp.

[Bug target/80618] [8 regression] test case gcc.dg/pr50310-2.c fails with ICE starting with 247544

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80618 --- Comment #9 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Segher's revision fixed the ICEs but the 4 other test case failures were due to this (r247544) revision. gcc.dg/vect/vect-50.c gcc.dg/vect/vect-44.c gfortran.dg/vect/vect-2.f90 gfortran.dg/vect

[Bug other/80946] New: [8 regression] test cases gfortran.dg/vect/vect-2.f90 and gfortran.dg/vect/vect-5.f90 fail starting with r247544

Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: other Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- This is split from the earlier pr https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla

[Bug tree-optimization/81038] New: [8 regression] test case g++.dg/vect/slp-pr56812.cc fails starting with r248678

: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- This test case was failing recently (https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80925) but starting working

[Bug tree-optimization/81038] [8 regression] test case g++.dg/vect/slp-pr56812.cc fails starting with r248678

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81038 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target||powerpc

[Bug other/81096] New: [8 regression] test case ttest in libbacktrace fail starting with r249111

Priority: P3 Component: other Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- This started failing on powerpc64 LE with r249111. It also fails with the same error for BE though note that on BE some

[Bug other/81096] [8 regression] test case ttest in libbacktrace fail starting with r249111

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81096 --- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- 10001510 : 10001510: 03 10 40 3c lis r2,4099 10001514: 00 7f 42 38 addir2,r2,32512 10001518: a6 02 08 7c mflrr0 1000151c: 10 00 01 f8

[Bug other/81041] New: [8 regression] test case gcc.dg/pr78582.c fails with ICE starting with r249058

: normal Priority: P3 Component: other Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- I am seeing this on powerpc64 both BE and LE. make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS=dg.exp=gcc.dg/pr78582.c spawn -ignore SIGHUP

[Bug middle-end/80644] New: [8 regression] many test cases fails starting with 247622

Priority: P3 Component: middle-end Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- All these tests fail now on powerpc64 LE. From the details it looks like they all are triggering overflow warnings from -Wstringop-overflow

[Bug other/80678] New: g++.dg/cpp1y/constexpr-79681-2.C fails with ICE starting with r247678

Priority: P3 Component: other Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- The backported test g++.dg/cpp1y/constexpr-79681-2.C fails with an ICE on powerpcle: spawn /home/seurer/gcc/build/gcc-6/gcc

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >