Hi,
X32 may use SUBREG_REG in parts.index and parts.base. I checked
this patch into x32 branch.
H.J.
---
commit e2f00cf7ffb008eb4710221853d82fa1b81433e0
Author: H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com
Date: Sun Mar 6 11:14:50 2011 -0800
Check SUBREG_REG for parts.index and parts.base.
diff --git
It was recently pointed out to me that we still have the README.QMTEST
file in gcc/testsuite. That file talks about how to use QMTest
instead of DejaGNU to test G++ -- but the information there is just
not accurate anymore. Various things have bit-rotted since the point
at which that was
It was recently pointed out to me that we still have the README.QMTEST
file in gcc/testsuite. That file talks about how to use QMTest
instead of DejaGNU to test G++ -- but the information there is just
not accurate anymore. Various things have bit-rotted since the point
at which that was
On 3/6/2011 2:57 PM, Mike Stump wrote:
It was recently pointed out to me that we still have the
README.QMTEST file in gcc/testsuite. That file talks about how to
use QMTest instead of DejaGNU to test G++
If you were to summarize the 3 most compelling features provided, I'd
be interested.
Isn't this too conservative? Shouldn't CONSTANT_ALIGNMENT increase
the alignment of STRING_CST to word-aligned? The only problem is
structs?
- David
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 2:34 AM, Alan Modra amo...@gmail.com wrote:
Prior to a fix I committed recently on the gcc-4.5-ibm branch, we used
to
This patch, for 4.7 and relative to a tree with
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-02/msg01709.html applied,
stops the MN10300 handle_option hook from using global state. The
-mtune= option, taking a string argument and storing it in a string
variable, is made to use Var to store the string
2011/3/4 Gerald Pfeifer ger...@pfeifer.com:
On Thu, 3 Mar 2011, Mingjie Xing wrote:
2011-03-03 Mingjie Xing mingjie.x...@gmail.com
* doc/cfg.texi: Remove See before @ref.
* doc/invoke.texi: Likewise.
This is fine, thank you. If you want to apply this to the GCC 4.5
2011/2/25 Mingjie Xing mingjie.x...@gmail.com:
Hi,
This patch updates the description about ENTRY_BLOCK_PTR and
EXIT_BLOCK_PTR, since their index numbers are no longer negative now.
Is it OK?
Thanks,
Mingjie
ChangeLog,
2011-02-25 Mingjie Xing mingjie.x...@gmail.com
*
