Hi Zoltan,
the grass Nviz modul can do this.
http://grass.fbk.eu/grass65/manuals/html65_user/wxGUI.Nviz.html
Gr
Ralf
Am Mittwoch 05 Januar 2011, 07:31:51 schrieb Zoltan Szecsei:
Hi,
Can anyone point me to a simple 3D viewer that can read simple DXF, and
maybe even a space separated (4
Hi all,
for what is worth also for me the simplicity of FWTOOLS wins.
Best regards,
andrea
-
Andrea Borruso
email: aborr...@tin.it
website: http://blog.spaziogis.it
my 2.0 life: http://aborruso.spaziogis.it
feed:
2011/1/5 Livneh Yehiyam ye...@rafael.co.il
I personally will be happy to see FWTOOLS updated at least for major Gdal
releases. I find it to be a much simpler way to distribute Gdal to my end
users.
I agree that OSGeo4W is more complete, but I think that for many users the
simplicity of
Hi All,
ogrinfo is skiping some fields my gml files
for example the
fields addressStatus, matchStatus, physicalStatus, positionalQuality
and structureType are not read...
osgb:addressPointMember
osgb:AddressPoint fid='osgb10219388'
osgb:version11/osgb:version
On 1/5/11 3:41 AM, iomeneandrei wrote:
for what is worth also for me the simplicity of FWTOOLS wins.
FWTools is nice, but I think with OSgeo4win, not really important.
However, for simplicity, a one-click installer for just GDAL/OGR for
Windows, complete with command line tools and ready for
On Jan 5, 2011, at 11:13 AM, ext Sebastian E. Ovide wrote:
Hi All,
ogrinfo is skiping some fields my gml files
for example the fields addressStatus, matchStatus, physicalStatus,
positionalQuality and structureType are not read...
Those are complex fields, which OGR doesn't handle.
2011/1/5 Christopher Barker chris.bar...@noaa.gov
However, for simplicity, a one-click installer for just GDAL/OGR for
Windows, complete with command line tools and ready for use with the python
bindings (and others language bindings?) would be great.
I've found it painful to find
On 11-01-05 12:44 PM, Tamas Szekeres wrote:
I also wanted to include these files in an installer (or multiple
installers) but at the moment I don't see the real benefit of this over
extracting a single zip package, since these libraries don't require
significant preparation (like regkey
I guess my worry was if someone uses the FWTools libs to link against.
1.7.0 had that serious bug for writing HFA files:
*ALERT: The GDAL/OGR 1.7.0 release has been discovered to have a serious bug
which results in all Erdas Imagine files (HFA driver) being generated in a
way that is unreadable
On 1/5/11 9:44 AM, Tamas Szekeres wrote:
Supporting multiple vesions (development/stable branches/releases,
x32/x64, multiple MSVC CRT dependencies) is quite a difficult task in a
single installer.
yes, a Major pain. I don't know that we need a single installer, but
there is a lot to
Hello all,
My question is simple. Is it possible to combine two GeoTIFFs, each with its
own unique color palette into a single image that is properly color mapped?
Each image only has 16 colors so I feel like it should be possible to copy
Image #1's color table straight into indexes 0-15 and
2011/1/5 Christopher Barker chris.bar...@noaa.gov
1) It would be nice to have binaries for the latest release front and
center at the main GDAL site -- having to poke around to find Tamas's site
is not a big deal, but not always obvious.
Chris,
With regards to the comment above, while I'm
2011/1/5 Daniel Morissette dmorisse...@mapgears.com
I agree with you, but it seems that an [OK] button (even if it doesn't do
anything) makes Windows users feel so much better. :)
Daniel,
:-) And sometimes we wonder what a heck is being done behind an OK button
on Windows which takes so
On 11-01-05 04:06 PM, MyKillK wrote:
Hello all,
My question is simple. Is it possible to combine two GeoTIFFs, each with its
own unique color palette into a single image that is properly color mapped?
Each image only has 16 colors so I feel like it should be possible to copy
Image #1's color
It may well be that GDAL has too many different use cases to even have a
standard install, but...
On 1/5/11 1:37 PM, Tamas Szekeres wrote:
2011/1/5 Christopher Barker chris.bar...@noaa.gov
1) It would be nice to have binaries for the latest release front
and center at the main GDAL
Hi Rahkonen,
thank you.
Rahkonen Jukka wrote:
I have a feeling that gdal wms driver might be able to do it. See
examples at http://gdal.org/frmt_wms.html
This seems the right solution.
best regards
-
Andrea Borruso
email:
Folks,
Wow, what a lot of discussion.
From my perspective, I'm pleased with Tamas' provided binaries as a source
for developers who want a GDAL SDK for a particular compiler version and
choice of win32/win64.
I like Jurgen's idea of building a stock GDAL binaries package with an
installer
Specifically regarding Python programmers who primarily or exclusively use
Windows:
The majority of popular Python packages are delivered to Windows users by
one of two mechanisms:
1.A stand-alone installation program (either a .exe or .msi file) that
the user just downloads and runs,
2011/1/5 Jason Roberts jason.robe...@duke.edu
Right now, to install the latest GDAL for Python on Windows, the user has
to download a zip file from http://vbkto.dyndns.org/sdk/, drill in to find
the Python files, copy them to C:\PythonXX\Lib\site-packages, drill into
find the GDAL binaries
Chris,
Good points below, but having the compiled gdal binaries (and the binaries
of the dependent libraries) in hand, which is the right way to install those
files on Windows? (Assuming we don't provide python.exe and the related
files in the package)? I mean which install actions should be done
Tamas,
I have a decent amount of experience programming with Python (6 years,
develop my own extension modules, etc) and I have never seen a package that
recommends you install it to a directory of your choice and then modify the
PYTHONPATH environment variable. The standard installation
On 1/5/11 2:32 PM, Frank Warmerdam wrote:
From my perspective, I'm pleased with Tamas' provided binaries as a source
for developers who want a GDAL SDK for a particular compiler version and
choice of win32/win64.
yes, those are great!
Like some others, I'm also confused by the correct way
Hi Frank,
On Wed, 05. Jan 2011 at 17:32:42 -0500, Frank Warmerdam wrote:
Is there someone that wants to take on producing official GDAL binaries
from OSGeo4W with a self installer sort of similar to FWTools, likely
using the mechanism Jurgen described? I'm interested, but interest hasn't
23 matches
Mail list logo
