Hi all,
First hunk is not needed indeed. Testing is ok. Thanks!!!
Here is the final patch:
diff --git a/gcc/configure.ac b/gcc/configure.ac
index 2c17736..43e760b 100644
--- a/gcc/configure.ac
+++ b/gcc/configure.ac
@@ -4566,6 +4566,11 @@ AC_CACHE_CHECK(__stack_chk_fail in target C library,
On 12/05/2012, at 9:03 AM, Igor Zamyatin wrote:
Hi!
Please look at the modified patch in the attachment. ChangeLog remains the
same.
Tested in android environment(x86_64-*-linux-android), also
bootstrapped on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
I also started regtesting on linux. Is it ok after
Hi!
Please look at the modified patch in the attachment. ChangeLog remains the same.
Tested in android environment(x86_64-*-linux-android), also
bootstrapped on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
I also started regtesting on linux. Is it ok after successfull regtesting?
Thanks,
Igor
On Mon, May 7, 2012
On 6/05/2012, at 7:02 PM, Igor Zamyatin wrote:
Hi!
The patch enables stack protector for Android.
Android targets don't contain necessary information in features.h so
we explicitly enable stack protector for Android.
Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64. Ok to commit?
Thanks,
Igor
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Maxim Kuvyrkov ma...@codesourcery.com wrote:
On 6/05/2012, at 7:02 PM, Igor Zamyatin wrote:
Hi!
The patch enables stack protector for Android.
Android targets don't contain necessary information in features.h so
we explicitly enable stack protector for
Hi!
The patch enables stack protector for Android.
Android targets don't contain necessary information in features.h so
we explicitly enable stack protector for Android.
Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64. Ok to commit?
Thanks,
Igor
2012-05-06 Igor Zamyatin igor.zamya...@intel.com
