Hi!
On Sun, 21 Aug 2011 02:14:10 +0200, Matthias Klose d...@ubuntu.com wrote:
Non-text part: multipart/mixed
On 08/20/2011 09:51 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
Multiarch [1] is the term being used to refer to the capability of a system
to
install and run applications of multiple different
Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, committed on trunk.
2011-09-06 Arnaud Charlet char...@adacore.com
* gcc-interface/Makefile.in (X86_TARGET_PAIRS): Remove duplicate
declaration.
Index: gcc-interface/Makefile.in
===
-lm is a symlink to libSystem.dylib on all recent Darwin and
therefore not required (as libSystem is automatically provided by gcc).
Using -lm (especially when in conjunction with -flat_namespace) can
cause unexpected differences in behavior between Darwin 9 - Darwin10
(where the
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2011-08/threads.html#00264
Mikael Morin wrote:
the 4 follow-up patches try to refactor some common code
initializing gfc_ss structs.
Regression-tested (the 4 patches together only) on x86_64-freebsd8.2.
OK for trunk?
The patch set is OK. I think it is a nice
On Mon, 5 Sep 2011, Eric Botcazou wrote:
This avoids setting the TREE_OVERFLOW bit on DECL_FIELD_OFFSET for
the shifted bounds field.
If DECL_FIELD_OFFSET of array-field is always a constant we could
as well use
DECL_FIELD_OFFSET (bounds_field)
= size_int (-int_byte_position
1. rs6000.c (WORLD_SAVE_P) decides on the use of the out-of-line
prologue saves on the basis of cfun-calls_setjmp flag_exceptions.
of course, flag_exceptions is NOT set by Ada for SjLj - which is
what's used for the compiler build.
It isn't set because GNAT implements a different SJLJ
This set of changes implements support for AI05-0234's rules
about how the accessibility level of a function result object may
be determined by the point of call. The implementation involves
passing in an additional accessibility-level parameter to some
functions, similar in some ways to the
Hello Eric,
On 6 Sep 2011, at 08:41, Eric Botcazou wrote:
- it doesn't seem reasonable to force -fexceptions - until we can
build ada with ZCE.
Or change the SJLJ scheme.
Hm. I'm probably being a bit dumb here - but not clear about which
scheme/where in the code-base you have in mind.
The compiler complains when a limited private type has a full type
that is a protected type extending an interface, thinking that the
partial view is not limited. The compiler was incorrectly checking
that the partial view satisfies Is_Limited_Composite rather than simply
testing for limitedness.
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 3:29 AM, Jiangning Liu jiangning@arm.com wrote:
PING...
Ok.
-Original Message-
From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches-
ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Jiangning Liu
Sent: Friday, August 26, 2011 5:56 PM
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
A case expression is rewritten as an Expression_With_Actions, whose main
component is a case statement that mirrors the structure of the case expression.
The actions created for the expression in a given case alterantive must be
attached to the statement list of the ccrresponding case statement
That's a good question, and one that I haven't got to the bottom of -
but the exclusion was there in the original code-base [still in the
vendor's tree too].
(also, the rs6000 pro/epilogue code is not the easiest to navigate).
Assuming that this is because the non-local goto handler needs to
In addition to fixing some bugs, the major effect of this set of
changes is to temporarily disable support for AI05-0234's rules about how
the accessibility level of a function result object may be determined
by the point of call.
Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, committed on trunk
2011-09-06
On 09/05/2011 02:46 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 02:31:32PM +0200, Tom de Vries wrote:
--- gcc/recog.c (revision 178145)
+++ gcc/recog.c (working copy)
@@ -118,6 +118,46 @@ init_recog (void)
}
+/* Return true if labels in asm operands BODY are LABEL_REFs. */
+
Hi,
During testing the approved-for-commit middle-end patch for bug 43864 on ARM, I
ran into a gcc.dg/torture/pr46068.c ICE.
The following assert in haifa-sched.c:check_cfg triggered:
...
else if (any_condjump_p (head))
gcc_assert (/* Usual case. */
On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 11:05:16AM +0200, Tom de Vries wrote:
bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64, build and regtested on arm.
OK for trunk?
Yes.
2011-09-06 Tom de Vries t...@codesourcery.com
* recog.c (asm_labels_ok): New function.
(check_asm_operands): Use
This patch fixes a crash in the compiler when inlining a function call that
returns an unconstrained array in the context of an assignment created for an
extended return statement. The patch also optimizes the case where the target
of the assignment is a selected component, and avoid the use of an
Simplify s-linux*.ads files by using s-oscons-tmplt.c to generate proper
definition of pthread_mutex_t.
Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, committed on trunk
2011-09-06 Pascal Obry o...@adacore.com
* s-linux.ads, s-linux-alpha.ads, s-linux-hppa.ads, s-linux-mipsel.ads,
This patch adds the support needed to load references of entities
imported from other languages. This functionality is required by
tools processing ALI files (for example GPS).
Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, committed on trunk
2011-09-06 Javier Miranda mira...@adacore.com
* ali.adb
The final version of the Ada 2012 RM specifies that a type invariant can be
given in the private part of a package, on the completion of a private type
declaration.
The following must compile quietly:
package Inv is
type List is private;
private
type Length_T is new Integer;
type Array_T
Hi,
this is a regression present on the mainline/4.6/4.5 branches. I overlooked
the -mregnames business when I changed the probe_stack pattern and, while
this silently works on most platforms, this breaks on Darwin because of the
awkward assembler.
Tested on PowerPC/Darwin by Iain and on
Hi,
tested x86_64-linux, committed to mainline. See audit trail for details...
Thanks,
Paolo.
/
2011-09-06 Paolo Carlini paolo.carl...@oracle.com
PR libstdc++/50257
* include/bits/hashtable_policy.h (_Prime_rehash_policy::
_M_next_bkt): Optimize
Some cleanups before I touch this code.
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, applied to trunk.
Richard.
2011-09-06 Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de
* tree-ssa-sccvn.c (visit_use): CSE stmt pieces and simplify
matching.
Index: gcc/tree-ssa-sccvn.c
This small change brings the indirect case on par with the direct case when it
comes to eliminating an index check for dynamic arrays. No index check will
be generated for the following procedure in default mode:
type Darray is array (1 .. Q.N) of Long_Float;
procedure Add (X, Y : access
This change implements a new feature in the tasking runtime library: if
Unchecked_Deallocation is called on a non-terminated task (which was
previously a no-op), the task is now marked to be freed automatically when
it terminates.
The following test case demonstrates the feature:
$ gnatmake -q
This change fixes a defect in the tasking runtime library whereby a
task freeing its own Ada Task Control Block would reference it after it
had been deallocated, because the deallocation is made with abortion deferred,
and Abort_Undefer needs access to the ATCB.
In particular this happens when a
Bernd Schmidt ber...@codesourcery.com writes:
On 09/01/11 16:16, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Bernd Schmidt ber...@codesourcery.com writes:
On 08/26/11 14:57, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Wouldn't a reverse post-order (inverted_post_order_compute) allow even
more pre-opening (as well as being less
This patch provides support for attribute Descriptor_Size. Currently the
attribute is applicable only to unconstrained arrays types and returns the
size of the dope vector plus any additional padding due to alignment issues
in bits.
Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, committed on trunk
2011-09-06
Now that gnatmake supports -j0, it's possible to speed up the build of
gnattools during GNAT build by using gnatmake -j0 instead of gnatmake.
This is useful since gnattools is the only target which isn't parallelized
in the Makefile before this change.
Tested on x86_64-linux-gnu, committed on
This patch allows a better detection of unused formals in subprogram bodies.
Previously the use of a formal as the selector in a parameter association was
treated as a proper reference, thus missing otherwise unused entities.
The following command :
gcc -c -gnatwa k.adb
must yield:
Hi Arnaud,
Now that gnatmake supports -j0, it's possible to speed up the build of
gnattools during GNAT build by using gnatmake -j0 instead of gnatmake.
This is useful since gnattools is the only target which isn't parallelized
in the Makefile before this change.
this means using as many
Chung-Lin Tang clt...@codesourcery.com writes:
Hi Richard, this looks very similar to this patch, originally for LP:689887:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-01/msg00794.html
Apart from your additional handling in the dominance modes cases.
Indeed. Sorry about that. It must look odd
On 17 August 2011 15:49, Richard Earnshaw rearn...@arm.com wrote:
On 16/08/11 10:28, Ira Rosen wrote:
Hi,
This patch changes the default vector size for auto-vectorization on
ARM NEON to 128 bits. This new version is a result of a discussion
with Richard and Ramana.
wwwdocs changes will
this means using as many processes as there are CPUs, right? It seems pretty
Right, but only for gnattools, which is a relatively short time, and
which always occurs at the end of the build (so with nothing else
running at the same time).
dubious to me to use more processes than the user
Hi,
this is a regression present on the mainline and 4.6 branch caused by the
constructor uniquization patch. The tree_output_constant_def routine rejects
offsetof-like computations that can be written in the C family of languages.
While the C compiler folds most of them early, it doesn't if
If a record component is constrained with a current instance, that is to say
an access to the enclosing type, an initialization call for the component must
use a reference to the target object. Previously this was done when generating
the code for the initialization procedure for the encloing
Ada2012 Expression functions behave like default expressions in regards to
freezing rules: their declaration does not freeze, only a use of them (in a
call) freezes.
The following must compile quietly in Ada2012 mode:
---
with Interfaces; use Interfaces;
package Images is
type RGBQUAD is
No change in behavior, this patch just removes code that is not
used since a long time.
Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, committed on trunk
2011-09-06 Pascal Obry o...@adacore.com
* sysdep.c (winflush_nt): Removed as not needed anymore.
(winflush_95): Likewise.
On Tue, 6 Sep 2011, Eric Botcazou wrote:
Hi,
this is a regression present on the mainline and 4.6 branch caused by the
constructor uniquization patch. The tree_output_constant_def routine rejects
offsetof-like computations that can be written in the C family of languages.
While the C
Hello,
Thanks for review!
2011/9/3 Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com:
Did you also test on x32 ? H.J.'s x32 page [1] currently says that
Atom LEA optimization is disabled on x32 for some reason.
No. I did not try to cover x32. It will be a separate work.
+bool
+ix86_avoid_lea_for_addr (rtx
Hi,
I'm going to apply this after a quick c-only bootstrap and test on the
4.6 branch to revert my previous fix for PR 49886 because it causes PR
50295 (and probably also PR 50287 though I do not know whether that is
against trunk or 4.6 too).
I'm not reverting this on trunk because I know there
Hello,
2011/9/2 Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com:
I assume that you need to split tune attribute to int and FP part to
handle reassociation for other targets, since Atom handles both in the
same way.
Please also describe function return value in the comment (and perhaps
in documentation, too).
Hi Jeff, Hi Alex,
The MN10300 target is currently failing to build in the mainline FSF
sources because of this error when creating libgcc:
gcc/libgcc2.c: In function '__popcountsi2':
gcc/libgcc2.c:834:1: internal compiler error: in create_trace_edges, at
dwarf2cfi.c:2325
This
The body that is a rewriting of an expression function does not freeze previous
entities.
The following must compile quietly in Ada2012 mode:
---
package Ada12 is
type T is tagged null record;function Template (Self : T) return String
is (foo.thtml);
type T2 is new T with null
This patch implements the new restriction No_Implementation_Units, as
defined in AI 242. This restriction is also part of the new Ada 2012
profile No_Implementation_Extensions.
Here is a test of the new restriction (compiled with -gnatld7 -gnatj60)
1. pragma Ada_2005;
2. pragma
On 9/6/2011 7:14 AM, Duncan Sands wrote:
this means using as many processes as there are CPUs, right? It
seems pretty dubious to me to use more processes than the user maybe
asked for.
We often find that the optimum number of processes is a little bit more
than the number of physical
This patch fixes some errors in the previous initial checkin of this
new feature.
1. package noimpunit4 is end;
1. pragma Restrictions (No_Implementation_Units);
2. with noimpunit4;
3. with GNAT.IO;
|
violation of restriction
This makes SCCVN combine COMPLEX_EXPR arguments with its operands,
allowing to optimize piecewise pass-thru of a complex value.
The meat of the patch is the tuplification fix
! TREE_CODE (gimple_assign_rhs1 (def_stmt)) == SSA_NAME)
---
! TREE_CODE (TREE_OPERAND
This update adds many more magic numbers for various ARM CPUs, and
also ensures that the implementer is ARM (as opposed to Marvell, etc.).
The list is far from comprehensive, but it should cover many (but by no
means all) of the cores in current use and it would not be hard to add
support for
Hi,
PR target/50099 is a case where we are using the wrong predicate for
the sign_extend from QI to DImode values. ldrsb has a lower range than
the other ldrb instructions in ARM state and hence one has to be
careful about generating the right addresses when splitting it.
Attached is a patch to
On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 9:52 PM, Iyer, Balaji V balaji.v.i...@intel.com wrote:
Hello Everyone,
This patch is for the Cilk Plus branch. It will add the include
directory path it the testsuite script (cilk_plus.exp) in both
gcc.dg/cilk-plus and g++.dg/cilk-plus directories.
Thanking
Attached, please find a patch with the modifications you have suggested (adding
the info in Changelog.cilk).
Sorry for the mistake.
Thanks,
Balaji V. Iyer.
-Original Message-
From: H.J. Lu [mailto:hjl.to...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2011 10:22 AM
To: Iyer, Balaji V
Cc:
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 09:24:36AM +0200, Jan Hubicka wrote:
Hi,
the patch below improves the comparisons of BINFOs in IPA-CP. The
problem is that we can read different BINFOs for the same type (or a
base type component) from the LTO summaries because BINFOs coming from
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 7:30 AM, Iyer, Balaji V balaji.v.i...@intel.com wrote:
Attached, please find a patch with the modifications you have suggested
(adding the info in Changelog.cilk).
Please remove the extra blank line in ChangLog. ChangeLog
should simply say what you did, not why.
H.J.
I fixed all the changed you have requested. Here is an updated patch.
Thanks,
Balaji V. Iyer.
-Original Message-
From: H.J. Lu [mailto:hjl.to...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2011 10:41 AM
To: Iyer, Balaji V
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [Patch][Cilkplus branch]
Here is a new version of the patch which considers the changes from
2011-09-02 Richard Guenther
ChangeLog
20011-09-06 Artjoms Sinkarovs artyom.shinkar...@gmail.com
gcc/
* fold-const.c (constant_boolean_node): Adjust the meaning
of boolean for vector types: true = {-1,..},
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 4:50 PM, Artem Shinkarov
artyom.shinkar...@gmail.com wrote:
Here is a new version of the patch which considers the changes from
2011-09-02 Richard Guenther
ChangeLog
20011-09-06 Artjoms Sinkarovs artyom.shinkar...@gmail.com
gcc/
* fold-const.c
You should just say * g++.dg/cilk-plus/cilk_plus.exp: Likewise since
the change is the same as above.
H.J.
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 7:45 AM, Iyer, Balaji V balaji.v.i...@intel.com wrote:
I fixed all the changed you have requested. Here is an updated patch.
Thanks,
Balaji V. Iyer.
Sure! Here is the fixed patch.
Thanks,
Balaji V. Iyer.
-Original Message-
From: H.J. Lu [mailto:hjl.to...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2011 10:57 AM
To: Iyer, Balaji V
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [Patch][Cilkplus branch] Adding include directory path to
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Tom de Vries vr...@codesourcery.com wrote:
Hi,
During testing the approved-for-commit middle-end patch for bug 43864 on ARM,
I
ran into a gcc.dg/torture/pr46068.c ICE.
The following assert in haifa-sched.c:check_cfg triggered:
...
else if
On 09/06/2011 01:56 PM, Arnaud Charlet wrote:
this means using as many processes as there are CPUs, right? It seems pretty
Right, but only for gnattools, which is a relatively short time, and
which always occurs at the end of the build (so with nothing else
running at the same time).
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/06/11 07:01, Nick Clifton wrote:
Hi Jeff, Hi Alex,
The MN10300 target is currently failing to build in the mainline FSF
sources because of this error when creating libgcc:
gcc/libgcc2.c: In function '__popcountsi2': gcc/libgcc2.c:834:1:
On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 5:52 PM, Artem Shinkarov
artyom.shinkar...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 8:52 PM, Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com
wrote:
On Fri, 2 Sep 2011, Artem Shinkarov wrote:
Joseph, I don't understand this comment. I have 2 or 3 arguments in
the
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com wrote:
Is fixed version OK?
Thanks,
Ilya
---
gcc/
2011-09-06 Enkovich Ilya ilya.enkov...@intel.com
* config/i386/i386-protos.h (ix86_lea_outperforms): New.
(ix86_avoid_lea_for_add): Likewise.
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com wrote:
I assume that you need to split tune attribute to int and FP part to
handle reassociation for other targets, since Atom handles both in the
same way.
Please also describe function return value in the comment (and
This fixes PR47025, __builtin_va_end is preventing dead store
elimination and __builtin_va_start is an escape point for the
valist.
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, applied to trunk.
Richard.
2011-09-06 Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de
PR
2011/9/6 Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com:
OK.
Thanks,
Uros.
Could please someone check it in for me?
Thanks,
Ilya
On Sep 6, 2011, at 1:12 AM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
That's a good question, and one that I haven't got to the bottom of -
but the exclusion was there in the original code-base [still in the
vendor's tree too].
(also, the rs6000 pro/epilogue code is not the easiest to navigate).
Assuming that
Greetings,
This patch adds a lightweight self-consistency check to many vector
operations. Google issue 5246356.
Ok for google/integration branch?
Thanks,
--
2011-09-06 Paul Pluzhnikov ppluzhni...@google.com
* include/bits/stl_vector.h (__is_valid): New function.
(begin,
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 8:01 AM, Iyer, Balaji V balaji.v.i...@intel.com wrote:
Sure! Here is the fixed patch.
It won't apply. Please make sure that it is against cilkplus branch.
H.J.
Thanks,
Balaji V. Iyer.
-Original Message-
From: H.J. Lu [mailto:hjl.to...@gmail.com]
Sent:
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 9:28 AM, Paul Pluzhnikov ppluzhni...@google.com wrote:
This patch adds a lightweight self-consistency check to many vector
operations. Google issue 5246356.
Sorry, forgot to mention: tested by doing bootstrap and make check on
Linux/x86_64.
--
Paul Pluzhnikov
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 9:07 AM, Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com wrote:
2011/9/6 Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com:
OK.
Thanks,
Uros.
Could please someone check it in for me?
I checked it in for you.
--
H.J.
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 12:28, Paul Pluzhnikov ppluzhni...@google.com wrote:
Greetings,
This patch adds a lightweight self-consistency check to many vector
operations. Google issue 5246356.
Ok for google/integration branch?
Thanks,
--
2011-09-06 Paul Pluzhnikov ppluzhni...@google.com
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog.cilk b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog.cilk
index c9eac87..a602b88 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog.cilk
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog.cilk
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+2011-09-05 Balaji V. Iyer. balaji.v.i...@intel.com
^^ Your name
Hi,
the patch below makes SRA produce intere type replacements when it
currently produces enumeration type ones because this then may cause
VRP to assume wrong bounds (PR 49911).
I do not know how to create a testcase for the PR this should solve
because I could not reproduce it on yesterday's
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 12:54, Paul Pluzhnikov ppluzhni...@google.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 9:44 AM, Diego Novillo dnovi...@google.com wrote:
OK. Any reason not to send this (or a variant) to mainline?
AFAIU, mainline is not interested -- there is already a debug mode (enabled
by
2011/9/6 Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com:
Please merge your new splitters with corresponding LEA patterns.
OK with this change.
Thanks,
Uros.
Fixed. Could please someone check it in if it's OK now?
Thanks,
Ilya
---
gcc/
2011-09-06 Enkovich Ilya ilya.enkov...@intel.com
*
Hi,
somehow I lost two hunks in the patch allowing IPA-CP to process
functions with variable number of arguments and one of these omissions
caused PR 50301 (416.gamess LTO miscompilation). The two hunks check
the number of actual arguments in two places of IPA-CP which are not
executed so often
On 7/09/2011, at 3:13 AM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Tom de Vries vr...@codesourcery.com wrote:
Hi,
During testing the approved-for-commit middle-end patch for bug 43864 on
ARM, I
ran into a gcc.dg/torture/pr46068.c ICE.
The following assert in
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Diego Novillo dnovi...@google.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 12:54, Paul Pluzhnikov ppluzhni...@google.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 9:44 AM, Diego Novillo dnovi...@google.com wrote:
OK. Any reason not to send this (or a variant) to mainline?
AFAIU,
I checked it into cilkplus branch.
Thanks.
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 10:38 AM, Iyer, Balaji V balaji.v.i...@intel.com wrote:
OK..fixed. Please try it now.
Thanks,
Balaji V. Iyer.
From: H.J. Lu [hjl.to...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2011
A followup: non-literal argument types shouldn't change the constexpr
flag either, and we shouldn't crash when a constructor initializes bases
as well as members (50296). I'm not sure how my testing missed that bug...
Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, applying to trunk.
commit
OK.
Jason
On 08/08/2011 03:52 PM, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
+ cfun-language = NULL;
Might as well ggc_free it first.
+ /* We want T to be either a type or a TYPE_DECL. */
Comment is out of date.
Does __attribute ((used)) on the typedef prevent the warning?
Jason
On 6 September 2011 19:01, Paul Pluzhnikov wrote:
But this is something to discuss with libstdc++ (CC'd).
Sure. If the parallel debug mode is more tenable now, I am all for it.
I don't think anything has changed. I'm not excited by the idea of
another debug mode, especially not this patch,
On 6 September 2011 20:23, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
What's a dangling vector anyway? One that has been moved from?
Apparently not, since a moved-from vector would pass __valid() (as
indeed it should)
So I'm quite curious what bugs this catches. The existing debug mode
catches some fairly
I applied the following under the 'obvious' rule.
config/darwin10.h no longer modifies LIB_SPEC and thus the one in it
was just a duplicate of the one in darwin.h.
tidied.
cheers,
Iain
gcc:
* config/darwin10.h Remove duplicate LIB_SPEC.
Index: gcc/config/darwin10.h
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Jonathan Wakely jwakely@gmail.com wrote:
On 6 September 2011 20:23, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
What's a dangling vector anyway? One that has been moved from?
Apparently not, since a moved-from vector would pass __valid() (as
indeed it should)
So I'm quite
On 6 Sep 2011, at 21:19, Paul Pluzhnikov wrote:
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Jonathan Wakely jwakely@gmail.com
wrote:
On 6 September 2011 20:23, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
What's a dangling vector anyway? One that has been moved from?
Apparently not, since a moved-from vector
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Jonathan Wakely jwakely@gmail.com wrote:
for (it = v-begin(); it != v-end(); ++it) // Oops!
Eurgh, the occurrence of delete in anything except a destructor is a
code smell that should have led someone to find those bugs anyway!
Obviously the code above
Hello!
x32 follows x86_64 ABI, so no MMX regs are saved/restored in
__builtin_apply_args/__builtin_return, even with -mmmx. The patch also
includes some cleanups in this area.
2011-09-06 Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com
* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_function_value_regno_p): Use AX_REG.
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 8:00 PM, Maxim Kuvyrkov ma...@codesourcery.com wrote:
On 7/09/2011, at 3:13 AM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Tom de Vries vr...@codesourcery.com wrote:
Hi,
During testing the approved-for-commit middle-end patch for bug 43864 on
ARM, I
On 09/06/2011 04:21 PM, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
Jason Merrillja...@redhat.com a écrit:
A followup: non-literal argument types shouldn't change the constexpr
flag either, and we shouldn't crash when a constructor initializes
bases as well as members (50296). I'm not sure how my testing missed
On 6 September 2011 21:52, Paul Pluzhnikov wrote:
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Jonathan Wakely jwakely@gmail.com wrote:
for (it = v-begin(); it != v-end(); ++it) // Oops!
Eurgh, the occurrence of delete in anything except a destructor is a
code smell that should have led someone to
Hi,
somehow I lost two hunks in the patch allowing IPA-CP to process
functions with variable number of arguments and one of these omissions
caused PR 50301 (416.gamess LTO miscompilation). The two hunks check
the number of actual arguments in two places of IPA-CP which are not
executed so
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Jonathan Wakely jwakely@gmail.com wrote:
I don't mean for vector::begin and the other functions in that patch,
I mean in general for member functions of any type. There are plenty
of functions that wouldn't crash when called through a null pointer.
But even
I committed the following patch as obvious to make the dg-error test match the
current compiler's error message (the current compiler now lists the type which
broke the regexp).
2011-09-06 Michael Meissner meiss...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
* g++.dg/ext/altivec-17.C: Fix dg-error to match
I checked in the following patch to update the documentation for tm_p.h. I
noticed the FIXME comment in the texi source when I was working on my previous
patch for combining the standard and machine dependent builtin indexes. While
that patch did not go in, I figured I could improve the
Here's the tuple additions for constexpr now that it's ok to return
this.
I'm not quite sure what to do with the get, tie, tuple_cat functions
given the current signatures. Is tuple_cat now considered conforming?
If so, certain signatures can be constexpr.
tested x86/linux
benjamin2011-09-06
This patches fixes bugs that caused the multi-version tests to fail.
* mversn-dispatch.c (specialize_call): Rebuild cgraph edges after
specialization.
(clone_and_dispatch_function): Rebuild cgraph edges to compute
inline parameters.
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
