Re: [Gcl-devel] Version_2_7_0t1

2005-06-22 Thread Camm Maguire
Greetings! My apologies, that should be: CVS_RSH=ssh cvs -z9 -q -d:ext:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvsroot/gcl co -r Version_2_7_0t1 gcl Please let me know if problems persist. Take care, Camm Maguire [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Greetings! Just created the above non-branch tag in CVS head to serve

[Gcl-devel] Re: GCL File o/hash.d

2005-06-22 Thread Camm Maguire
Greetings! Warren A. Hunt Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi Camm, Bob and I have merged your changes with our changes. We will do some more testing before we send you (in a day or two) our new o/hash.d. We had to comment out a couple of lines (see just below) because of unresolved

[Gcl-devel] Re: compile-file bug in 2.7.0

2005-06-22 Thread Camm Maguire
Greetings, and thanks for the report! This should be fixed now in cvs head. to get the fix from Version_2_7_0t1, just do export CVS_RSH=ssh export CVSROOT=:ext:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvsroot/gcl cvs -z9 -q update -r HEAD cmpnew/gcl_cmpmain.lsp BTW, on an older thread, here is what I get with t1:

Re: [Gcl-devel] GNU make bug

2005-06-22 Thread Camm Maguire
Greetings! Vadim V. Zhytnikov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Camm Maguire writes: Greetings, and thanks Vadim! This is now committed. You asked earlier about a 2.7.0 roadmap. I'll try to put together a comprehensive list soon, but obviously the top is ansi compliance. I'm wondering if I

Re: [Gcl-devel] GNU make bug

2005-06-22 Thread Vadim V. Zhytnikov
Camm Maguire writes: Greetings! Vadim V. Zhytnikov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Camm Maguire writes: Greetings, and thanks Vadim! This is now committed. You asked earlier about a 2.7.0 roadmap. I'll try to put together a comprehensive list soon, but obviously the top is ansi compliance. I'm