On 2011.10.28 at 07:20 +0200, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
On 2011.10.27 at 17:29 -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
Markus Trippelsdorf mar...@trippelsdorf.de writes:
By popular demand, I've prepared a patch that updates the in-tree
libtool to version 2.4.2. It is needed for lto-bootstrap with
2011/10/27 Georg-Johann Lay a...@gjlay.de:
This is support of a new option -maccumulate-args that implements
ACCUMULATE_OUTGOING_ARGS as proposed by Richard.
As 4.7 will be released very soon, I'd like to supply the documentation part
later and use the remaining stage I time for
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 01:48, Mikael Morin mikael.mo...@sfr.fr wrote:
On Tuesday 18 October 2011 17:11:24 Janne Blomqvist wrote:
Also, I think I've found a small standards conformance bug. From F2008
(N1830) 9.10.2.23 (page 256): ... ASIS if the connection was opened
without changing its
This broke cross to cris-elf and I guess many other targets
with TOT binutils, as follows:
mv -f Tlto-wrapper lto-wrapper
Oops. Can you please confirm this patch fixes it?
-Andi
diff --git a/gcc/gcc-ar.c b/gcc/gcc-ar.c
index fc7e4a2..1e86d20 100644
--- a/gcc/gcc-ar.c
+++ b/gcc/gcc-ar.c
@@
I haven't figured out yet how to use gcc-ar et al. instead of the shell
wrappers. The plugin path seems to be hardcoded, which is unfortunate.
Would it be possible to make the wrappers more flexible, so that they
could be used during bootstrap?
The path can be set with GCC_EXEC_PREFIX
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 10:09:48AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
This broke cross to cris-elf and I guess many other targets
with TOT binutils, as follows:
mv -f Tlto-wrapper lto-wrapper
Oops. Can you please confirm this patch fixes it?
I committed the patch with ChangeLog as as obvious
From: Andi Kleen a...@firstfloor.org
Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2011 10:09:48 +0200
Oops. Can you please confirm this patch fixes it?
My autotester is still busy after your commit, but has passed
the point of failure. Thanks for fixing.
brgds, H-P
On Saturday 29 October 2011 10:09:07 Janne Blomqvist wrote:
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 01:48, Mikael Morin mikael.mo...@sfr.fr wrote:
On Tuesday 18 October 2011 17:11:24 Janne Blomqvist wrote:
Also, I think I've found a small standards conformance bug. From F2008
(N1830) 9.10.2.23 (page 256):
As approved on the PR thread,
Iain
Index: gcc/objc/ChangeLog
===
--- gcc/objc/ChangeLog (revision 180650)
+++ gcc/objc/ChangeLog (working copy)
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+2011-10-29 Iain Sandoe ia...@gcc.gnu.org
+
+ PR target/47997
On Fri, 2011-10-28 at 07:53 -0500, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tm/memopt-1.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tm/memopt-1.c
index 06d4f64..9a48dcb 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tm/memopt-1.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tm/memopt-1.c
@@ -2,8 +2,8 @@
/* {
On 10/26/2011 11:56 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Hi!
This patch implements gather vectorization with -mavx2, if
dr_may_alias (which apparently doesn't use tbaa :(( ) can figure out
there is no overlap with stores in the loop (if any).
The testcases show what is possible to get vectorized.
I chose
On 10/26/2011 11:56 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Hi!
This patch implements gather vectorization with -mavx2, if
dr_may_alias (which apparently doesn't use tbaa :(( ) can figure out
there is no overlap with stores in the loop (if any).
The testcases show what is possible to get vectorized.
Hmmm,
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 06:30:35PM +0200, Mikael Morin wrote:
On Friday 28 October 2011 15:56:36 Jack Howarth wrote:
Mikael,
The complete patch bootstraps current FSF gcc trunk on
x86_64-apple-darwin11 and the resulting gfortran compiler can compile the
Polyhedron 2005 benchmarks
On Saturday 29 October 2011 14:43:22 Mikael Morin wrote:
FWIW, it seems ifort 12.0 uses UNDEFINED in this case; I suppose a
case could be made for using the same. Comments?
Let's go for UNDEFINED then.
On second thought, UNSPECIFIED is better as UNDEFINED is for another case.
Hello, gentle maintainer.
This is a message from the Translation Project robot.
A revised PO file for textual domain 'gcc' has been submitted
by the Japanese team of translators. The file is available at:
http://translationproject.org/latest/gcc/ja.po
(This file, 'gcc-4.6.1.ja.po', has
TLS_MODEL_GLOBAL_DYNAMIC and TLS_MODEL_LOCAL_DYNAMIC symbol references
are not legitimate constants because they may require a function call.
This change fixes a bug exposed by the mpfr-3.1.0 testsuite.
Tested on hppa-unknown-linux, hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11 and hppa64-hp-hpux11.11.
Committed to
Hello!
2011-10-29 Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com
* gcc.target/i386/fma-check.h (main): Use return 0 instead of exit (0).
* gcc.target/i386/fma4-check.h (main): Ditto.
* gcc.target/i386/xop-check.h (main): Ditto.
Committed as trivial change to mainline SVN.
Uros.
Index:
Could someone please review this?
+ if (cxx_dialect cxx0x !in_system_header)
+ pedwarn (input_location, OPT_pedantic,
+ comma at end of enumerator list);
Why not use maybe_warn_cpp0x there?
Hello!
lshlv16qi3 is not a generic name for expander, and we have ashlv16qi3
for this. Attached patch adds lshrv16qi3 to generate logical
shift-right XOP instruction.
2011-10-29 Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com
* config/i386/i386.md (lshlv16qi3): Remove expander.
(lshrv16qi3):
When emitting the symbols and cgraph nodes in the symbol table, we were
using the same pointer set to decide whether to emit decls and cgraph
nodes.
So, if a function decl F was sent to rest_of_decl_compilation, we would
later refuse to call cgraph_finalize_function on its node because F had
Hello!
These pattern names are misleading, implying that these are logical
shift left and arithmetic shift left. They are not, they are shift
logical and shift arithmetic. Attached (trivial) patch renames
these patterns to the insn mnemonic they generate.
2011-10-29 Uros Bizjak
...a bit, by disabling the headers for empty sessions.
Committed.
Gerald
Index: changes.html
===
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-4.6/changes.html,v
retrieving revision 1.134
diff -u -r1.134 changes.html
--- changes.html
Applied.
Gerald
2011-10-29 Gerald Pfeifer ger...@pfeifer.com
* done.html: Use th for the header.
Index: done.html
===
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/java/done.html,v
retrieving revision 1.49
diff -u -r1.49 done.html
Richard,
I have a tentative fix for PR50764.
In the example from the test-case, -fsched2-use-superblocks moves an insn from
block 4 to block 3.
2
bar
|
---+-
/ \
* *
5 * 3
abortbar
2011-10-29 Gerald Pfeifer ger...@pfeifer.com
* build-snapshot.html: Adjust title to not refer to CVS any more.
Adjust formatting of title.
Change link from CVS instructions to SVN.
Installed.
Gerald
Index: build-snapshot.html
...a bit, by disabling the headers for empty sessions.
Installed.
Gerald
Index: changes.html
===
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-4.5/changes.html,v
retrieving revision 1.101
diff -u -r1.101 changes.html
--- changes.html
...and has been for a while.
Committed.
Index: snapshots.html
===
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/snapshots.html,v
retrieving revision 1.20
diff -u -r1.20 snapshots.html
--- snapshots.html 21 Sep 2006 14:17:36 - 1.20
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 4:42 PM, Diego Novillo dnovi...@google.com wrote:
On 11-10-27 01:46 , Richard Guenther wrote:
On Wed, 26 Oct 2011, Richard Guenther wrote:
This completely rewrites LTO option merging. At compile (uselessly
now at WPA?) time we now stream a COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS like
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 5:48 PM, Joseph S. Myers
jos...@codesourcery.com wrote:
On Fri, 28 Oct 2011, Richard Guenther wrote:
+ /* Fallthru. */
+ case OPT_fPIC:
+ case OPT_fpic:
+ case OPT_fpie:
+ case OPT_fcommon:
+ case OPT_fexceptions:
+ append_option
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 7:06 AM, Ian Lance Taylor i...@google.com wrote:
Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com writes:
On Fri, 28 Oct 2011, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
This patch changes Linux to GNU/Linux in a comment. Bootstrapped
and ran libiberty testsuite on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
DR 1082 changed the rules for implicitly declared copy constructors and
assignment operators in the presence of move ctor/op= such that if
either move operation is present, instead of being suppressed the copy
operations will still be declared, but as deleted.
We have detected a side effect
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 18:35, Mikael Morin mikael.mo...@sfr.fr wrote:
On Saturday 29 October 2011 14:43:22 Mikael Morin wrote:
FWIW, it seems ifort 12.0 uses UNDEFINED in this case; I suppose a
case could be made for using the same. Comments?
Let's go for UNDEFINED then.
On second
On Wed, 6 Jul 2011, Michael Meissner wrote:
I updated the html documents for my two recent changes:
I made the small follow-up patch below which tweaks markup and
refers to GNU/Linux instead of Linux.
Gerald
Index: changes.html
Hi,
today, by chance, I noticed this:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-03/msg01756.html
and it occurred to me that maybe it's time to do this?
Thanks,
Paolo.
//
2011-10-30 Paolo Carlini paolo.carl...@oracle.com
* c.opt: Add -std=c++11.
Index: c.opt
On 10/30/2011 02:12 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Hi,
today, by chance, I noticed this:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-03/msg01756.html
and it occurred to me that maybe it's time to do this?
... or maybe we want, at the same time, to tweak a bit the description
of c++0x?
Paolo.
35 matches
Mail list logo
