On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 4:46 PM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 11:07 PM, Sebastian Pop seb...@gmail.com wrote:
Sebastian Pop wrote:
Richard Biener wrote:
I think it would be better to identify a set of features we rely on that
are not present in
Hi,
On 08/26/2014 10:56 AM, Rainer Orth wrote:
bits/c++config...
Which won't help users seeing them in the headers. Maybe the issue
could be avoided by chosing names that make it clear that they are
g++/libstdc++ specific, not generic?
Sure, whatever works, the names were tentative, for the
Hi,
On Sun, 17 Aug 2014 15:06:02 +0200
Mikael Morin mikael.mo...@sfr.fr wrote:
Le 17/08/2014 14:26, Dominique Dhumieres a écrit :
As Mikael said in https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2014-08/msg00047.html
the testcase should check that the code generated is actually working,
not just that
The following patch introduces a new syntax to initialize temporaries
used in c-exprs (such as if conditionals). So a simplify pattern is now
'simplify' [ ident ] expr result-op
with
result-op = op | if | with
if = '(' 'if' '(' c-expr ')' result-op ')'
with = '(' 'with'
On 08/26/2014 04:59 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Hi,
On 08/26/2014 10:56 AM, Rainer Orth wrote:
bits/c++config...
Which won't help users seeing them in the headers. Maybe the issue
could be avoided by chosing names that make it clear that they are
g++/libstdc++ specific, not generic?
Sure,
On 15/04/14 20:06 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 29/03/14 14:54 -0400, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
All,
In string_view I botched the noexcept specification of operations
like find and friends with CharT* arguments.
I'm a little surprised the inconsistency between string_view and
On 26/08/14 07:11 -0400, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
On 08/26/2014 04:59 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Hi,
On 08/26/2014 10:56 AM, Rainer Orth wrote:
bits/c++config...
Which won't help users seeing them in the headers. Maybe the issue
could be avoided by chosing names that make it clear that they are
On 15/08/14 17:24, Evandro Menezes wrote:
I tripped at a typo that goes undetected because the macro NAMED_PARAM
doesn't apply in the absence of designated initializers.
Since struct scale_addr_mode_cost has the cost for DI, but not for QI, the
instances of struct cpu_addrcost_table are not
Committed to the 4.8 branch.
commit d926658a428654221ecbf42f431afa43abe4ac00
Author: Jonathan Wakely jwak...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Aug 26 13:15:58 2014 +0100
* doc/xml/manual/status_cxx2011.xml: Correct status table.
* doc/html/manual/*: Regenerate.
diff --git
On 29/07/14 15:49, Jiong Wang wrote:
this patch optimize copysign/copysignf for -mfloat-abi=soft on arm when BFI
instruction is available.
before this patch, we do copysign (a, b) by three steps:
* fetch the sign bit of b to A
* fetch all non-sign bits of a to B
* or A and B
Ping?
On Sat, 26 Jul 2014, Marc Glisse wrote:
Hello,
any comment on this patch?
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-06/msg00769.html
On Tue, 10 Jun 2014, Marc Glisse wrote:
On Tue, 19 Mar 2013, Richard Henderson wrote:
I'm not fond of this, primarily because I believe the pattern
On 22/08/14 23:05, Richard Henderson wrote:
Don't continually re-read data from cfun-machine.
* config/aarch64/aarch64.c (aarch64_expand_prologue): Load
cfun-machine-frame.hard_fp_offset into a local variable.
---
gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c | 14 +++---
1 file
That is covered by a separate part of the patch:
(make check and bootstrap passed: 2 new passes for core-avx2)
is it ok?
diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/sse.md b/gcc/config/i386/sse.md
index d6155cf..68ee65a 100644
--- a/gcc/config/i386/sse.md
+++ b/gcc/config/i386/sse.md
@@ -81,6 +81,7 @@
;; For
The following is needed to allow building libada if the conversion
simplifications go in. Currently IVOPTs replaces IV uses in
arbitrary order which can result in intermediate code that
still refers to IVs that are going to be removed. As it folds
replacement statements via force_gimple_operand
Dominik Vogt wrote:
The attached patch fixes a bessel_7 fortran test failure that appeared during
SLES 12 distro tests for s390x - by bumping the error tolerance.
The same patch should apply to gcc-4.9 and gcc-4.8.
OK. Thanks for the patch.
Please do not commit this patch; one of my
thanks,
verified no regression on aarch64-none-elf bare-metal check-gcc/check-gdb.
-- Jiong
On 22/08/14 23:05, Richard Henderson wrote:
Delay cfi restore opcodes until the stack frame is deallocated.
This reduces the number of cfi advance opcodes required.
We perform a similar optimization
The following fixes C++ testsuite FAILs. First in fold_binary
we should delay the dispatch to generic_simplify until after
const OP const folding which generic_simplify isn't supposed
to do. (I note that neither fold_unary nor fold_ternary has
such clear const operand path...)
Second, the C++
Friendly ping.
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 7:50 AM, Jonathan Wakely jwakely@gmail.com wrote:
On 13 August 2014 14:55, Siva Chandra wrote:
Ping. Any update on this?
No, I haven't committed it yet, but I will get round to it.
On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 6:37 AM, Siva Chandra sivachan...@google.com
The following fixes PR62239 and moves strcat_chk folding to GIMPLE.
Bootstrapped on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, testing in progress.
Richard.
2014-08-26 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
PR middle-end/62239
* builtins.c (fold_builtin_strcat_chk): Move to gimple-fold.c.
Another wrongdoing detected by -Wlogical-not-parentheses. From
my reading of the code it seems that simple != was meant here.
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux, ok for trunk?
2014-08-26 Marek Polacek pola...@redhat.com
PR c/61271
* sel-sched-ir.c
On 26.08.2014 18:03, Marek Polacek wrote:
Another wrongdoing detected by -Wlogical-not-parentheses. From
my reading of the code it seems that simple != was meant here.
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux, ok for trunk?
OK. Heck, we traced this code back to the May 2007 commit :)
Andrey
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 4:16 PM, Andrey Belevantsev a...@ispras.ru wrote:
On 26.08.2014 18:03, Marek Polacek wrote:
Another wrongdoing detected by -Wlogical-not-parentheses. From
my reading of the code it seems that simple != was meant here.
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux, ok for
On 12/08/14 16:20 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
We're missing these overloads required by C++11.
Tested x86_64-linux, committed to trunk.
I think this should go on the branches too, any objections?
Committed to the 4.9 branch.
On Aug 25, 2014, at 11:04 PM, James Clarke jrt...@jrtc27.com wrote:
So I should just take that particular check out then?
Oh, yeah, I guess the is the way to fix it.
On 08/26/2014 04:57 AM, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
2014-08-26 11:49 GMT+04:00 Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com:
2014-08-25 19:08 GMT+04:00 Vladimir Makarov vmaka...@redhat.com:
On 2014-08-22 8:21 AM, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
Hi,
On Cauldron 2014 we had a couple of talks about relaxation of ebx
On 08/26/14 02:48, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 11:54 PM, H.J. Lu hongjiu...@intel.com wrote:
Inside lto-plugin, when $host_subdir is '.', which means GCC is configured
inside source tree, gcc_build_dir is ../../$host_subdir/gcc, not
../$(host_subdir)/gcc. Tested with both
On Mon, 2014-08-25 at 08:22 -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
On 08/19/14 14:41, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 08/06/2014 10:23 AM, David Malcolm wrote:
gcc/
* rtl.h (rtx_expr_list::insn): New method.
---
gcc/rtl.h | 9 +
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gcc/rtl.h
gcc/
* function.h (struct rtl_data): Convert field
x_nonlocal_goto_handler_labels from rtx_expr_list * to
rtx_insn_list *.
* rtl.h (remove_node_from_insn_list): New prototype.
* builtins.c (expand_builtin): When prepending to
gcc/
* function.h (struct expr_status): Convert field x_forced_labels
from rtx_expr_list * to rtx_insn_list *.
* cfgbuild.c (make_edges): Convert local x from an
rtx_expr_list * to an rtx_insn_list *, replacing use of
element method with insn method.
gcc/
* dwarf2cfi.c (dw_trace_info): Strengthen field head from rtx to
rtx_insn *.
(get_trace_info): Likewise for param insn.
(save_point_p): Likewise.
(maybe_record_trace_start): Likewise for both params.
(maybe_record_trace_start_abnormal):
These patches combine to address PR target/61407, meaning that GCC is
able to bootstrap on OS X 10.10 Yosemite.
James Clarke (2):
Fix __ENVIRONMENT_MAC_OS_X_VERSION_MIN_REQUIRED__
Fixed dirent sanitizer for 32-bit OS X builds
gcc/config/darwin-c.c | 25
Previously, this macro had taken the form 10X0, where X is the minor
version number, e.g. 1090 for OS X 10.9 Mavericks. However, as of OS X
10.10 Yosemite, it should take the form 10XX00, i.e. 101000 for 10.10.
Added a test for the new format and fixed the formatting for the
existing ones.
The __DARWIN_64_BIT_INO_T macro is used to indicate whether dirent.d_ino
is 64-bit or not, and so should be sized appropriately. Additionally,
dirent.d_seekoff should only be defined/checked when
__DARWIN_64_BIT_INO_T is defined.
libsanitizer/ChangeLog:
*
On 08/26/2014 05:59 AM, Evgeny Stupachenko wrote:
+(define_insn_and_split avx2_rotatemode_perm
+ [(set (match_operand:V_256 0 register_operand =x)
+ (vec_select:V_256
+ (match_operand:V_256 1 register_operand x)
+ (match_parallel 2 palignr_operand
+ [(match_operand
On 08/26/2014 09:00 AM, David Malcolm wrote:
OK for trunk?
David Malcolm (3):
Convert nonlocal_goto_handler_labels from an EXPR_LIST to an INSN_LIST
Convert forced_labels from an EXPR_LIST to an INSN_LIST
Use rtx_insn in more places in dwarf2cfi.c
Ok to all. Thanks.
r~
On Aug 26, 2014, at 1:35 AM, Richard Biener richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
8 The implicitly-defined copy constructor for class X performs a member-
wise copy of its subobjects. The order of copying is the same as the
order of initialization of bases and members in a user-defined
On Aug 26, 2014, at 9:02 AM, James Clarke jrt...@jrtc27.com wrote:
These patches combine to address PR target/61407, meaning that GCC is
able to bootstrap on OS X 10.10 Yosemite.
James Clarke (2):
Fix __ENVIRONMENT_MAC_OS_X_VERSION_MIN_REQUIRED__
For the first patch, Ok.
So, after baking
On Mon, 2014-08-25 at 08:25 -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
On 08/19/14 15:35, David Malcolm wrote:
On Tue, 2014-08-19 at 13:57 -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 08/06/2014 10:23 AM, David Malcolm wrote:
diff --git a/gcc/cfgrtl.c b/gcc/cfgrtl.c
index 59d633d..5e42a97 100644
--- a/gcc/cfgrtl.c
These patches combine to address PR target/61407, meaning that GCC is
able to bootstrap on OS X Yosemite.
Changes from v2:
[PATCH v3 1/2] Fix __ENVIRONMENT_MAC_OS_X_VERSION_MIN_REQUIRED__:
* Unchanged
[PATCH v3 2/2] Fixed dirent sanitizer for 32-bit OS X builds:
* Switch to using the
Previously, this macro had taken the form 10X0, where X is the minor
version number, e.g. 1090 for OS X 10.9 Mavericks. However, as of OS X
10.10 Yosemite, it should take the form 10XX00, i.e. 101000 for 10.10.
Added a test for the new format and fixed the formatting for the
existing ones.
The _DARWIN_FEATURE_64_BIT_INODE macro indicates whether dirent.d_ino is
64-bit or not, which should be sized appropriately, and whether
dirent.d_seekoff should be defined/checked.
libsanitizer/ChangeLog:
* sanitizer_common/sanitizer_platform_limits_posix.cc: Only check
dirent.d_seekoff
Shouldn't there be a change to python/Makefile.am so that xmethods.py
gets installed alongside printers.py? Otherwise you can use these new
xmethods in the libstdc++ testssuite, but they're not available to
users.
I'd also expect something to call the register_libstdcxx_xmethods
function
These patches combine to address PR target/61407, meaning that GCC is
able to bootstrap on OS X Yosemite.
Changes from v3:
[PATCH v4 1/2] Fix __ENVIRONMENT_MAC_OS_X_VERSION_MIN_REQUIRED__:
* Unchanged
[PATCH v4 2/2] Fixed dirent sanitizer for 32-bit OS X builds:
* Check whether the
Previously, this macro had taken the form 10X0, where X is the minor
version number, e.g. 1090 for OS X 10.9 Mavericks. However, as of OS X
10.10 Yosemite, it should take the form 10XX00, i.e. 101000 for 10.10.
Added a test for the new format and fixed the formatting for the
existing ones.
The _DARWIN_FEATURE_64_BIT_INODE macro indicates whether dirent.d_ino is
64-bit or not, which should be sized appropriately, and whether
dirent.d_seekoff should be defined/checked.
libsanitizer/ChangeLog:
* sanitizer_common/sanitizer_platform_limits_posix.cc: Only check
dirent.d_seekoff
Hi Tobias,
first, thanks Trevor for the first round of review!
Also thanks from my side!
I still see:
- expr_count = 0;
+ expr_array.truncate (0);
Is there is a reason for not using release() here?
No, changed in the committed version.
Regards
Thomas
On 08/26/2014 12:01 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
the difference, for the latter and for more complex cases, is that
adjust_temp_type calls cp_fold_convert which ends up returning a
NOP_EXPR (eg, build in fold_convert_loc).
Perhaps we should address this in adjust_temp_type, either by ignoring
the
[Jeff, sorry for the duplicate, sent the original from an account that
adds disclaimers.]
Jeff Law l...@redhat.com writes:
On 08/09/14 04:13, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Jeff Law l...@redhat.com writes:
On 08/03/14 08:32, Richard Sandiford wrote:
The old for_each_inc_dec callback had a
This PR points out an ICE caused by thread_local on static data members,
which we weren't handling properly at all. There is still the issue
that calling set_decl_tls_model on a template variable adds it to the
symbol table, causing problems later on, but this patch fixes the front
end
Hi,
On 08/26/2014 08:58 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 08/26/2014 12:01 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
the difference, for the latter and for more complex cases, is that
adjust_temp_type calls cp_fold_convert which ends up returning a
NOP_EXPR (eg, build in fold_convert_loc).
Perhaps we should
Hello Uroš,
On 23 Aug 09:44, Uros Bizjak wrote:
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 1:51 PM, Kirill Yukhin kirill.yuk...@gmail.com
wrote:
This patch extends unaligned loads and stores patterns.
At this stage, I'd still prefer simple constraints (the solution,
proposed above), even for the price of
Hello Martin, Honza,
I noticed most of the cgraph and IPA files use xstrdup for cgraph node
names when printing to dump_file. Very leaky...
What is the reason for all those xstrdups? I couldn't think of any.
Thoughts?
Ciao!
Steven
* cgraph.c (cgraph_node::get_create): Don't xstrdup
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 9:55 PM, Kirill Yukhin kirill.yuk...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Uroš,
On 23 Aug 09:44, Uros Bizjak wrote:
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 1:51 PM, Kirill Yukhin kirill.yuk...@gmail.com
wrote:
This patch extends unaligned loads and stores patterns.
At this stage, I'd still
Hello!
I noticed most of the cgraph and IPA files use xstrdup for cgraph node
names when printing to dump_file. Very leaky...
What is the reason for all those xstrdups? I couldn't think of any.
Please see [1] and [2].
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-04/msg01904.html
[2]
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 10:52 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
Hello!
I noticed most of the cgraph and IPA files use xstrdup for cgraph node
names when printing to dump_file. Very leaky...
What is the reason for all those xstrdups? I couldn't think of any.
Please see [1] and [2].
[1]
This doesn't seem to be used anywhere but in dwarf2out.c.
OK for mainline?
commit 8a48cdd576442cee103399ab4f1f67ee215ee6b8
Author: Aldy Hernandez al...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Aug 26 14:30:22 2014 -0700
* dwarf2out.h (dwarf2out_decl): Remove prototype.
* dwarf2out.c
On 08/26/14 15:32, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
This doesn't seem to be used anywhere but in dwarf2out.c.
OK for mainline?
OK
jeff
On 26 Aug 11:25, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
On 08/26/2014 04:57 AM, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
I've looked into one of fails. There is still a problem with
allocation in reload. Here is a piece of code which uses float
constant:
(insn 1199 1198 1200 96 (set (reg:SI 3 bx)
(reg:SI 1301
Hi
In insn pattern *andim_ashiftmode_bfiz, if the operands[2] is larger than
the size of register, gcc may generate invalid assembler code. If operands[2]
is larger than the size of the underlying type of INTVAL, the following insn
condition may also be undefined.
exact_log2 ((INTVAL
On 8/23/2014 11:19 AM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
On Mon, 18 Aug 2014, Joel Sherrill wrote:
I think this is a minor documentation bug which is in the head but also
seems to be in the gcc 4.4.7 docs shipped with CentOS 6.x.
OK to commit?
2014-08-18 Joel Sherrill joel.sherr...@oarcorp.com
Attached is an update to the baseline symbols on hppa-linux to fix the
abi test failure
in the current 4.8 tree.
Dave
--
John David Anglin dave.ang...@bell.net
2014-08-26 John David Anglin dang...@gcc.gnu.org
* config/abi/post/hppa-linux-gnu/baseline_symbols.txt: Update.
Hi,
This patch adds a few more cases of overloaded vector built-ins to
support V2DI and V2DF modes: vec_xl, vec_xst, vec_splat, vec_div,
vec_mul, vec_round. These are all straightforward. For vec_div and
vec_mul, the most efficient thing appears to be to just scalarize these;
at least I
This patch fixes a bunch of guality failures. With it I get 144
guality.exp failures vs. 163 for make check-gcc
RUNTESTFLAGS=guality.exp. A lot better than 100% fail rate ;-).
Variable DIEs were not being reused. Instead, variable DIEs even had
the wrong context (unilaterally the
This patch by Chris Manghane fixes the Go frontend to not permit calling
a pointer method on *T with a variable of **T. Previously it was
incorrectly dereferencing the **T to get a *T and using that to call the
method. Fixing this required tweaking one test case. Bootstrapped and
ran Go
Ping!
--
Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature to help me spread!
So I should just take that particular check out then?
James Clarke
On 25 Aug 2014, at 21:05, Mike Stump mikest...@comcast.net wrote:
On Aug 25, 2014, at 11:03 AM, James Clarke jrt...@jrtc27.com wrote:
Previously, this macro had taken the form 10X0, where X is the minor
version number, e.g.
Hi all,
Deja pattern in r214086's test is too strict (Asan runtime will not
always be able to detect that invalid memory access is
use-after-poison). I've cooked a trivial patch to loosen the check so
test now also works on i386.
Tested on x64 and i386. Ok to commit?
-Y
commit
Ping.
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 12:45 PM, Kirill Yukhin kirill.yuk...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
On 12 Aug 10:58, Andrey Turetskiy wrote:
All remarks from
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-06/msg02166.html are fixed.
Updated version of liboffloadmic you can find in GIT branch
On Wed, 2014-08-13 at 11:13 -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
On 08/13/14 11:08, David Malcolm wrote:
On Wed, 2014-08-13 at 07:44 -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
On 08/06/14 11:20, David Malcolm wrote:
gcc/
* function.h (struct rtl_data): Strengthen field
x_parm_birth_insn from rtx to rtx_insn *.
*
2014-08-25 19:08 GMT+04:00 Vladimir Makarov vmaka...@redhat.com:
On 2014-08-22 8:21 AM, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
Hi,
On Cauldron 2014 we had a couple of talks about relaxation of ebx usage in
32bit PIC mode. It was decided that the best approach would be to not fix
ebx register, use speudo
On Thu, 21 Aug 2014, Marc Glisse wrote:
On Thu, 21 Aug 2014, Richard Biener wrote:
2014-08-21 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
* match.pd ((T1)(~(T2) X) - ~(T1) X): Paste all comment
from fold-const.c, fix simplification result.
Index: gcc/match.pd
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 5:52 PM, Marek Polacek pola...@redhat.com wrote:
This is one of the issues that -Wlogical-not-parentheses detected.
Interestingly, this code has been added in 2002 (!). I believe the
logical not there should be just removed; the comment above it says
/* We must now
Hi,
On 08/24/2014 12:37 AM, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
With revision 214400 we have the C++14 value of __cplusplus set to the
correct value of 201402L (from 201300L).
It occurs to me: instead of having to remember every time those numbers,
couldn't we predefine, for example:
__cplusplus_98
Hi Thomas, hi all,
first, thanks Trevor for the first round of review!
Thomas Koenig wrote:
Trevor Saunders wrote:
doloop_warn (ns);
- XDELETEVEC (doloop_list);
+ doloop_list.truncate (0);
.release () would be more typical.
Changed (also below).
I still see:
- expr_count
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 1:47 AM, Mike Stump mikest...@comcast.net wrote:
On Aug 21, 2014, at 4:22 AM, Richard Biener richard.guent...@gmail.com
wrote:
I still say we need to solve the issue at language level - that is,
try to figure out what the language standard says about
volatile struct
Paolo Carlini paolo.carl...@oracle.com writes:
Hi,
On 08/24/2014 12:37 AM, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
With revision 214400 we have the C++14 value of __cplusplus set to the
correct value of 201402L (from 201300L).
It occurs to me: instead of having to remember every time those numbers,
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 3:02 PM, Marek Polacek pola...@redhat.com wrote:
Another issue found by -Wlogical-not-parentheses.
tree-vect-data-refs.c contains
if (!LOOP_REQUIRES_VERSIONING_FOR_ALIGNMENT (loop_vinfo))
but since the definition of LOOP_REQUIRES_VERSIONING_FOR_ALIGNMENT
is lacking
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 11:07 PM, Sebastian Pop seb...@gmail.com wrote:
Sebastian Pop wrote:
Richard Biener wrote:
I think it would be better to identify a set of features we rely on that
are not present in earlier versions and make the test a link
test unconditionally.
Tobias, are
Ping?
-Original Message-
From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches-
ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Preud'homme
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2014 9:28 AM
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [PATCH][ARM] Fix -fcall-saved-rX for X 7
This patch makes
On 08/18/2014 07:37 PM, Marat Zakirov wrote:
Hi there!
I have a fix for https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61875.
This situation occurs when somebody decides to build GCC with
-fexeptions and -frtti which are forbidden for libsanitizer. They get
strange error (see bug above) which
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 11:54 PM, H.J. Lu hongjiu...@intel.com wrote:
Inside lto-plugin, when $host_subdir is '.', which means GCC is configured
inside source tree, gcc_build_dir is ../../$host_subdir/gcc, not
../$(host_subdir)/gcc. Tested with both in-tree and out-tree build on
Linux/x86-64.
On 08/18/2014 07:37 PM, Marat Zakirov wrote:
Hi there!
I have a fix for https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61875.
This situation occurs when somebody decides to build GCC with
-fexeptions and -frtti which are forbidden for libsanitizer. They get
strange error (see bug above) which I
On 26/08/14 10:28 +0200, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Hi,
On 08/24/2014 12:37 AM, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
With revision 214400 we have the C++14 value of __cplusplus set to
the correct value of 201402L (from 201300L).
It occurs to me: instead of having to remember every time those
numbers, couldn't
Hi,
On 08/26/2014 10:42 AM, Rainer Orth wrote:
Paolo Carlini paolo.carl...@oracle.com writes:
Hi,
On 08/24/2014 12:37 AM, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
With revision 214400 we have the C++14 value of __cplusplus set to the
correct value of 201402L (from 201300L).
It occurs to me: instead of
Hi,
On 08/26/2014 10:52 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
That seems like a good idea, but I'm not convinced there's any benefit
in Ed's changes to do:
-#if __cplusplus 201103L
+#if __cplusplus = 201402L
It seems like unnecessary churn to me,
about this, I had the same thought ;)
Paolo.
Hi Paolo,
On 08/26/2014 10:42 AM, Rainer Orth wrote:
Paolo Carlini paolo.carl...@oracle.com writes:
Hi,
On 08/24/2014 12:37 AM, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
With revision 214400 we have the C++14 value of __cplusplus set to the
correct value of 201402L (from 201300L).
It occurs to me: instead
2014-08-26 11:49 GMT+04:00 Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com:
2014-08-25 19:08 GMT+04:00 Vladimir Makarov vmaka...@redhat.com:
On 2014-08-22 8:21 AM, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
Hi,
On Cauldron 2014 we had a couple of talks about relaxation of ebx usage in
32bit PIC mode. It was decided that
87 matches
Mail list logo
