...@gcc.gnu.org;Gabriel Dos Reis/a./dd
dtvar-template/dt
ddThis branch is for implementation work on
! emvariable template for C++/em. It is maintained by
! a href=mailto:g...@gcc.gnu.org;Gabriel Dos Reis/a./dd
dtcilkplus/dt
ddThis branch is for the development
Coutantccout...@google.com
c++ runtime libs Paolo Carlini paolo.carl...@oracle.com
-c++ runtime libs Gabriel Dos Reisg...@integrable-solutions.net
c++ runtime libs Ulrich Drepper drep...@gmail.com
c++ runtime libs Benjamin De Kosnik
Andrew Sutton andrew.n.sut...@gmail.com writes:
| I added a new macro to replace the use of TREE_TYPE to get
| constraints. It's called TEMPLATE_PARMS_CONSTRAINTS. Patch attached:
|
| 2013-09-10 Andrew Sutton andrew.n.sut...@gmail.com
| * gcc/cp/cp-tree.h (TEMPLATE_PARMS_CONSTRAINTS): New.
Andrew Sutton andrew.n.sut...@gmail.com writes:
| Ok to commit? Attached is the doc fix patch. I'll send the TREE_TYPE
| patch shortly.
Yes, please -- that is what Jason earlier. Let me know when youve
committed so that I can synchronize with trunk.
-- Gaby
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 4:06 AM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 11:00 PM, Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr wrote:
On Sat, 7 Sep 2013, Mike Stump wrote:
On Sep 7, 2013, at 12:27 PM, Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr wrote:
Now flag_check_new should
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 4:19 AM, Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr wrote:
On Mon, 9 Sep 2013, Richard Biener wrote:
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 11:00 PM, Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr wrote:
On Sat, 7 Sep 2013, Mike Stump wrote:
On Sep 7, 2013, at 12:27 PM, Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 4:46 AM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 11:45:08AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
Well, in this case the patch should IMHO be a no-op.
- warning (OPT_Wunused_parameter, unused parameter %q+D, decl);
+ warning_at
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 5:04 AM, Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de wrote:
On Mon, 9 Sep 2013, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 11:45:08AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
Well, in this case the patch should IMHO be a no-op.
- warning (OPT_Wunused_parameter, unused parameter
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 5:13 AM, Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de wrote:
On Mon, 9 Sep 2013, Paolo Carlini wrote:
On 09/09/2013 12:04 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, 9 Sep 2013, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 11:45:08AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
Well, in this case
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 5:38 AM, Paolo Carlini paolo.carl...@oracle.com wrote:
On 09/09/2013 11:37 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
That said, grepping for %q+D reveals quite some uses and it looks like
all of them expect the location being used to be that of the decl passed
to the diagnostic call,
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 5:41 AM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 12:38:46PM +0200, Paolo Carlini wrote:
On 09/09/2013 11:37 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
That said, grepping for %q+D reveals quite some uses and it looks like
all of them expect the location being used
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 7:49 AM, Paolo Carlini paolo.carl...@oracle.com wrote:
Hi all, hi Gaby,
thus a more sensible try at fixing this issue:
function.c:do_warn_unused_parameter uses %q+D for the error call. That
means that cp/error.c:cp_printer does:
if (set_locus t != NULL)
On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Paolo Carlini paolo.carl...@oracle.com wrote:
Hi all, Gaby,
I was having a look to c++/58363 and besides the main issue, that is we
probably want to help the user and tell him/her something about destructors,
etc, I noticed that we aren't able to pretty print
at revision 202396. No conflict.
-- Gaby
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Mike Stump mikest...@comcast.net wrote:
You've failed to understand g++. Please seek to understand the compiler,
before you weigh in.
Gee Mike, see a medical assistance for your and our benefits.
-- Gaby
Andrew Sutton andrew.n.sut...@gmail.com writes:
| The last merge didn't compile for me. Apparently some pretty printing
| functions have disappeared that were being called in the concept
| stuff. This patch just replaces the broken calls to pp_cxx_type_id
| with pp-type_id.
|
| Ok to commit?
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 12:54 PM, Mike Stump mikest...@comcast.net wrote:
On Sep 9, 2013, at 10:25 AM, Gabriel Dos Reis g...@integrable-solutions.net
wrote:
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Mike Stump mikest...@comcast.net wrote:
You've failed to understand g++. Please seek to understand
On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 4:36 AM, Paolo Carlini paolo.carl...@oracle.com wrote:
.. it's r202296 aka bootstrap/58340, Jeff is already on it.
Thanks for the detective work, Paolo.
-- Gaby
On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 8:00 AM, Paolo Carlini paolo.carl...@oracle.com wrote:
Hi all, Gaby,
in this bug Manuel noticed that the zeros in the diagnostic lines of the
form:
built-in:0:0:
don't provide useful information. Thus the below just avoids printing the
zeros basing directly on
On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 9:23 AM, Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz wrote:
Hi,
this patch adds API for varpool node removal/insertion hooks that are fully
symmetric
to cgraph code.
Bootstrapped/regtested x86_64-linux after working around PR58340, will commit
it shortly.
Hi Honza,
I can't
On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz wrote:
On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 9:23 AM, Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz wrote:
Hi,
this patch adds API for varpool node removal/insertion hooks that are
fully symmetric
to cgraph code.
Bootstrapped/regtested x86_64-linux after
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 6:44 AM, Basile Starynkevitch
bas...@starynkevitch.net wrote:
On Sat, 2013-09-07 at 12:33 +0200, Marc Glisse wrote:
Hello,
this patch teaches the compiler that operator new, when it can throw,
isn't allowed to return a null pointer. Note that it doesn't work for
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 11:42 AM, Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr wrote:
On Sat, 7 Sep 2013, Marc Glisse wrote:
this patch teaches the compiler that operator new, when it can throw,
isn't allowed to return a null pointer. Note that it doesn't work for
placement new (that one may have to be
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 12:59 PM, Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr wrote:
Furthermore, I do think that the compiler should have special nodes
for both standard placement new and the global operator new functions,
That's one way to do it. Since this is the first time I look at those, I
don't
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 2:27 PM, Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr wrote:
On Sat, 7 Sep 2013, Mike Stump wrote:
On Sep 7, 2013, at 3:33 AM, Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr wrote:
this patch teaches the compiler that operator new, when it can throw,
isn't allowed to return a null pointer.
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Paolo Carlini paolo.carl...@oracle.com wrote:
-- Caroline,
something seems wrong with the patch, I can't build anymore. Something in
libvtv/testsuite:
make[4]: Entering directory
`/home/paolo/Gcc/svn-dirs/trunk-build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/libvtv/testsuite'
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 2:46 PM, Mike Stump mikest...@comcast.net wrote:
On Sep 7, 2013, at 12:37 PM, Gabriel Dos Reis g...@integrable-solutions.net
wrote:
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 2:27 PM, Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr wrote:
On Sat, 7 Sep 2013, Mike Stump wrote:
On Sep 7, 2013, at 3:33
Tested on an x86_64-suse-linux. Applied to trunk.
-- Gaby
2013-09-04 Gabriel Dos Reis g...@integrable-solutions.net
c-family/
* c-pretty-print.h (c_pretty_printer::simple_type_specifier): Now
a virtual member function.
(pp_simple_type_specifier): Remove
Same topic as 19/n.
Tested on an x86_64-suse-linux. Applied to trunk.
-- Gaby
2013-09-03 Gabriel Dos Reis g...@integrable-solutions.net
c/
* c-objc-common.c (c_tree_printer): Tidy.
c-family/
* c-pretty-print.h (c_pretty_printer::type_id): Now a virtual
member
Eric Botcazou ebotca...@adacore.com writes:
| It seems the patch needs a couple of minor amendments to work with Darwin -
| and I've added an updated version to the PR which passes bootstrap and make
| check-ada on x86_64-darwin12. Iain
|
| Thanks, here is the final patch I just installed.
Eric Botcazou ebotca...@adacore.com writes:
| This patch fixes that by introducing GXX_LINK which is GCC_LINK except
| that CXX (e.g. xg++) instead of CC (e.g. xgcc) is invoked.
|
| Eric, are there other executables that need to be linked with GXX_LINK
| too but aren't triggered yet?
|
|
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 8:44 AM, Michael Matz m...@suse.de wrote:
And the manual GTY markers are so not maintainable in the long run,
gengtype or something else really needs to be taught to create them
automatically.
I thought the principle that was acquired was that gengtype shouldn't
be
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 9:02 AM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 08:58:43AM -0500, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 8:44 AM, Michael Matz m...@suse.de wrote:
And the manual GTY markers are so not maintainable in the long run,
gengtype
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 10:21 AM, Michael Matz m...@suse.de wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, 30 Aug 2013, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 9:02 AM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
I thought the principle that was acquired was that gengtype shouldn't
be improved to support more
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 10:37 AM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 11:28:34AM -0400, Diego Novillo wrote:
Well, it was a wrong decision then. For some smaller types writing manual
marker might be a sensible thing, or for some extra complicated
constructs. But
Most of declaration pretty printing functions.
Tested on an x86_64-suse-linux. Applied to trunk.
-- Gaby
2013-08-30 Gabriel Dos Reis g...@integrable-solutions.net
c-family/
* c-pretty-print.h (c_pretty_printer::declaration): Now a virtual
member function
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 9:20 AM, Adam Butcher a...@jessamine.co.uk wrote:
* error.c (dump_lambda_function): New function, dependent on ...
(maybe_dump_template_bindings): ... this new function, factored out of
...
(dump_function_decl): ... here. Updated to
and ...
(dump_function_decl): ... here. Updated to early-out with call to
dump_lambda_function after determining template bindings.
---
Hi Gaby,
On 29.08.2013 18:04, Adam Butcher wrote:
On 29.08.2013 16:25, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
Document the new functions.
Use pp-translate_string (with) instead
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 3:57 PM, Adam Butcher a...@jessamine.co.uk wrote:
From: abutcher abutcher@138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4
* error.c (dump_lambda_function): New function, dependent on ...
(dump_substitution): ... this new function, factored out of ...
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 4:06 PM, Adam Butcher a...@jessamine.co.uk wrote:
On 29.08.2013 21:59, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 3:57 PM, Adam Butcher a...@jessamine.co.uk
wrote:
From: abutcher abutcher@138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4
* error.c
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 7:54 PM, Adam Butcher a...@jessamine.co.uk wrote:
* error.c (dump_function_decl): Use standard diagnostic flow to dump a
lambda diagnostic, albeit without stating the function name or
duplicating the parameter spec (which is dumped as part of the
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 7:58 PM, Jason Merrill ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On 08/26/2013 11:21 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
Our default behaviour special case inline functions that are always
AVAIL_AVAILABLE and, via decl_replaceable_p, also any COMDAT (that may be
for
functions since all COMDATs are
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 8:17 PM, Jason Merrill ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On 08/26/2013 10:45 AM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
Hmm, let's not make it a default. Replacing global operator new (e.g. for
tracing purposes) is a valid C++ programming idiom.
Absolutely. What strikes me as vanishingly
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 2:44 AM, Mike Stump mikest...@comcast.net wrote:
but I fear you won't understand this and how it applies.
You must be right. I cannot match the entertaining value of your
message, so you win.
-- Gaby
Same topic as patch 17/n. For more expressing printers.
Tested on an x86_64-suse-linux. Applied to mainline.
-- Gaby
2013-08-26 Gabriel Dos Reis g...@integrable-solutions.net
c-family/
* c-pretty-print.h (c_pretty_printer::unary_expression): Now a
virtual member function
Paolo Carlini paolo.carl...@oracle.com writes:
| Hi Gaby.
|
| On 08/26/2013 10:42 AM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
| Same topic as patch 17/n. For more expressing printers.
| Tested on an x86_64-suse-linux. Applied to mainline.
| Just got this:
|
| /scratch/Gcc/svn-dirs/trunk/gcc/c/c-objc
Paolo Carlini paolo.carl...@oracle.com writes:
| Hi Gaby,
|
| bootstrap is currently broken:
|
| /scratch/Gcc/svn-dirs/trunk/gcc/c/c-objc-common.c: In function ‘bool
| c_tree_printer(pretty_printer*, text_info*, const char*, int, bool,
| bool, bool)’:
|
at revision 201992.
There were conflicts with the recent pretty printing patches.
Fixed. (Mostly due to the new concept-specific nodes printing.)
Modulo the asan stuff.
-- Gaby
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 7:24 AM, Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz wrote:
Hi,
it seems to be couple weeks I am not able to compile big ltrans unit with
-fdump-tree-all
because the compiler eventually runs out of memory. I think it is one of
your patches
introducing serious memory leak. Can you,
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 9:00 AM, Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz wrote:
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 7:24 AM, Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz wrote:
Hi,
it seems to be couple weeks I am not able to compile big ltrans unit with
-fdump-tree-all
because the compiler eventually runs out of memory. I think
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 9:38 AM, Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz wrote:
On 08/22/2013 12:45 PM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
If the user-supplied operator new returns a, then it must
also ensure that 'a' is not used anywhere else -- e.g. I you can't
do lvalue-to-value conversion on 'a' to see what
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 9:32 AM, Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz wrote:
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 9:00 AM, Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz wrote:
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 7:24 AM, Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz wrote:
Hi,
it seems to be couple weeks I am not able to compile big ltrans unit
with
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 9:07 AM, Jason Merrill ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On 08/22/2013 12:45 PM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
If the user-supplied operator new returns a, then it must
also ensure that 'a' is not used anywhere else -- e.g. I you can't
do lvalue-to-value conversion on 'a' to see what
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 9:32 AM, Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz wrote:
modify ALL_LINKERFLAGS or BUILD_LINKERFLAGS?
configure --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto . You need plugin enabled
buinutils for that.
I think there however should be a lot easier way to reproduce it by just
dropping some
Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com writes:
| On Sun, 25 Aug 2013, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
|
| Instead of defining the same macro several times in different
| translation units, we can just make it a function and use it where
| needed.
|
| Have you made sure that po/exgettext still
On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 10:38 AM, Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz wrote:
On 08/24/2013 05:18 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
In the next step I would like to introduce the
DECL_CPP_CONSTRUCTOR/DESTRUCTOR macro.
The catch I run into is that these flags are tested on TEMPLATE_DECL so the
middle-end
macro
Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com writes:
[...]
| | @@ -379,15 +375,15 @@
| |switch (code)
| | {
| | case INTEGER_TYPE:
| | - pp_string (pp, (TYPE_UNSIGNED (t)
| | - ?
Same topic as patch 14/n. This time for primary_expression.
-- Gaby
2013-08-25 Gabriel Dos Reis g...@integrable-solutions.net
c-family/
* c-pretty-print.h (c_pretty_printer::primary_expression): Now a
virtua member function.
(pp_primary_expression): Adjust
is GCC_LINK except
that CXX (e.g. xg++) instead of CC (e.g. xgcc) is invoked.
Eric, are there other executables that need to be linked with GXX_LINK
too but aren't triggered yet?
Thanks,
-- Gaby
ada/
2013-08-25 Gabriel Dos Reis g...@integrable-solutions.net
* gcc-interface/Makefile.in
Same topic as patch 15/n, but postfix_expression.
Tested on an x86_64-suse-linux. Applied to mainline.
-- Gaby
2013-08-25 Gabriel Dos Reis g...@integrable-solutions.net
c-family/
* c-pretty-print.h (c_pretty_printer::postfix_expression): Now a
virtual member function
Most of the specialized pretty printing functions from the C-family
languages are really virtual functions. This patchlet makes the first
explicitly so.
Tested on an x86_64-suse-linux. Applied to trunk.
-- Gaby
c-family/
2013-08-24 Gabriel Dos Reis g...@integrable-solutions.net
Same as previous topic; for id_expression.
-- Gaby
2013-08-24 Gabriel Dos Reis g...@integrable-solutions.net
c-family/
* c-pretty-print.h (c_pretty_printer::id_expression): Now a
virtual function.
(pp_c_id_expression): Remove.
(pp_id_expression): Adjust
Instead of defining the same macro several times in different
translation units, we can just make it a function and use it where
needed.
Tested on an x86_64-suse-linux. Applied to mainline.
-- Gaby
2013-08-25 Gabriel Dos Reis g...@integrable-solutions.net
c-family/
* c-pretty
This patchlet is an easy low hanging fruit in the pile of local patches
I have. It turns old style emulation of inline functions into real inline
functions.
Tested on x86_64-suse-linux. Applied to mainline.
-- Gaby
2013-08-23 Gabriel Dos Reis g...@integrable-solutions.net
it easier to search for a pretty printer's output
buffer access.
Tested on an x86_64-suse-linux. Applied to trunk.
-- Gaby
2013-08-23 Gabriel Dos Reis g...@integrable-solutions.net
* diagnostic.c (diagnostic_set_caret_max_width): Use pp_buffer.
* gimple-pretty-print.c
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 7:32 PM, Mike Stump mikest...@comcast.net wrote:
On Aug 22, 2013, at 7:16 PM, Gabriel Dos Reis g...@integrable-solutions.net
wrote:
But even so, in light of this, I don't think you original assertion is
definitive.
Nothing is ever definitive. Now, if you want
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 10:34 PM, Mike Stump mikest...@comcast.net wrote:
On Aug 23, 2013, at 5:53 PM, Gabriel Dos Reis g...@integrable-solutions.net
wrote:
If you quoted the standard to back up your assertions, I would have been
able to feel free to point this out :-)
The thing is I am
-printer.c , and one in cp/error.c.
Tested on an x86_64-suse-linux. Applied to trunk.
-- Gaby
2013-08-22 Gabriel Dos Reis g...@integrable-solutions.net
* pretty-print.h (output_buffer::output_buffer): Declare.
(pretty_printer::pretty_printer): Likewise.
(pp_construct
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 8:19 AM, Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz wrote:
Hi,
this patch started as a work to make cxa_pure_virtual as noreturn. This
is good for middle-end to figure out that it should not care about
devirtualizing to it and it should devirtualize speculative where there
is only
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 9:38 AM, Alexander Monakov amona...@ispras.ru wrote:
On Thu, 22 Aug 2013, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
- I would like to recall issue if we can make NEW_EXPR annotated with
MALLOC attribute. Without it, it is basically impossible to track
any dynamically allocated
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 9:56 AM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 09:53:35AM -0500, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 9:38 AM, Alexander Monakov amona...@ispras.ru
wrote:
On Thu, 22 Aug 2013, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
- I would like to recall
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 10:21 AM, Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz wrote:
On Thu, 22 Aug 2013, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
- I would like to recall issue if we can make NEW_EXPR annotated with
MALLOC attribute. Without it, it is basically impossible to track
any dynamically allocated
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 10:38 AM, Alexander Monakov amona...@ispras.ru wrote:
On Thu, 22 Aug 2013, Jan Hubicka wrote:
On Thu, 22 Aug 2013, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
- I would like to recall issue if we can make NEW_EXPR annotated with
MALLOC attribute. Without it, it is basically
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 10:39 AM, Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz wrote:
So the existing program needs to overwrite libsup++ symbol like we do with
malloc?
Of course with user defineed malloc function we should not propagate the
attribute,
but I think we could have it when we end up
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz wrote:
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 10:39 AM, Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz wrote:
So the existing program needs to overwrite libsup++ symbol like we do
with malloc?
Of course with user defineed malloc function we should not
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 11:08 AM, Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz wrote:
This should be a C++ front-end bug. The specific operator new
from new used in this placement-new should be folded,
even if -fno-inline. Jason, is this something easily fixable?
After overload resolution, we know exactly
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 4:14 PM, Mike Stump mikest...@comcast.net wrote:
On Aug 22, 2013, at 9:45 AM, Gabriel Dos Reis g...@integrable-solutions.net
wrote:
I.e. can I have something like
int a;
test()
{
int *b=new (int);
}
with custom implementation of new that returns
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 6:16 PM, Mike Stump mikest...@comcast.net wrote:
On Aug 22, 2013, at 2:28 PM, Gabriel Dos Reis g...@integrable-solutions.net
wrote:
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 4:14 PM, Mike Stump mikest...@comcast.net wrote:
On Aug 22, 2013, at 9:45 AM, Gabriel Dos Reis
g...@integrable
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 8:51 PM, Mike Stump mikest...@comcast.net wrote:
On Aug 22, 2013, at 6:10 PM, Gabriel Dos Reis g...@integrable-solutions.net
wrote:
I think we must distinguish what is wrong according to the standards
we are implementing from what is wrong from a QoI point of view
, it becomes a problem.
Tested on an x86_64-suse-linux. Applied to mainline.
-- Gaby
2013-08-20 Gabriel Dos Reis g...@integrable-solutions.net
* error.c (pp_ggc_formatted_text): New.
(type_as_string): Use it in lieu of pp_formatted_text.
(type_as_string_translate
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 8:59 AM, Tom Tromey tro...@redhat.com wrote:
This converts the C++ front end.
This renames g++spec.o to cp/g++spec.o for uniformity.
This lets us remove an explicit rule.
This patch does not remove various *_H macros from cp/Make-lang.in.
These are still needed by
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 6:04 AM, Paolo Carlini paolo.carl...@oracle.com wrote:
Hi,
was having a look to c++/58187 (looks like we are missing a lookup) and
noticed this. It seems obvious to me, I'll commit it later today barring
objections.
OK.
Tested x86_64-linux.
Thanks,
Paolo.
The c++-concepts branch was synchronized with trunk at revision 201834.
-- Gaby
On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 7:56 PM, Jason Merrill ja...@redhat.com wrote:
I do not know if one can do
something like having automatic variable of class A and use placement new
to change it to class B.
This is something of a grey area in the standard, with a few defect reports
yet to be
Same topic as previous patch in this series.
-- Gaby
2013-08-16 Gabriel Dos Reis g...@integrable-solutions.net
* sched-vis.c (rtl_slim_pp_initialized): Remove.
(rtl_slim_pp): Likewise.
(init_rtl_slim_pretty_print): Likewise.
(dump_value_slim): Don't call
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 9:07 AM, Jason Merrill ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On 08/12/2013 08:34 PM, Adam Butcher wrote:
Currently it is the implicit function template code in pt.c that updates
this; specifically add_implicit_template_parms and
finish_fully_implicit_template.
It is queried by the
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 9:22 AM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Gabriel Dos Reis
g...@integrable-solutions.net wrote:
I agree 'const void*' is preferable, and all the places you mention should
be covered too.
I already installed my original patch, so
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 9:49 AM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 4:36 PM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Gabriel Dos Reis
g...@integrable-solutions.net wrote:
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 9:22 AM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 6:40 PM, Jason Merrill ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On 08/08/2013 03:54 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
the really interesting one is decltype28.C, which we don't reject
anymore, we simply accept it. What is happening is that the overload
which leads to excessive template
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 2:13 AM, Florian Weimer fwei...@redhat.com wrote:
On 08/09/2013 08:43 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Yes, that is intended. Changing that could mean that the meaning of
code depends on what max depth the user selected.
Indeed. Yesterday I wondered what would happen if the
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 2:33 AM, Florian Weimer fwei...@redhat.com wrote:
On 08/09/2013 09:28 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
I see. You know, I was trying to figure out the logic other compilers -
two of them, actually - are following, because the really appear to sfinae
away infinite recursions.
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 2:13 AM, Paolo Carlini paolo.carl...@oracle.com wrote:
.. another thought I had, less esoteric ;) is the following: we use tf_none
for two rather different reasons: for SFINAE and to avoid recursive Error
routines calls, when we call tsubst (... tf_none, ...) from
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 4:28 AM, Paolo Carlini paolo.carl...@oracle.com wrote:
Hi,
On 08/09/2013 10:46 AM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
I think we should find ways to have the pretty printer in the diagnostic
framework stop trying to redo most of the work done by the type checker. In
its current
trunk was merged into c++-concepts branch at revision 201560.
I resolved some conflicts in cp caused by recent merges and ongoing work
on trunk.
-- Gaby
This patchlet has print_c_tree use non-static local variable for its
pretty-printer object. The code is much simpler that way.
(A follow up will add destructor so we stop leaking storage.)
Tested on an x86_64-suse-linux. Applied to trunk.
-- Gaby
2013-08-05 Gabriel Dos Reis g
This patch stops the gimple printer from using global pretty printers.
Applied to trunk.
-- Gaby
2013-08-05 Gabriel Dos Reis g...@integrable-solutions.net
* gimple-pretty-print.c (buffer): Remove.
(initialized): Likewise.
(maybe_init_pretty_print): Likewise
Same topics as from previous patch; this time for the graphiz outputter.
-- Gaby
2013-08-05 Gabriel Dos Reis g...@integrable-solutions.net
* graph.c (init_graph_slim_pretty_print): Remove.
(print_graph_cfg): Do not call it. Use local pretty printer
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 6:24 AM, Martin Jambor mjam...@suse.cz wrote:
[…]
Note that as per
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-07/msg01365.html
we'll use pass_manager rather than pipeline, so this would look
like:
pass_manager get_passes () { gcc_assert (passes_); return *passes_;
This patch replaces uses of pp_string on operators and punctuators with
specialized pretty printing functions.
Tested on an x86_64-suse-linux. Applied to trunk.
-- Gaby
2013-08-03 Gabriel Dos Reis g...@integrable-solutions.net
* pretty-print.h (pp_bar_bar): New
On Sun, Aug 4, 2013 at 8:37 PM, Trevor Saunders tsaund...@mozilla.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 10:02:29PM -0500, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
* declare the pointer to function fields as virtual functions --
that is what I meant
with the (necessarily poor) emulation through the casts
1 - 100 of 570 matches
Mail list logo
