Tom == Tom Tromey tro...@redhat.com writes:
Tom Unless you have other tests to suggest, I am going to say that it has
Tom been sufficiently tested and check it in on Friday.
Jakub said on irc that he thought I had done sufficient testing.
So, I am checking this patch in now.
thanks,
Tom
Jakub == Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com writes:
Jakub Well, even bad debugging experience problems would be very undesirable
Jakub if we generated wrong debug info and everybody compiled it into their
Jakub sources. But pretty-printers stay on the side, it is just a matter of
Jakub updating the
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 8:36 PM, Tom Tromey tro...@redhat.com wrote:
This patch fixes some pretty-printer bugs pointed out in PR 51649.
The bug in the PR is that the pretty-printers don't work if you build
with --enable-symvers=gnu-versioned-namespace.
This patch adds test cases for all the
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 11:29:12AM +0100, Richard Guenther wrote:
We're technically in regression-fixes-only mode. We give target/language
maintainers some extra freedom though - while C++/libstdc++ are considered
release critical and thus should not regress at this point I'm less sure
about
This patch fixes some pretty-printer bugs pointed out in PR 51649.
The bug in the PR is that the pretty-printers don't work if you build
with --enable-symvers=gnu-versioned-namespace.
This patch adds test cases for all the changes I made.
I derived most of the information here from reading
