On Aug 15, 2011, at 1:30 PM, Iyer, Balaji V wrote:
This letter describes the recently created GCC branch called cilkplus
that ports the Intel(R) Cilk(TM) Plus language extensions to the C and C++
front-ends of gcc-4.7. We are looking for collaborators and advice as we
proceed
Enhance the
I saw that the test case now XPASSes and I find also some xpass in
gcc-testresult. (Not for all, but I think those do not build graphite.)
I think the XPASS is due to
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2011-08/msg00023.html
Committed patch as Rev. 177923.
Tobias
Index:
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 5:22 PM, Artem Shinkarov
artyom.shinkar...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Richard Guenther
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:29 AM, Artem Shinkarov
artyom.shinkar...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, I had the problem with passing
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 6:40 PM, Tom Tromey tro...@redhat.com wrote:
Dimitrios == Dimitrios Apostolou ji...@gmx.net writes:
Richard Note that sparsely populated hashes come at the cost of increased
Richard cache footprint. Not sure what is more important here though, memory
Richard access or
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 8:12 AM, Mike Stump mikest...@comcast.net wrote:
On Aug 15, 2011, at 1:30 PM, Iyer, Balaji V wrote:
This letter describes the recently created GCC branch called cilkplus
that ports the Intel(R) Cilk(TM) Plus language extensions to the C and C++
front-ends of
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 5:25 PM, Michael Matz m...@suse.de wrote:
.LFB0:
.cfi_startproc
movsd .LC0(%rip), %xmm2
movapd %xmm0, %xmm1
andpd %xmm2, %xmm1
andnpd %xmm0, %xmm2
addsd .LC1(%rip), %xmm1
roundsd $1, %xmm1,
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 11:49 AM, Richard Guenther
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
Hm, ok ... let's hope we can sort-out the backend issues before this
patch goes in so we can remove this converting stuff.
Hm, I would hope that we could commit this patch even with this issue,
because my
Hello!
This patch adds intrinsics for FMA instruction set along with tests for them.
Bootstraps and passes make check (including make check on simulator
for new runtime tests).
? ? ? ? ? ? ? * config/i386/fmaintrin.h: New.
It is not included in the patch.
? ? ? ? ? ? ? * config.gcc: Add
Hi Vlad,
Vladimir Makarov vmaka...@redhat.com writes:
The following patch makes gcc4.7 behaving as gcc4.6 for the case
described on http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49936.
The patch was successfully bootstrapped on x86_64 and ppc64.
Committed as rev 177916.
2011-08-19
I'm afraid this patch casues i386 bootstraps to fail:
Comparing stages 2 and 3
warning: gcc/cc1-checksum.o differs
warning: gcc/cc1plus-checksum.o differs
warning: gcc/cc1obj-checksum.o differs
Bootstrap comparison failure!
libiberty/pic/cplus-dem.o differs
libiberty/pic/crc32.o
Latest results for 4.6.x
-tgc
Testresults for 4.6.1:
alphaev68-dec-osf5.1a
hppa64-hp-hpux11.00
i386-pc-mingw32
powerpc-apple-darwin8.11.0
x86_64-apple-darwin10.7.0
x86_64-apple-darwin11.0.0
Index: buildstat.html
===
RCS
Latest results for 4.5.x
-tgc
Testresults for 4.5.3:
mips-sgi-irix5.3
Index: buildstat.html
===
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-4.5/buildstat.html,v
retrieving revision 1.12
diff -u -r1.12 buildstat.html
--- buildstat.html
Latest results for 4.4.x.
-tgc
Testresults for 4.4.6:
alphaev68-dec-osf5.1a
Testresults for 4.4.5:
x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Index: buildstat.html
===
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-4.4/buildstat.html,v
retrieving
Latest results for 4.3.x.
-tgc
Testresults for 4.3.6:
i386-pc-solaris2.6
sparc-sun-solaris2.6
sparc-sun-solaris2.7
Index: buildstat.html
===
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-4.3/buildstat.html,v
retrieving revision 1.35
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 4:51 PM, Kirill Yukhin kirill.yuk...@gmail.com wrote:
Updated patch is attached.
Comments inline.
diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c b/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
index 53c5944..bff1a05 100644
--- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
+++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
@@ -79,6 +79,7 @@ along
This adds a futex-based version of the serial lock for use on Linux. The
futex code is basically old code of libitm (it got removed in SVN rev
157758) with one fix for sysfutex0 on x86_64 and one change that returns
the number of woken processes (futex_wake).
The gtm_rwlock is similar in concept
On Mon, 8 Aug 2011, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
On Mon, 8 Aug 2011, Marc Glisse wrote:
* include/obstack.h (obstack_free): Cast to char* instead of int
This header comes from glibc/gnulib. Although some local changes have
been made to it in the past, sending any fixes to upstream glibc
Richard Henderson r...@redhat.com writes:
As found by a c6x build failure, INSN_ANNULLED_BRANCH_P and RTL_CONST_CALL_P
both resolve to the same bit for CALL_INSNs. I want to fix this by
restricting INSN_ANNULLED_BRANCH_P to JUMP_INSNs, since annulling the slots
for a call or a plain insn
Richard Sandiford rdsandif...@googlemail.com writes:
In this case it's a MIPS backend bug. The single pressure class
for MIPS is ALL_REGS, and CLASS_MAX_NREGS (ALL_REGS, TImode)
is returning 4, based on the fact that ALL_REGS includes the
floating-point condition codes. (CCmode is hard-wired
There is for example (currently) no special handling for operators.
Well, unfortunately one cannot just return -3 for non-matching
operators. Just think of cases like A*(B+C) vs A*B+A*C.
Ah yes. I was thinking expressions themselves were compared; but only their
values are.
I'm not sure
Multiarch [1] is the term being used to refer to the capability of a system to
install and run applications of multiple different binary targets on the same
system. The idea and name of multiarch dates back to 2004/2005 [2] (to be
confused with multiarch in glibc).
Multiarch defines new system
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 7:55 AM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 07:47:40AM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
2011-08-19 H.J. Lu hongjiu...@intel.com
PR target/46770
* config.gcc (tm_file): Add initfini-array.h if
.init_arary/.fini_array supported.
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 09:51:33PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
Tested on non-multilib'd and multilib'd systems, both native and cross builds.
Ok for the trunk?
I don't think we want to do this unconditionally, we already search way too
many directories by default. This is a Debian/Ubuntu
On Saturday 20 August 2011 21:29:21 Janus Weil wrote:
There is for example (currently) no special handling for operators.
Well, unfortunately one cannot just return -3 for non-matching
operators. Just think of cases like A*(B+C) vs A*B+A*C.
Ah yes. I was thinking expressions
On Sat, 20 Aug 2011, Matthias Klose wrote:
The multiarch triplets are defined in the target specific tmake files, and
provided for all known existing multiarch implementations (currently Debian,
Ubuntu and derivatives). For non-multilib'd configurations, the triplet is
Is there a
On 08/19/2011 02:04 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
So make sure that __cpu_indicator initially has a conservative correct
value? I'd still prefer the constructor-in-libgcc option - if only because
then the compiler-side is much simplified.
Err, I thought __cpu_indicator was a function, not
document MULTILIB_OSDIRNAMES, copied from genmultilib.
Ok for the trunk?
Matthias
PR bootstrap/25508
* doc/fragments.texi: Document MULTILIB_OSDIRNAMES.
Index: gcc/doc/fragments.texi
===
---
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 2:09 PM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
Don't expand RORX through ix86_expand_binary_operator, generate it
directly from expander. You are complicating things with splitters too
much!
I will rewrite this part of i386.md.
So, attached RFC patch handles BMI2 mul,
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 2:02 PM, Richard Henderson r...@redhat.com wrote:
On 08/19/2011 02:04 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
So make sure that __cpu_indicator initially has a conservative correct
value? I'd still prefer the constructor-in-libgcc option - if only because
then the compiler-side is
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 2:16 PM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 2:09 PM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
Don't expand RORX through ix86_expand_binary_operator, generate it
directly from expander. You are complicating things with splitters too
much!
I will
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 8:51 AM, Torvald Riegel trie...@redhat.com wrote:
This adds a futex-based version of the serial lock for use on Linux. The
futex code is basically old code of libitm (it got removed in SVN rev
157758) with one fix for sysfutex0 on x86_64 and one change that returns
the
On 08/20/2011 02:16 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
- Yb register constraint is added to conditionally enable generation
of BMI alternatives in generic shift and rotate patterns. The BMI
variant is generated only if RA chooses it as the most profitable
alternative.
We really should use the (relatively
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 2:44 PM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 11:31 PM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
We can also implement MULX with split:
(define_split
[(parallel [(set (match_operand:DWI 0 register_operand )
(mult:DWI
On 08/20/2011 02:16 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
+(define_insn bmi2_umulmodedwi3_1
+ [(set (match_operand:DWI 0 register_operand =r)
+ (mult:DWI
+ (zero_extend:DWI
+ (match_operand:DWIH 1 nonimmediate_operand %d))
+ (zero_extend:DWI
+ (match_operand:DWIH 2
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 2:52 PM, Richard Henderson r...@redhat.com wrote:
On 08/20/2011 02:16 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
+(define_insn bmi2_umulmodedwi3_1
+ [(set (match_operand:DWI 0 register_operand =r)
+ (mult:DWI
+ (zero_extend:DWI
+ (match_operand:DWIH 1
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 3:02 PM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 2:52 PM, Richard Henderson r...@redhat.com wrote:
On 08/20/2011 02:16 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
+(define_insn bmi2_umulmodedwi3_1
+ [(set (match_operand:DWI 0 register_operand =r)
+ (mult:DWI
+
On Sat, 20 Aug 2011, Matthias Klose wrote:
+@findex MULTILIB_OSDIRNAMES
+@item MULTILIB_OSDIRNAMES
+If @code{MULTILIB_OPTIONS} is used, this variable specifies the list
+of OS subdirectory names. The format is either the same as of
+@code{MULTILIB_DIRNAMES}, or a set of mappings. When it
On 08/21/2011 12:21 AM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
On Sat, 20 Aug 2011, Matthias Klose wrote:
+@findex MULTILIB_OSDIRNAMES
+@item MULTILIB_OSDIRNAMES
+If @code{MULTILIB_OPTIONS} is used, this variable specifies the list
+of OS subdirectory names. The format is either the same as of
On 08/20/2011 06:13 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Hi Vlad,
Vladimir Makarovvmaka...@redhat.com writes:
The following patch makes gcc4.7 behaving as gcc4.6 for the case
described on http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49936.
The patch was successfully bootstrapped on x86_64 and ppc64.
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 11:47 PM, Richard Henderson r...@redhat.com wrote:
- Yb register constraint is added to conditionally enable generation
of BMI alternatives in generic shift and rotate patterns. The BMI
variant is generated only if RA chooses it as the most profitable
alternative.
We
On 08/20/2011 10:07 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 09:51:33PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
Tested on non-multilib'd and multilib'd systems, both native and cross
builds.
Ok for the trunk?
I don't think we want to do this unconditionally, we already search way too
many
On 08/20/2011 03:03 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 3:02 PM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
You can do better than this, and avoid the %M %N specifiers.
The outputs are truly independent and do not need to be a pair.
Since RA use register pairs for TImode/DImode, should
On 08/20/2011 10:39 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
On Sat, 20 Aug 2011, Matthias Klose wrote:
The multiarch triplets are defined in the target specific tmake files, and
provided for all known existing multiarch implementations (currently Debian,
Ubuntu and derivatives). For non-multilib'd
On 08/20/2011 09:51 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
Multiarch [1] is the term being used to refer to the capability of a system to
install and run applications of multiple different binary targets on the same
system. The idea and name of multiarch dates back to 2004/2005 [2] (to be
confused with
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 1:58 AM, Richard Henderson r...@redhat.com wrote:
On 08/20/2011 03:03 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 3:02 PM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
You can do better than this, and avoid the %M %N specifiers.
The outputs are truly independent and do not need to
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 5:47 PM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 1:58 AM, Richard Henderson r...@redhat.com wrote:
On 08/20/2011 03:03 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 3:02 PM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
You can do better than this, and avoid the
On 08/20/2011 05:52 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
One problem is 32bit movdi and 64bit movti. They require
register pairs.We may need to split them before RA.
lower-subreg ought to be able to look through plain moves...
r~
On 08/20/2011 06:39 PM, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
On 08/20/2011 06:13 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Hi Vlad,
Vladimir Makarovvmaka...@redhat.com writes:
The following patch makes gcc4.7 behaving as gcc4.6 for the case
described on http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49936.
The patch
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 5:11 PM, Matthias Klose d...@ubuntu.com wrote:
For MIPS, the hard-float and soft-float ABIs are incompatible. So you
need twelve triplets, not six.
yes. but I didn't see a soft-float mips port yet.
We at Cavium has a soft-float mips port and in fact use debian as a
49 matches
Mail list logo
