On 08/19/2011 09:11 PM, Rainer Orth wrote:
2011-07-31 Rainer Orthr...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de
config:
* picflag.m4: New file.
gcc:
* configure.ac (GCC_PICFLAG_FOR_TARGET): Call it.
(PICFLAG_FOR_TARGET): Substitute.
* aclocal.m4: Regenerate.
Hello list,
the followup patches are a selection of minor changes introduced in
various times during my GSOC project. They mostly are simple or
not that important to be posted alone, so I'll post them alltogether under
this thread. Nevertheless they have been carefully selected from a pool of
2011-08-22 Dimitrios Apostolou ji...@gmx.net
* emit-rtl.c (mem_attrs_htab_hash): Hash massively by calling
iterative_hash(). We disregard the offset,size rtx fields of the
mem_attrs struct, but overall this hash is a *huge* improvement to
the previous one, it
free() was called way too often before, this patch reduces it
significantly. Minor speed-up here too, I don't mention it individually
since numbers are within noise margins.
2011-08-22 Dimitrios Apostolou ji...@gmx.net
* graphds.h (struct graph): Added edge_pool as a pool for
2011-08-22 Dimitrios Apostolou ji...@gmx.net
Allocate some very frequently used vectors on the stack:
* vecir.h: Defined a tree vector on the stack.
* tree-ssa-sccvn.c (print_scc, sort_scc, process_scc)
(extract_and_process_scc_for_name): Allocate the scc
2011-08-22 Dimitrios Apostolou ji...@gmx.net
* tree-ssa-structalias.c (equiv_class_add)
(perform_var_substitution, free_var_substitution_info): Created a
new equiv_class_pool allocator pool for struct
equiv_class_label. Changed the pointer_equiv_class_table and
As described in PR50146, a recent change to ira-color.c caused trunk to
fail to bootstrap on ARM. The issue is that a new variable saved_nregs
is declared unconditionally but used #ifndef HONOR_REG_ALLOC_ORDER. Since
the ARM backend defines HONOR_REG_ALLOC_ORDER, an 'unused variable' warning
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 10:32:35AM +0300, Dimitrios Apostolou wrote:
--- gcc/emit-rtl.c2011-05-29 17:40:05 +
+++ gcc/emit-rtl.c2011-08-21 04:44:25 +
@@ -256,11 +256,10 @@ mem_attrs_htab_hash (const void *x)
{
const mem_attrs *const p = (const mem_attrs *) x;
- return
2011-08-22 Dimitrios Apostolou ji...@gmx.net
* tree-ssa-pre.c (phi_trans_add, init_pre, fini_pre): Added a pool
for phi_translate_table elements to avoid free() calls from
htab_delete().
=== modified file 'gcc/tree-ssa-pre.c'
--- gcc/tree-ssa-pre.c 2011-05-04
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 10:37:58AM +0300, Dimitrios Apostolou wrote:
--- gcc/graphds.h 2009-02-20 15:20:38 +
+++ gcc/graphds.h 2011-08-19 16:44:41 +
@@ -18,6 +18,10 @@ You should have received a copy of the G
along with GCC; see the file COPYING3. If not see
Forgot the patch...
On Mon, 22 Aug 2011, Dimitrios Apostolou wrote:
2011-08-22 Dimitrios Apostolou ji...@gmx.net
* tree-ssa-structalias.c (equiv_class_add)
(perform_var_substitution, free_var_substitution_info): Created a
new equiv_class_pool allocator pool for
Hi Jakub,
I forgot to mention that all patches are against mid-July trunk, I was
hoping I'd have no conflicts. Anyway thanks for letting me know,
if there are conflicts with my other patches please let me know, and I'll
post an updated version at a later date.
All your other concerns are
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 10:58:48AM +0300, Dimitrios Apostolou wrote:
the future. I didn't like hashing addresses either, and I was
surprised I saw no regressions.
Hashing on the expr address as well just results in smaller sharing
in the hash table (i.e. if the expr has different address, but
For whoever is concerned about memory usage, I didn't measure a real
increase, besides a few KB. These are very hot allocation pools and
allocating too many blocks of 10 elements is suboptimal.
2011-08-22 Dimitrios Apostolou ji...@gmx.net
* cselib.c (cselib_init): Increased
Attached patch is also posted at bug #19832 and I think resolves it, as
well as /maybe/ offers a negligible speedup of 3-4 M instr or a couple
milliseconds. I also post it here for comments.
2011-08-13 Dimitrios Apostolou ji...@gmx.net
* cse.c (preferable): Make it more readable and
Ping.
On 18 July 2011 15:00, Michael Zolotukhin
michael.v.zolotuk...@gmail.com wrote:
Here is a summary - probably, it doesn't cover every single piece in
the patch, but I tried to describe the major changes. I hope this will
help you a bit - and of course I'll answer your further questions if
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 1:39 PM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
This is the third version of BMI2 support that includes generation of
mulx, rorx, shiftx part. This patch includes all comments on
previous version, splits all insn post-reload, uses enable attribute
and avoids new register
Tobias,
I saw that the test case now XPASSes and I find also some xpass in
gcc-testresult. (Not for all, but I think those do not build graphite.)
I think the XPASS is due to
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2011-08/msg00023.html
This is PR tree-optimization/50124.
Rainer
--
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 09:46:17AM +0200, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
Patch was pre-approved by Vladimir Makarov in the PR trail, but I don't
have svn write access so I'll need help to commit it.
Committed, thanks.
Jakub
Use __x86_64__ instead of __LP64__ in setjmp/longjmp and TLS
definitions.
H.J.: Is that sufficient for x32, or do we need entirely different code?
If so, can you please provide the required changes?
Otherwise, OK for branch?
commit 5337bae3f70d53e463d09e8d6806826876b0da8a
Author: Torvald Riegel
Hello,
I'm attaching here the final version of statistics dumping, I think I made
some stylistic/insignificant changes. Tested on i386 and x86_64. I have
withheld the hash table size changes, so please apply if you find
everything good.
Would you agree on a future patch that would make such
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 9:43 AM, Dimitrios Apostolou ji...@gmx.net wrote:
2011-08-22 Dimitrios Apostolou ji...@gmx.net
Allocate some very frequently used vectors on the stack:
* vecir.h: Defined a tree vector on the stack.
* tree-ssa-sccvn.c (print_scc, sort_scc,
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 9:37 AM, Dimitrios Apostolou ji...@gmx.net wrote:
free() was called way too often before, this patch reduces it significantly.
Minor speed-up here too, I don't mention it individually since numbers are
within noise margins.
As there is no re-use in this pool the natural
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 9:46 AM, Dimitrios Apostolou ji...@gmx.net wrote:
2011-08-22 Dimitrios Apostolou ji...@gmx.net
* tree-ssa-structalias.c (equiv_class_add)
(perform_var_substitution, free_var_substitution_info): Created a
new equiv_class_pool allocator pool for
A small change. OK for branch?
commit b9db8481779fc5a4069ac36505bd6cce8da971a1
Author: Torvald Riegel trie...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Aug 22 11:52:00 2011 +0200
Move x86 TLS definition to linux/x86.
* config/x86/tls.h: Moved to ...
* config/linux/x86/tls.h: ... here.
diff
Tested on arm-linux-gnueabi. OK to install?
gcc/
* config/arm/arm-protos.h (arm_writeback_dep): Declare.
(arm_writeback_only_dep): Likewise.
* config/arm/arm.c (arm_writeback_dep): New function.
(arm_writeback_only_dep_1, arm_writeback_only_dep): Likewise.
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 10:58:48AM +0300, Dimitrios Apostolou wrote:
the future. I didn't like hashing addresses either, and I was
surprised I saw no regressions.
Hashing on the expr address as well just results in
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 9:50 AM, Dimitrios Apostolou ji...@gmx.net wrote:
2011-08-22 Dimitrios Apostolou ji...@gmx.net
* tree-ssa-pre.c (phi_trans_add, init_pre, fini_pre): Added a pool
for phi_translate_table elements to avoid free() calls from
htab_delete().
Ok if
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 11:57:18AM +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
And at some point the idea popped up to just dump this whole re-using
mem-attrs. There is at most a single function in RTL but the whole program
is available in SSA, so the memory overhead must be small.
Some functions are
On Mon, 22 Aug 2011, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 9:46 AM, Dimitrios Apostolou ji...@gmx.net wrote:
2011-08-22 Dimitrios Apostolou ji...@gmx.net
* tree-ssa-structalias.c (equiv_class_add)
(perform_var_substitution, free_var_substitution_info): Created a
Applied.
Richard.
2011-08-22 Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de
PR testsuite/50145
* gcc.dg/torture/pr50067-1.c: Run on little-endian systems only.
* gcc.dg/torture/pr50067-2.c: Likewise.
Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr50067-1.c
Hello list,
this patch has all of my changes to var-tracking that I believe are worth
keeping. These are all minor changes not touching algorithmic issues, I
lost much time trying to understand what is actually done in
var-tracking.c but I still don't get it. I wish there was some document
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 12:07 PM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 11:57:18AM +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
And at some point the idea popped up to just dump this whole re-using
mem-attrs. There is at most a single function in RTL but the whole program
is
While looking at the multiarch patches, I noticed that a previous change is not
necessary. MULTILIB_DEFAULTS is handled in config/mips/mips.h.
Matthias
gcc/
2011-08-22 Matthias Klose d...@debian.org
Revert:
2011-07-11 Arthur Loiret aloi...@debian.org
Matthias Klose d...@debian.org writes:
2011-08-22 Matthias Klose d...@debian.org
Revert:
2011-07-11 Arthur Loiret aloi...@debian.org
Matthias Klose d...@debian.org
* config/mips/t-linux64 (MULTILIB_DIRNAMES): Set to 'n32 . 64' if
tm_defines
Hello,
In c_common_read_pch when gt_pch_restore loads a new pch, the previous
line table (referenced from the global 'line_table') is
garbage-collected and a new one is built.
As the global instance of cpp_reader referenced by the local variable
'pfile' has a pfile-line_table member that
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 12:53 AM, Artem Shinkarov
artyom.shinkar...@gmail.com wrote:
Richard
I formalized an approach a little-bit, now it works without target
hooks, but some polishing is still required. I want you to comment on
the several important approaches that I use in the patch.
So
Hello,
the attached patch applies after my previous one, and actually cancels all
runtime gains from it. It doesn't make things worse than initially, so
it's not *that* bad.
While trying to understand var-tracking I deleted the whole shared hash
table concept and some other indirections. It
I should note here that specialised hash-tables in pointer-set.c have a
load-factor of at most 25%. Also another very fast hash table I've
studied, dense_hash_map from google's sparse_hash_table, has a load factor
of 50% max.
As I understand it a good hash function gives a perfectly random
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 02:26:58PM +0300, Dimitrios Apostolou wrote:
the attached patch applies after my previous one, and actually
cancels all runtime gains from it. It doesn't make things worse than
initially, so it's not *that* bad.
You should really test it on the testcases which lead to
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 1:37 PM, Dimitrios Apostolou ji...@gmx.net wrote:
I should note here that specialised hash-tables in pointer-set.c have a
load-factor of at most 25%. Also another very fast hash table I've studied,
dense_hash_map from google's sparse_hash_table, has a load factor of 50%
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 01:30:33PM +0300, Dimitrios Apostolou wrote:
--- gcc/var-tracking.c2011-06-03 01:42:31 +
+++ gcc/var-tracking.c2011-08-22 09:52:08 +
@@ -1069,14 +1067,14 @@ adjust_insn (basic_block bb, rtx insn)
static inline bool
dv_is_decl_p (decl_or_value
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 12:25 PM, Richard Guenther
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 12:53 AM, Artem Shinkarov
artyom.shinkar...@gmail.com wrote:
Richard
I formalized an approach a little-bit, now it works without target
hooks, but some polishing is still required. I
Hello again,
most of this patch was posted at the beginning of my GSOC adventure and
primarily is about replacing fprintf() calls with custom faster ones. From
that time I changed minor things you suggested, omitted some complexities
that offered minor speed-up, and made the code as clear as
Thank you for all the answers. Now I have another problem.
When I reach a function call during statement iteration, I want to go to
this function's code.
if (is_gimple_call(stmt)) {
tree fndecl = gimple_call_fndecl(stmt); // This returns
function_decl ;-)
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Mateusz Grabowski grabek...@wp.pl wrote:
Thank you for all the answers. Now I have another problem.
When I reach a function call during statement iteration, I want to go to
this function's code.
if (is_gimple_call(stmt)) {
tree fndecl =
Richard Guenther-2 wrote:
The latter.
But how to do it? I want to have all functions after SSA pass, but before
any optimizations. Maybe you could tell me how to enforce it (or even better
- a small example)?
Thanks in advance.
--
View this message in context:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 2:42 AM, Torvald Riegel trie...@redhat.com wrote:
Use __x86_64__ instead of __LP64__ in setjmp/longjmp and TLS
definitions.
H.J.: Is that sufficient for x32, or do we need entirely different code?
If so, can you please provide the required changes?
I need to take a
Hi Steven,
On Mon, 1 Aug 2011, Steven Bosscher wrote:
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 11:59 PM, Steven Bosscher stevenb@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 11:48 PM, Steven Bosscher stevenb@gmail.com wrote:
I'll see if I can test the patch on the compile farm this weekend,
just to be
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 6:18 AM, Kirill Yukhin kirill.yuk...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
thanks for input, Uros. Spaces were fixed.
Updated patch is attached. ChangeLog entry is attached.
Could anybody please commit it?
I checked in for you.
--
H.J.
Thanks!
K
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 5:57 PM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 6:18 AM, Kirill Yukhin kirill.yuk...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
thanks for input, Uros. Spaces were fixed.
Updated patch is attached. ChangeLog entry is attached.
Could anybody please commit
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revisionrevision=177954
Committed that patchlet as obvious.
testsuite/
* gcc.dg/pr49994-2.c: Add dg-require-effective-target scheduling.
* gcc.dg/pr49994-3.c: Ditto.
Johann
Index: ChangeLog
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 10:37 PM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 05:09:59PM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
I didn't know .init_array section was enabled for AIX. Does this patch
work for you?
Some ELF targets (e.g. arm*-linux*) don't use elfos.h. IMHO you should
Hi,
On Sun, 21 Aug 2011, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 11:02 PM, Richard Henderson r...@redhat.com wrote:
On 08/19/2011 02:04 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
So make sure that __cpu_indicator initially has a conservative correct
value? I'd still prefer the
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 7:07 AM, Michael Matz m...@suse.de wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, 21 Aug 2011, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 11:02 PM, Richard Henderson r...@redhat.com wrote:
On 08/19/2011 02:04 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
So make sure that __cpu_indicator initially has a
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Mateusz Grabowski grabek...@wp.pl wrote:
Richard Guenther-2 wrote:
The latter.
But how to do it? I want to have all functions after SSA pass, but before
any optimizations. Maybe you could tell me how to enforce it (or even better
- a small example)?
Jakub == Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com writes:
Jakub For ccache and friends I think it would be better to have a
Jakub preprocessing mode that would output all lines as is (i.e. no
Jakub macro replacement), except for processing #include/#include_next
Jakub directives.
That exists --
Hi!
As the testcase below shows (on i686-linux or x86_64-linux -m32),
we don't unshare expressions in CALL_INSN_FUNCTION_USAGE, which
with entry_value support now include MEMs. The invalid sharing then
can lead to changes in unrelated insns affecting a call insn (or vice
versa), which results in
Hi!
DECL_THREAD_LOCAL_P may be used only on VAR_DECLs, not other decls
like PARM_DECL, RESULT_DECL etc.
Fixed thusly, bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux,
ok for trunk?
2011-08-22 Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com
PR middle-end/50141
* expr.c (get_bit_range):
Hi!
The following testcase ICEs, because gsi_end_p (*gsi) and thus
there is no stmt after it from which to copy over the location.
As can be seen in the PR, we could do ugly hacks to retrieve locus
from previous stmt (non-debug of course) instead, but I'm probably missing
something obvious why we
Hi!
TYPE_TRANSPARENT_AGGR types are passed and mangled as its first field.
But if somebody errorneously doesn't put any types in its definition,
the FE marks it TYPE_TRANSPARENT_AGGR early (e.g. even on a forward
declaration), but during mangling or in middle-end when trying to find out
how it
On 11-08-22 07:10 , Dodji Seketeli wrote:
Hello,
In c_common_read_pch when gt_pch_restore loads a new pch, the previous
line table (referenced from the global 'line_table') is
garbage-collected and a new one is built.
As the global instance of cpp_reader referenced by the local variable
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 08:16:45AM -0600, Tom Tromey wrote:
Jakub == Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com writes:
Jakub For ccache and friends I think it would be better to have a
Jakub preprocessing mode that would output all lines as is (i.e. no
Jakub macro replacement), except for processing
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 7:06 AM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 10:37 PM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 05:09:59PM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
I didn't know .init_array section was enabled for AIX. Does this patch
work for you?
Some ELF
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 4:18 PM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi!
DECL_THREAD_LOCAL_P may be used only on VAR_DECLs, not other decls
like PARM_DECL, RESULT_DECL etc.
Fixed thusly, bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux,
ok for trunk?
Ok.
Thanks,
Richard.
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 4:22 PM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi!
The following testcase ICEs, because gsi_end_p (*gsi) and thus
there is no stmt after it from which to copy over the location.
As can be seen in the PR, we could do ugly hacks to retrieve locus
from previous stmt
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 2:05 PM, Artem Shinkarov
artyom.shinkar...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 12:25 PM, Richard Guenther
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 12:53 AM, Artem Shinkarov
artyom.shinkar...@gmail.com wrote:
Richard
I formalized an approach a
On 08/22/2011 04:45 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
Can I check in this patch to address AIX issue first?
I will submit a patch to test .section .init_array later?
Thanks.
Yes.
Paolo
This patch fixes some template test cases. We were trying to
expand functions that did not really need expanding (templates). This
got me thinking that we are not approaching the expansion properly.
We are trying to re-create all the cgraph creation done during the
compilation of the header
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 4:01 PM, Richard Guenther
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 2:05 PM, Artem Shinkarov
artyom.shinkar...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 12:25 PM, Richard Guenther
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 12:53 AM, Artem
This patch refactors pph_write_tree and pph_read_tree so that we can
reduce the amount of special casing we were doing. It first tries to
handle nodes based on their tree code class. The only class that
cannot be handled this way is tcc_exceptional, so we only deal with
those nodes individually.
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 4:34 PM, Richard Guenther
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 5:21 PM, Artem Shinkarov
artyom.shinkar...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 4:01 PM, Richard Guenther
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 2:05 PM, Artem
Hi,
On Mon, 22 Aug 2011, Richard Guenther wrote:
Some functions are extremely large though. Do you mean that MEM
itself would be enlarged to have the MEM_ATTRS field so that one
operand is the address, then expr, then HWI size, offset, etc.?
Because if the mem attrs aren't shared
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 4:19 PM, David Edelsohn dje@gmail.com wrote:
This patch broke bootstrap on AIX. It emits a .section op in
assembly but .section is an ELF syntax op not AIX XCOFF.
FE..initialize_critical:
.section .init_array
varasm.c should not be generating ELF
@@ -4354,7 +4354,8 @@ get_bit_range (unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT *b
|| TREE_CODE (innerdecl) == TARGET_MEM_REF)
!ptr_deref_may_alias_global_p (TREE_OPERAND (innerdecl, 0)))
|| (DECL_P (innerdecl)
- (DECL_THREAD_LOCAL_P (innerdecl)
+ ((TREE_CODE
Hi,
On Mon, 22 Aug 2011, H.J. Lu wrote:
Oh, I thought it was data initialized by the constructor ...
Sriramans patch right now has a function __cpu_indicator_init which is
called from (adhoc constructed) ctors and that initializes variables
__cpu_model and __cpu_features ;-) There's
Paolo Bonzini bonz...@gnu.org writes:
On 08/19/2011 09:11 PM, Rainer Orth wrote:
2011-07-31 Rainer Orthr...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de
config:
* picflag.m4: New file.
gcc:
* configure.ac (GCC_PICFLAG_FOR_TARGET): Call it.
(PICFLAG_FOR_TARGET): Substitute.
*
Do I need to sync the config and libiberty parts to src manually or does
this happen by some sort of magic?
intl/; config.rhost; libiberty/; libiberty's part of include/
gcc: http://gcc.gnu.org
Changes need to be done in tandem with the official GCC
sources or
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/22/11 11:16, Dimitrios Apostolou wrote:
Any updates will come as a followup to this thread. I still have to
do some testing on other platforms. Do we have access to any PA and
MIPS machinery? I also wanted to test on architecture with lots
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 10:09 AM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 10:37 PM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
nd/or add another test to it that tests
that you can actually use
.section .init_array
and it will use correct section flags for the section.
We need
Ping 2 ?
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-07/msg01889.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-07/msg02555.html
On 08/21/2011 02:14 AM, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 08/20/2011 09:51 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
Multiarch [1] is the term being used to refer to the capability of a system to
install and run applications of multiple different binary targets on the same
system. The idea and name of multiarch
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 1:54 PM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
* From a very wide field of view, all this DF solving reminded me a
lot of what I've seen in df-*.c. Why can't variable tracking be
integrated in the main DF pass of the compiler, the one that happens
*after* register
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 07:49:43PM +0200, Steven Bosscher wrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 1:54 PM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
* From a very wide field of view, all this DF solving reminded me a
lot of what I've seen in df-*.c. Why can't variable tracking be
integrated in the main
DJ Delorie d...@redhat.com writes:
Do I need to sync the config and libiberty parts to src manually or does
this happen by some sort of magic?
intl/; config.rhost; libiberty/; libiberty's part of include/
gcc: http://gcc.gnu.org
Changes need to be done in tandem with the
This is a refactoring patch, it doesn't change/fix anything in pph itself.
I extracted out/in logic for includes into their own functions.
I removed the LINETAB parameter from in/out functions for the line_table as
there is only one line_table and that's the only one we stream, the main/global
On 11-08-22 14:20 , Gabriel Charette wrote:
2011-08-22 Gabriel Charettegch...@google.com
* pph-streamer-in.c (pph_loc_offset): Add FIXME to move this variable
to pph_stream.encoder.r
(pph_in_include): New.
(pph_in_line_table_and_includes): Remove LINETAB
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 9:02 AM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 8:56 AM, Michael Matz m...@suse.de wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 22 Aug 2011, H.J. Lu wrote:
Oh, I thought it was data initialized by the constructor ...
Sriramans patch right now has a function
On Mon, 22 Aug 2011, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 10:37 PM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
nd/or add another test to it that tests
that you can actually use
.section .init_array
and it will use correct section flags for the section.
We need this information in
On 11-08-21 18:14 , Mark Heffernan wrote:
Ping?
Mark
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 9:41 AM, Mark Heffernanmeh...@google.com wrote:
This patch adds an option for enabling/disabling the warning for
attempting to free nonheap objects (PR/38509). The warning is
imprecise and can issue false
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 11:53 AM, Joseph S. Myers
jos...@codesourcery.com wrote:
On Mon, 22 Aug 2011, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 10:37 PM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
nd/or add another test to it that tests
that you can actually use
.section .init_array
and it will
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 11:50 AM, Sriraman Tallam tmsri...@google.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 9:02 AM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 8:56 AM, Michael Matz m...@suse.de wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 22 Aug 2011, H.J. Lu wrote:
Oh, I thought it was data initialized
On Mon, 22 Aug 2011, H.J. Lu wrote:
Require a good assembler on ELF targets and just enable this by default
for them without trying a configure test that won't work for cross
compilation (AC_RUN_IFELSE is bad).
The toplevel config/elf.m4 provides a good notion of what is or is not
ELF
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 11:58 AM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 11:50 AM, Sriraman Tallam tmsri...@google.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 9:02 AM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 8:56 AM, Michael Matz m...@suse.de wrote:
Hi,
On Mon,
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 8:51 PM, Kirill Yukhin kirill.yuk...@gmail.com wrote:
Attached fix for http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50155
ChangeLog entry:
2011-08-22 Kirill Yukhin kirill.yuk...@intel.com
PR target/50155
* config/i386/sse.md (VI1248_AVX2): New.
OK to install?
* config/m32c/m32c.h (CLASS_MAX_NREGS): Remove macro.
* config/m32c/m32c-protos.h (m32c_class_max_nregs): Remove.
* config/m32c/m32c.c (m32c_class_max_nregs): Make static. Change
regclass argument type to reg_class_t. Change 'max' and 'v'
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 6:25 PM, Ilya Tocar tocarip.in...@gmail.com wrote:
You don't need to add negated versions, one FMA builtin per mode is
enough, please see existing FMA4 descriptions. Just put unary minus
sign in the intrinsics header for negated operand and let GCC do its
job. Please
OK.
Jason
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 5:34 PM, Richard Guenther
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
In this case it is simple to analyse that a is a comparison, but you
cannot embed the operations of a into VEC_COND_EXPR.
Sure, but if the above is C source the frontend would generate
res = a != 0 ? v0 : v1;
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 6:02 PM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 8:56 AM, Michael Matz m...@suse.de wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 22 Aug 2011, H.J. Lu wrote:
Oh, I thought it was data initialized by the constructor ...
Sriramans patch right now has a function
1 - 100 of 116 matches
Mail list logo
