On Wed, 13 May 2015, Andreas Krebbel wrote:
On 05/12/2015 01:45 PM, Tom de Vries wrote:
On 12-05-15 12:04, Tom de Vries wrote:
Committed with comments below added.
Hmm, this causes an ice for s390 in gcc.dg/tree-ssa/stdarg-2.c:
...
gimplification failed:
ap addr_expr
On 06/05/15 12:21 +0200, Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
Patch for libstdc++-v3.
The libstd++ parts are OK.
N.B. libstdc++ patches should be sent to the libstdc++ list (which
saves you CCing individual maintainers.)
(Will this change mean I need to have 1.11.1 and 1.11.6 both installed
and
Hi,
the SJLJ EH schemes manipulate a buffer that contains a few pointers and, in
particular, the stack pointer. Therefore, when dynamic stack allocation is
also used, you need to update its value in the buffer, otherwise Bad Things
will happen if you resume execution where the stack is
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 06:13:40AM -0700, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
* combine.c (simplify_set): When generating a CC set, if the
source already is in the correct mode, do not wrap it in a
compare. Simplify the rest of that code.
Committed now.
Segher
Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de writes:
PR tree-optimization/37021
* tree-vectorizer.h (struct _slp_tree): Add two_operators flag.
(SLP_TREE_TWO_OPERATORS): New define.
* tree-vect-slp.c (vect_create_new_slp_node): Initialize
SLP_TREE_TWO_OPERATORS.
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 9:38 AM, Tom de Vries tom_devr...@mentor.com wrote:
Hi,
this patch fixes a gimplification error of the va_list argument of va_arg
for target s390. The error was introduced by r223054, the fix for PR66010.
I.
consider test-case:
...
#include stdarg.h
int
f1
On 05/12/2015 03:42 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
I promised to send out my pat^Whack. Before building I introduce
gcc/FULL-VER as copy of gcc/BASE-VER and adjust gcc/BASE-VER to
just the major number. Then I only need the following small
patch (where I don't speak enough tcl for fixing
* configure.ac (TARGETLIB_PIC, TARGETLIB_NOASAN): New variables.
* configure: Regenerate.
* maint-tool: Refactor pic/ and noasan/ handling.
* Makefile.in: Likewise. Regenerate dependencies.
---
The below does the same but attempts to be limited to what POSIX
On Tue, 12 May 2015, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 9:32 AM, Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de wrote:
On May 12, 2015 6:11:45 PM GMT+02:00, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 9:09 AM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On May 12, 2015 5:58:07 PM
On 13/05/15 09:49, Christian Bruel wrote:
2 parts for maintainers
- c-family: machine descriptions export macro definitions into c
implementation : need to export 'builtin_define_with_int_value' and '
builtin_define_type_sizeof'
+1 on this. It would help me a lot in implementing
target
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, applied.
Richard.
2015-05-13 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
PR tree-optimization/66123
* tree-ssa-dom.c (propagate_rhs_into_lhs): Check if we found
a taken edge.
* gcc.dg/torture/pr66123.c: New testcase.
On 05/05/2015 06:03 PM, Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
Hello build machinery maintainers,
following up
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gcc.patches/331902/focus=334462
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gcc.patches/332160
On 01/25/2015 08:42 PM, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
On Sun,
Like C++ const and volatile, in D mangled symbols can exist modifiers
that represent the const, immutable, inout and shared-ness of the
'this' parameter.
This information should be written out in the demangled symbol to show
that each variant has a unique identity.
---
libiberty/ChangeLog:
If a symbol that has so far been valid abruptly ends then we will want
to fail the process rather than silently succeed.
---
libiberty/ChangeLog
2015-05-13 Iain Buclaw ibuc...@gdcproject.org
* d-demangle.c (dlang_call_convention): Return NULL if have reached the
end of the symbol, but
Hi,
Started these as separate patches, but as more came out of what I was
originally trying to achieve (see Patch 6/7), I thought it better to
have it as a running series.
These set out to update d-demangle.c for new ABI additions, general
bug fixes, and improved template support.
---
D
On 08/05/15 13:43 +0200, Rainer Orth wrote:
Jonathan Wakely jwak...@redhat.com writes:
I've committed the two changes attached (only tested on linux again).
patch2.txt should fix the mingw-w64 errors above, as well as the
issues Daniel reported, and should fix the error on Solaris 10
Rainer,
On Tue, 12 May 2015, Richard Biener wrote:
The following patch fixes PR66110 - there is no reason why two alias-sets
conflict just because one or the other has a child with alias-set zero.
We need to paper over strict-aliasing bugs in dfp.c (re-using
struct real_value unsigned long sig[]
On 12/05/15 18:42 +0200, Eric Botcazou wrote:
libstdc++-v3/
* acinclude.m4 (GLIBCXX_ENABLE_SJLJ_EXCEPTIONS): Delete.
* configure.ac: Remove GLIBCXX_ENABLE_SJLJ_EXCEPTIONS.
* config.h.in: Regenerate.
* configure: Likewise.
* libsupc++/eh_personality.cc:
In my tests, this gives the demangler near-complete support. Of a
sample of about 75k symbols pulled from the standard library
unittester, all but 20 were successfully parsed.
---
libiberty/ChangeLog:
2015-05-13 Iain Buclaw ibuc...@gdcproject.org
* d-demangle.c (dlang_symbol_kinds): New
The next version of D introduces two new mangle conventions.
- Nj to represent methods whose 'this' parameter is also the function
return value
- Nk to represent a 'ref' parameter that is also the function return value
This patch introduces support for these two symbols.
---
This addresses a subtle logic error, noticed when I was in the middle
of testing out some other tightening up of parsing checks.
---
libiberty/ChangeLog
2015-05-13 Iain Buclaw ibuc...@gdcproject.org
* d-demangle.c (dlang_identifier): Check encoded length of identifier
to verify strncmp
Hi Mikael,
snip
--- 5198,5222
/* In all other cases evaluate the expr3 and create a
temporary. */
gfc_init_se (se, NULL);
+ /* For more complicated expression, the decision when to get the
+descriptor and when to get a reference is depending
The next version of D adds support for cent and ucent for platforms
that are able to handle them natively. This adds support for
demangling them.
---
libiberty/ChangeLog:
2015-05-13 Iain Buclaw ibuc...@gdcproject.org
* d-demangle.c (dlang_type): Handle cent and ucent types.
*
On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 5:09 PM, Kyrill Tkachov
kyrylo.tkac...@foss.arm.com wrote:
On 08/05/15 14:56, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
On 08/05/15 11:18, Richard Biener wrote:
On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 6:02 PM, Kyrill Tkachov
kyrylo.tkac...@foss.arm.com wrote:
Hi all,
GCC has some logic to expand
On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 12:47 PM, Bin Cheng bin.ch...@arm.com wrote:
Hi,
GCC's IVO currently handles every IV use independently, which is not right
by learning from cases reported in PR65447.
The rationale is:
1) Lots of address type IVs refer to the same memory object, share similar
base
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 12:12 AM, Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz wrote:
Hi,
this patch works around PR where we refuse to inline always_inline memcpy
into function with explicit Ofast optimization attribute. This is because
we think we can not promote -fno-fast-math code to -fast-math code.
This patch fixes an issue preventing mingw-w64 i686 dwarf2-eh
bootstrapping described at:
http://sourceforge.net/p/mingw-w64/mailman/message/34101954/
I'm assuming this has more to do with switching away from the current
sjlj configuration method since configuring gcc with
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2015/n4383.html#2454
Voted into the WP in Lenexa.
Tested powerpc64le-linux, committed to trunk.
commit 8cb30e1ad50f1bb277c635d83796c64772b61d68
Author: redi redi@138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4
Date: Wed May 13 13:54:46 2015 +
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2015/n4383.html#2418
This was voted into the TS in Lenexa.
Tested powerpc64le-linux, committed to trunk.
commit ef712e821bc683fe3979251dcc09786bee0233e0
Author: Jonathan Wakely jwak...@redhat.com
Date: Wed May 13 13:37:05 2015 +0100
*
As discussed in the PR, match.pd happily folds 0 * whatever into 0. That
is undesirable from the C/C++ FE POV, since it can make us accept invalid
initializers.
So fixed in match.pd -- I'd hope there's a better way to do this, but this
seems to work. There was some fallout, but nothing
The following is an attempt to implement what Joseph outlined here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-05/msg01015.html. This
patch relies on the match.pd I've just posted. It shouldn't reduce
e.g. division by zero to pedwarn-if-pedantic (the tests test that).
But e.g. enum { A = 1 -5 };
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2015/n4383.html#2455
Voted into the WP in Lenexa.
We already did the right thing for vector, so only basic_string needs
to change.
Tested powerpc64le-linux, committed to trunk.
commit 634ed6e2d2ea4d69a29a8907044e6f68541d88aa
Author: Jonathan
http://wiki.edg.com/twiki/pub/Wg21lenexa/StrawPolls/N4525.html#2407
Voted into the WP in Lenexa.
Tested powerpc64le-linux, committed to trunk.
commit f58bb7ab1b098d525359869767286f9c8955acd3
Author: Jonathan Wakely jwak...@redhat.com
Date: Wed May 13 14:39:24 2015 +0100
*
On 05/13/2015 12:27 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 06/05/15 12:21 +0200, Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
Patch for libstdc++-v3.
The libstd++ parts are OK.
N.B. libstdc++ patches should be sent to the libstdc++ list (which
saves you CCing individual maintainers.)
Indeed, thanks!
(Will
The following fixes PR66129.
Bootstrapped on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, testing in progress.
Richard.
2015-05-13 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
PR tree-optimization/66129
* tree-vect-slp.c (vect_build_slp_tree): Make sure all ops are
commutative.
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#2466
We agreed to move this to Ready in Lenexa.
I'd like to see max_size() deprecated, it's useless, but if we can't
do that it might as well not give an impossible answer.
Tested powerpc64le-linux, committed to trunk.
commit
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2015/n4383.html#2459
Voted into the WP in Lenexa.
Tested powerpc64le-linux, comitted to trunk.
commit 9bf3b9ea20334711ecdced656323f69959521a82
Author: Jonathan Wakely jwak...@redhat.com
Date: Wed May 13 14:18:03 2015 +0100
*
2015-05-13 15:32 GMT+02:00 Jonathan Wakely jwak...@redhat.com:
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2015/n4383.html#2459
Voted into the WP in Lenexa.
Tested powerpc64le-linux, comitted to trunk.
What about assertions regarding non-NAN rho and finite theta, as
decided for by the
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 03:41:11PM +0200, Marek Polacek wrote:
As discussed in the PR, match.pd happily folds 0 * whatever into 0. That
is undesirable from the C/C++ FE POV, since it can make us accept invalid
initializers.
So fixed in match.pd -- I'd hope there's a better way to do this,
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2015/n4383.html#2440
This was resolved as a defect and voted into the working paper in
Lenexa. As an extension we can also make the default constructor
noexcept.
Tested powerpc64le-linux, committed to trunk.
commit
On Wed, 13 May 2015, Daniel Krügler wrote:
2015-05-13 15:32 GMT+02:00 Jonathan Wakely jwak...@redhat.com:
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2015/n4383.html#2459
Voted into the WP in Lenexa.
Tested powerpc64le-linux, comitted to trunk.
What about assertions regarding
Hi DJ,
Currently the RL78 port does not place zero-initialised data in the
.bss section. This is because of the rl78_select_section() function
which does not handle bss data. The patch below updates the function
to handle that and other types of data so that they end up in the
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 04:11:15PM +0200, Marek Polacek wrote:
I don't know how to reliably fix this :(.
Except disabling (0 * X) - 0 completely, that is.
Marek
On Mon, 2015-05-04 at 13:19 -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
On 05/01/2015 06:56 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
As a relative newcomer to GCC, one of the issues I had was
becoming comfortable with the linemap API and its internal
representation.
To familiarize myself with it, I wrote a dumping routine
Hello!
2015-05-13 Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com
* config/alpha/alpha.c (alpha_emit_set_long_const): Remove c1 argument.
(alpha_extract_integer): Redeclare as static HOST_WIDE_INT.
Remove *p0 and *p1 arguments. Rewrite function.
(alpha_legitimate_constant_p): Update call to
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 03:55:10PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 03:41:11PM +0200, Marek Polacek wrote:
As discussed in the PR, match.pd happily folds 0 * whatever into 0. That
is undesirable from the C/C++ FE POV, since it can make us accept invalid
initializers.
On Wed, 13 May 2015, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 03:55:10PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 03:41:11PM +0200, Marek Polacek wrote:
As discussed in the PR, match.pd happily folds 0 * whatever into 0. That
is undesirable from the C/C++ FE POV, since it
On 13/05/15 15:36 +0200, Daniel Krügler wrote:
2015-05-13 15:32 GMT+02:00 Jonathan Wakely jwak...@redhat.com:
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2015/n4383.html#2459
Voted into the WP in Lenexa.
Tested powerpc64le-linux, comitted to trunk.
What about assertions regarding
On Wed, 13 May 2015, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 03:55:10PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 03:41:11PM +0200, Marek Polacek wrote:
As discussed in the PR, match.pd happily folds 0 * whatever into 0. That
is undesirable from the C/C++ FE POV, since it
On Wed, 13 May 2015, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 04:11:15PM +0200, Marek Polacek wrote:
I don't know how to reliably fix this :(.
Except disabling (0 * X) - 0 completely, that is.
Well, make sure that X has TREE_SIDE_EFFECTS set. That way we'd fold
to 0, X.
Richard.
--
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 12:12 AM, Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz wrote:
Hi,
this patch works around PR where we refuse to inline always_inline memcpy
into function with explicit Ofast optimization attribute. This is because
we think we can not promote -fno-fast-math code to -fast-math
This might qualify as obvious.
OK for trunk? (if it passes bootstrap and regrtest)
gcc/c-family/ChangeLog:
* c-indentation.c (warn_for_misleading_indentation): Bail out
immediately if -Wmisleading-indentation isn't enabled.
---
gcc/c-family/c-indentation.c | 6 ++
1 file
One last thing that was added in the next D version's ABI (and I
subsequently missed).
This is a trivial patch to just ignore the new mangle symbol.
---
libiberty/ChangeLog:
2015-05-13 Iain Buclaw ibuc...@gdcproject.org
* d-demangle.c (dlang_template_args): Skip over specialized template
On Mon, 11 May 2015, Jan Hubicka wrote:
Yes, to make my original email clear, I think we are safe to remove
peep2_reg_dead_p.
I would however introduce a check that the call target is not also among
parameters of the function. In this case the peephole would remove the load
and make the
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 03:06:00PM +, Joseph Myers wrote:
It won't handle e.g. 0 * (unsigned) (1 / 0).
I think this illustrates why handling this in the folding-for-optimization
is a mistake.
For optimization, it's perfectly fine to fold away 0 * (something without
side effects),
Hi!
On Wed, 29 Apr 2015 09:27:49 -0700, Cesar Philippidis
cesar_philippi...@mentor.com wrote:
This patch teaches the c++ front end to error when reference typed
variables are used in openacc parallel and kernels regions. The c++
front end changes are pretty straightforward. I did, however,
Hi!
On Sat, 9 May 2015 10:26:22 -0700, Satoshi_OHSHIMA satoshiohsh...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'm trying to use and evaluate gcc with OpenACC on some NVIDIA GPUs.
I succeeded to build gcc with OpenACC by using
http://scelementary.com/2015/04/25/openacc-in-gcc.html as a reference.
Heh, their build
On 05/13/2015 11:11 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
We can use general_operand instead of some_operand.
2015-05-13 Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com
* config/alpha/alpha.md (extendqidi2): Use general_operand
instead of some_operand for operand[1] predicate.
(extendhidi2): Ditto.
Hi!
On Fri, 10 Apr 2015 09:20:30 -0700, Cesar Philippidis
cesar_philippi...@mentor.com wrote:
This patch implements the various atomic __sync_* functions inside
libgcc. The original [motivation], were the calls to
__sync_val_compare_and_swap_1 by openacc kernels involving boolean
On 13 May 2015 at 22:34, Iain Buclaw ibuc...@gdcproject.org wrote:
On 13 May 2015 at 10:51, Iain Buclaw ibuc...@gdcproject.org wrote:
Like C++ const and volatile, in D mangled symbols can exist modifiers
that represent the const, immutable, inout and shared-ness of the
'this' parameter.
This
Hi!
On Wed, 22 Apr 2015 17:08:26 +0200, Bernd Schmidt ber...@codesourcery.com
wrote:
On 04/21/2015 05:58 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
suggests that while it is nice that when building nvptx accel compiler
we build libgcc.a, libc.a, libm.a, libgfortran.a (and in the future
hopefully
Hi!
On Mon, 11 May 2015 18:35:12 +0200, I wrote:
On Tue, 05 May 2015 10:54:02 +0200, I wrote:
In follow-up messages, I'll be posting the separated parts (for easier
review) of a next set of OpenACC changes that we'd like to commit.
ChangeLog updates not yet written; will do that before
On 13 May 2015 at 10:51, Iain Buclaw ibuc...@gdcproject.org wrote:
Like C++ const and volatile, in D mangled symbols can exist modifiers
that represent the const, immutable, inout and shared-ness of the
'this' parameter.
This information should be written out in the demangled symbol to show
On 05/12/2015 04:12 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
Hi,
this patch works around PR where we refuse to inline always_inline memcpy
into function with explicit Ofast optimization attribute. This is because
we think we can not promote -fno-fast-math code to -fast-math code.
This is of course safe for
Hi!
On Fri, 24 Oct 2014 00:18:10 +0200, I wrote:
On Thu, 23 Oct 2014 17:02:20 +0200, I wrote:
On Fri, 16 May 2014 20:01:47 +0200, I wrote:
On Fri, 16 May 2014 19:02:41 +0200, Tom de Vries tom_devr...@mentor.com
wrote:
Essentially I want to run the set of testcases in libgomp.oacc-c,
On Wed, 13 May 2015, Marek Polacek wrote:
Rather, how about having an extra argument to c_fully_fold_internal (e.g.
for_int_const) indicating that the folding is of an expression with
integer constant operands (so this argument would be true in the new case
of folding the contents of a
On Wed, 13 May 2015, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
* config/nvptx/nvptx.opt (ptx_isa, sm_30, sm_35): New enum and its
values.
(misa=): New option.
New options do of course need documenting in invoke.texi.
--
Joseph S. Myers
jos...@codesourcery.com
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 11:25:56AM -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
This might qualify as obvious.
OK for trunk? (if it passes bootstrap and regrtest)
Ok.
Marek
Hi Richard,
On 13/05/15 12:27, Richard Biener wrote:
I notice that we don't have a testuite check that the target has
a hw sqrt instructions. Would you like me to add one? Or can I make
the testcase aarch64-specific?
Would be great to have a testsuite check for this.
I've committed the
On 07/05/15 23:12, Jim Wilson wrote:
I noticed that the list of -mtune options in the arm-cores.def file
didn't match the list in the doc/invoke.texi file. There are 3 cores
missing: generic-armv7-a, cortex-a17, and cortex-a17.cortex-a7. This
patch adds the missing cores to the docs.
Jim
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 9:42 AM, Eric Botcazou ebotca...@adacore.com wrote:
6 target libraries in the tree detect whether they are being compiled by a
compiler configured for setjmp/longjmp exceptions: libada, libgcc, libgo,
libjava, libobjc and libstdc++. They can be divided into 3
This patch fixes an issue preventing mingw-w64 i686 dwarf2-eh
bootstrapping described at:
http://sourceforge.net/p/mingw-w64/mailman/message/34101954/
I'm assuming this has more to do with switching away from the current
sjlj configuration method since configuring gcc with
On 12/05/15 14:01, Martin Galvan wrote:
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 5:49 AM, Ramana Radhakrishnan
ramana.radhakrish...@arm.com wrote:
That's what I mean when I say email clients munged it : email clients and
/ or some popular email servers appear to end up munging white spaces and
patches don't
Ping ?
Thanks,
Kugan
On 27/04/15 09:07, Kugan wrote:
While I support your goals, I think your approach needs some refinement.
In particular, we DO NOT want another function that starts looking at
constant values and tries to decide, on a case by case basis, what to do
with that value. We
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 10:17:01PM +, James Bowman wrote:
It seems that with whenever a function's frame is bigger than 512 bytes,
LRA loops. Likely this causes a problem because there is no actual
instruction for subtracting constants more than 512. However, there is a
link pattern
The attached patch reverts a change I made for pr65456 which caused this
regression and adds a check for quotes farther down in the function. This
avoids treating a '!' in a string as a comment and wiping the rest of the line.
I found the added code is needed because an interposing quote was
ping?
Thanks,
Kugan
On 15/04/15 17:53, Kugan wrote:
As mentioned in PR65768, ARM gcc generates suboptimal code for constant
Uses in loop. Part of the reason is cprop is undoing what loop invariant
code motion did.
Zhenqiang posted a patch at to fix this based on rtx costs:
-Original Message-
From: Terry Guo [mailto:flame...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2015 3:24 PM
To: Segher Boessenkool
Cc: l...@redhat.com; Hale Wang; GCC Patches; Richard Sandiford
Subject: Re: Ping^3 : [PATCH] [gcc, combine] PR46164: Don't combine the
insns if a volatile
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2015/n4383.html#2415
Voted in to the WP in Lenexa.
Tested powerpc64le-linux, committed to trunk.
commit 87937e036ae87944f7ac2b26d8ae17fe81525c4f
Author: Jonathan Wakely jwak...@redhat.com
Date: Wed May 13 15:54:45 2015 +0100
*
Hi!
During taskloop development, I have noticed a bug in the GIMPLE_OMP_TASK
ompexp - unlike GIMPLE_OMP_PARALLEL, where if the parallel body is noreturn,
the GOMP_parallel call never returns either, for tasks it really depends
on whether the task is included or not. If the library (the usual
This patch changes rs6000_rtx_costs to be closer to reality. It is
still not quite right, but at least it handles more cases, so the
(set (reg:SI) (eq:SI (reg:SI) (reg:SI)))
from the PR isn't taken as costing 1 insn anymore, while setting
a reg:DI was cost 3 insns. The mode of the dest
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 01:25:16PM -0400, David Edelsohn wrote:
PR rtl-optimization/30967
* config/rs6000/rs6000.c (rs6000_rtx_costs): Don't consider
destination mode for the cost of scc patterns.
Okay.
Should this be applied to GCC 5 branch?
[ Testing is still
On 05/13/2015 08:04 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
Hello!
2015-05-13 Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com
* config/alpha/alpha.c (alpha_emit_set_long_const): Remove c1 argument.
(alpha_extract_integer): Redeclare as static HOST_WIDE_INT.
Remove *p0 and *p1 arguments. Rewrite function.
On 13/05/15 17:37, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
On 12/05/15 14:01, Martin Galvan wrote:
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 5:49 AM, Ramana Radhakrishnan
ramana.radhakrish...@arm.com wrote:
That's what I mean when I say email clients munged it : email
clients and
/ or some popular email servers appear
2015-05-13 16:05 GMT+02:00 Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr:
On Wed, 13 May 2015, Daniel Krügler wrote:
What about assertions regarding non-NAN rho and finite theta, as
decided for by the LWG 2439?
non-NAN rho is already covered by rho = 0.
Agreed on that.
- Daniel
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 1:58 PM, Ramana Radhakrishnan
ramana.radhakrish...@arm.com wrote:
On 13/05/15 17:37, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
I'm not sure what's going on here and couldn't figure out what was going
wrong in the 20 minutes I spent on it just now.
Bah, I must be going blind.
@@
Hello,
it seems that the discussion here got stuck without arriving to a consensus.
I generally see three options here
1) make TYPE_PUBLIC flag of TYPE_STUB_DECL to work consistently across
frontends
in a sense that types with flag !TYPE_PUBLIC (TYPE_STUB_DECL (t)) can be
considered
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 02:07:34PM -0300, Martin Galvan wrote:
That makes sense. I downloaded the gcc sources from the git mirror at
github-- perhaps that's what's munging the patch?
That mirror seems to be out-of-date. I suggest using
https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=summary.
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 1:15 PM, Segher Boessenkool
seg...@kernel.crashing.org wrote:
This patch changes rs6000_rtx_costs to be closer to reality. It is
still not quite right, but at least it handles more cases, so the
(set (reg:SI) (eq:SI (reg:SI) (reg:SI)))
from the PR isn't taken
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 6:46 PM, Richard Henderson r...@redhat.com wrote:
On 05/13/2015 08:04 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
Hello!
2015-05-13 Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com
* config/alpha/alpha.c (alpha_emit_set_long_const): Remove c1 argument.
(alpha_extract_integer): Redeclare as static
Hi
The more strict devirtualization condition in this patch helps to fix
google bug b/19872411.
Bootstraped and regression tested on x86-64.
OK for google 4.9 branch?
patch
Description: Binary data
OK to apply ?
Ok but..
+case SECCAT_TBSS:
+ return default_select_section (decl, reloc, align);
+
+default:
+ gcc_unreachable ();
Would it be better to just default: everything to
default_select_section, instead of enumerating everything we know
about today?
Hello!
Also fixes a couple of operand constraints.
2015-05-13 Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com
* config/i386/i386.md (*mulmode3_1): Merge with *mulhi3_1
using SWIM248 mode iterator.
(*mulvmode4): Use x86_64_sext_operand for operand[2] constraint.
(*mulvhi4): mark operand[1] as
ok.
David
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 11:00 AM, Carrot Wei car...@google.com wrote:
Hi
The more strict devirtualization condition in this patch helps to fix
google bug b/19872411.
Bootstraped and regression tested on x86-64.
OK for google 4.9 branch?
Here's the new patch. I downloaded the gcc sources from the SVN
repository, removed the extra semicolon from my version of the files
and re-generated the patch using svn diff, making sure the context
info had all the tabs from the original. I then e-mailed the patch to
myself as an attachment,
Forgot to mention: I first did a --dry-run of the patch and then
applied it to the gcc sources.
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 3:11 PM, Martin Galvan
martin.gal...@tallertechnologies.com wrote:
Here's the new patch. I downloaded the gcc sources from the SVN
repository, removed the extra semicolon from
The libgo parts are fine, but since libgo is mirrored from an external
repository I'll commit those parts myself.
Thanks!
I assume I can go ahead and commit them now?
Yes, you can, the libgo bits are independent.
--
Eric Botcazou
We can use general_operand instead of some_operand.
2015-05-13 Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com
* config/alpha/alpha.md (extendqidi2): Use general_operand
instead of some_operand for operand[1] predicate.
(extendhidi2): Ditto.
(cbranchdi4): Use general_operand instead of
Hi Mike,
Thanks for your comments.
Please find my comments inlined.
- Thanks and regards,
Sameera D.
On Monday 11 May 2015 10:09 PM, Mike Stump wrote:
On May 11, 2015, at 4:05 AM, sameera sameera.deshpa...@imgtec.com wrote:
+(define_insn *join2_loadhi
+ [(set (match_operand:SI 0
Hi,
this patch fixes a gimplification error of the va_list argument of va_arg for
target s390. The error was introduced by r223054, the fix for PR66010.
I.
consider test-case:
...
#include stdarg.h
int
f1 (int i, ...)
{
int res;
va_list ap;
va_start (ap, i);
res = va_arg (ap,
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
