Re: [gdmxml] GDMXML et. al.

2002-08-15 Thread Hans Fugal
I realize I neglected to comment on TEI and Stan's project. I am only vaguely familiar with TEI but I know that it is a general-purpose XML standard for encoding text (as in transcriptions). It probably is applicable in a genealogy framework, although I'm not sure how at this point. As for

Re: [gdmxml] GDMXML et. al.

2002-08-15 Thread Stan Mitchell
Sure, I'll gladly add my comments on gdmuml ... I've been monitoring (and occasionally participating) in the gdmxml and GenealogyXML groups for a few months. From the beginning my interest has been more in the data model rather than in an XML schema. As a starting point, I believe the GENTECH

[gdmxml] cvs commit 15 Aug 2002 at 20:15

2002-08-15 Thread fugalh
Thu Aug 15 20:15:39 MDT 2002 Update of /var/lib/cvs/fugalh/gdmxml In directory andreas:/tmp/cvs-serv31776 Modified Files: fugl.xml gdmxml.rnc gdmxml.rng Log Message: Reimplemented repository-source as discussed on the mailing list. Took out activity-id from repository-source and added

[gdmxml] Representation

2002-08-15 Thread Hans Fugal
After about 5 weeks I'm finally getting back to this. I hope everyone else's minds are less clouded over than my own. :) I have addressed all the elements of the evidence submodel to my liking with the exception of representation. I have a few questions for the members of the LWG out there, as