Re: [gdmxml] RELAX NG

2002-06-26 Thread Hans Fugal
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > > Hans Fugal > > Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 7:36 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: [gdmxml] RELAX NG > > > > > > Hello all, > > > > I have decided to go with RELAX NG for the

RE: [gdmxml] RELAX NG

2002-06-26 Thread Michael Fitzgerald
PROTECTED] > Subject: [gdmxml] RELAX NG > > > Hello all, > > I have decided to go with RELAX NG for the schema. I will explain my > reasons for doing so. > > First and foremost, it is more readable. A developer getting his feet > wet with XML will be able to understand

[gdmxml] RELAX NG

2002-06-26 Thread Hans Fugal
Hello all, I have decided to go with RELAX NG for the schema. I will explain my reasons for doing so. First and foremost, it is more readable. A developer getting his feet wet with XML will be able to understand the schema just by reading it. Understanding an XSD schema takes a little research,