On 9 May 2012 01:34, Cary Coutant ccout...@google.com wrote:
A suggestion: Make dwarf_name call the demangler, and then a (new?) a
function that converts a mangled decl to a human-readable string. In
any case, the pretty-printer does a lot of stuff that is mostly
useless for just printing a
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 6:44 PM, Gabriel Dos Reis
g...@integrable-solutions.net wrote:
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Sterling Augustine
saugust...@google.com wrote:
This is the second in the series of patches to make c decl pretty printing
more closely match the demangler. A full explanation
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Sterling Augustine
saugust...@google.com wrote:
Do you have a suggestion for fixing the disagreement? I would love to
add this as a parameter somewhere, but the decision is very deep in
the internals of the pretty printer.
I disagree with your characterization
On 8 May 2012 18:20, Sterling Augustine saugust...@google.com wrote:
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 6:44 PM, Gabriel Dos Reis
g...@integrable-solutions.net wrote:
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Sterling Augustine
saugust...@google.com wrote:
This is the second in the series of patches to make c decl
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 4:38 PM, Manuel López-Ibáñez
lopeziba...@gmail.com wrote:
A suggestion: Make dwarf_name call the demangler, and then a (new?) a
function that converts a mangled decl to a human-readable string. In
any case, the pretty-printer does a lot of stuff that is mostly
useless
A suggestion: Make dwarf_name call the demangler, and then a (new?) a
function that converts a mangled decl to a human-readable string. In
any case, the pretty-printer does a lot of stuff that is mostly
useless for just printing a declaration (translation, wrapping, etc.).
Bonus point if all
This is the second in the series of patches to make c decl pretty printing
more closely match the demangler. A full explanation is here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-05/msg00512.html
OK for mainline?
Sterling
2012-05-07 Sterling Augustine saugust...@google.com
*
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Sterling Augustine
saugust...@google.com wrote:
This is the second in the series of patches to make c decl pretty printing
more closely match the demangler. A full explanation is here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-05/msg00512.html
OK for mainline?
