--- Additional Comments From wilson at specifixinc dot com 2005-02-19
23:15 ---
Subject: Re: gcc.dg/transparent-union-* fail on ia64-hpux
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-19
21:24 ---
Hmm, Does
--- Additional Comments From wilson at specifixinc dot com 2005-02-19
23:31 ---
Subject: Re: New: gcc.dg/ia64-fptr-1.c fails on ia64-hpux
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
ld: Unsatisfied symbol _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_ in file /var/tmp//ccU3vrUt.o
DT_PLTGOT will hold the gp value
--- Additional Comments From wilson at specifixinc dot com 2005-02-21
23:11 ---
Subject: Re: gcc.dg/transparent-union-* fail on ia64-hpux
giovannibajo at libero dot it wrote:
--- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2005-02-20
13:03 ---
Jim
--- Additional Comments From wilson at specifixinc dot com 2005-02-21
23:19 ---
Subject: Re: gcc.dg/transparent-union-* fail on ia64-hpux
giovannibajo at libero dot it wrote:
--- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2005-02-20
13:03 ---
Jim
--- Additional Comments From wilson at specifixinc dot com 2005-03-30
22:49 ---
Subject: Re: missing vector support
steven at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-30
11:21 ---
Is anyone going to work
--- Additional Comments From wilson at specifixinc dot com 2005-04-05
19:44 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] Many C++ testsuite failures
on ia64-hpux
jh at suse dot cz wrote:
This sounds like reason for the failure. What precisely is the
behaviour of FDESC_ADDR? (ie should I
--- Additional Comments From wilson at specifixinc dot com 2005-04-19
23:05 ---
Subject: Re: IA-64 NaT consumption faults due to uninitialized
register reads
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-19
20:47
--- Additional Comments From wilson at specifixinc dot com 2005-01-08
03:51 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0 regression] [ia64] Extra '.restore sp'
in tail call
On Wed, 2004-12-22 at 14:47, debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
wrote:
--- Additional Comments From debian-gcc
--- Additional Comments From wilson at specifixinc dot com 2005-01-11
04:06 ---
Subject: Re: [3.3/3.4/4.0 regression] [ia64] Extra
'.restore sp' in tail call
On Fri, 2005-01-07 at 20:47, gdr at integrable-solutions dot net wrote:
I must have missed that patch
--- Additional Comments From wilson at specifixinc dot com 2005-01-13
22:36 ---
Subject: Re: operations on vector mode not recognized in C++
On Wed, 2005-01-12 at 01:44, rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen
dot de wrote:
--- Additional Comments From rguenth at tat dot
--- Additional Comments From wilson at specifixinc dot com 2004-10-19 01:07
---
Subject: Re: New: bad unwind info due to multiple
returns (missing epilogue)
On Fri, 2004-10-15 at 04:14, davidm at hpl dot hp dot com wrote:
To fix this bug, GCC should be emitting a .restore sp
--- Additional Comments From wilson at specifixinc dot com 2004-11-11
00:40 ---
Subject: Re: [3.4/4.0 Regression] libstdc++ fails for
crosses
On Wed, 2004-11-10 at 13:11, mg_gentoo at yahoo dot com wrote:
--- Additional Comments From mg_gentoo at yahoo dot com 2004-11-10
12 matches
Mail list logo
