The (unsigned) long int to double vector conversion instructions
expect 2 immediate parameters. One for the inexact suppression
control and another one for the rounding mode. However, the
vec_double builtin has just the vector source operand. The 2
addtional operands need to be added with an
[ was: Re: [libgomp, nvptx] Disable
OMP_{DISPLAY_AFFINITY,AFFINITY_FORMAT} support ]
On 12-12-18 14:15, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 02:02:20PM +0100, Tom de Vries wrote:
>> This RFC patch implements that approach for getpid and gethostname (I
>> wonder though whether it's not
> 2018-03-22 Renlin Li
>
> PR middle-end/84877
> * explow.h (get_dynamic_stack_size): Declare it as external.
> * explow.c (record_new_stack_level): Remove function static attribute.
> * function.c (assign_stack_local_1): Dynamically align the stack slot
> addr
On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 06:55:14PM -0600, Peter Bergner wrote:
> On 12/12/18 2:52 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> >> +/* This is a fairly new feature bit, so handle it not being defined. */
> >> +#ifndef PPC_FEATURE2_HTM_NO_SUSPEND
> >> +# define PPC_FEATURE2_HTM_NO_SUSPEND 0
> >> +#endif
> >
>
On 13/12/18 08:56 +0100, Christophe Lyon wrote:
On Wed, 12 Dec 2018 at 17:13, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
Ensure we don't try to instantiate __is_constructible_from,
because there are two partial specializations that are equally good
matches.
PR libstdc++/80762
*
On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 10:15 AM Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>
> Thanks for doing this.
>
> "Kyrill Tkachov" writes:
> > @@ -15716,16 +15716,19 @@ an effect when SVE is enabled.
> >
> > GCC supports two forms of SVE code generation: ``vector-length
> > agnostic'' output that works with any size
On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 07:41:37PM +, Julian Brown wrote:
> @@ -11870,7 +11874,8 @@ c_parser_oacc_wait_list (c_parser *parser, location_t
> clause_loc, tree list)
> static tree
> c_parser_omp_variable_list (c_parser *parser,
> location_t clause_loc,
> -
On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 01:43:57PM +1030, Alan Modra wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 05:17:41AM -0600, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 12:02:55PM +1030, Alan Modra wrote:
> > > OK, fair enough. Another option is to just disable -many when gcc is
> > > in development, like
On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 09:47:10PM +0800, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
> I have revised the patch to make both gomp_[un]map_vars and
> gomp_[un]map_vars_async
> point to gomp_[un]map_vars_internal, which is static always_inline. This
> should
> alleviate that part of the concerns.
> @@ -263,8 +279,9
Thanks for doing this.
"Kyrill Tkachov" writes:
> @@ -15716,16 +15716,19 @@ an effect when SVE is enabled.
>
> GCC supports two forms of SVE code generation: ``vector-length
> agnostic'' output that works with any size of vector register and
> -``vector-length specific'' output that only
On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 10:13:28AM +0100, Alan Hayward wrote:
> --- a/gcc/rtl.c
> +++ b/gcc/rtl.c
> @@ -304,6 +304,10 @@ copy_rtx (rtx orig)
> return orig;
>break;
>
> +case CLOBBER_HIGH:
> + gcc_assert (REG_P (XEXP (orig, 0)));
> + return orig;
Wrong formatting
On Thu, 13 Dec 2018 at 10:16, Rainer Orth wrote:
>
> As reported in the PR, the test names of DejaGnu tests should be the
> path relative to the respective testsuite directory, a convention the
> gdc.test tests currently don't follow.
>
> The patch below fixes this. After a few false starts
Hi Jason,
> This issue also will be resolved by disabling or removing the old
> demangling code, which I haven't seen anyone argue against.
Doh - of course. I withdraw my patch and I hope that yours will go in soon.
Cheers
Nick
Hi Ian,
> I thought we were removing the old demangling schemes?
Doh! yes, I totally forgot. So I will withdraw this patch in favour of
Jason's.
Cheers
Nick
Hi all,
We've received reports about the -msve-vector-bits=128 bits being somewhat
ambiguous.
It isn't clear whether -msve-vector-bits=128 forces vector-length-agnostic code
or whether
-msve-vector-bits=scalable forces 128-bit vector-lengh-specific code.
The latter is a, perhaps unintuitive,
As reported in the PR, the test names of DejaGnu tests should be the
path relative to the respective testsuite directory, a convention the
gdc.test tests currently don't follow.
The patch below fixes this. After a few false starts (some described in
the PR and several more) I came up with the
On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 11:38 PM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> As mentioned in the PR, we can use kxor? %kN, %kN, %kN or
> kxnor? %kN, %kN, %kN to set %kN to 0 or -1, instead of
> setting a GPR to that and moving to the mask register.
>
> Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux,
101 - 117 of 117 matches
Mail list logo