Is this patch ok for trunk?
Hi,
the patch is OK.
Sorry for delayed reply, I was very busy by the inliner/thunk bits and this code
is not really in my area of expertise, so it needed some consideration to make
sense
of it.
Honza
Allowing relative path in -fprofile-generate= is very useful
Honza, what do you think of the patch? It actually fixed a regression.
Thanks,
David
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 4:40 PM, Xinliang David Li davi...@google.com wrote:
Is this patch ok for trunk?
Allowing relative path in -fprofile-generate= is very useful when
running the program remotely -- the
Is this patch ok for trunk?
Allowing relative path in -fprofile-generate= is very useful when
running the program remotely -- the profile data will be just dumped
in the dir relative to the working dir in the remote machine. Using
GCOV_PREFIX_STRIP can workaround the problem, but it is not always
This is slightly updated from my previous patch proposal. The test now
correctly work if multiple tests are executed in parallell.
2011-04-17 Martin Thuresson mart...@google.com
* gcc/doc/invoke.tex: Document support for relative profile paths.
* gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr47793.c:
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 10:48 AM, Martin Thuresson mart...@google.com wrote:
This is slightly updated from my previous patch proposal. The test now
correctly work if multiple tests are executed in parallell.
Forgot to mention that this patch has been bootstrapped without
regression on x86_64
