Hi,
On Sun, 14 Aug 2011, Richard Guenther wrote:
which would be exactly the way no distribution would use it. So please
just don't bundle ISL with CLoog.
Well, I would simply have linked the bundled ISL statically into
libcloog.
Which would still require not exporting the (bundled)
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 6:26 PM, Matthias Klose d...@debian.org wrote:
On 08/13/2011 06:02 PM, Sebastian Pop wrote:
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 10:32, Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com
wrote:
I advise either removing the option for CLooG to use bundled ISL, or
making the bundled version
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 10:32, Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com wrote:
I advise either removing the option for CLooG to use bundled ISL, or
making the bundled version the recommended version for GCC. Having too
many ways to configure things is bad.
I would prefer using the ISL bundled
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 11:02:40AM -0500, Sebastian Pop wrote:
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 10:32, Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com
wrote:
I advise either removing the option for CLooG to use bundled ISL, or
making the bundled version the recommended version for GCC. Having too
many
On 08/13/2011 06:02 PM, Sebastian Pop wrote:
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 10:32, Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com
wrote:
I advise either removing the option for CLooG to use bundled ISL, or
making the bundled version the recommended version for GCC. Having too
many ways to configure
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 11:26, Matthias Klose d...@debian.org wrote:
On 08/13/2011 06:02 PM, Sebastian Pop wrote:
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 10:32, Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com
wrote:
I advise either removing the option for CLooG to use bundled ISL, or
making the bundled version the
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 10:16:05AM -0500, Sebastian Pop wrote:
---
gcc/doc/install.texi |8 +++-
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/doc/install.texi b/gcc/doc/install.texi
index 368221f..f2b2fd9 100644
--- a/gcc/doc/install.texi
+++
On Fri, 12 Aug 2011, Sebastian Pop wrote:
---
gcc/doc/install.texi |8 +++-
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/doc/install.texi b/gcc/doc/install.texi
index 368221f..f2b2fd9 100644
--- a/gcc/doc/install.texi
+++ b/gcc/doc/install.texi
@@ -368,6
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 05:02:18PM +, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
On Fri, 12 Aug 2011, Sebastian Pop wrote:
+@item Integer Set Library (ISL) version 0.08
+
+Necessary to build GCC with the Graphite loop optimizations.
+It can be downloaded from @uref{http://www.kotnet.org/~skimo/isl/}.
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 07:35:24PM +0200, Sven Verdoolaege wrote:
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 05:02:18PM +, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
On Fri, 12 Aug 2011, Sebastian Pop wrote:
+@item Integer Set Library (ISL) version 0.08
+
+Necessary to build GCC with the Graphite loop optimizations.
On Fri, 12 Aug 2011, Sven Verdoolaege wrote:
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 05:02:18PM +, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
On Fri, 12 Aug 2011, Sebastian Pop wrote:
+@item Integer Set Library (ISL) version 0.08
+
+Necessary to build GCC with the Graphite loop optimizations.
+It can be
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 06:56:38PM +, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
I don't see why that should make any difference to the build requirements.
If CLooG-ISL builds and installs a library libisl.a as well as
libcloog-isl.a (as config/cloog.m4 thinks it does at present), why should
someone need
On Fri, 12 Aug 2011, Sven Verdoolaege wrote:
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 06:56:38PM +, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
I don't see why that should make any difference to the build requirements.
If CLooG-ISL builds and installs a library libisl.a as well as
libcloog-isl.a (as config/cloog.m4
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 07:16:55PM +, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
Do you mean there is not only a requirement to build both libraries, but
there is a requirement to build CLooG *first*, then ISL, so that ISL's
libisl.a overwrites CLooG's rather than the other way round (supposing
that they
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 12:50, Jack Howarth howa...@bromo.med.uc.edu wrote:
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 07:35:24PM +0200, Sven Verdoolaege wrote:
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 05:02:18PM +, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
On Fri, 12 Aug 2011, Sebastian Pop wrote:
+@item Integer Set Library (ISL) version
On Fri, 12 Aug 2011, Sven Verdoolaege wrote:
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 07:16:55PM +, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
Do you mean there is not only a requirement to build both libraries, but
there is a requirement to build CLooG *first*, then ISL, so that ISL's
libisl.a overwrites CLooG's rather
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 09:22:04PM +0200, Sven Verdoolaege wrote:
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 07:16:55PM +, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
Do you mean there is not only a requirement to build both libraries, but
there is a requirement to build CLooG *first*, then ISL, so that ISL's
libisl.a
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 07:28:52PM +, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
On Fri, 12 Aug 2011, Sven Verdoolaege wrote:
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 07:16:55PM +, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
Do you mean there is not only a requirement to build both libraries, but
there is a requirement to build CLooG
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 03:30:25PM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote:
Skimo,
Currently we don't have any checks for the minimal isl version required.
I assume they will be added at some point.
AFAIU, Sebastian just started working on this.
It will take some time for him to finish the transition.
19 matches
Mail list logo
